Citing Space Constraints, Obama Campaign Kicks Off the Plane Reporters from Newspapers Whose Coverage it Doesn't Like

veteran ,the difference between you and colin powell is that one veteran knows when to shut up and stay out of politics ,and one doesnt...

and i am old enough to cancel out one republican vote /per election ,which i always do...

dlboggan
And denied a debate with Fox moderators.

A Veteran: Obama had personal interviews with Fox news hosts Bill O'Reilly and Chris Wallace. So what was your point again?

The Historical Lessons of Lower Tax Rates
by Daniel J. Mitchell, Ph.D.
WebMemo #327
There is a distinct pattern throughout American history: When tax rates are reduced, the economy’s growth rate improves and living standards increase. Good tax policy has a number of interesting side effects. For instance, history tells us that tax revenues grow and “rich” taxpayers pay more tax when marginal tax rates are slashed. This means lower income citizens bear a lower share of the tax burden – a consequence that should lead class-warfare politicians to support lower tax rates.

Conversely, periods of higher tax rates are associated with sub par economic performance and stagnant tax revenues. In other words, when politicians attempt to “soak the rich,” the rest of us take a bath. Examining the three major United States episodes of tax rate reductions can prove useful lessons.

dlbloggan, as part of a dressing down of another poster, you wrote "And by the way, Obama's records are a matter of public record." Oh, really? His medical records? (A note from his doctor, less than a page in length, doesn't cut it.) His billing records as a lawyer? His small donors list? His records as a state legislator? His college thesis? His college transcripts? None of those is in the public record and none of those have been released by the Obama campaign despite repeated requests by the media and others.

A Veteran: If you have "real" backed up proof from multiple reliable unbiased sources than please do provide that information. Make sure that you can also support your interpretation of that information, even if it's from Obama himself or from any other source. You have the right to put your interpretation forth and the rest of us have the right to agree or disagree on our the merits and with our own interpretations. That is true democracy at it's best. Good luck!

One plus for McCain in my view is that he has not ducked any hard questions or the media that has wanted to ask them. Can you say the same for Obama. If he is truly able to lead this great country shouldn't he be able to take on FOX news??

Ryan C, your attempts at logic would be comical if I didn't feel that you were completely serious. You called the person who said s/he voted for Hillary in the primaries and McCain in the general a liar. Don't be silly. I did not have the opportunity to vote for Hillary in the primaries but I did contribute money to her campaign. And you know I'm going to vote for McCain on Tuesday.

Ryan C, your attempts at logic would be comical if I didn't feel that you were completely serious. You called the person who said s/he voted for Hillary in the primaries and McCain in the general a liar. Don't be silly. I did not have the opportunity to vote for Hillary in the primaries but I did contribute money to her campaign. And you know I'm going to vote for McCain on Tuesday.

Alas, I must go. My kids insist on celebrating Halloween, which I'm sure was invented by liberals.

Knock, Knock, Trick or treat, give me something good for free.

I would have worded it differently: More than 75 percent of Congress voted FOR the war based on information... or mis information given them by Bush.
The same information Clinton had and passed along. 3000 + people might not have had to die if Clinton had been able to get Bin Laden. He has 6 or 7 years to try.
Yes ultimately it was Bush's decision because the buck stop there. He still has shown leadershiop in that when public opinion started to sour due to the negativity of the press, he sayed firm and strong in his belief. The mark of a leader. You may not agree with what he has done but I do admire his unwavering spirit.

Posted by: dlboggan | Oct 31, 2008 6:49:11 PM
++++++++++++++
Oh please, I've read from your posts have been your opinions. I haven't seen any proof of what you have said is true, other than to sight Barack Hussein Obama's website.

Bryan T All of our money supports Acorn. They get federal funds given to them and I don't want that. May I suggest we all stop giving to non profits and tell them in light of Acorn this election we can not trust them to give any more money to any agency. Plus on opensecret you will see non profits donate to the dems and I for one do not want my donations going to any political party. Point this out to them and lets see how fast all the non profits start complaining about Acorn. This may be a way to put an end to them once and for all.

Questioner: My goodness angry one. No one here as said you were not intellectual and no one here has said you were racist. You’re the only one that has brought that up. No one here questioned McCain's, or Bush ivy league schooling but you. Saying that we made inappropriate statements about you does not mean we did. This only came from you head and no one else's. I would suggest that this is a poor means of baiting those in debate with you. Starting something out of nothing. And by the way, Obama's records are a matter of public record. All you have to do is do the research to discover them for yourself. Start at his official web site and then go from there to double check it to confirm the authenticity. Simple but affective.

Saying that something is something does not necessarily make it true.
I have been saying that forever. Everytime I do provide factual proof it is never looked up by a democrat. It is just debunked here as right wing lies. The Clinton way was to never admit to anything wrong. Instead immediately trash or accuse the other side. Obama learned that real well as have all democrats here.

Ryan C Then why is he proposing this sweetheart of a total pass on seniors paying any taxes with these nice stock portfolios. It is to get senior votes and it is working. And as I said before he really does not care about the middle class. Obama cares for Obama and winning. Who do you think is going to make up for this total tax base of wealthy seniors Obama is planning to eliminate Income taxes for? Go to his sight and read it it is right there. He is a fraud and has said whatever he has to to get votes. I would type the quote for you but I am getting tired of doing that for the Obama supporters who don't even know what his plans are. By the way in some states $250,000 a year income isn't even considered rich for a family of 4-5 once you account for clothing, food, insurance,dental,cars for teens and insuring teens and then college. And singles can earn up to 200,000. that 50,000 diferrence he allows families doesn't cover much. It just gained senior and single votes and the theme of middle class families is a con. It is Obama who is out of touch with reality.

>>>>>BAH!

Y O U are now officially banned from the democratic party. do not disgrace the party with your most unappreciated presence from now on.

___-
I stay away from where I'm not wanted....

actually, this reminds me of a song:

"I don't want it, you can have it, it's to mean for me!

Tee hee hee hee hee.

Not my cup of tea!"

Since Fox News and Wall Street Journal still have newsmen on board there is no need to explain. These two are definitely right wing. Absolutely so!! Yes, I feel their endorsement of McCain played a part, but this is just way it goes and new crew realized the dangers when their bosses endorsed McCain. Just have to roll with the punches. Adding home town news is special.

Since no second plane - no big deal. McCain did same thing. Someone had to go unfortunately. Since they rolled dice and took stance - bye-bye. You play, you accept.

questioner
Amen. You would think that the democrats here that " admire Obamas class" would have taken some lessons from him. At least republicans know the truths and know what to expect with an Obama presidency. Just batten down the hatches it will be a rough ride.

S Adams: You can attempt to get into the lies argument all you want. All the of the hype being put up out their has been debunked before and it can be done again. Must I apply to you the same verbiage that I have applied to others about their posts? Ok, I will: Most of your statements seemed to be pure speculation and outright theory coming from no other sources but yourself. Saying that something is something does not necessarily make it true. Please, for future reference, provide your statements with qualified supporting information from multiple non-biased reliable sources. Don't pull words out of context to turn something into something it is not. And if I hear complaints that this was the media's job than do your best to do what the media has failed to do according to you. I.E. practice what you preach. If you can start doing this, than, and may than, some of us out here might start taking you seriously, maybe.