Political Punch
Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper
RECENT POSTS
- Will It Get Ugly? Both Sides Prepared for Start of Sotomayor Hearings Monday
- Obama in Africa
- Out of Africa
- Kenyan President should be “squirming”, says country’s political analyst
- An Emotional President Obama Tours Former Slave Port with Family
- O Baby! The Obamas Visit Maternity Clinic in Ghana
- In Ghana, President Obama Gives Tough Love
- 2 Prez Obama: Questions Sent in Via Text, Email from Africa & the World
- Obama Campaign Plane Emergency: Report Shows it Could Have Been Catastrophic
- Give it Some Time, Obama Says in Defending the Recovery Act
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
McCain Raises the Spectre of a Multi-headed Reid-Pelosi-Obama Hydra Controlling Washington, DC
October 26, 2008 1:32 PM
ALBUQUERQUE, NM – There's a topic that Sen; Barack Obama, D-Ill., and his campaign don't seem eager to discuss much, or at all, and it's one that Republicans are raising with increasing frequency in these final days: the notion of one-party rule returning to Washington DC.
Speaking at the New Mexico State Fairgrounds in Albuquerque on Saturday morning, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., raised the prospect of Democrats controlling the White House, the Senate, and the House.
"Senator Obama is measuring the drapes and planning with Speaker Pelosi and Senator Reid to raise taxes, increase spending and concede defeat in Iraq," McCain said.
It's one of McCain's closing arguments, and it makes sense. As ABC News' Polling Director Gary Langer points out, many swing-voting independents don't like the idea of one party controlling the executive branch, as well as both houses of Congress.
Independents, by 43-34 percent in the latest ABC News/Washington Post tracking poll, say divided government is the better way to go.
And by 45-37 percent they say they'd rather see Republicans win control of Congress. (Which ain't gonna happen. As of now, House Republicans lament, the only question is how many seats they lose.)
You're going to hear this argument a lot this week; former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, R-Ga., has even come up with a handy nickname for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and (in this construct) President Barack Obama: "RePO".
And it's why you hear Republicans seize upon remarks like those made by Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., chair of the House Financial Services Committee, who told a local Massachusetts newspaper that in addition to a second economic stimulus package he'd like to see Congress enact a 25 percent cut in military spending.
Frank doesn't control the pursestrings of the Pentagon budget, but the underlying argument is that America is about to turn over control to a bunch of liberal Democrats.
Bloomberg News columnist Amity Shales, a senior fellow in economic history at the Council on Foreign Relations, writes that RePO won't be popular on Wall Street.
Shales writes of Eric Singer, founder of the new mutual fund the Congressional Effect Fund, who noted that "the Standard & Poor's 500 Index performs two or three times better when Congress is out of session than when at least one of the two chambers is at work. That difference, Singer discovered, wasn't because of political party -- a laboring Republican Congress was also problematic. The poor performance, rather, reflects market anxiety that the House and Senate generate when they pass a new regulation or revise laws already on the books. Simple congressional workday chatter about possible changes is also negative, according to the Singer data."
Looking back at the data from 1965 to today, Singer came to the conclusion that a divided Washington – "in which at least one of the two chambers is led by a party other than the president's, points to a better total return for the S&P 500 than a unified Washington in which the presidency, House and Senate are controlled by one party...Having Democrat Bill Clinton in the White House in 1998 constrained congressional Republicans, or the other way around."
Obama talks a lot about his record of "reaching across the aisle," a record that's fairly thin in Washington DC.
But what if he doesn't have to reach across the aisle to get his legislative agenda passed? What if Pelosi and Reid rejoice in their fatter majorities and decide they ultimately have no need to take any Republican concerns into account?
Obama doesn't seem overly concerned about that prospect. Earlier this month, he suggested that with a Democratic Congress he'd be able to "get something done."
Obama told Pittsburgh's KDKA-TV: "I think that if current trends continue we will continue to have a Democratic Congress. And I think that what the American people need at a moment when we've got huge problems here at home -- we've also got huge problems abroad with two wars -- what we need is a President who can mobilize Congress to actually get something done, instead of continuing the gridlock that we've seen over the last eight years. And that is something that I intend to provide—that leadership."
Obama's impulses throughout his career have been to reach out to Republicans on a few relatively uncontroversial subjects, and to generally maintain a fairly orthodox liberal Democratic voting record. His rhetoric speaks of uniting the country, and there's talk that should he win he'd appoint a couple Republicans to his Cabinet. But when push comes to shove, would he take on Pelosi and Reid and reach out to House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, if he doesn't have to?
Of course, whether or not the RePO issue has any real resonance with voters is of course an open question. McCain made the charge in Albuquerque before a crowd of somewhere between 1,000 and 1,500 people Saturday morning. On Saturday evening, Obama spoke at Johnson Field at the University of New Mexico. He attracted a crowd of roughly 35,000.
-- jpt
October 26, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (941)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
I don't understand something here. McCain keeps on pushing the point of "we don't want one-party rule" which he claims you will get if Sen Obama is elected (i.e. Obama/Pelosi/Reid). That's really a bad thing, you think?
I seem to recall that that's exactly what this country had under Bush from 2001 until the midterm elections of 2006; how come that didn't bother anyone? What am I missing here? Please someone tell me.......HOW DOES MCCAIN'S ARGUMENT HOLD WATER ESPECIALLY WHEN HE WAS A PART OF THE "ONE PARTY RULE" WHICH HE NOW ABHORS? I'd like someone to explain that to me in a rational succint manner. Denzel Washington said it best when he used the following line in the movie "Philadelphia".....please explain it to me like I'm a four year old.
Posted by: Bob | Oct 31, 2008 10:15:25 PM
A Pelosi-Obama-Reid hydra spells just one thing: POR!
POR is what we'll be if we let these three run the government, for they will tax us into socialism. A study on countries that went from free-market to socialism found their GDP typically declined 40%.
Anybody here want to take a 40% pay cut?
That's what will happen under POR!
Posted by: Rockyspoon | Oct 28, 2008 7:19:31 AM
Lucky for us, McCain never could decide on a message as to why he should be the next president.
Eight days out after a circus like campaign, are we to give credence to his fear all-dems government? That's his best reason!?
He's the candidate who has cried wolf more than the little boy--my guess is few are listening. But yes, it's not over til it's over.
Posted by: Mavsreader | Oct 27, 2008 11:23:48 PM
One side sounds like the side who has been fed lies and that is the Mc Cain side about their opponent Obama. if your leadersare willing to feed you lie after lie and not even be in office yet then they are the shady characters who we should be looking into. Palin already corrupt and found guilty of abuse of power. Mc Cain already treid for bribes and inappropriate behavior with a person that stole money from peoples retirements. Lies about their opponent daily and in the face of questioners verify their belief in the lies. Mc Cain and Palin are dabgerous people who have been proven to be so and that is the difference. One has experience in being caught in inproper act and his VP and one is just speculation coming from the person who got caught doing improper things. You figure it out. Mc Cain and Palin who where both INVESTIGATED for improper and shady things or Obama who they accuse of things. Those things we still dont have clear understanding of what exactly they are. Just fuzzy uneasy feelings and whispers but no actual case to make specific why you fear him and no actual sane reason or record just the word of proven liars and investigated morally questionable characters like Palin and Mc Cain to go on as the basis for these fears.
Posted by: Chris | Oct 27, 2008 9:21:32 PM
I am quoting from Obama's book: "I will stand with the Muslims when the winds of politics change."
This is for the person who commented "Vote for Obama for my grandkids." I pray your grandchildren are not Jewish.
Posted by: Appalled at the ignorance in America | Oct 27, 2008 8:16:08 PM
Jon,
How about actually changing things, rather than just changing ideologies?!
Your method just means we get one group of inflated egos after another. Obama says it's eight years of gridlock and seems to forget that Repubs controlled Congress for six, which is no gridlock, and that the Demos control it now. He has such a short memory for a young man. But then again, no one actually cares what Obama says and he looks good.
If we have it your way, RePO is the next round of inflated egos.
Chicago
Posted by: Chicago | Oct 27, 2008 8:04:58 PM
Jon S, Cincinnati, Ohio
if the Dems are 'running the show', and, they blow it......... I will vote someone else in.
The Repubs had their chance, that's why they are about to get the boot. Everyone of you bought into W's and the rest 'pipe-dream', hook, line and sinker...
Republicans bait folks like you with a pix of the American flag and a lot of empty talk about 'honor'... Repubs speak of a mythological America that doesn't exist ... honor is something Repubs seem to always be lacking when it comes time to display it. You only need look and see how the repubs and conservatives are killin' each other in the blame game.
The difference between you and me is that I don't blindly adhere to Dems or Repubs policy, and I don't blindly salute the flag because a politician says to do it. I actually ask questions and don't claim to have 'god and country' on my side as repubs do..... and I am willing to at least try someone and something different without the fear Republicans generate.
Neither party is perfect, but, when one ie. Republicans have led America so astray and blundered so profoundly on the world stage, they have to be held accountable for what they said and what they did. That's Bush, Cheney et.al, advisers and sycophants.
Posted by: Blue | Oct 27, 2008 7:56:22 PM
Obama - The tax man cometh; the tax man taketh away.
For all his speeches...Obama will raise your taxes, and raise taxes on capital gains, so if you have a personal portfolio of stocks in your retirement account, you will pay 20% to Obama, lol.
Also he wants to tax home sales, and re-institute the death tax.
He wants to let the Bush Tax cuts expire, which will raise your taxes.
Posted by: Jeff | Oct 27, 2008 7:17:19 PM
How about we should talk to our enemies, Like that worked really well in the past.
Posted by: A Veteran | Oct 27, 2008 5:49:28 PM
I think we scared them off!!!!!
Posted by: Concerned United States Citizen | Oct 27, 2008 5:48:01 PM
where do I go next . . . I do like a good argument . . . Any suggestions? . . . .
Posted by: Concerned United States Citizen | Oct 27, 2008 5:47:19 PM
I can see that also . . . God's got to have a great since of homor . . . .
Posted by: Concerned United States Citizen | Oct 27, 2008 5:45:44 PM
Looks like we are the only two here. Which one should we go to and see if we can rouse some people up with the truth.
Posted by: A Veteran | Oct 27, 2008 5:44:44 PM
though I don't think God was a total belief of his I can see him doing his routine in front of God telling him what is wrong in heaven. LOL
Posted by: A Veteran | Oct 27, 2008 5:41:07 PM
I do too. George definately had a unique grasp of the reality of things. He was able to see past the smokescreen and see the obvious. Then he managed to make it humorous while sending a message that not enoough people listened to.
Posted by: A Veteran | Oct 27, 2008 5:39:13 PM
I truely miss brother George!!!!!!
After all what's a house but a place for more stuff . . . .
Posted by: Concerned United States Citizen | Oct 27, 2008 5:34:51 PM
There were two shows I watched and would recommend to all that they see.
Frontline: The secret history of the credit card
In Debt We Trust before the bubble bursts.
Excellant way to know some of why we are where we are at today.
To quote George Carlin
Too many people buying stuff they don't need with money they don't have.
Posted by: A Veteran | Oct 27, 2008 5:31:36 PM
Aye Aye Captain . . . And same to you . . . I'll be standing watch beside you looking for blue sky ! ! ! ! ! !
Posted by: Concerned United States Citizen | Oct 27, 2008 5:25:29 PM
hungry bellies always brings people together for a change. I have a feeling it isn't just going to be rough seas, more like the perfect storm.
Good Luck mate
Posted by: A Veteran | Oct 27, 2008 5:21:19 PM
A Veteran
I pray that we can weather this storm . . . History has proven that this Nation is great . . . She rises when others count her out . . . Her people rise to new levels when looking into the face of great adversity . . . She succeeds when others can’t . . . I too love this country for of her faults . . . And I will defend her to my dying breath . . . .
However, I also feel that all American’s need to make their voices heard against bad, corrupt government . . . Perhaps a world-wide, financial collapse will bring people to a point of anger great enough to make our politicians deathly aware of our resolve . . . It’s time to make a stand – but unfortunately I don’t think most people recognize the challenges set out before us . . . .
Batton down the hatches it's gonna get rough seas . . . .
Posted by: Concerned United States Citizen | Oct 27, 2008 5:18:26 PM
Post a comment

