Political Punch

Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper

« Previous | Main | Next »

Obama Campaign Says Michelle Obama ‘Interview’ on ‘African Press’ Web Site Is 100% Bogus

October 15, 2008 11:42 AM

Some conservative blogs are all atwitter about a bizarre interview allegedly with Michelle Obama on a Web site called "African Press International."

“My husband was born in Hawaii and adopted by his stepfather -- does that make him unpatriotic," she supposedly said "on a direct telephone to API" the "interview" hypes. It goes on from there.

This morning my inbox is filled with the "WHY ARENT YOU COVERING THIS?" e-mails on the subject. The answer is: because it doesn't appear to be in any way real.

Obama campaign senior adviser Robert Gibbs says the interview is a complete and utter fabrication. "It's bogus, she didn't call, it's all a lie," he says.

And I have to say -- I find their pushback quite believable. The Obama campaign does not tend to directly engage fringe Web sites making wild charges, and if they were to do so, they certainly wouldn't have Michelle Obama make the call.

Maybe the folks at API were taken in by an imposter. Maybe they made it up, I don't know.

In these last three weeks, there is going to be a lot of dung thrown at the wall. Lots of charges and counter-charges and counter-counter-charges.

A word to the wise, my friends. I don't know if you know this, but not everything that appears on the Internet is true.

(Counting down now to the explosion of insane comments that will inevitably post below. Three...two...one...)

- jpt

UPDATE: Little Green Footballs takes issue with the first line of this blog, believing I was lumping ALL conservative blogs in with the use of my word "all" in "all atwitter." For the record, by no means did I mean to suggest every or even most conservative blogs had hopped on the story -- any more so than I would be implying that every liberal blog slimed Gov. Sarah Palin with some of the rumors I've criticized "liberal blogs" for spreading.

October 15, 2008 | Permalink | User Comments (350)

User Comments

Hopey Uniter says "We all know Michelle "hates Whitey"...."
_______________


You must be talking about the tape that's supposedly out there wherein Michelle alledgedly says "whitey" when in reality she says "why'd he". If it actually said "whitey" it would have been released this week already.


**********

Posted by: Jay | Oct 29, 2008 10:52:28 PM

"(Counting down now to the explosion of insane comments that will inevitably post below. Three...two...one...)"

Holy $%#& - I don't think I've ever seen such a collection of upper-case-infused derangement outside the most far-flung fringes of the lunatic right.

Where do you find these guys, Jake? Or more fairly, how do they all find you?

Posted by: Sky | Oct 24, 2008 2:39:18 AM

Barking mad.

I am so glad that the USA is finally waking from its nightmare of domination by the obviously insane right-wing crazies, if I might not be so premature.

Obama anti-American? Oil the cause of the credit crisis? Ms Obama going on about birth certificates?

Really, My Friends, take your medication.

Posted by: Jackomo Conti | Oct 23, 2008 3:18:58 PM

We all know Michelle "hates Whitey"....she has followed Rev. Wright and Louis Farrakhan for years and her college thesis is off limits to read now as her racist views are out there for everyone to read.
ANYONE WHO HAS DONE THEIR HOMEWORK KNOWS THE OBAMA'S FOLLOW BLACK LIBERATION THEOLOGY....wake up people!

Posted by: Hopey Uniter, is Dopey Divider | Oct 23, 2008 12:39:25 PM

THE PERFECT STORM FOR A DEPRESSION ...
A far left Media ...
A far left President ...
A far left Congress ...
A far left Senate ...
eliminates all the checks and
balances that our democracy is based upon.
A vote for Obama is a vote for voter fraud,
a corrupt media, and the road to Socialism.
God Help Us !!!

Posted by: Howard | Oct 22, 2008 7:44:04 PM

There is so much legitimate information about Barack Obama that the media should have investigated and exposed by now that "we the people" should just turn off anything that is not totally documented. Barack Obama has raised and spent more money than any politican in history - he has more anti-American, radical associates than any politican in history. Just one of the antics should disqualify Obama for POTUS. Just one! WHAT IS HAPPENING TO AMERICANS - HAVE WE ALL GONE STUPID!!
WAKE UP!!! We need a real American hero in the White House right now - today - we need John McCain. GET SENSIBLE FOR GOD'S SAKE!!!

Posted by: RAltiere | Oct 22, 2008 1:37:31 PM

Whether the call happened or not... the quotes they a realizing don't seem overly offensive.... I am a southern white woman and the notion of a Black Woman talking about how this historic race will effect the feelings of black people in this country seems perfectly legitimate... I can't wrap my head around it... why do so many white people feel threatened and defensive when people talk about race in this country???

It's a fair discussion that is LONG overdue... seems quite obvious since so many people have such strong feelings... (refer to all the CRAZY comments before mine =)

And when it comes to API it seems awfully suspicious that they choose Berg to represent them AND released the tapes to Fox news for free when they could have given them to any number of independent news organizations...

Posted by: mk | Oct 22, 2008 9:14:06 AM

It's no wonder that FOX won the scoop with API since the MSM seems to be incapable of taking their heads out of Obamessiah's behind long enough to come up for air.

FOX has proven time & time again to be the best that we have in this country for any semblance of true reporting. The MSM is a pathetic propaganda machine for the extreme left. YEP, that includes you ABC! You're a joke!

End of story.

Posted by: Susan | Oct 22, 2008 5:40:58 AM

I think Fox News won the scoop

Posted by: NoBama | Oct 22, 2008 3:05:11 AM

Thanks Ted Park - that was funny!

"not everything that appears on the Internet is true"

Would that include this internet article?

Posted by: Kahleeka | Oct 21, 2008 4:08:40 PM

OMG.. I am so disheartened and confused. Can this really be true?
"A word to the wise, my friends. I don't know if you know this, but not everything that appears on the Internet is true."

This just turns my world inside-out

Posted by: Shovelkicker | Oct 21, 2008 2:11:35 PM

Another one of my comments was suppressed. None of my comments have been beligerent or using smears or slurs of any kind. The strongest thing in my most recent comment was questioning the enthusiasm of the 3 major networks for investigating things that may turn out bad for Obama.

Posted by: Ted Park | Oct 20, 2008 11:23:26 PM

"not everything that appears on the Internet is true"

Would that include this internet article?

Posted by: rightinmissouri | Oct 20, 2008 10:06:27 PM

The reason why America’s enemies prefer Barack Obama as president is obvious. Obama is as naive as John F. Kennedy and Jimmy Carter. And we know how the world came apart during those two administrations.

The Russians are courting Hugo Chavez; conducting naval exercises together and planning to provide Venezuela with nuclear technology. They are also planning to provide Cuba with missiles for “commercial use.” There is speculation that Putin wants to expand and perhaps regress to the old USSR ways.

Considering the aforementioned, the radical Islamic groups that have been in check, and the rest of our enemies we must ask ourselves, is Barack Obama the right man for the job? If the Russians proceed with their plans to provide Hugo Chavez nuclear technology and arm Cuba with missiles again, will Barack Obama allow it? What will he do if Russia invades neighbor countries?

There is no secret that the rise in oil cost precipitated the economic meltdown. An economic crisis before the elections benefited Obama and was a huge setback for McCain. The two OPEC countries responsible for the rise in oil cost were Iran and Venezuela. Shouldn’t this be raising flags?

There is much at stake; we need experience and decisiveness, not eloquence and socialism.

Posted by: Santiago | Oct 20, 2008 8:29:25 PM

After reading this, I'm not sure you are right:

Posted by: Linda Starr | Oct 20, 2008 5:59:52 PM

Hey Ted,

Surely America's enemies would then endorse the candidate they most fear. Am I right?

Posted by: Ralph | Oct 20, 2008 2:32:53 PM

Why did the very excellent question I asked here yesterday about Obama's membership in the Socialist New Party get suppressed? It was here for a while and then disappeared. Very fishy.

Posted by: Carlyle | Oct 20, 2008 1:16:48 PM

Do our enemies prefer Obama?

Why isn't this the central issue of the campaign? I believe every state and every organization we are presently in conflict with have verbally or in writing endorsed Obama. Perhaps I am wrong, but some simple investigative reporting by the Media could quickly determine the real truth of this. If I am right and our enemies are universally in favor of Obama, how can that be good for America? Why doesn't this consideration trump all others? How can we get this message out?

Posted by: Ted Park | Oct 19, 2008 3:06:44 PM

The unbelievable aspect of this entire matter is "we the people" are in a position to have the SLIGHTEST doubt regarding the legitimate citizenship of a candidate for POTUS. What is all the confusion - I think the DNC is obligated to verify - leaving not the slightest doubt - the deal on this birth certificate.
And - beyond that - this is a man with so many - so very many - radical, anti-American associates - it is absolutely incredible - the media has taken a "strange" candidate and made him into a phenomenon - Obama lost me at the flag pin and no hand on heart for anthem deal. Let alone all the twists and turns and QUESTIONS in his recent history. WHAT IS AMERICA THINKING??

Posted by: RAltiere | Oct 18, 2008 3:53:27 AM

This would all be over if he gave them the requested documents...as requested in court. McCain gave them all teh information that they requested.....What does he have to hide?

Come clean! No one knows who Obama is? They are going to give him the top position in the country??? I guess now we know what it takes to be president...$550 million.

Posted by: kandis | Oct 18, 2008 3:43:25 AM

So Jack,

Will you be reporting on the story once the API releases the recording? I doubt it. You'd actually have to admit you're wrong, and modern liberal journalists don't have that much character.

Counting down now to the next Tapper commentary full of one side of the complete story in...3..2..1..

Posted by: Mike | Oct 17, 2008 8:22:41 PM

That's some egotism by the folks at Little Green Footballs.

Posted by: Tim | Oct 17, 2008 6:58:03 PM

I think after 20 months of non stop campaigning we all know that Michelle Obama is not stupid. And if you've ever listened to her at all, the wording does not sound like her. Why would she do something like this at this point in the campaign when her husband is leading in all the polls. Get real people.

Posted by: linda | Oct 17, 2008 6:05:11 PM

Mr. Trapper,

You stated that "The Obama campaign does not tend to directly engage fringe Web sites making wild charges, and if they were to do so, they certainly wouldn't have Michelle Obama make the call". But why do you assume that Mrs. Obama would only make such a call if the Obama Campaign was behind it? Why did you fail to even consider the scenario that Mrs. Obama acted on her own to help her husband?

Also, the Obama Campaign has a vested interest in protecting Senator Obama's reputation, for obvious reasons. Is it then so hard to believe that they would deny this story?

Posted by: Dan | Oct 17, 2008 5:19:23 PM

So apparently only the garbage the mainstream media puts out is the truth and all of us main streeters are making insame comments here... Jake, you are so into that dung up to your eyebrows that you cannot see or hear that Obama is trying to take over this country with his Socialist/Communist ways - we have been warned and if he is elected there will be no turning back!
GOD help us!

Posted by: ChrisLee | Oct 17, 2008 4:26:55 PM

API will release the tape & finally put a stop to this madness. It's about time that Obama (or Soetoro or whatever his name is) & his Mrs. be revealed for who they truly are.

Frauds!

Posted by: Jake | Oct 17, 2008 4:26:20 PM

The Day after the elections, America is going to wake up to an Obama hangover, with no way to get rid of it.

The oval office will be soon be known as the the deceitful office!!!

America, wake up now!!!

Where there is smoke there is fire!!!

Posted by: Truth Be Said | Oct 17, 2008 4:24:29 PM

Whydhe won't let us gets a real prisdident in orfice. They jist tring to keep us down my home gurl michelle is just doing what she think is best for her husband and the cuntry it aint so bad this this cuntry will popoff if he aint electeted Go my man Obama & Ludicris 2!
Holla!

Posted by: Deejaun Washington | Oct 17, 2008 3:49:26 PM

If it is true that Obama will not release his birth certificate, then it is unbelievable to me. I have had to produce mine all my life, and here is a man who is asking us to put him in the Oval Office, and he won't. Come on now. The fact that the drive-by and mainstream media is not making this an issue shows which side they are on.

Posted by: David A. Farrell | Oct 17, 2008 3:08:01 PM

The simple matter is we know nothing about this man. Every record is sealed from Columbia and Harvard. No one believes the certificate photos (??) on an Annenberg run site, factcheck, upon which Bill Ayers sits. The simpliest thing would be to show the certificate, wouldn't it, instead of filing counter suits against Philip Berg, who is demanding for the American people and the sanctity of the U.S. Constitution that Obama prove his citizenship. But he just won't? Why not? I have had to prove my credentials when I applied for work, why shouldn't he?

Posted by: cynibun | Oct 17, 2008 1:14:04 PM

Media member,

We knew everything on the internet wasn't true...

We saw Hollywood on the internet.
We saw the mainstream media on the internet.
We saw evolution on the internet.
We saw many lies on the internet.

When the mainstream media ignores multiple candidates for the President of the United states, they can't be believed about much of anything.

Let every man be a liar, but let God be true!

However, when simple questions are not answered simply, the questions will multiply.

Find the answers. Or go away!

Posted by: Paul | Oct 17, 2008 1:04:02 PM

I can tell you what will happen. One of these WILL happen.
1. API will chicken out and not release the tape.
2. They will end up releasing the tape but not ALL of the tape.
3. The Hussain camp will listen to the quality of the audio and see if it is scratchy enough to say it isn't her. If the audio isn't really clear, it couldn't be verified that it was her and they would have plausible deniability.

Rest assured there will not be a damning tape of great clarity that will contain a conversation that will unequivocally sink the Hussain camp. Sad but true.

Posted by: TimInCA | Oct 17, 2008 12:17:03 PM

People so desperate to believe negativity about Barack Obama that they can't see this is obviously not true. LOL Michelle Obama is an attorney and a professional woman. Her husband is running for the POTUS. Do you really think she would be worried about what some podunk internet site is saying, enough to do a phone interview with them? LOL right. Of course the information is false....but it is incredulous to even entertain the thought that she would have made the call to API.. ROTFL!

Posted by: Lorrie | Oct 17, 2008 11:58:28 AM

To: glpage | Oct 17, 2008 8:35:32 AM / who cited and quoted something called... "The Constitution"...

... what's "The Constitution?"

Never heard of such a thing... at least not recently. And... neither has anyone else who's been educated in the past 20 years... and... they certainly haven't read it and understand it... its significance, nor actual meaning.

Nor... do they understand economics... hell most can't even spell the word... because that's not been part of their education either.

No... most, like Jake, have received an education in "the liberal arts"... which means... they have no education... and understand almost nothing that occurs in our World... and are so uniformed and naive... they actually believe anyone... who makes a bold, declarative statements in mellifluous tones... about "hope and change"... no matter how devoid of factual substance, or how contradictory and conflicting with reality and the documented "facts on the record" (which they never bother to review and understand)... or how contradictory and conflicting with "that one's" prior positions and declarative statements in mellifluous tones... nor how contradictory and conflicting with documented, factual truth... nor how contradictory and conflicting with the text and meaning of that thing called "The Constitution."

Such poorly educated and informed persons... of such obviously limited intellect... are always the target of those that would seek to deceive via form over substance.

As an infamous "community organizer" once said:

"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, (uneducated, uninformed) people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State."

Posted by: RCA, Dallas | Oct 17, 2008 11:54:21 AM

"Reparations can't begin to recompense our people for the disease, poverty and shame that have been forced upon us as America's second class citizens."

Considering that my ancestors came from other lands and also Native American (Russian and Tuscarora Indian Tribe), I think they qualified as second class citizens also.

And you still didnt answer my question of what is owed to me for my ancestors that opposed slavery, never owned slaves, and died to defeat the evil of slavery.

Posted by: faamecanic | Oct 17, 2008 11:25:32 AM

Those people that are shouting those things at a McCain rally are Obama supports trying to stir things up. But the media reports on that.

Posted by: Campbell | Oct 17, 2008 11:13:49 AM

Well, it's all Obama's fault for refusing to release his birth certificate. This issue is doing damage to Obama, so if he still won't release his birth certificate it's obvious that there's a problem that Obama doesn't want anyone to know about.

Posted by: EyeDoc | Oct 17, 2008 10:40:40 AM

If anything good will come out of an Obama’s presidency it will be this. America will learn the Socialist Lesson first hand. Europe tried Socialism and has been trying to cast off that "tar baby" every since. (No racism intended, inasmuch as most of Europe is white!)

Yes, when your free speech as well as your wallet is owned by the new Socialist States of America, then at the very least, reporters and Joe the Plumber alike will opine for the good old days. “Better to be poor and free than live like a Socialist King in a dungeon”!

Posted by: Kerry in Texas | Oct 17, 2008 9:36:38 AM

Truth or Not! We will be to see. Is it real freedom when only 2 canadates for President are given coverage and allowed to debate? Is that Freedom? Here is a fact in life. Everone will pass away into the next life. God will judge us even if you don't believe it. How will we be judged? According to His laws written in the Bible. Even if we don't believe it. We won't escape. Abortion is Murder that is what Bible says. Vote for abortion parties and you are an accessory to murder. Even if you don't believe it. If the Bible is wrong then we have nothing to worry about! If the Bible is right - we better be ready. Truth will win in the end.

Posted by: Motoman | Oct 17, 2008 9:34:09 AM

and the fact that The One has refused to signoff to allow Hawaii to reveal his birth certificate - that fact doesn't make anyone at ABC or your Jake, curious as to why???

Posted by: TheOriginalRalph | Oct 17, 2008 9:30:40 AM

so let me get this straight - the Obama campaign, that has already been shown to have made inaccurate statements, and then adjusted those statements with still incomplete & inaccurate statements, - they simply say it's bogus and why, that's it? No need to further investigate????

and ABC wonders why people turn to Fox for their news. Incredible - the MSM bury their heads in the sand and expect their viewership to follow suit. Like lemmins marching off the cliffs.

when i first went into business, 35 years ago, a mentor advised me to not make "dumb" mistakes. I responded: then i'm dead before i've left the starting gate. he retorted: no, you make stupid mistakes. we all do. But to make the same mistake again, that's dumb.

in ABC and the other MSM's case, it seems they are intent on repeating the same dumb mistakes and wondering why they lose viewshipship and respect. It must be their marketing department's fault, not the lack of aggressive journalism.

Posted by: TheOriginalRalph | Oct 17, 2008 9:26:47 AM

API has a tape, they are clearing through their legal depatment to release.

So we will see.

Posted by: s.b. | Oct 17, 2008 8:57:10 AM

Let's all wait for the release of the audio tape of Michelle Obama's phone call to be released within a couple of days. Then we shall see exactly what she said.

In fact, it might be quite interesting in the next couple of weeks as more information regarding the relationship between Obama and Raila Odinga. I think a few of you guys are going to be shocked! Get your popcorn ready!!

Posted by: TxBoB | Oct 17, 2008 8:54:42 AM

My guess is that when Obama's money starts to run out, the media will follow another money trail. The media have no hearts or brains because they are media robots. There is no logic to what they do. They cannot or will not admit the harm they have caused this country over the years. They only go in one direction, because they aren't capable of the truth or refuse to search the truth. When I saw the vicious attack on Sarah Palin and her family and realized no one questioned Obama or his family about anything, I came to realize that the media cares nothing for the truth. They are vultures scavenging for money. We the people, are bombarded with filth on prime time news because of money. It is so sad that prime time news is not family oriented anymore. In fact, we are bombarded by commercials that sell drugs for male enhancement purposes and see women clad in skimpy clothing. So between the unreliable news segments, they sell sex. That isn't news our children can watch. They are all media madonnas. Maybe they should all dress in black like Madonna does. At least that would show a little bit of honesty. After watching O'Reilly last night, I realized he has more spin than all of them. He's not looking out for us, he's looking out for O'Reilly. I am a republican and I am ashamed because of all the resources this great country has, I am forced to watch garbage for news. I just can't seem to flip the channels and get the truth anymore. It is all spin. They can spin and spin and go round and round and chase their tails all day because I'm not listening. I see through their smoke screen. The joke has been on us viewers. Well, this viewer doesn't think it's funny, because the issues are way too important.

Posted by: debbie | Oct 17, 2008 8:53:33 AM

This story may or may not be true, however there's plenty of "truth" out there that the main stream media has chosen to ignore. If Obama wins the election, it will be directly attributed to the sad and sorry reporting of the main stream media. He might have 30% of the vote right now if the public new what "change" means. The mainstream media is in the tank for Obama, they have promoted his candidacy and sadly this is the year journalism died....

Posted by: Barbara | Oct 17, 2008 8:40:23 AM

From Jen06, "Republicans are for taking some money from all of us and redistributing it to our men and women in the military. But surely you don't think that's socialist."

No Jen, it called "provide for the common defence," as stated in the Preamble of the Constitution and expressly called for in Section 8 of Article 1.

Posted by: glpage | Oct 17, 2008 8:35:32 AM

Alisha,

Are you seriously implying that those who make over $250,000 don't work? My God, they work harder than anybody! My husband doesn't make that much, yet he works 60-70 hours a week. And your hero is proposing coming in here and taking the fruits of his labor. If you honestly think that 95% will get a tax cut ,particularly when he is proposing hundreds of billions in increased expenditures, then you don't know anything about economics.

The irony here, Alisha, is that you state that people should work for their money, yet Obama wants to take by force that which some have earned and give it to others who haven't. Do you not understand?

Please go to the library and check out a copy of Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand and read it. You may need someone to explain it to you, but it foretells exactly what will happen in an Obama administration.

Posted by: Irene Adler | Oct 17, 2008 8:28:29 AM

API is a legitimate African news organization, one only has to look up the origin of the web domain. Let's hope they post the audio.

Posted by: flpyrate | Oct 17, 2008 7:23:12 AM

So let me get this straight, if the obama camp says its a lie then thats good enough?!!! If a story was circulating about McCain I seriously doubt the media would stop at the McCain camp saying it was a lie. Now do you know why so many people don't trust the media? It's suppose to be your job to INVESTIGATE the story to see if it's validate NOT take the word of a political campaign that it isn't. Also whats with the attacks on Joe the plumber by the media? Did the media investigate the claims by a democrat lawyer that has filed a lawsuit in against Obama claiming he isn't a natural born citizen? The media had no problem investigating Sarah Palin's daughter, but anything related to Obama the media ignores.This is why the media gets booed at McCain rallies and at the Republican Convention, you bring it on yourselves for you absolutely bias coverage. What ever happened to objective journalism? It has been replaced with "activist journalism"

Posted by: Tyrone | Oct 17, 2008 6:45:46 AM

Jake, you stated that you were not reporting on this story because "it does not appear to be true." Did you contact anybody besides the Obama campaign? Obama and his campaign have made so many "misstatements" that I don't believe anything they say anymore. Example: When asked about Obama's association with Bill Ayers, David Alexrod made a statement to the effect that their "kids go to school together." Then we found out that Ayer's "children" are adults and Obama's children are in elementary or middle school. That is just one example of many untruths....and the list is growing. It's unbelieveable. How can you guys in the mainstream look at your selves in the mirror and call yourselves responsible journalists? Aren't you supposed to tell the whole truth? I appeal to your conscience: The American people deserve to hear the WHOLE truth - not just distortions, half-truths, spins, and outright lies.

Posted by: Sue | Oct 17, 2008 5:22:32 AM

This is not the Michelle Obama that I knew...... Really,, It sounds feasible, given that a story like that in Kenya would rile Raila Odinga, and it's well documented that he talks with Senator Obama regularly. I suspect Michelle Obama could have been responding because of a call from Odinga, not a blog note. Time will tell, let's hope it's IN TIME.

Posted by: Judy Jawa | Oct 17, 2008 2:34:08 AM

HMMMM...The API is waiting for Michelle Obama to respond to them directly about the story and the API is getting legal advice from there Lawyers ...when they do the tape is going to be released and then BYE BYE Obamanites ...

Posted by: Mark | Oct 17, 2008 2:33:32 AM

right. he's being sued in TWO STATES to force him to produce the documents that all other candidates willingly reveal in order to prove citizenship... and you think there's no story here? obama is fighting in Philadelphia federal court NOT to have to prodcue something as simple as a freakin' original birth certificate... but you think there's no story here. obama refuses to release his original birth certificate, his high school records, his college records and some other records that presidential candidates offer up for scrutiny as a matter of course... but you're sure there's no story here. the guy suing obama in Philly federal court is a HUGE democrat and influential attorney who is able to bring cases to the supreme court and has vowed to take this to the supreme court... it's been mentioned in the washington times already... and some *mysterious* third party from california who has requested anonymity from the court has filed suit alongside berg, the democrat, in philadelphia demanding the same information from obama..... but... you... think... there's no story here. SYCOPHANT! if this was a republican candidate you be up their insides like a high colonic by now. HYPOCRITE!

Posted by: lovesscots | Oct 17, 2008 2:28:55 AM

According to the brilliant, and non-partisan journalist, Mr. Tapper, this is my insane comment that inevitably follows below:

I guess everything the Obama campaign says is true, Mr. Tapper. They are never wrong. They always speak the truth. Whatever they say goes, Mr. Tapper. Yeah, like anyone with a brain believes what they say about Barack Obama and ACORN.

Not everything that appears on the Internet is true - gee, no kidding Mr. Tapper. You ought to know.

ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, NY Times, and so many other liberal-leaning organizations are in cahoots with the Obama campaign. I guess you are too, Mr. Tapper.

You have to be pretty stupid and naive to believe what the Obama campaign says.

How much is the Obama campaign paying you to silence critics of the "Great Leader", Barack Hussein Obama?

Maybe there will be more and more children who are forced to sing praises to the great Socialist/Marxist Saul Alinsky-type leader Barack Hussein Obama, and you, Mr. Tapper, can sing along with them. Happy May Day to you, and all at ABC, CBS, NBC, NY Times, LA Times, Newsweek, etc...



Posted by: DLS1 | Oct 17, 2008 2:26:31 AM

Don't you think you should check further than to just ask the Obama campaign if this is true or not? What kind of reporting is that? If something like this had come out about the McCain campaign, I don't think you would just sit back and accept what they told you. You would dig and find out the truth. You will be one of those responsible if you don't tell everyone the truth and someone gets elected that shouldn't.

Posted by: Roberta | Oct 17, 2008 2:00:43 AM

This entire campaign the Democrats have said everything negative about Obama was a LIE and Denied all. Well I think this time their Lie and Deny is going to backfire because with Bill Ayres, Tony Rezko, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Dr. Khalid al-Mansour, ACORN, etc, etc. if the shoe fits he is going to have to wear it!!! There is too much smoke surrounding him for there not to be a fire. He has eloquently lied about almost everything.

Posted by: ChrisLee | Oct 17, 2008 1:44:25 AM

Doesn't it concern anyone that we are poised to elect a candidate for "President that is a sociopath with narcissistic personality disorder?

___________

I have thought this about him ever since the second or third time I saw him and heard him speak. I think the guy is certifiably nuts!

Posted by: tttkn"

You're talking about John McCain, right? I agree.

Posted by: Virgil | Oct 17, 2008 12:59:06 AM

The above article states that "perhaps we are unaware that not everything on the internet is true"...perhaps this author is unaware that everything on the main stream media is NOT true.

Posted by: CyberFerret52 | Oct 17, 2008 12:38:01 AM

The above article states that "perhaps we are unaware that not everything on the internet is true"...perhaps this author is unaware that everything on the main stream media is NOT true.

Posted by: CyberFerret52 | Oct 17, 2008 12:37:44 AM

Doesn't it concern anyone that we are poised to elect a candidate for President that is a sociopath with narcissistic personality disorder?

___________

I have thought this about him ever since the second or third time I saw him and heard him speak. I think the guy is certifiably nuts!

Posted by: tttkn | Oct 16, 2008 10:35:40 PM

Come on Jake...You are in the tank for Barack Hussein Obama. Why would you call them for verification of an article sent to you by another news agaency? Do your job, investigate and report. Or are you worried that if Obama gets in office you will lose your job as a what? journalist.

Posted by: Tina | Oct 16, 2008 9:12:39 PM

@Bob

The Secret Service is talking about the Scranton rally.

The Washington Post report is about the Clearwater rally.

You might want to check to see if the latest wingnut talking point actually is true before parroting it. (Although that would hardly be typical wingnut behavior.)

Clue stick: Thwack!

Posted by: CS Lewis Jr. | Oct 16, 2008 8:02:19 PM

Jake _ I heard you were all atwitter about the bogus "Kill Him" claim.

"Secret Service: No One Shouted 'Kill Him' at McCain Rally"

Posted by: Bob | Oct 16, 2008 6:24:30 PM

"Republicans are for taking some money from all of us and redistributing it to our men and women in the military. But surely you don't think that's socialist. So my question is: at what point do you become a socialist? Where is the line?"

I think the difference is pretty simple to understand. Issues like universal health care take tax money from those who work, and some portion of it goes to those who don't work. Many have a problem with that. On the other hand, few people would try to claim that our soldiers aren't working for the income they get.

Take a taxpayer's money, and give it to someone who isn't disabled, and hasn't done anything to deserve it, and that's income redistribution. Pay it out to men who are putting their lives on the line in service of the country, and it's payment for services rendered.

Posted by: Yashmak | Oct 16, 2008 6:14:37 PM

Nobody seems to address the fact that BHO wants to let the Bush tax cuts expire. Isn't this a de facto tax increase?

Posted by: Jen06 | Oct 16, 2008 4:51:35 PM

Can I ask a question of conservatives? This is serious. I get it that you think Obama is a socialist. And I get it that you think that because he proposes raising taxes on anybody at all, but especially because he proposes raising taxes on the wealthiest Americans. Here's my question: at what point on the tax policy spectrum do you start to become a socialist? No Republican has proposed eliminating taxes altogether. So even the least possible amount of taxes is still redistributing wealth, is it not? I know that you must realize that the war on terror is funded by taxes. We pay our soldiers with money from taxes. Republicans are for taking some money from all of us and redistributing it to our men and women in the military. But surely you don't think that's socialist. So my question is: at what point do you become a socialist? Where is the line? If conservatives propose taxing the wealthy at all, why isn't that socialist? At what percentage is it acceptable to be taxed? Seriously, I would love to know the answers.

Posted by: bms | Oct 16, 2008 4:41:24 PM

The only conservative 'blog I know of that even mentioned this whole thing, did so in the context of the likelihood that it was completely false.

I guess that's what "all atwitter" means.

Posted by: Yashmak | Oct 16, 2008 3:59:42 PM

(Counting down now to the explosion of conservative blogs named, that were "atwitter" Three...two...one...)

Whether any are named or not, calling the dwindling number of ABC news viewers, "insane", probably isn't the brightest thing one who's living is derived from those same viewers could do.

Posted by: MNHawk | Oct 16, 2008 2:42:41 PM

"So as the old saying goes, If you stand for something...you will fall for anything. Dont fall for Obama, he doesnt stand for anything."

He does stand for something:

Bigger Government

More Control

Social Justice

Socialist Concepts

Posted by: Jake | Oct 16, 2008 2:30:34 PM

Jake, could you please point out one prominent blog on the right that pushed this story? I saw it on a few but only in a context that is was bogus and to not fall for it.

Posted by: kahall | Oct 16, 2008 2:10:24 PM

Tapper, identify prominent blogs that were propagating this unconfirmed story. Identify prominent blogs that did not denounce the story when it was shown to be false.

Ironically, what you have written here is itself unsupported by fact. Some facts, please. You are supposed to be a reporter. Show examples of who was "atwitter."

Posted by: Steve | Oct 16, 2008 1:38:14 PM

Who really care? The Republicans are feeling the same way the Democrats did 8 yrs ago. Everyone, take my advice...vote. No one governs alone and our constitution is strong enough to handle any assault. We the people embody the spirit of our great country. Let's respectfully disagree on the issues. The personal attacks are hurtful by all. In the end there is no left or right, conservative or liberal, dem or rep...We are simply Americans and we share this beautiful land. So I wish McCain and Obama the best; lets just all vote and stop being rude to one another.

Posted by: Vic from Indiana | Oct 16, 2008 12:26:14 PM

Who really care? The Republicans are feeling the same way the Democrats did 8 yrs ago. Everyone, take my advice...vote. No one governs alone and our constitution is strong enough to handle any assault. We the people embody the spirit of our great country. Let's respectfully disagree on the issues. The personal attacks are hurtful by all. In the end there is no left or right, conservative or liberal, dem or rep...We are simply Americans and we share this beautiful land. So I wish McCain and Obama the best; lets just all vote and stop being rude to one another.

Posted by: A US Voter | Oct 16, 2008 12:25:10 PM

How do you cut taxes for 95% when only 60% actually pay them?

Write 'em a check.
It's called welfare.
It's called Socialism.

That idea worked well in Cuba, Venezuela, the old USSR, etc... no?
Fails every time it's tried. Yet, people still want to keep trying.

We'll hit a tipping point where high income people will buckle down (as was the case under Carter) and lower their income, bringing in less $ to the Treasury. Every time income taxes have been lowered, the Treasury took in MORE money. That's a fact. Even JFK knew that.

Posted by: ster | Oct 16, 2008 12:21:25 PM

While it's rich seeing a left wing blogger accuse right wingers of spreading false information, when you left wingers spread false positive propaganda about freedom crusher Obama daily, the fact is lots of right wing bloggers identified that story as bogus, including little green footballs. I remember Charles Johnson making a point that it was bogus, and so not publishing it. Not that there is anything positive to say about obama. I mean, I value life, liberty, the fruits of my labors and the pursuit of happiness, therefore I despise Obama.

Posted by: John Alway | Oct 16, 2008 12:17:43 PM

And some ignorami wonder why the dead tree media is perceived to be biased . . .

Posted by: Wil Golden | Oct 16, 2008 12:16:15 PM

UNBELIEVABLE. I actually thought that for the most part Americans made informed and educated decisions about what they read or hear. Could it be true? Are we actually going to base out voting decision on fear of difference? Fear of minorities progressing? Fear that the wealthy will actually have to pay for their privileged lives? OMG! You actually have to work for what you get! What a concept, you actually may have to get your next promotion based on merit and not status. How dare Obama actually try to adhere to morally sound policies and the freekin' Constitution and Bill of Rights! What's ashamed is that I think the American people are going to fall for propaganda and time tested and proven predjudicial garbage and flat out racism. Shame on America.

Posted by: Alisha | Oct 16, 2008 12:10:16 PM

Tapper,