Political Punch
Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper

« Previous | Main | Next »

Obama's Answer on Blagojevich -- and the Questions it Raises

December 09, 2008 9:17 PM

If anything, the criminal complaint against Democratic Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich portrays President-elect Obama and his aides as good guys, since Blago is seen fuming, cursing at Obama for only offering "appreciation" in return for appointing his preferred Senate candidate, Valerie Jarrett.

But this isn't just a complaint against a guy who happens to, coincidentally, also be a Chicago Democrat. Team Obama is all over the criminal complaint -- as seemingly innocent characters, perhaps even potential victims, of the Blago drama. But they're in there nonetheless, and that is highly unusual.

Incoming White House senior adviser Valerie Jarrett has her own pseudonym - Senate Candidate 1. So is some unnamed individual with ties to the Obama team. Blagojevich has many epithets for the President-elect himself. There are lots of questions about what any of them knew.

Then there's the big question about how Blago was so sure -- so angry -- that Team Obama would not pay to play.

Who in the Obama Team was talking to the Governor's office?

When they found out that Blago wanted to quid pro quo Team Obama (Jarrett gets the Senate seat if Blago gets a Cabinet position, or a good-paying job with a union-affiliated organization, or his wife gets a seat on some corporate boards) what did they do?

Did a member of Team Obama drop a dime on him?

As of now, the lack of answers from Team Obama is all we have. Obama sources say the silence is for two reasons: 1) this is a criminal investigation and they want to be careful about what they're allowed to say, and 2) they want to talk to everyone, make sure they know just who spoke to whom, and then be able to give one definitive answer with no subsequent shoes dropping.

A problem with this is that President-elect Obama appeared before the cameras today for a previously-scheduled photo op with environmental guru Al Gore.

"Did you have any contact with or were you aware at all of what was happening with your Senate seat?" asked a reporter, the Wall Street's Journal Jonathan Weisman.

"I had no contact with the Governor or his office," Obama said, "and so we were, I was not aware of what was happening."

As we noted, this contradicted a comment made by Obama senior aide David Axelrod, who told Fox News Chicago about Obama, "I know he's talked to the governor" -- about the Senate seat -- "and there are a whole range of names, many of which have surfaced, and I think he has a fondness for a lot of them."

Axelrod has since said he was "mistaken when I told an interviewer last month that the President-elect has spoken directly to Governor Blagojevich about the Senate vacancy. They did not then or at any time discuss the subject."

But there are other problems with Obama's response as well.

Slate's John Dickerson writes, Obama saying "I was not aware of what was happening" is "so vague as to be nearly meaningless" and "can mean anything you want it to. It can mean you weren't aware of anything relating to the Senate seat, or that you weren't aware the governor was trying to sell the Senate seat, or that you weren't aware the governor was under federal investigation for trying to sell the Senate seat. ..Was Obama purposefully trying to be unclear? It's hard to say. It's a little hard to believe that he didn't know anything that was happening relating to his old seat."

Then there's that other part of Obama's statement -- the one that he self-corrects, mid-sentence: "We were, I was not aware of what was happening."

He starts off speaking for the Obama Team. "We were." Then he stops himself and goes back and speaks only for himself. "I was."

He was not aware of what was happening. Not sure about anyone else.

There's nothing inherently wrong with this self-correction -- giving Mr. Obama the benefit of the doubt, he was trying to be precise and presumably at that point he wasn't sure of who in his team had talked to whom on Team Blago, if anyone.

But it does seem to indicate an unspoken acknowledgement that he doesn't know the whole story, or at least didn't at that point.

Sources close to Obama say that he found out about the arrest of Blagojevich at the same time we all did, this morning. But it would seem highly improbable that no one there knew anything.

On its website, President-elect Obama's Transition Team is making a big deal about transparency, posting memos and information about meetings with various, largely supportive organizations.

True transparency means a little more than that, one might posit. It means telling voters about matters that aren't entirely comfortable to share.

If one is just counting as being "transparent" the act of sharing meetings with environmental groups delighted to be counting down the days until Wyoming gets its favorite son back, then the notion might not mean much.

And that would mean that in order to truly be transparent, the American people need to find out as much as possible, as soon as possible, about what role anyone Team Obama played in any of the various shenanigans Gov. Blagojevich is accused of committing -- or any others we don't yet know about.

- jpt

December 9, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (99)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Is there a reason why we should believe one of the three statements suggested by Leslie Jo must be true?

Yeah, common sense...

Posted by: TJ | Dec 11, 2008 5:18:03 AM

Is there a reason why we should believe one of the three statements suggested by Leslie Jo must be true?

Posted by: BishopKingPawn | Dec 11, 2008 4:18:19 AM

Thanks, Jake. Keep asking questions so we can see how many times they get answered differently.

Posted by: RL in Illinois | Dec 11, 2008 12:26:03 AM

Blagojevich, Wright, Ayers, Rezko, Pfleger, Acorn...the list goes on. Obama is:

1. Corrupt and "in bed" with those in the list above

2. Unconcerned about what others do around him as long as he gets what he wants

or 3. Too stupid to know what's going on.

Any one of these three things is unsettling.

Posted by: Leslie Jo | Dec 11, 2008 12:03:48 AM

David H writes, "It is reasonable to assume that Obama has been tied in with Blago and his schemes over the years. That is how Chicago politics seems to work. To save his own skin Blago will talk. When he does we can kiss goodbye to the Obama presidency."
==================================
Only in YOUR world is it reasonable. In the ACTUAL world, you have a Congressman from Illinois who hasn't met with the Governor of Illinois in YEARS. Yet in YOUR world, the Senator (who has been running for the Presidency for two years - LOL) keeps in touch. How pathetic is that?

Posted by: Dems | Dec 10, 2008 9:30:27 PM

Pres.-Elect Obama is quoted as saying "I was not aware of what was happening." This man literally sees-no-evil, hears-no-evil, smells-no-evil even when he's in the middle of it. We will witness a look and attitude of bewilderment when one voices concern that he may have been influenced by corrupt Chicago politics. One has to question that so many people attribute great intellect to man who seems so clueless, or perhaps it's many of my fellow Americans who are clueless!

Posted by: Bobby B. | Dec 10, 2008 5:53:59 PM

I am with Kravitz above -- Blogo was a little too out there for his own good better to squash it in the beginning than be involved later on -- the governor was on a ego trip to large for anyone to trust containment. It's obvious from his "appreciate" statement that it wasn't enough. I hope the media will now settle down to the facts and that no one is tainted except the governor.

Posted by: Paulet | Dec 10, 2008 5:34:07 PM

TJ - You had to go back a few years to get reputable politicians from Illionis. Anyone that lives near Chicago knows how dirty the politicians are. I feel like I need a shower now just talking about it.

Posted by: PD | Dec 10, 2008 4:47:02 PM

If no-one in Obama's team knew anything , we should never have elected such a bunch of cretins - it is their job !

Posted by: John | Dec 10, 2008 4:14:47 PM

You forgot to mention Sarah Palin when listing public servants to disprove an assumption. You know, that public servant who actually has experience governing something that was so much a threat to Dems that they had to send an army to Alaska to find something to demonize her with (but couldn't)?

Posted by: TJ | Dec 10, 2008 12:46:23 PM

It's an insulting stereotype to assume that any politician who comes from Chicago or receives political support from Chicago is a "crook." It's tantamount to claiming that anyone who comes out of Alaska politics is a nitwit who can't assemble a coherant sentence.

The assumption is disproven by honorable public servants like Congressmen Abner Mikva and Sidney Yates; Senators Paul Douglas, Paul Simon and Adlai Stevenson III; and Governor Adlai Stevenson II.

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | Dec 10, 2008 12:36:43 PM

Yeah, right. Nice try, Jake. No wonder you're the only one being credited by "Morning Joe."

At least other journalists know what it actually takes to win a Pulitzer or Emmy.

Posted by: Diane | Dec 10, 2008 12:28:45 PM

Why is this news so surprising? When people see how a completely unqualified community activist can come along and BUY a job in the white house, of course some moron like Blagojevich is going to come along and think he can SELL a senate seat...duh

Posted by: TJ | Dec 10, 2008 12:26:02 PM

Wow what a pathetic article. There is no evidence of a connection so JT made some up and vaguely talked about questions being raised. Shocker republican apologist and whiner extraordinaire Joe "how did the intern die in my office" Scarborough thought making stuff up about democrats is great reporting. Way to earn those wing nut points JT. Hey maybe you can accuse Obama of playing the race card.

Posted by: Julian | Dec 10, 2008 12:08:06 PM

Democrats in Illinois have been backing away from Blago for years. His approval rating, even before his arrest and all this came out, has been 11%. Blago is the only elected Dem governor not to have a role at the Dem convention last summer. Blago was no where near Grant Park on election night. He has been excluded from having any role whatsoever in the Obama transition. Blago would have faced a primary challenge even if this arrest had not taken place. There is no way Obama or his team would have negotiated in any manner with this Democratic pariah.

Posted by: Goddard W. Bolt | Dec 10, 2008 11:31:40 AM

Read the contents of the taped conversations about 'the unnamed individual' and put two and two together. What made Blago so mad was that HIS wife was more qualified than Obama's wife, and yet he was told he would have to wait TWO YEARS for Obama to put Mrs. Blago on a corporate board (like the one that was 'paid to' Obama, for Michelle). Blago knew Obama was being hypocritical, so he stated (paraphrased): "My wife has the experience to be on a board now, unlike 'the unnamed individual'" (Michelle had no experience when she was 'given' her corporate board job that pays them dearly each year, both in salary and in company profits). I laughed when I read that these crooks know better than to trust each other -- hence, the warning to Blago from his advisor: 'Be wary of the two year promise'. LOL, if it weren't so sad for America that BO is our President-elect.

Posted by: Sami | Dec 10, 2008 11:19:35 AM

There is some speculation that, once Blagojevich proposed the quid pro quo, Rahm Emanuel dropped a dime on him to Fitzgerald.

Posted by: Goddard W. Bolt | Dec 10, 2008 11:16:51 AM

Thank you. I believe Fitzgerald brought this out NOW to stop Obama from being part of the bribe. Fitzgerald couldn't go direct to Obama so he circumvented Obama committing a crime by bring this out NOW. Because in and article written by Brian Ross of abc on 12/9/08. One of the things he said is this: The FBI affidavit said Blgo had been told by an ADVISER "the present-elect can get Blgo's wife on paid corporate boards in exchange for naming the president-elect's pick to the senate. The FBI was told by two other ADVISERS that Blgo has to "suck it up" for two years. That's when Blog starting swearing. So, Blgo's wife would get her job in two years but not right now. Fitzgerald is a democrat and what he did with Scooter Libby proves where his loyalties are.

Posted by: yia | Dec 10, 2008 11:01:03 AM

This isn't going to stick to Obama for the same reason Rezko didn't. People believe in Obama's character, rightfully so. Yes, his answers were vague and imprecise, much like many of his policy statements. But that doesn't make him dirty. If anything, I think this reflects positively on him. After all, look at the cesspool he rose from, and he's still a straight arrow.

Posted by: cordelia525 | Dec 10, 2008 11:00:48 AM

It is reasonable to assume that Obama has been tied in with Blago and his schemes over the years. That is how Chicago politics seems to work. To save his own skin Blago will talk. When he does we can kiss goodbye to the Obama presidency.

Posted by: David H | Dec 10, 2008 10:08:57 AM

Post a comment





 

POLITICAL VIDEOS