On the Same Block as PEBO, Blago Plots His Next Move

Do we really need to resort to ideology bashing? Yes, the libs might be bull-headed, pushy, and quick to point a finger, but at least they're not ignorant bigots.
Anyway, can't you see what Concerned is actually trying to say? Our troops are not terrorists! They are brave men who protect our country. Unfortunately, they take orders from a ruthless imperialist dictator-want-to-be. (Can someone PLEASE remind me why we have no rights to privacy anymore??) Not to mention the whole war crimes/Guantanamo Bay/endless list. But can't you be just a little empathetic for pete's sake--if you were one of those people "in blankets, wearing towels on their heads", not all of them are evil. You can't hate people just for believing something different, otherwise you might as well be yelling "Nuke 'em all!" And some of those innocent civilians get killed. Think of they're families: We have violated the borders of their country, utterly disrespected their religions, and in effect, have conquered their people, and now have killed their innocent husband/wife/children/whatever. I'd be pretty angry if that happened to me! And don't any of you dare say that they deserved it, because many of them did not.
Our soldiers are not terrorists, they're just good at following orders.
(Hm, doesn't that sound a bit familiar?)

Anyway, Obama didn't do anything wrong. Pull your heads out of the clouds and give up the conspiracies.
Blago will be tried in court, and if you don't believe in our country's government (including courts), than I guess you can "love it or leave it".

not really-Concerned in Ohio
re: 'You said our American Soldiers were terrorists"

obviously at this point it is clear you either are unable to understand the context of postings or you are simply confused or dense.

"Like him, you should immediately apologize to our soldiers and immediately resign (from this board)."

Until you do Blue, Concerned in OH is going to carve a B in his left cheek and blame a black man for it!

"Hate to tell you sweetie, but the first in a LONG line of the lawsuits was brought by a LIFELONG DEMOCRAT. Berg, an attorney, is not ONLY a LIFELONG DEMOCRAT, but a Hillary supporter. So YOU get over it!"

Any who told you Berg was a Hillary supporter and lifelong Democrat?

Oh yeah Berg did.

The same guy told gullible right wingers that Obama had been subpoenaed. Same guy who told them that Obama had been ordered to produce his birth certificate. Same guy who has lied about his case a half dozen times.

"Why you have sympathy for people who behead women and children is beyond me."

One would take your advocacy for these women and children more seriously if you did not enjoy torturing their husbands and brothers so much.

"You're a bigger liar than 0bama."

Someone who put Ashley Todd on his shoulders and ran with it long after it was proven a hoax is calling someone else a liar?

ROFLMAO!

No reason for Blago to resign.
The Feds have no case. There's
nothing in the Feds' complaint
that is any more than normal
political horesetrading talk
by the governor with his advisors.

Concerned in OH

- obviously you are unable to accept the point that there are others who live on this planet besides Americans,... you seem to have adopted the Republican view of 'if you don't agree with me, your a terrorist'...... that view has been proven false over the last 8 years, but it is revealing however that you, like the bush administration continue to use that canard.

- as for your calling people liars:
You and the republicans have no room on that subject as just about everything that has been said by 'W' and Co. in the last 8 years plainly speaks for itself on the negative side.

re: 'apologize'
as it seems my last post was edited out for some inexplicable reason..... let me repeat:
I will apologize for my comments right after
Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Wolfewitz et. al apologize for starting a needless war.

It seems to me perfectly logical that the president elect or may his staff may have spoke with the gov. about people he thought he should replace him, so the question is why did barack originally deny having even suggested anything to the gov about replacing him. Even if President elect's cheif of staff spoke to the gov certianly it was with Barack's approval and knowledge.

It is perfectly legal, logical and reasonable for a Pres. Elect to present a list of people he would consider as good, qualified contenders for the Senate seat he is vacating. This is likely what Emanuel did. Once whack-job Blago figured out there was nothing being offered except "gratitude," he went on his F-bomb tirade. Obama is in the clear, as is Emanuel.

Hang on, Rod! The Governorship is your best leverage! Cut a deal and sing like the Mormon Tabernacle Choir!

GP -

Berg also wanted to arrest Bush and Cheney for perpetrating 9/11. This guy is a member in good standing of the Tin Foil Hat Brigade.

Would "Concerned in OH" please eliminate "OH" from your signature line. You are a "concern" to people in OH just as the people in TX do not want to be associated with Bushby.

Further proof that Blago and PEBO are in cahoots! Maybe they've been horse trading via a secret passage way between the buildings. Perhaps they've been standing in the windows waving semaphores at one another or sending Morse Code via the venetian blinds!

Don't be surprised if Blago ends being named Ambassador to San Marino!

Republicans are economic terrorists.

Employment was booming. What did the republicans do? They outsourced our jobs and expanded the H1B visa program so more Americans could get laid off and so that foreigners could work in the U.S. for cheaper pay.

People were buying houses. What did the republicans do? They expanded their outsourcing/insourcing efforts so that Americans could not afford mortgages.

Americans were investing and saving for retirement. What did the Republicans do? They crashed the stock market and eroded confidence of both foreign and domestic investors.

Americans were buying cars. What did the Republicans do? They let the big 3 go under just in time for Christmas in an attempt to bring down the unions.

There is now a report on WSJ that the Tribune moved earlier than prosecutors wanted and forced their hand.

I think I smell Rahm leaking so to save other candidates before Fitz could net 4 or 5. Now that would be embarrassing!

Concerned in OH
re:
"Right. That's your problem. You believe that American Soldiers are literally equivalent to terrorists."

- your problem is that you project your view on other people's comments....

- your other problem is that you are unable to imagine that there are innocent civilians being killed accidentally by coalition military forces, [BTW: well documented in the news].

- I said nothing about equating American forces with terrorists, what I said was that civilians killed by American or 'coalition' forces would naturally view those who killed their family members with understandable hate and could view them as terrorists. By your own definition: anyone who 'targets civilians'.

Does it really matter once their family members are dead who killed them? Are you implying that 'they' think:.. 'thank you, coalition forces for killing my children, I know you represent president Bush so I won't hate you for killing them'? I will only hate the 'beheaders.'

Obamacrat for Palin,

Nice to meet you and I used to be a Palin supporter. But i really didn't like the dream i had about her failed presidency, y'know? It was really a horrible, horrible experience, wouldn't wish it on my enemy. so I had to switch sides, sadly.

So, do tell us more about the Obama Presidency, would you? what was it like? I seemed to have slept through it and don't recall it ever starting. fill me in. I want all the details on all things that happened through the four years of his presidency, ok?

Matt Jaffe,

what does the location have to do with anything?

commondecency,

'LOL'?? are you sure you are using it in the right way? Nothing funny about wasting taxpayer money.

Concerned in OH,

OH, u again.

commondecency

you forgot to mention why they have 'standing', and their 'burden of proof' is still the same as all the other cases.

"these plaintiffs have standing under a
unique Washington statute that:
allows any registered voter to challenge the election of someone who, at the time of the
election, was ineligible to hold the office."