Political Punch
Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper
RECENT POSTS
- Who Really Wears the Pants in Russia?
- Malia Obama – Budding Fashionista?
- The Very Latest on the US-Russian Summit
- President Obama Seeks to Build Up Medvedev Over Putin
- President Obama's Proverbial Reset Button
- The Latest from the US-Russian Summit
- Kenya Dig It? President Obama Talks Africa, Chastises Politics in Late Father's Homeland
- US-Russian Arms Negotiators "Under the Gun," Might Temporarily Bypass Senate Ratification for Treaty
- Asked What He Doesn’t Like About Himself, President Obama Cites His Golf Game
- Today's Q's For O's White House
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
Questions Arise About the Obama/Blagojevich Relationship
December 09, 2008 3:37 PM
"Obviously like the rest of the people of Illinois I am saddened and sobered by the news that came out of the US attorney's office today," said President-elect Obama this afternoon in Chicago, speaking of the criminal complaint against Democratic Gov. Rod Blagojevich for corruption. "But as this is a ongoing investigation involving the governor I don't think it would be appropriate for me to comment on the issue at this time."
Asked what contact he'd had with the governor's office about his replacement in the Senate, President-elect Obama today said "I had no contact with the governor or his office and so we were not, I was not aware of what was happening."
But on November 23, 2008, his senior adviser David Axelrod appeared on Fox News Chicago and said something quite different.
While insisting that the President-elect had not expressed a favorite to replace him, and his inclination was to avoid being a "kingmaker," Axelrod said, "I know he's talked to the governor and there are a whole range of names many of which have surfaced, and I think he has a fondness for a lot of them."
(UPDATE: An Obama Transition Team aide says that Axelrod misspoke on Fox News Chicago.)
(UPDATE #2: Axelrod this evening issued a statement saying. "I was mistaken when I told an interviewer last month that the President-elect has spoken directly to Governor Blagojevich about the Senate vacancy. They did not then or at any time discuss the subject.")
There are no allegations that President-elect Obama or anyone close to him had anything to do with any of the crimes Gov. Blagojevich is accused of having committed.
In fact, there are indications that Mr. Obama and his team refused to go along with the "pay to play" way Blagojevich is accused of operating, offering only "gratitude" if the governor appointed his friend Valerie Jarrett to take his U.S. Senate seat, much to the governor's chagrin.
But there remain questions about how Blagojevich knew that Mr. Obama was not willing to give him anything in exchange for the Senate seat -- with whom was Blagojevich speaking? Did that person report the governor to the authorities?
And, it should be pointed out, Mr. Obama has a relationship with Mr. Blagojevich, having not only endorsed Blagojevich in 2002 and 2006, but having served as a top adviser to the Illinois governor in his first 2002 run for the state house.
In the Democratic gubernatorial primary that year, then-state sen. Obama endorsed former Illinois Attorney General Roland Burris. But after Blagojevich won, Obama came around enthusiastically. At the same time, meanwhile, Axelrod had such serious concerns about whether Blagojevich was ready for governing he refused to work for his one-time client.
According to Rep. Rahm Emanuel, D-Ill., Mr. Obama's incoming White House chief of staff, Emanuel, then-state senator Obama, a third Blagojevich aide, and Blagojevich's campaign co-chair, David Wilhelm, were the top strategists of Blagojevich's 2002 gubernatorial victory.
Emanuel told the New Yorker earlier this year that he and Obama "participated in a small group that met weekly when Rod was running for governor. We basically laid out the general election, Barack and I and these two."
Wilhelm said that Emanuel had overstated Obama's role. "There was an advisory council that was inclusive of Rahm and Barack but not limited to them," Wilhelm said, and he disputed the notion that Obama was "an architect or one of the principal strategists."
(An Obama Transition Team aide emails to note that Emanuel later changed his recollection of this story to Rich Miller's "CAPITOL FAX," saying, "David [Wilhelm] and I have worked together on campaigns for decades. Like always, he's right and I'm wrong.")
Either way, others now around Obama were less enthusiastic about Blagojevich at the time, namely David Axelrod, Obama's senior campaign adviser who will soon be a senior adviser at the White House.
Axelrod had worked for Blagojevich in his past races for the House, but he declined to work on his gubernatorial run.
"He had been my client and I had a very good relationship with him, but I didn't sign on to the governor's race," Axelrod told the New Yorker. "Obviously he won, but I had concerns about it...I was concerned about whether he was ready for that. Not so much for the race but for governing. I was concerned about some of the folks -- I was concerned about how the race was being approached."
On the Chicago TV show "Public Affairs with Jeff Berkowitz" on June 27, 2002, state Sen. Obama said, "Right now, my main focus is to make sure that we elect Rod Blagojevich as Governor, we..."
"You working hard for Rod?" interrupted Berkowitz.
"You betcha," said Obama.
"Hot Rod?" asked the host.
"That's exactly right," Obama said.
In 2004, then-Gov. Blagojevich enthusiastically endorsed Obama for the Senate seat after he won the nomination, and Obama endorsed Blagojevich for his 2006 re-election race in early 2005.
In the Summer of 2006, then-U.S. Sen. Obama backed Blagojevich even though there were serious questions at the time about Blago's hiring practices.
At the time, numerous state agencies had had records subpoenaed, with U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald telling authorities he was looking into "very serious allegations of endemic hiring fraud" with a "number of credible witnesses."
In an interview with the Chicago Daily Herald in July 2006, then-Sen. Obama said, "I have not followed closely enough what's been taking place in these investigations to comment on them. Obviously I'm concerned about reports that hiring practices at the state weren't, at times, following appropriate procedures. How high up that went, the degree at which the governor was involved, is not something I'm going to speculate on.
"If I received information that made me believe that any Democrat had not been acting in the public interest, I'd be concerned," Obama said.
That said, Mr. Obama said, "If the governor asks me to work on his behalf, I'll be happy to do it."
Apparently the governor did. At the Illinois State Fair in August 2006, Obama spoke on Blagojevich's behalf.
"We've got a governor in Rod Blagojevich who has delivered consistently on behalf of the people of Illinois," Obama told the crowd.
In January 2007, Blagojevich's office reserved the Old State Capitol for Mr. Obama's presidential announcement at Obama's request.
Blagojevich spokeswoman Rebecca Rausch told reporters that "Representatives for Sen. Obama contacted the governor's office regarding use of the Old State Capitol. We contacted the Illinois Historic Preservation Agency and reserved the Old State Capitol for the Senator on February 10th."
The Old State Capitol is where President Abraham Lincoln delivered his "House Divided" speech in 1858.
Fitzgerald today said that the charges the government was making about Blagojevich "would make Lincoln turn over in his grave."
-- jpt
December 9, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (1323)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Jake, I appreciate that you dug deep; the story deserved it- though I did wish you to be moreso prior to election. Now, unless Obama administration lawyer skills prove that "oral sex" is not "sex" we might have an impeached president, since Obama is, instead of "change we can believe in," "change to Chicago corruption." But then again, lawyers can prove that black is not white, and white is not black. And people do change. They learn to distance themselves from their past, or their present, especially if the national media is "gracious" and allows a presidential candidate to escape his past. Kennedy was never forgiven for Chapaquiddick and the death of Mary Jo Kopechne, though he escaped any responsibility whatsoever in court. However, towards Obama, the media was "gracious" and totally escaped scrutiny. Now we all pay for it. Thank you, Jake, for your turnaround. Scrutiny is better for the country. I only wish it came earlier.
Posted by: john roco | Dec 27, 2008 6:21:22 AM
America,
Please show me a politician that is not corrupt. I challenge you! The system which they operate within is corrupt and it merely becomes varying degrees of corruption.
Are you all really that blind/stupid/ignorant?
Patti Blagojevich's dad is a powerfull alderman in the city of chicago (corrupt) she has a real estate license and if anyone would bother to investigate her "sales" they are all real estate developers that received wonderfull zoning variences in order to build buildings they otherwise could not have built. Rod Blagojevich's career started with a gentleman referred to as fast Eddie Vrdolyak (does he sound corrupt?) just recently plead out to a deal with federal prosecuters. These taped phone conversations are evidence and should be public record but who really thinks we will hear the entire tapes? Right now someone is "editing" the tapes so only the people our fine (corrupt) government wants to prosecute will be prosecuted. NO EVIDENCE WILL SURFACE REGARDING OBAMA, IT WOULD NOT BE GOOD FOR US. Everyone who thinks the news ius not filtered raise your hand, look around and find the misguided souls.
Get real people, how dumb are you?
That said we still live in the best country on earth!
Posted by: Mike | Dec 26, 2008 6:35:07 PM
I actually voted for Obama, and now regret it. I'm aghast at the corruption.
Tuesday, January 20, 2009:
12:00 noon inauguration
12:01 impeachment proceedings begin
Posted by: Stozzel | Dec 23, 2008 7:01:03 PM
Can we talk about the current corrupt White House? Jake, why haven't you been asking the hard questions to Bush? I would like some answers. I want to know why the White House decided to cover up the Black Water crimes and the torture carried out by US personnel at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo . I also want to know where millions of unaccounted dollars went for military aid that never reached our troops. Also, how did Halliburton get a no-bid contract and then was allowed to pad their invoices by 51% and now they can no longer be found? Can you investigate that, instead of made up stories about Obama?
Posted by: Tonia | Dec 18, 2008 12:12:09 AM
Oh, BTW, "gimmieabreak":
Sorry to burst your bubble, but history has already been written.
It includes information on Hussein's WMDs, the ones we discovered, and the yellowcake material that Joe Wilson claimed he never had. It was confiscated and shipped to Canada.
Happy reading.
Posted by: sfcmac | Dec 16, 2008 2:04:09 PM
test
Posted by: Johnny | Dec 15, 2008 4:37:03 PM
I may have picked the "losers" in the past three general elections (Gore 2000, Kerry 2004, HRC/McCain 2008) but I'm sure they would've been better presidents than the so called "winners".
Posted by: Eric, California | Dec 14, 2008 11:02:31 PM
After all of crap being shoveled by a lot of Democrats AND Republicans; it astonishes me that ANYONE would still be blindly loyal to either party!
Good heavens!
I like Obama better than any Politician; ever. However, I am not stupid.
Here's a thought; let's wait and see how this plays out before anyone starts frothing at the mouth.
The fact that Blago(unbeknownst to him at the time)complained about Obama being a goody-2-shoes on that wiretap pretty well sums it up for me. If Blago LOVED Obama; then I would be more suspicious about whether Obama was dirty or not.
As it is, I will wait and see.
Anyone with me?
Posted by: Mrs. Jude Bourff | Dec 13, 2008 10:25:17 PM
I just stumbled upon these comments and thought I had found the official site of patients of the State Hospital for the Uninformed, Illogical and Mean. It's apparent that many of you are using "The Book of Convenient Facts and Statistics" to prove everyone else is crazier than you.
Sheeeeesh.
Posted by: Babz | Dec 13, 2008 3:37:15 PM
You realize when you wingnuts call Obama "The Messiah" and "The One" you sound like complete idiots, right? Your criticisms would have more bite if you hadn't supported W and the unbelievable corruption, incompetence and idiocy of the last 8 years.
Posted by: Beaumont | Dec 13, 2008 2:06:02 PM
It is(was) right in front of our faces. They are ALL CONNECTED. Ayers, Wright, Jarrett, Emanuel, Blago, Obama, Michele Obama. Are we going to let this slip by??? Monday the electors cast their votes. I think they better look closer. Or, do we wait six months from now?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What a paranoid load of tripe! "ALL CONNECTED?"... What do you mean? (I could not help noticing that you DON'T SAY what you mean.) HOW are they "ALL CONNECTED?" And do we really have to take your word for it? Because my days of taking a Bushie's word for ANYTHING are long gone.
Posted by: Bart Stewart | Dec 13, 2008 1:06:29 PM
Everybody knows Obama campaigned for Blago back in 2002. They knew each other, being politicians from the same state and party. But they weren't joined at the hip, folks! Obama is responsible for his own office, and is NOT responsible for what this governor does. If my twin brother commits a crime am I to blame? Show us some specifics where Obama has broken the law and we'll talk. Otherwise, all the hot air, hate, and wishful thinking on earth will not make this amount to anything outside of the Illinois governor's office.
Posted by: Bart Stewart | Dec 13, 2008 1:01:19 PM
How did Obama get his senate seat?
Posted by: pcn | Dec 13, 2008 9:16:34 AM
It is(was) right in front of our faces. They are ALL CONNECTED. Ayers, Wright, Jarrett, Emanuel, Blago, Obama, Michele Obama. Are we going to let this slip by??? Monday the electors cast their votes. I think they better look closer. Or, do we wait six months from now?
Posted by: drno | Dec 13, 2008 9:14:54 AM
I don't buy Obama didn't know the man was crooked. The sheep follow this man without asking themselves why are all these man's friends either crooks or radicals.
Come on Obots admit it he is a crook and a lie. How are those picks of his working out for you. Idiots.
Posted by: hillarysmygirl16 | Dec 13, 2008 9:13:37 AM
VERY SAD DAY
I HOPE TO GOD THAT OBAMA COMES THROUGH THIS SMELLING LIKE A ROSE.IF NOT POLITICS WILL GO BACK TO WHERE IT WAS NOT TRUSTING IN POLITICS.PEOPLE WILL GO RIGHT BACK TO STAYING AT HOME AND NOT VOTING.WILL NOT VOTE AGAIN
Posted by: sandra | Dec 12, 2008 9:43:11 PM
Say it ain't so, Barack.
Posted by: John Doe | Dec 12, 2008 9:11:37 PM
Obama wasn't just an acquaintance, he worked closely with these hoodlums. There is no possible way he can distance himself from the tactics that entailed. Just what kind of person would want to be supported by unscrupulous individuals? Is this someone we want as a friend let along a leader?
Posted by: p | Dec 12, 2008 3:22:02 PM
Wait a minute. I just checked the Fox News Website and read the transcript for the Axelrod interview on November 23. Chris Wallace and David Axelrod make no mention of the vacated senate seat. They're just talking about cabinet appointments and economic policy. Where's the beef Jake?
Posted by: JSK | Dec 11, 2008 11:24:29 PM
Obama and ties to another sleaze ball Chicagoan--I'm shocked !!!!(sarcasm)
Posted by: DS | Dec 11, 2008 7:37:10 PM
Post a comment

