Political Punch

Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper

« Previous | Main | Next »

The Unit

December 01, 2008 2:54 PM

Just five days after coordinated terrorist attacks killed nearly 200 people and wounded hundreds more in Mumbai, India, President-elect Barack Obama Monday unveiled his national security team, heralding a "new beginning for American national security."

What seemed more new than the names involved, however, was the larger concept: The group drew from the camps of various political rivals Mr. Obama has faced including Secretary of Defense Robert Gates from the current president's administration; National Security Adviser-designee Gen. Jim Jones (Ret.), a friend of Sen. John McCain's of more than three decades; and Democratic primary opponent Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, now his nominee to become Secretary of State.

"In this uncertain world, the time has come for a new beginning, a new dawn of American leadership to overcome the challenges of the 21st century and to seize the opportunities embedded in these challenges," Obama said at a Chicago press conference this morning.

In all, Obama announced six members of his national security team: in addition to Clinton, Gates and Jones, Mr. Obama announced Eric Holder for Attorney General; Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano for Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; and Dr. Susan Rice for Ambassador to the United Nations, a position Obama intends to give Cabinet rank.

Obama noted that he wanted a cabinet of "strong personalities and strong opinions" to avoid a White House where "everybody agrees with everything", while emphasizing that "the buck stops with me."

"I assembled this team because I'm a strong believer in strong personalities and strong opinions," Mr. Obama said. "I think that's how the best decisions are made. One of the dangers in a White House, based on my reading of history, is that you get wrapped up in groupthink and everybody agrees with everything and there's no discussion and there are no dissenting views. So I'm going to be welcoming a vigorous debate inside the White House. But understand, I will be setting policy as president."

Vice President-elect Joe Biden, who in October guaranteed that Obama would face an international crisis within six months of taking over the Oval Office, praised the Illinois lawmaker for putting together "one of the most talented national security teams ever assembled."

ALL EYES ON HRC

Despite the unveiling of a half-dozen picks for the national security team, all of whom spoke today, the attention of the press fell predominantly on one in particular: Clinton.

In the not so distant past, the New York lawmaker was vigorously outlining her differences and criticisms of Obama's foreign policy approach, suggesting that Mr. Obama was naïve, reckless, and unprepared for the job of President. Those days seemed long gone, as the two exited the room arm in arm.

"I think she is going to be an outstanding Secretary of State," predicted Obama. "And if I didn't believe that, I wouldn't have offered her the job. And if she didn't believe that I was equipped to lead this nation at such a difficult time, she would not have accepted."

In both of their remarks, the two former rivals showered one another with praise, with Obama saying his selection of her was "not a light-bulb moment" and shrugging off a question about their campaign trail battles as merely "fun for the press."

"During campaigns or during the course of election season, differences get magnified," he said. "I did not ask for assurances from these individuals that they would agree with me at all times. I think they understand and would not be joining this team unless they understood and were prepared to carry out the decisions that have been made by me after full discussion."

"And, you know, most of the people who are standing here are people who I've worked with, and on the broad core vision of where America needs to go, we are in almost complete agreement," he continued. "There are going to be differences in tactics and different assessments and judgments made. That's what I expect; that's what I welcome. That's why I asked them to join the team."

Calling her "an American of tremendous stature... who will command respect in every capital," Obama said that "Hillary's appointment is a sign to friend and foe of the seriousness of my commitment to renew American diplomacy and restore our alliances."

For her part, the former First Lady assured Obama that she would give "this assignment, your administration, and our country my all," while noting that his election demonstrated Americans' desires for "not just a new direction at home but a new effort to renew America's standing in the world as a force for positive change."

"I believe the best way to continue serving my country is to join President-elect Obama, Vice President-elect Biden, the leaders here, and the dedicated public servants of the State Department on behalf of our nation at this defining moment," Clinton said. "President Kennedy once said that engaging the world to meet the threats we face was the greatest adventure of our century. Well, Mr. President-elect, I am proud to join you on what will be a difficult and exciting adventure in this new century."

Added the former First Lady: "And may God bless you and all who serve with you and our great country."

MILITARY MINDS

Another national security team pick who has disagreed with Obama in the past is Defense Secretary Gates, specifically regarding a withdrawal plan from Iraq, prompting one reporter to ask if Gates -- a registered Independent who has only served in Republican administrations -- fills the "requirement for a Republican in the cabinet."

"I didn't check his voter registration," replied Obama, as Biden laughed and put his arm around the Pentagon chief.

"I have complete confidence in Secretary Gates being able to carry out his tasks," continued the President-elect. "And I think the point here is that I didn't go around checking people's political registration. What I was most concerned with was whether or not they can serve the interests of the American people."

With Gates by his side, Obama reiterated that he intends to pull American troops out of Iraq within 16 months.

"I believe that 16 months is the right time frame, but, as I've said consistently, I will listen to the recommendations of my commanders," Obama promised. "And my number-one priority is making sure that our troops remain safe in this transition phase, and that the Iraqi people are well served by a government that is taking on increased responsibility for its own security."

Obama's pick for National Security Advisor, Gen. Jones, appeared on the campaign trail alongside Obama's general election rival, Republican nominee Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., though he never formally endorsed the Republican senator. But today former NATO commander Jones said he was "deeply humbled and deeply appreciative of this great opportunity."

Holder, Napolitano, and Rice were all considered long-time members of the Obama world and therefore less surprising picks.

INDIA ATTACKS

Differences or not, Obama said his team had met this morning to discuss last week's mayhem in Mumbai, still fresh in the minds of many, as he noted that he was "heartbroken" about the deaths of six Americans there.

"In the world we seek, there is no place for those who kill innocent civilians to advance hateful extremism," he stated. "This weekend, I told Prime Minister Singh of India that Americans stand with the people of India in this dark time. And I am confident that India's great democracy is more resilient than killers who would tear it down."

Since the Mumbai terrorists crossed over from Pakistan to attack the India coastal city last Wednesday, tension between the two neighboring countries has mounted. Forecasting "very delicate diplomacy" in the coming days and weeks, Obama was reluctant to comment on the situation today, but he did say he expects Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari to "follow through" with the commitment he made to cooperate with the investigation.

The President-elect also gave a limited response when asked by ABC News if he believed India had the right to attack high-level terrorist targets in Pakistan with our without the Pakistani's government's permission, if given actionable intelligence. During the campaign, Obama had said he believed that the U.S. had the right to do so.

"Sovereign nations obviously have a right to protect themselves. Beyond that, I don't want to comment on the specific situation that's taking place in South Asia right now," Obama responded, having already reiterated that "there is only one president at a time."

Obama's transition to power won't be complete until inauguration still over six weeks away, but today he expressed hope that the confirmation process for his national security picks will "proceed swiftly" so that his administration can "hit the ground running".

The Obama logistical staff once again split the press conference room seats according to a local Chicago reference. Once it was White Sox/Cubs, but a local newspaper challenged Obama Transition advance team staffers to come up with something more imaginative. Today’s divide? Frango or Garrett’s Peanut Shops.

The newser was Obama's fifth since he was elected President and his fourth in the past eight days, with the previous three last week all focused on the nation's slumping economy.

-- Matt Jaffe and Jake Tapper

December 1, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (21)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Oh and Mike_C,

Your view of the world must be pretty limited, if you actually think almost the entire world doesn't hate Bush.

I wonder why everybody from Tokyo to Indonesia was celebrating on the streets when the news came that Obama would be 44.

(Yes, you're going to say that Obama wants to compromise US interests and benefit the world blah, blah. You can think that all you want even though it is not true, but hey, admit it, isn't it advantageous that the whole world doesn't hate the President and doesn't consider him to be a total buffoon?)

Posted by: Grey Matter | Dec 3, 2008 8:48:49 AM

Hey Mike_C

The Iraqis are feeling better? Please start reading reports other then the propaganda from the Bush admin.

Don't make me laugh. I read the Three Trillion Dollar War which described the terrible conditions in Iraq and all the taxpayer's money wasted on contractors. Other newspapers and reports say the same. Iraqis outside of the green zone are now are lucky to have electricity for only a few hours a day- electricity used to be available under Saddam regularly. Some areas get no power at all. Many have no running water or access to clean food. Iraq had more cholera cases in one year then the whole of Asia combined. Saddam's long shadow no longer falls on them but many are without jobs and looting and violence is a possibility and the streets are no longer as safe. Any Iraqi you stop on the street has most likely lost somebody to the invasion and civil war.

About Clinton missing Osama, hey, your idol Bush hasn't exactly caught him yet, has he, eh? Why, he might have if he had continued allowing his soldiers to chase Osama down in Afghanistan where they were cornering him, but nooooo he had to pull them out for the Iraq "adventure". At least Clinton didn't invade the WRONG country and get over one million of their citizens killed. Sure, any military operations will result in civilians getting killed, but this was a stupid war and avoidable. Bush could have chosen to focus just on Afghanistan- where bin Laden really was. The terrorists were never in Iraq before the invasion.

Yeah, you think the way to scare off terrorists is to throw military weight around. I'm not so naive to think we can not deal with people who want to kill us harshly- sometimes only a bullet will do it. But I think it is just stupid to end up killing a lot more other people and making people who PREVIOUSLY not habour any anti-pathy towards us do so. Is the logic so difficult to understand? The terrorists attack us. We bomb their entire country and kill lots of their civilians. We give any jobs to private contractors so civilians are left jobless and can barely support themselves. Many civilians get angry and frustrated and join the terrorists. That, clearly is counter-productive.

It is an incredible fallacy to assume strength is measured in military weight. When Bush unveiled his plans to invade Iraq, I am sure that somewhere, instead of being cowed, bin Laden was laughing.

Posted by: Grey Matter | Dec 3, 2008 8:44:33 AM

Hussein Obama will try to lead through the internet and his blackberry. He wants to be the "cool, hip" president. Unfortunately, he has never lead anything and it is already showing. Just consult with all of his advisors with "strong personalities." We had better hope another terrorist strike or bullet to his head does not materialize over the next 4 years, for he is grossly underqualified. If it does happen, as people are predicting, america will be in a much weaker position thanks to his liberal and out of touch ideas and will wish we had the Repubs and George Bush back.

Posted by: Rob | Dec 3, 2008 7:16:59 AM

Obama has made a wise move in his choices. He talked about a unity government and now he is making it so. Imagine, a president leading from the center and not pandering far right or left, or up or down. This is a remarkably good thing, people, whether you voted for him or not.

Posted by: DaveM | Dec 2, 2008 6:09:34 PM

Grey Matter : The problem with your argument is that it amounts to "don't attack the people trying to kill you or they'll try to kill you."

You also seem to forget that the 9-11 attacks were planned during Clinton's terms in office. And were directly related to the apathy he showed towards national defense. Weakness attracts far more criminals than hate ever will, Clinton was weak so they acted. The scary part is Obama makes Clinton look like Dirty Harry.

Posted by: howwouldiknow | Dec 2, 2008 12:16:53 PM

I'll try to make it as simple for you to understand. Sure, anti-American sentiment has always existed, but Bush certainly bred more of it in the Middle-East with the Iraq fiasco and the Guantanamo Bay- which made a mockery of our claim to be a beacon for human rights (before you shout that all terrorists deserved to be treated that way, you should know that many got arrested indiscriminately). I personally would be pretty angry with some country that dropped a bomb on my brothers' wedding and killed everyone. People around the world sure liked America more when it was under Clinton, despite his moral lapses personally.

Grey,

You libbies want everyone to "get over it"...try practicing what you preach! Bush is not the root of all the problems in the world. As far as
hitting the wrong target, CLinton missed Bin Laden on more than occassion....remember the Asprin Factory?

As far as innocents getting killed, WHY DO YOU THINK THESE TERRORISTS EMBED THEMSELVES NEAR THE INNOCENTS????

Yuo get upset at name calling....well I'm sorry when liberals only want to a view the entire world thru a one-way mirror and demonstrate on a daily basis just how foolish they are, if I point it out!

LOL....oh yes...every single person on the planet hates Bush. Strange, right now, I pretty sure MOST Iraqis are sure feeling better about their future NOW than before 2003! You may disagree about getting into Iraq, but the future there is a hell of a lot better than if we had never gone in.

Also factor this into your limited view of the world. It seems now some of these terrorists are showing up in Somalia, If we had not gone to Iraq, you can better your last Obama '08 pin that these guys would be gathering in Iraq if Saddam were still in power there today!

But wait, Im sure that when the O takes over, all our intelligence gathering will be flawless and the military will be able to take action with out a single casuality. Hail...Hail...

Posted by: Mike_C | Dec 2, 2008 12:15:09 PM

Mike C,

Wow! Are you unable not to resort to name-calling? Are you one of the 20% who make up Bush's Watergate level-ratings?

I'll try to make it as simple for you to understand. Sure, anti-American sentiment has always existed, but Bush certainly bred more of it in the Middle-East with the Iraq fiasco and the Guantanamo Bay- which made a mockery of our claim to be a beacon for human rights (before you shout that all terrorists deserved to be treated that way, you should know that many got arrested indiscriminately). I personally would be pretty angry with some country that dropped a bomb on my brothers' wedding and killed everyone. People around the world sure liked America more when it was under Clinton, despite his moral lapses personally.

Sure, not everything is Bush's fault, but alot heck is, and it's a stretch to say Bush has kept us safe. He certainly hasn't made people around the world have less reasons to target Americans.

Bush, still, is someone I have distaste for, trashing the wilderness before he has to leave, introducing midnight regulations that allow mining companies to dump waste into streams, making it harder to prevent workers from being over-exposed to dangerous chemicals and so on.

I and about six billion other people will be mighty glad to see 43 get lost on January 20th 2009 to make way for 44.

Posted by: Grey Matter | Dec 2, 2008 8:51:58 AM

This statement from O makes me wonder if he really knows what he is talking about...has he ran anything in his life!

"I assembled this team because I'm a strong believer in strong personalities and strong opinions," Mr. Obama said. "I think that's how the best decisions are made.

"strong personalities", what is that? what does he mean by that? It's seems has no clue and he is hoping the "strong personalities" will argue in front of him and then he can form some idea!

God help us!

Posted by: frieda | Dec 2, 2008 2:38:01 AM

The President will set the policy, not his secretaries.

And Obama isn't some clown like Bush who left things to Cheney and his thugs while he romped off the play golf/ go on vacation back at his ranch/ Camp David.

To all those people who say Bush kept us safe, try telling that to the Americans caught in the Mumbai blast. Or the US Embassy blast. The list goes on. This anti-American sentiment Bush bred because of the Iraq war fiasco is one factor behind all these attacks.

Sure, we may not have had another attack on home soil, but Bush sure as heck made the whole world really hate us.

Posted by: Grey Matter | Dec 2, 2008 1:27:51 AM

This was one serious piece of reporting.

Posted by: Danny | Dec 1, 2008 10:31:55 PM

I can't believe I voted for this guy! It's Clintons 3rd term, more of the same. Look at all the Clintonites and Washington insiders this guy is appointing. Is Obama unsure of himself? Sure looking that way.

Posted by: Weresoscrewed | Dec 1, 2008 9:26:24 PM

Dear Mr.President elect. Greetings and congratulations on your presidential election victory.I would like to put myself at the disposal of you and the government of the United States of America.I would like to offer you my knowledge of how to produce ENERGY gravitational and holistic,from photon (energy machine),and food froom three basic elements of the earth, water, soil and the air. I offer this infoemation totally free to you.

Posted by: GEORGES PRZYTULSKI | Dec 1, 2008 6:28:05 PM

In researching those appointed by Obama thus far, he seems to have some very experienced, intelligent, knowledgeable people on board to advise him. I'm glad he says he is willing to listen to and participate in serious discussion prior to making decisions. I'd love to see him appoint Mitt Romney as one of his economic advisers. His record for pulling deficit laden states and organizations from the red to the black speaks for itself. I'd love to see his expertise used.

Posted by: learn_decide | Dec 1, 2008 5:36:52 PM

Of course Bush bashing is now officially over and Mike is completely right.

Check out Madeline Albright's Memo to the President Elect where she says that the President and the S of S get a daily briefing memo with scary things on it quite regularly, now its liquids on planes and now gunman hitting hotels.

Now Consider the date of the memo 8/6/01 - the 19 terrorists were in the country and completed training and planning. What would have been the action taken if you were there buddy?
Under then standing laws with no Patriot Act override of bureaucracy, FISA intelligence gathering rules dating from before the internet, cellphones or even fully digital phone exchanges. With Gorelick's DOJ "wall" between FBI spying and prosecution, let alone rivalry with CIA and NSA or even Customs and Immigration, Mr. Z Moussaoi (sp) was detained but his computer, with as it turned out operational if outdated details was not searched. Suspicions on Arabs taking flight training were "bubbling up" the chain of command but no cross check with CIA bad list or Immigration. That's just the way it was, but NO MORE

Posted by: robert b | Dec 1, 2008 5:20:21 PM

Mike_C
re: ' This country is STILL attack free since 9/11. "

too bad 'W' & Condi didn't take that intelligence briefing that said 'Bin Laden wants to attack the U.S. with airplanes' more seriously at the time..


Posted by: dewde | Dec 1, 2008 4:32:32 PM

Still bashing Bush huh ?...seems like Bush and his administration had intel that these attacks were going to happen. They told India who stepped up thier security measures, only to relax them shortly after.

Point - With all your babbling on & on about how Bush has meesed everything up since the big bang, This country is STILL attack free since 9/11. Maybe you should ask the people in India right now if these measures are worth keeping.

Posted by: Mike_C | Dec 1, 2008 4:08:54 PM

olin tucker sounds like lavampire.
with all of the horoscope stuff.

but true,
no one wants to bush to be history more than bush.

Posted by: what? | Dec 1, 2008 3:44:51 PM

ditto

dewde

Posted by: what? | Dec 1, 2008 3:42:29 PM

Pluto is entering Capricorn; and leaving Saggutatius. The last time this happened was 284 years ago. History, when combined with a knowledge of the parallel universe reveals what to expect, because history of a recording of actions under certain influences. The point is that the Pluto in Capricorn triggers revolutions, which we need to prepare for. Bush and Clinton opperated under the expansive Saggutarius influences; those daus are gone, an era simular to the French and American Revolution are again upon us for the next 16 years. Strauss and Howe (1997) present a scientific explanation -- which is really a validation of what the ancients related by the measurement of magnetic changes.
A fool will lose tomorrow trying to hold on to yesterday. Bush is history --we would be well advised to forget him and plan for the future.

Posted by: olin tucker | Dec 1, 2008 3:38:48 PM

This is really starting to get frightening. Domestic troops, laws limiting private gun ownership and ammunition sales, the government takeover of industry and banking, and the collapse of an independent press.

All the people blogging and screaming about Bush's attack on our freedoms *voted* for THIS.

Posted by: Roxie | Dec 1, 2008 3:19:56 PM

Post a comment





 

POLITICAL VIDEOS