Political Punch
Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper

« Previous | Main | Next »

President Obama Signs Environmental Memoranda

January 26, 2009 12:16 PM

Standing in the East Room in the White House with Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood and Environmental Protection Agency administrator Lisa Jackson, President Obama issued two presidential memoranda today dealing with the environment.

Both memoranda are written with cautious legalese and assiduous attention to process. But however wary the memoranda may seem, both are expected to lead to dramatic changes in environmental policy from the Bush administration, paving the way for states to impose much stricter fuel emissions standards, and for the federal government to require that U.S. automakers producer far more fuel efficient cars and trucks much quicker than President Bush would have required them to do so.

The first of the two presidential memoranda -- which the president erroneously referred to as "executive orders" -- asks Jackson to reconsider the Bush EPA's denial of a waiver to California and more than a dozen other states to seek tougher auto emissions standards than the current federal level.

In 2007, the Bush administration's EPA administrator, Steven Johnson, denied the 14 states -- the other 13 are Arizona, Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and New Jersey -- a waiver to set their own clean air standards. Johnson was overruling EPA staff scientists when he did so.

"The federal government must work with, not against, states to reduce greenhouse gas emissions," President Obama said today. "California has shown bold and bipartisan leadership through its effort to forge 21st-century standards, and over a dozen states have followed its lead. But instead of serving as a partner, Washington stood in their way ...  The days of Washington dragging its heels are over."

House Minority leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, said the decision could hurt American jobs, given Detroit's struggles.

“The president’s action today is disappointing," Boehner said. "The effect of this policy will be to destroy American jobs at the very time government leaders should be working together to protect and create them. Millions of American jobs will be placed in further jeopardy if automakers are forced to spend billions to comply with potentially dozens of different emissions standards in dozens of different states.”

The second presidential memorandum directs LaHood to, by March, finalize the fuel efficiency standards for cars for 2011 and to make recommendations for beyond that year, an action expected to lead to stricter fuel efficiency standards.

The context for this memorandum: In 2007 Congress passed a law requiring an increase in fuel efficiency standards, giving whoever the President may be discretion in how to best reach a goal of a minimum fuel efficiency standard of 35 miles per gallon by 2020, making sure the goal is technically feasible, economically practical and based on the needs of the nation to save oil.

Obama said of the 2020 goal, "that 40 percent increase in fuel efficiency for our cars and trucks could save over 2 million barrels of oil every day: nearly the amount of oil that we import from the Persian Gulf."

Under the 2007 law, presidents have to issue new fuel efficiency standards 18 months before each year they are put into place, and they can't make any rules beyond five years out. President Bush proposed fuel efficiency standards for 2011-2015, but never issued them in final form, and environmentalists considered them to be weak.

Secretary LaHood will now review the Bush draft of the standards for 2011 and perhaps set new ones by March. He is also instructed to review the 2012-2015 proposals and suggest changes.

"We must ensure that the fuel-efficient cars of tomorrow are built right here in the United States of America," Obama said.

Before he began discussing the environmental actions he was taking, the president took a moment to push for Congress to pass his stimulus bill, noting that "over the last few days, we've learned that Microsoft, Intel, United Airlines, Home Depot, Sprint Nextel and Caterpillar are each cutting thousands of jobs. These are not just numbers on a page. As with the millions of jobs lost in 2008, these are working men and women whose families have been disrupted and whose dreams have been put on hold ... We can't afford distractions and we cannot afford delays."

The stimulus package, Mr. Obama said, would "put 460,000 Americans to work with clean energy investments and double the capacity to generate alternative energy over the next three years." The bill lays down 3,000 miles of transmission lines and make 75 percent of federal buildings more fuel efficient, he said.

Still new to the process, after he signed the memorandum to the EPA administrator President Obama asked his staff secretary Lisa Brown if Jackson gets the pen with which he signed it.

Told that she does -- which Jackson was visibly excited about -- the president noted to the assembled crowd of 150 environmentalists and auto industry advocates that "These are nice pens. Although they're a little hard to unstick."

LaHood, a former Republican congressman, was given the second pen.

-- jpt

January 26, 2009 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (87)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

It's so nice to actually see legislation being passed and orders being signed for once. It's also nice to see a president who's actually interested in being president who's working hard and not worried about trying to rack up as many vacation days as possible. And John Boehner needs to just disappear. He sure does obstruct but what does he have to offer?

Posted by: Travis | Jan 30, 2009 1:50:57 PM

This is great. Finally someone who sticks it to them and says despite times are bad, other things can't take a backseat. Too many times we get caught up in one issue that we forget the rest. Environmental issues have been put on the back burner for far too long and its about damn time someone says it has to be done no matter what.

Will it cost American jobs for the increase in spending? Well that's up to the respectability of a company. We are giving you all this bailout money and you better damn well use some of it to meet these environmental standards so you don't have to lay people off. It really is that easy. Companies for once are going to have to decide their own future. They can either become an outstanding corporation that cares about things other than themselves which led to economic crisis or they can continue old ways which will further the worsening of the situation.

Basically how I see it is they have no choice. We, the taxpayers, are funding their bailouts and we taxpayers want more environmental laws that help our mother earth along with the continuation of jobs. As far as I see it because we are saving their asses, we can have it both and we will. I don't think these corps have much of a choice and that's how it should be. Call it socialism or whatever, but when they took that bailout money they accepted some changes and these are some of them.

Posted by: Zucas | Jan 27, 2009 7:11:57 PM

Remember the Geo Metro? I got 45-50 miles per gallon running around town with that thing. While I'm not sure how it's emissions were, I don't get why the fuel efficiency can't be required sooner, while working on the emissions parts. Part of me believes a conspiracy,between car makers and the oil companies. The oil companies, thepoor dears, aren't making enough profit -have they reached the trillions profit yet? Poor babies going bankrupt with only billions of profit. Sorry my sarcasm is showing. But seriously. I'd love to know how I can help make a difference in getting the oil company regulated so they can't make so much obscene profit off of everyday people who are hard at work scratching out a living.

Posted by: Duane's Kitties | Jan 27, 2009 9:58:43 AM

The reason many of these small fuel efficient cars you see overseas are not sold here, is that they do not meet the emmision standards of our country.

Especially the super sippy diesel's, as they do not run on low sulfar fuel.

Result,,,, 50mpg Volkswagon Diesel,,,, gone. Exhaust particle too large for the new standard.

Posted by: Bard | Jan 26, 2009 9:33:05 PM

You know what costs millions of Americans jobs in the auto industry? MAKING INEFFICIENT STYLE-BACKWARD CARS, BOEHNER.

Posted by: acknowledgment | Jan 26, 2009 8:44:14 PM

These pencil pushing litigators and tree hugging greenines have no idea of the impact of policies such as these...

If I were running one of the Big 3 companies I'd be tempted to tell California to find someone else to supply vehicles to Californians (there may be a legitimate business case here...it's not a stretch to believe the cost-benefit analysis would indicate profits cannot be made by selling vehicles in CA due to additional costs legislated upon them by state and federal governments).

Posted by: tjp612 | Jan 26, 2009 7:51:47 PM

Is this the same Obama who will be giving our tax dollars to the auto industry to bail them out? Now he wants to put new restrictions on them that will increase their costs (costs that will be passed on to the consumer)? Nice double talk. Of course, Obama owes payback to the global warming zealots who helped finance his buying of the White House.

Posted by: Daisy21 | Jan 26, 2009 7:36:10 PM

President Obama- The man who saved us from ourselves! Thank God we elected him. he is working his butt off and doing what is RIGHT not was is politically palpable. A great start, Americans must answer the challenge and use our ingenuity to take OUR country back. Mr. President put down the requirements and regulations and Americans will answer your call, MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!!

Posted by: AN AMERICAN! | Jan 26, 2009 5:12:08 PM

"Forcing American car companies to make more efficient cars is the only thing that can save them."

Yes they lose money on every small car but if they sell more of them that should help then turn the corner.

Is it any wonder these Democrat's have never had a real job.

Posted by: BertieW | Jan 26, 2009 5:08:16 PM

Forcing American car companies to make more efficient cars is the only thing that can save them. And to get their average MPG up they will be forced to stop building the worst gas-guzzling SUV's. It is good for the environment and good for our dependence on foreign oil.
This should force those short-sighted CEO's to live in the present instead of the past, with the idea that bigger is better. Honda and Toyota saw the writing on the wall a long time ago. It is long past due for our American car manufacturer's leaders to see the light. (Why they kept their jobs despite smaller profits and weaker sales for years is a mystery.)

Posted by: Lydia | Jan 26, 2009 4:36:49 PM

I am mystified how the Americans have got away with making such poorly designed and built cars for so long.

It is astounding how such large engines can be designed to produce such little power.

How is it that the nation that got to moon cannot design a car that corners properly?

I think you will find that it is much cheaper to build better cars than go off and fight for the remaining oil and you will kick yourselves that you didn't do it before.

Three cheers for Barak Obama, you lot may start to be a little more descerning in your life choices.

Posted by: European Dave | Jan 26, 2009 3:42:21 PM

I liked it better when oily Bush was kissing the butts of the Saudi's and holding hands with them as the Saudi's continued their middle eastern kingdom, non-democratic government and repression of women and democratic values.
*************************************************
The Wahhabi form of Islam in Saudi Arabia was left out. It's a very literal form of Islam which is prominent among the Al Qaeda, in addition to being the state religion. Unfortunately, It's been disseminated into Africa. Let's not forget that 15 of the 19 9/11 hijackers were Saudi and probably Wahhabi followers.

To further elaborate on the oppression of women - they're clad in burkas to render them invisible and risk stoning for anything that could be interpreted as an affront to Wahhabism.

Posted by: kathy | Jan 26, 2009 3:37:05 PM

Love it--the Republicans want to stand up for higher oil consumption and more pollution. That's their jobs program: bad cars.

Meanwhile, Obama wants to make American industry more competitive, decrease oil consumption and improve air quality by setting sensible standards--a win-win-win.

Is there any question which party is looking to the future?

Posted by: guzzler | Jan 26, 2009 3:14:16 PM

The final nail in the coffin of the car industry. That's okay. I like Hondas and Nissans.

Posted by: Dinosaur | Jan 26, 2009 2:50:18 PM

I liked it better when oily Bush was kissing the butts of the Saudi's and holding hands with them as the Saudi's continued their middle eastern kingdom, non-democratic government and repression of women and democratic values.

I think the Bush family even went into business with them - on a massive scale. That's the kind of wholesome morality and spirit we need in America.

Posted by: pefros | Jan 26, 2009 2:48:31 PM

Wow,

And I thought that breath of fresh air was just because Obama is President and Bush is back in tx.

Posted by: Omentum | Jan 26, 2009 2:30:50 PM

And BTW Ox...you do realize that we are in the state we are in becuase of de-regulation right. That is a conservative value...Not a liberal one. It takes years for laws and actrions by the government to effect everyday people as far as the economy goes. This recession started well before the election. But by your arguement, becuase the POTUS hasn't fixed it since the election where he hadn't any power at all...it's all his fault. Very narrow minded I must say again.

Posted by: Chuck S | Jan 26, 2009 2:30:32 PM

First global warming now this. Liberals are duping the mindless followers of the world everyday. Wake up. If it's not one thing that's going to detroy the world it's another. It's the way liberals live. They don't know how to live without a mindless cause. Look how many scientists were forced to swallow this garbage and are back pedaling now. People are so gulible. How sad.

Posted by: Doug | Jan 26, 2009 2:29:18 PM

The hoax is running out of time. If the current solar trends continue, and no one thinks they won't, it will soon be so cold, the snow piled so high, the glaciers growing so fast, the sea ice getting so think, that Al Gore will be the only one left on the planet who doesn't know Al Gore is an idiot.

Pay more in taxes to the government, so government scientist can fake the data and pretend to control the weather. The perfect scam.

Follow-up question -- How do the magic tax beans fix the climate.

Posted by: bill-tb | Jan 26, 2009 2:27:57 PM

"More jobs lost today. More jobs lost tommorrow. republicans dont have anything to worry about, because Democrats dont have a clue. And before you respond just ask yourself one thing in 3 months did your pay go up if not you VOTED wrong?"
Posted by The year of the ox ...

Really...what job do you have that gets a pay raise every 3 months and can I get in on that? Also...POTUS has only been on the job for 6 days. Where you do get 3 months from? This is yet another example of the short sighteness of the the Neo-Cons...thank you for your stellar example Ox.

Posted by: Chuck S | Jan 26, 2009 2:26:00 PM

Post a comment





 

POLITICAL VIDEOS