RECENT POSTS
- White House State Dinner Party Crashers
- Obama to Lay Out Emissions Goals in Copenhagen
- Free Bird
- The "Good" War
- The Presidential Planner
- Under the Stars, Obama Toasts India’s Prime Minister
- White House State Dinner – Who Made the Exclusive Guest List?
- Admiral Mike Mullen To Geneva for START Talks
- VP Biden to Indian Prime Minister: “You’re the Hottest Ticket in Town”
- FLOTUS on the State Dinner: Like a Swan, "Calm and Serene Above Water, But We're Paddling Like Mad, Going Crazy Underneath"
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
Sacre Bleu! Le Monde Publishes Never-Before-Seen 1996 Interview With Obamas About Their Marriage
January 10, 2009 6:11 PM
"Ma priorité est de ramener les valeurs publiques ou collectives au centre du débat," said President-elect Barack Obama in an interview running in today's Le Monde newspaper.
Mr. Obama was not speaking in French; his words had been translated.
And in fact he hadn't uttered them in more than 12 years.
The French newspaper Le Monde on Saturday took the Obama team by surprise by publishing an interview with Barack and Michelle Obama from 1996 in which the two spoke at length about their marriage, only four years after they were wed, and two years before their oldest daughter Malia was born.
Many themes will not surprise those who know or follow the Obamas.
Sitting down to talk about their future the same year Obama eventually ended up running for state senate (and winning), his wife Michelle in the interview expresses reservations about whether a life in politics is what they want.
And while her husband is less uncertain of his calling, he wonders aloud about his ability to maintain a balance between private and public life. He also sounds out some notes about restoring civility in discourse to public life and the notion that we're all in this together, themes that have stayed with him throughout his career up through this week.
The interview, entitled "An Intimate Conversation with Michelle and Barack Obama," was conducted for a book about American marriages and was never published before today. The story was noticed in Le Monde by Tom McCarthy at the ABC News desk and translated from the French by Maeva Bambuck and Jean Fievet in ABC News' London bureau. (When assessing the precise accuracy of the quotes below, keep in mind they have now been translated from English to French to English.)
"If You Look Deep Into Her Eyes, There's a Certain Vulnerability"
President-elect Obama, who turned 35 that year, describes growing up with a single mother and absent father, and says, "I think that in a certain way, I’ve tried all my life to fabricate a family through stories, memories, friends or ideas. Michelle’s family life was different, very stable with two parents, a stay-at-home mom, a brother, a dog, that kind of thing. They’ve lived in the same house all their lives. And I think that in a certain way we complement each other, we represent two common models of family life in this country. One very stable and strong, another that frees itself from the constraint of a traditional family, travels, separates, is very mobile."
"A part of me was wondering what a strong, reassuring family life would look like," he says, "while Michelle in a way, wanted to break from that model. In a way only, because she’s very attached to family values, but I think she sometimes sees in me a more adventurous way of life, more exotic, and in that respect, we’re complementary."
Describing Michelle as "alluring" and with "a strong personality," the future President says, "if you look deep into her eyes, there’s a certain vulnerability. In any case, I see it even if most don’t realize it: she goes through life tall, beautiful, confident, very able…There’s a part of her that is fragile, young, sometimes scared, and I think these are contradictions that attracted me to her. And she makes me very happy. She is very familiar to me and so I can be myself around her, she knows me well, I completely trust her, but at the same time in certain respects she remains a mystery to me."
"Sometimes, when we’re lying together," he says, "I look at her and I feel dizzy with the realization that here is another distinct person from me, who has memories, origins, thoughts, feelings that are different from my own. That tension between familiarity and mystery meshes something strong between us. Even if one builds a life together based on trust, attentiveness and mutual support, I think that’s it’s important that a partner continues to surprise."
"I Was Thinking, 'He's Probably an Idiot, Whatever'"
"It was strange, that excitement over this first-year student," then-32-year-old Michelle Obama recalls when describing the buzz about a new summer associate at the law firm Sidley and Austin. "So smart, so good-looking, so intelligent, everyone was talking about Barack. I’m more of the skeptical kind, I was thinking, 'Yeah, he’s probably an idiot, whatever.'"
Why was she skeptical? "Because I always thought that when lawyers rave about someone, they always neglect the relational qualities," Michelle says, "so I told myself, 'He might be brilliant, but he’s probably very ordinary.' And then on the first day, he showed up late. He was late because it’d been raining! And then he walked into the office and we got along right away because he was charming and very good-looking, at least I found him good-looking. I think we were attracted to one another because we didn’t take ourselves too seriously, like some others did. He liked my dry humor and my sarcastic comments. I thought he was a good man, interesting, and I was fascinated by his personal story, so different from mine."
The first lady-in-waiting clearly liked the fact that he was different and perhaps even a bit exotic.
"It’s not every day that a girl from the South Side of Chicago meets someone who speaks Indonesian, who has traveled and has seen many fascinating things," she says. "It gave him a rather rare dimension in my higher middle-class work environment. Usually, these people are all cast from the same mold, but he came from elsewhere. He had a high level of conversation, while still remaining an average guy. He had an impressive curriculum, but was very down to earth and liked playing basketball. That’s what I found attractive in him. Our relationship was first a friendship. It took off from there."
"There's a strong possibility Barack will pursue a career in politics"
Asked how she envisions her future with her husband, Michelle says, "there’s a strong possibility that Barack will pursue a career in politics, although it’s not very clear yet. It’s an interesting challenge, the Illinois senate, although we’ve had disagreements on that topic. Once you’re involved in politics, your life becomes public and the people who scrutinize it are not always well-intentioned. I’m rather secretive and I like to surround myself with people I care about and who’s loyalty I trust."
"When you start in politics, you have to confide in all sorts of people," she continues. "We may go in that direction, even though I also want to have children, travel, and spend time with my family and friends. It’s not certain that we will succeed. But we’re going to be very busy with a number of different things, and it’s going to be interesting to see what life has to offer to us. We’re ready to take on that adventure for various reasons, for instance, for the opportunities it can open to us."
Her husband was clearly leading her down the path.
"Barack helped my overcome my shyness, take on risks, and try a less traditional path, just to see how it would go, because that’s how he was raised," she says."I’m the more traditional in the couple and he’s the more audacious. I’m more cautious. I think it shows in photographs. He’s more extroverted, more expansive, me I’m more ‘let’s wait and see how things present themselves and how it can benefit us.’"
Mr. Obama seems more sure that he will, in fact, enter politics.
"What concerns me the most are children and the way they are treated," he says about why he will pursue a career in public office. "As an African-American, I am very concerned about children from poor neighborhoods, the problems they deal with, the total lack of a stable environment to enable them to grow and develop. It depends a lot on the economy, the opportunities they are given, their own selves and their parents. It also depends on values, for instance on the kind of family values that get talked about a lot, especially by politicians."
He continues, saying, "values don’t just belong to individuals, they are also collective. Children are exposed to the values around them, and if they come to believe that the lives of their parents and their community cannot be rewarded, if their schools and homes are crumbling, how can they come to believe in their own values when they don’t have any to begin with? My priority is to return social values to public debate, because we are all one big family, transcending racial or class differences. We have obligations and responsibilities towards one another."
He says, "perhaps that’s where the private and public spheres meet, when it comes to couples, relationships, families or tribes. What’s important is empathy, an understanding of shared responsibilities, the ability to put yourself in other people’s shoes. That’s why my marriage to Michelle is vibrant, because we are able to imagine the hopes, the pains, the personal battles of other people, and the challenge for everyone is to transfer that ability (for empathy) from the family sphere to the public sphere."
"The Issue Will Be Finding a Balance Between Public Life and Private Life"
Describing his father, Mr. Obama said "he studied economy in the United States, at the University of Hawaii and at Harvard. He wanted to contribute to development of Kenya but in the end, he was disappointed, he found himself implicated in political rivalries and the government blacklisted him because he’d protested against nepotism and tribalism. He had a bitter life and died young. Michelle’s father also had to overcome challenges and was stricken by multiple sclerosis. He too died young, but I think he had a steadier and more established life."
Speaking of his mother's death just months before, Mr. Obama says, "she was only 53 years old. And when you have a small family, where every relative is very close to you…it was a difficult time for me. I have a sister on my mother’s side, she is half Indonesian like my mother’s second husband, and I also have brothers and sisters on the Kenyan side. They are very scattered, some live in Germany, others in Kenya, some here in the U.S."
Mr. Obama says that for him and his wife, "kids are an important priority. We really look forward to having them. I think that the issue will be finding a balance between public life and private life, which will mean finding a balance between my temperament that leans towards risk-taking and ambition, and Michelle’s instinct for stability, family and strong values. The way we go about dealing with these issues will be crucial."
- jpt
January 10, 2009 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (354)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Apparently the Obama haters and/or those who are terrified of boogeyman socialism are spending all their time on the Internet.
Check out the president-elect's approval rating, highest of any PE in transition since polling began. At 82% it says the vast majority are pleased, hopeful, or at least willing to give the guy a chance.
So who are you people?
Posted by: francesca | Jan 12, 2009 4:51:45 PM
And corrections for Myze, who said:
"Let me get this straight, the dems and libs think the time is now over for any name calling about the president, but it was ok for the last eight years!"
Myze, take it straight from me: please feel free to call Obama every name in the book, if he ever does anything CLOSE to:
- ignoring reports about an incoming terrorist attack for 9 months, doing NOTHING, and demoting people like Richard Clarke from meetings for NO GIVEN REASON
- lazily letting someone who murders 3000+ American civilians go free, because Obama really wants to invade a nearby country for no clear reason
- ignore the advice of and evidence of seasoned experts, because Obama wants to invade Iraq
- ending the careers of respected and decorated Generals, for giving the public the true figures of what an Iraq invasion will cost
- lying to Obama's own party about the cost of a Medicare bill - and *threatening to fire* others if they tell the truth
etc. etc.
The problem is, *you* didn't *listen* to the liberals and progressives, when we TOLD YOU what a disaster Bush was being.
Clinton handed Bush a perfectly working country - and Bush basically broke it, like a rich kid breaks a toy the day after Christmas, yawns, and goes out to his yacht.
Posted by: jim | Jan 12, 2009 4:45:04 PM
Correction for Juan, who said:
"Well Congratulations USA! We just got ourselves a President off of an Infomercial....."
You're a bit late, Juan. That happened in 2000. Remember, the President who had a Crawford "ranch" as a backdrop, so people could watch him "clear brush" and feel like he was "jsut regular folks"? Remember, the magical playtime "ranch" with no animals or farming, that he's selling now that he doesn't need a backdrop anymore?
Posted by: jim | Jan 12, 2009 4:37:52 PM
Corrections for Mike:
"Blame for the economy does not lie with the "Evil Rich" or George Bush. The problem is IN FACT with our government."
Oh! Right.
And who was running that government for the past 8 years?
Why it was George W. Bush, and his neocon buddies.
And this attempt to pin our current troubles on lax regulations for mortgages, is laughable. That may have been spark - but it's not the gasoline splashed around the ammo dump. That was allowing mortgage companies to package and SELL those bad mortgages for trading and investment - and then allowing other companies to create and sell investment based on THAT.
Which the Bush Administration and the GOP was continuously warned about - and which they continued to just let happen.
Now that investment and between-bank borrowing based on mortgage packaging was made possible by the repeal of the Glass-Steagal act - which happened under Clinton in 1996, and was approved by both parties. So Democrats are by no means innnocent. But to try and blame this solely on government itself, rather than those *incompetently running* government for the 8 years, doesn't hold water.
Get it right, will you? These facts are out there.
Posted by: jim | Jan 12, 2009 4:34:35 PM
Belle Starr: the urban/suburban IQ gap isn't quite that large. A generous estimate may be one that people in the suburbs are standard deviation above the national mean, which would put him at or near the 90th percentile.
Posted by: psychometrician | Jan 12, 2009 4:29:35 PM
Correcting people's incorrect statements. Why do I do it? It's both fun, and I feel a need.
To Tytler, who said:
"O[b]amas Socialism/Communism has failed in every country it has been tried. Not sometimes but everytime."
1. you spelled "Obama" as "Osama". Fixed it for you. Similar mistakes such as this, may be why Osama Bin Laden is still running free after killing 3000+ US citizens. Please get it together.
2. Obama's "socialism" includes ONLY policies that have been done in the US - AND WORKED. By getting us out of the Great Depression, and Bush 41's depression of the early 1990's.
So are you calling America a failed state?? How DARE you? Why do you hate America, huh?! Huh?!?
Posted by: jim b | Jan 12, 2009 4:29:22 PM
Good grief! It only takes is a simple story about the Obamas to elicit an hysterical regurgitation of bile from the right-wing Obama haters and conspiracy theorists.
Posted by: Tim Cleaveland | Jan 12, 2009 4:28:54 PM
It is astonishing how much energy people can waste on hate, envy and pettiness. Reading these comments has been mind-numbing. But what is clear is that people make a sport of projecting all their crap unto others, especially when they can gather agreement from other bitter, angry people.
For example, a few clearly stated facts are overlooked in the zeal to either attack or defend.
First is that this is not a "puff piece"; it's an interview (apparently by invitation) that "was conducted for a book about American marriages and was never published before today" and it took place "the same year Obama eventually ended up running for state senate".
So this notion that he was just making stuff up for the sake of his political career isn't even logical.
Besides, liars eventually slip up. The man is not, and has never, made up his personal history.
It is depressing that there are so many pathetic losers who create stories in their head for the sake of having something to complain about. Like, how could he possibly have been a Presidential candidate without an American birth certificate? Jesus!
Posted by: labelladonna | Jan 12, 2009 4:20:31 PM
We the People,
That is what we are. I am a Libertarian. I personally am not surprised that he says he will "scale back" on his campaign promises and nor should you be. The fact now is he will be our President and now we must move forward with resolving issues in our Economy. Blame for the economy does not lie with the "Evil Rich" or George Bush. The problem is IN FACT with our government. The government allowed this bubble to burst with the housing industry knowing that by allowing lax regulations for lending and instituting government controlled companies (MAC, Fannie Mae) to secure those loans with money that did not exist caused this to occur (see Community Reinvestment Act). Now, government wants to make more programs to do whatever they want them to do and this will only get worse. Ecenomy is stimulated by the people, not by the government. We need smaller government control of our lives. We need John Q. Taxpayer to stand up and take the reigns of responsibility again and quit pandering to the government for handouts.
I am a taxpayer and do not want the government to tell me how to live, how to spend, or even take more money from me in the name of "fairness". what is fair when the lazy bum does not want to work but get a portion of our hard earned money while they live on welfare driving their nice car, watching the news from the biased media on their nice flat screen TV?
Government does not create jobs, it creates dependence on government, only independent businesses create independent jobs. go to your nearest mall and see how many shop spots are closed because of the fiasco created by the government. Those businesses are the ones that create jobs. This is not some revelation, this has been a fact for over well over 150 years.
time to step up to the plate slackers and take charge of your own life and bring our country back to where we should and need to be. Or, you can be a bum and let the government take care of you. If that is the case, please move to some other country that lives that way so you all can whine like the incompetent, immature children the government believes you to be.
Posted by: Mike | Jan 12, 2009 4:14:14 PM
His memoir, Dreams From My Father had been published in 1995. Perhaps he got on the radar through a publicist trying to promote his book and the French journalist thought his story was interesting.
And to the loathsome person who claimed we'll be missing W--fat chance. The only way that would happen is if Hitler were to somehow be resurrected and become president.
Posted by: Kacee | Jan 12, 2009 4:10:35 PM
I didn't vote for him but I want him to be a success. That said, I think the article is a fake. If it wasn't how is it that the admiring media didn't find it during the campaign?
BTW, some of the things he says make me believe even more that there a few gay genes in Barach. Strtaight guys are never that mushy...ever!
Posted by: Bruce Tominello | Jan 12, 2009 4:08:27 PM
I didn't vote for him but I want him to be a success. That said, I think the article is a fake. If it wasn't how is it that the admiring media didn't find it during the campaign?
BTW, some of the things he says make me believe even more that there a few gay genes in Barach. Strtaight guys are never that mushy...ever!
Posted by: Bruce Tominello | Jan 12, 2009 4:08:27 PM
A board full of mixed nuts. The GOP will stay in the wilderness because they can't get on with their lives. Instead they resort to name calling, good luck with that and see you in 2010.
Posted by: Monarchland | Jan 12, 2009 3:58:45 PM
Sounds like a load of "merde de taureau" to me!
Posted by: g rider | Jan 12, 2009 3:36:51 PM
LMAO!! :O Why would the French interview them inspite they had not done anything yet?? Why not interview Joe Blow and his new wife? This thing is a joke. Mark my words: "YOU WILL BE MISSING 'W' in about a year and half"....He is that unqualified.
Posted by: A. Adams | Jan 12, 2009 3:20:03 PM
"He is not even a natural born U.S. citizen (his grandmother said she was there for his birth in Kenya)."
Presumably Rahm Emanuel's Kenya trip was/(is?) to help granny ... forget. Or whatever.
How many of Brock's old classmates and extended family will suffer sudden disappearances and/or disabling conditions?
Posted by: Belle Starr | Jan 12, 2009 3:09:13 PM
The article, finally, admits that Obama, formerly known as Barry Soetoro, speaks fluent Indonesian. What it doesn't mention if he was legally adopted by his step-father and/or did he have an Indonesian passport? Also did he legally change his name back to Barack Hussein Obama after he moved to Hawaii from Indonesia. Lots of questions other there.
Posted by: Al | Jan 12, 2009 2:47:01 PM
" ... 130s, that would place him somewhere in the 95th percentile of the distribution of IQ scores. Although this does not place him in genius territory, it would also be inaccurate to say that high schools are full of people who score this well."
What I said was that SUBURBAN high schools are full of people who score in the 130s.
Brock wasn't considered anything special, "intelligence"-wise, by His Harvard peers ... he was reinvented as "brilliant" as part of the selling of this "post-partisan" pig in a poke as a Democrat.
That some of the people RUNNING Him for "election" are indeed very bright -- if value-free where it counts -- isn't in contention.
Posted by: Belle Starr | Jan 12, 2009 2:35:17 PM
Why would Le Monde interview the Obamas in 1996????? This is a set up.
Posted by: ovamarabbit | Jan 12, 2009 2:32:48 PM
Well Congratulations USA! We just got ourselves a President off of an Infomercial..... and we all know how well the tummysizer and the magic bullet worked!
I am tired of having Obama crammed down my throat already!
If your not... feel free to switch to HIS television channel and you can "on Demand" any of his speeches, this might be a good idea, so you can start looking for the promises that he is already saying he WON'T keep!
NOTICE the talk of LOYALTY and TRUST.... hmmm... and that he admits making up stories of his family!
I am a hell of a marketing person and If I had realized that the US presidency was for sale and I could advertise to suckers and get elected...shoot, I'd of RUN too!
Praying for America. May GOD HELP US!
Posted by: Juan | Jan 12, 2009 2:02:47 PM
Post a comment


