Political Punch
Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper

« Previous | Main | Next »

Two Days After Instituting Ethics Rules, President Obama Waives them for Deputy Pentagon Secretary Nominee

January 23, 2009 5:12 PM

Two days after introducing what he heralded as the most sweeping ethics rules in American history -- ones that would "close the revolving door that lets lobbyists come into government freely" -- President Barack Obama today waived those rules for his nominee for Deputy Secretary of Defense, William Lynn.

Until last fall, Lynn was a registered lobbyist for the defense contractor Raytheon.

“After consultation with counsel to the president," said Director of the Office of Management of Budget Peter Orszag in a statement, "I hereby waive the requirements of Paragraphs 2 and 3 of the Ethics Pledge of Mr. William Lynn. I have determined that it is in the public interest to grant the waiver given Mr. Lynn's qualifications for his position and the current national security situation. I understand that Mr. Lynn will otherwise comply with the remainder of the pledge and with all preexisting government ethics rules.”

The "Revolving Door Ban" pledge heralded on Wednesday and discarded for Mr. Lynn today states:

"I will not for a period of 2 years from the date of my appointment participate in any particular matter involving specific parties that is directly and substantially related to my former employer or former clients, including regulations and contracts" and

"If I was a registered lobbyist within the 2 years before the date of my appointment, in addition to abiding by the limitations of paragraph 2, I will not for a period of 2 years after the date of my appointment: (a)  participate in any particular matter on which I lobbied within the 2 years before the date of my appointment; (b)  participate in the specific issue area in which that particular matter falls; or (c)  seek or accept employment with any executive agency that I lobbied within the 2 years before the date of my appointment."

Asked about Mr. Lynn on Thursday, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said that "a waiver process that allows people to serve their country is necessary. In the case of Mr. Lynn, he's somebody who obviously is superbly qualified, is experienced, going back to his Pentagon jobs during the Clinton administration, make him uniquely qualified to do this.”

In a written statement, the ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee John McCain, R-Ariz., said he was "disappointed" that President Obama has waived his "revolving door" executive order so soon.

“While I applaud the president’s action to implement new, more stringent ethical rules, I had hoped he would not find it necessary to waive them so soon," McCain said in the statement. "Before I can determine whether to support his nomination as Deputy Secretary of Defense, I intend to ask him to clarify for the record what matters and decisions will require his recusal.”

-- Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller

ABC News' Jonathan Karl contributed to this report.

January 23, 2009 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (343)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Sweeping rules without exemption are almost always a bad idea. Example one, the eight years of the Bush, Jr. presidency. The tension with lobbyists is that they often no the topic of their work better than many others. The point of the ethics rules instituted by Obama was an attempt to prevent lobbyists from entering government to benefit prior affiliations and interests. If the former lobbyist is the best person for the job, commits to performing his government position in the publics best interest, and does so, we should have no problem with the former lobbyist being appointed to a government position. Not all former lobbyists have alterior motivations for accepting a government appointment. The issue should not be about the rule made and the granting an exception to the rule, but whether President Obama has made a wise decision in instituting the waiver and that the appointment of the former lobbyist is in the country's best interest.

I am tired of the past eight years of adhering to principal when the principal is clearly not in the country's best interest. Obama has always said that if he takes a position, and that position appears to be not in the country's best interest, he would change course. As a general rule the ethics guidelines set forth by Obama are a good thing, which is why he has issued "waivers" but has not scraped the program altogether. Any intelligent person working for the BENEFIT of the people rather than PANDERING to the principals of the people would do the same.

I can't help but not that, as human beings themselves, there is not one commentator on this blog who has not changed course within there lives, leaving principal in favor of good functioning practicality. Our President is human. If you want something else vote for God.

Ultimately, we should want a well run government. We should not waste our time focusing on trifle issues. Time will tell whether Obama has made a wise decision in issuing these waivers, but given the fact that he has already made so many wise decisions, we should be giving him the benefit of the doubt until there is information to prove otherwise.

This blatantly "we, the public" are holier than thou dear, President, really pisses me off, is completely illogical, and results from profound ignorant adherence to principal even where the maintenance of that principal could either not be best for the country or, in the case of Bush, be downright harmful.

Let it go. Move on.

Posted by: Kate Emerson | Jan 29, 2009 3:01:06 PM

A lie means when a person knowingly make a false statement at the time of the statement is made. Does that mean our new president lied?

Posted by: John | Jan 28, 2009 9:56:21 PM

hmmm, i don't get it. Why would he be so blatantly self-contradictory? What does this guy have or can provide that he would do such a bone-headed thing? Does he really think the Obama Love Train is that strong?
oh and Richard, your comment...
Hey...it's not like it's a real
promise, it's a politician's promise.
There's a huge difference that I would
think most everyone over the age of,
say, 25 has learned by now.
That just shows how obviously Obama leaning you are. I seriously doubt you'd have made the same comment had it been Bush. Thank goodness he's not a dictator, I think ol' Richie here would be his opposition executioner.

Posted by: FrankyInCharge | Jan 26, 2009 5:49:52 AM

It got to be Bushes fault, what else can it be.
barrack doesn't lie, doesn't break promises, doesn't cheat and always practice what he preached..........so willed yourself to believed that ok.

Posted by: Reality2009 | Jan 25, 2009 11:39:12 PM

Bush Lied,...wait, wrong party. This was a perfectly acceptable application of protocols...

Personally I could care less, but spare me the double-standard.

Posted by: timbruce1 | Jan 25, 2009 11:34:38 PM

I am a President Obama supporter but I have to agree that on the surface this looks like a bad judgement call so early in the administration, but then he's made some other appointments which I'm not thrilled about either. To make rules and then waive them just about cancels them out, and looks unstable in thinking patterns...I think we saw this in the Bush administration with the Constitution which has stood as our guidence since our Nation began. There are exceptions to every rule, but to favor a specific person....not so good.

Posted by: Heidi Preston | Jan 25, 2009 9:15:33 PM

This will be a long 4 years! I just don't feel safe at 3 AM Knowing the Country is in his hands.

Posted by: Georgie from Ohio | Jan 25, 2009 8:38:46 PM

"bertW you think President Obama would stick his neck out to take the political heat supporting Bush appointee Gates' selection - for a $4600 contribution to Hillary?
"

Your childlike disingenuous is transparent. Obama is hardly doing Gates a favor, as you try to imply. Why wouldnt Gates keep his own guy, instead of this Democrat accountant?

Now who can he be doing a favor for.... perhaps his Secretary of State who pushes this maximum donor to the front of the line.

Dont pretend that he is uniquely qualified in any other way than being a maxed out Democrat donor.

"HE CAN BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE for any abuse or overuse of this waiver. "

We are holding him accountable right now. And you are objecting wildly.

Posted by: BertieW | Jan 25, 2009 2:42:54 PM

And we're off...I knew Obama would be breaking his promises, but he's made history on the time frame. We're in for a looooong miserable 4 years!! Think about it - he told different things to whatever group he was addressing during his campaign to win votes. Hope he can keep his stories straight, but I seriously doubt it. The man's a chameleon.

Posted by: Mary | Jan 25, 2009 11:23:51 AM

Rather telling, I would say! Get use to the kool aid America.

Posted by: LongT | Jan 25, 2009 9:41:15 AM

Fierce, President Obama did not reverse himself. He used a waiver that is to be used - as he sees fit - in circumstances he sees as exceptional circumstance. This is done with FULL PUBLIC DISCLOSURE and HE CAN BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE for any abuse or overuse of this waiver.

He knew he was going to take incredible political heat over this waiver. I wonder why he stuck his neck out to give the Bush appointee Gates his choice of Deputy? That is the question.

Posted by: pefros | Jan 25, 2009 3:40:36 AM

Might I remind you, Obama won with the INDEPENDENT vote... I don't care if a Republican asked for the guy... Obama has ALREADY reversed himself on his own policy daying back... 2 days?

4 MORE YEARS!! Yeah, right!!

Posted by: Fiercely_Independent | Jan 25, 2009 3:25:33 AM

"bertW you think President Obama would stick his neck out to take the political heat supporting Bush appointee Gates' selection - for a $4600 contribution to Hillary?"
******************************
Folks are working overtime in this pocket of cyberspace to pin anything they can on Obama. I have to say there's creativity involved in expanding on some of the minutiae.

Posted by: kathy | Jan 25, 2009 1:01:14 AM

bertW you think President Obama would stick his neck out to take the political heat supporting Bush appointee Gates' selection - for a $4600 contribution to Hillary?

Love your naive sense of humor.

Posted by: pefros | Jan 24, 2009 11:13:16 PM

The Obama ethics rules were to bring "change" to Washington.........but the "waiver" clause has to be available for someone who Obama thinks "is" worthy...........I guess it dpends upon the definition of "is".............is

Posted by: socialism101 | Jan 24, 2009 10:23:46 PM

And Lynn donated $4600 to Hillary.

That might be more of an explanation of his unique qualification that requires a waiver.

Posted by: BertieW | Jan 24, 2009 9:52:38 PM

Lynn started his career working for Ted Kennedy

Posted by: BertieW | Jan 24, 2009 9:47:42 PM

Just to clarify 2cents, Lynn is not Republican; Defense Secretary Gates is a Republican appointee. He was appointed by George Bush.

I find it interesting President Obama stuck his neck out for Gates - the Bush appointee.

"I asked that an exception be made because I felt that he (Lynn) could play the role of a deputy in a better manner than anybody else that I saw," Gates said.

So, Obama stuck his neck out for Gates - the Bush appointee - even though he knew he would draw a lot of political heat for doing so.

It may turn out he has to reverse his decision, but he was willing to take the heat to support Gates' choice.

Posted by: pefros | Jan 24, 2009 9:12:14 PM

pefros, I care less that Lynn's republican or not. Gates can recommend another republican that "qualified" for the job. Pres can stick his head out for the other candidate.

Should Lynn had the experience, then wait out for the 2year period and then join the administration 2 year from now.

Posted by: 2cents | Jan 24, 2009 8:59:52 PM

"Obama stuck his head out for the Republican-appointed Defense Secretary Gates.

And Obama knew he would get political heat like crazy.

I can only guess Obama felt national defense (and Gate's recommendation) was important enough to stick his head out and take the heat. That's a guess. "

Quit the martyr job- Lynn is a Democrat.

Posted by: BertieW | Jan 24, 2009 8:53:14 PM

Post a comment





 

POLITICAL VIDEOS