RECENT POSTS
- Under the Stars, Obama Toasts India’s Prime Minister
- White House State Dinner – Who Made the Exclusive Guest List?
- Admiral Mike Mullen To Geneva for START Talks
- VP Biden to Indian Prime Minister: “You’re the Hottest Ticket in Town”
- FLOTUS on the State Dinner: Like a Swan, "Calm and Serene Above Water, But We're Paddling Like Mad, Going Crazy Underneath"
- White House State Dinner: The Menu, Entertainment, and Decor
- Dan Pfeiffer, White House Blogger
- Guests Begin to Arrive for White House State Dinner Festivities
- President Obama on Afghanistan Strategy: “It Is My Intention to Finish the Job”
- The Obamas Kick off their First State Visit, Welcome India's Prime Minister to the White House
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
Liz Cheney Assails Release of Detainee Abuse Photos as 'Siding with Terrorists' -- and Is White House Walking the Photo Release Back?
May 12, 2009 3:25 PM
ABC News' Jake Tapper and Karen Travers report:
The daughter of former Vice President Dick Cheney, former Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State For Near Eastern Affairs Liz Cheney, took to the television airwaves today to assail the decision by President Obama to release photographs, as ordered by a judge, showing detainee abuse by American soldiers and/or CIA operatives in Afghanistan and Iraq.
"I have heard from families of sevicemembers, from families of 9/11 victims, this question about, you know, 'When did it become so fashionable for us to side, really, with the terrorists?'" Ms. Cheney said on Fox News Channel. "You know, for us to put information out that hurts American soldiers?"
Cheney said Obama administration officials "seem only to be interested in releasing things that really paint America in a negative light, and don't give the American people a full picture of what went on."
Last month, the Obama administration announced that the Pentagon would turn over to the American Civil Liberties Union 44 photographs showing detainee abuse of prisoners in Afghanistan and Iraq during the Bush administration.
The photographs are part of a 2003 Freedom of Information Act request by the ACLU for all information relating to the treatment of detainees -- the same battle that led, last month, to President Obama's decision to release memos from the Bush Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel providing legal justifications for brutal interrogation methods that the International Committee of the Red Cross has called torture.
The Obama administration opted not to take the fight over the photographs all the way to the Supreme Court.
"I think that it is really appalling that the administration is taking this step," Liz Cheney said today. "Clearly, you know, they're releasing images that really show American military men and women in a very negative light. And President Obama has a lot of sort of rhetoric about support for our military families and support for our men and women who are fighting overseas but, you know, if he really cares about them he wouldn't be making such an effort to release photos that show them in a negative light."
White House press secretary Robert Gibbs was today asked about a letter from Sens. Joe Lieberman, D-Ind., and Lindsey Graham, R-SC, asking him to reverse the decision, saying the "release of these old photographs of past behavior that has now been clearly prohibited can serve no public good, but will empower al-Qaeda propaganda operations, hurt our country’s image, and endanger our men and women in uniform."
Gibbs said "obviously, the president has, has great concern about any impact that pictures of detainee -- potential detainee abuse in the past could have on the present-day service members that are protecting our freedom either in Iraq, Afghanistan, or throughout the world. That's something the president is very cognizant of. And we are working to -- we are working currently to figure out what the process is moving forward."
He would not elaborate.
-- Jake Tapper and Karen Travers
May 12, 2009 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (432)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The entire Cheney family should be detained without recourse and waterboarded over 280 times...
Posted by: DaveM | May 21, 2009 10:17:58 AM
Listen, I'm a politician which means I'm a cheat and a liar, and when I'm not kissing babies I'm stealing their lollipops. But it also means I keep my options open.
Posted by: O-man | May 13, 2009 10:02:18 PM
1. Torture does bot work. The interrogated doesn't tell the TRUTH, in more the 80 % of the cases, that's the problem. He confesses everything to avoid pain.
2. They totured, that is a fact.
3. A court decision is a court decision!
4. the soldier r in danger, but because they tortured and NOT because they took pictures of it.
5. time to imprison those who ordered torture. NOW!
4.
Posted by: German | May 13, 2009 10:02:01 PM
"Did you forget the kidnapping in IRAQ of soldiers that ended up with their bodies decapitated, burned, hung on bridges."
Those weren't soldiers, those were Blackwater mercenaries.
And in response to that incident we killed about 10,000 innocent Iraqis while leveling Fallujah.
Posted by: Ryan C | May 13, 2009 4:13:14 PM
"In July 2007, the last of 500 METRIC TONS OF YELLOW CAKE WAS safely shipped from Irag to Canada. The US News Media did not report any of this to make it appear that the Bush administration was wrong on invading IRAQ. For you mental genuises, Yellow Cake is one of the ingredients to make nuclear grade uranium to CREATE NUCLEAR WEAPONS. Thus your WMD's."
The yellowcake was from the 80's and there were no WMD's.
Posted by: Ryan C | May 13, 2009 4:10:46 PM
"To not be hypocritical, Leftists must admit that Obama's execution order is far worse than subjecting a few mass murderers to temporary discomfort.
Where is the outrage over this gross violation of international law, the Geneva Convention, Pirate's Habeas Corpus, etc. and the fact Obama created many more violent Pirates with his actions?"
As anticipated, the Liberal Hypocrisy on this issue is STUNNING!"
ROFLMAO!
The lies the right wing needs to tell to create a moral quandry is hilarious.
An American was in immediate danger and the people on the ground with authorization from the chain of command did what they felt was right.
Posted by: Ryan C | May 13, 2009 4:09:04 PM
"While we're at it, why don't we release the videos of Obama's ordered executions of three teenage Pirates who were in US Custody (in a lifeboat tethered to a U.S. Warship)?
To not be hypocritical, Leftists must admit that Obama's execution order is far worse than subjecting a few mass murderers to temporary discomfort.
Where is the outrage over this gross violation of international law, the Geneva Convention, Pirate's Habeas Corpus, etc. and the fact Obama created many more violent Pirates with his actions?"
As anticipated, the Liberal Hypocrisy on this issue is STUNNING!
Posted by: Rick | May 13, 2009 3:03:01 PM
It's good to see that Obama has taken Liz Cheney's advice and is now not going to show the detainee photos, huh?
Posted by: Sigmonde | May 13, 2009 3:00:49 PM
I'm sick of listening to all of this whining. Give the guy a break... The man hasn't even been in office 6 months yet. I may not agree with all of his views but at least the man is trying to make some desparately needed changes. People want to complain about the possible release of these pictures. Pictures that were taken of our soldiers following orders from a tyranical, vindictive mama's boy on a power trip and his cranky, old, NRA card carrying sidekick. We need to show that we are better than those terrorist SOB's... the "we have ways of making you talk" days are over.
So, for all you Obama haters... If you don't like it here, the rest of us true Americans could really use the break from listening to your incoherent, asinine babblings. The border doors swing both ways and don't let the door hit you were the good lord split you...
Posted by: Shelly D | May 13, 2009 2:46:58 PM
stephan: point us to that fact? url.. news agency? and where in canada were the iraqi's supposedly going to build this a bomb? i was living in canada at the time and never heard of such a thing and canada's news certainly covers more "news" than our agencies do. they do not fill there segments with any fodder about celebrities or much about the stupidity that americans portray. where is this factual story you claim???? or do you posses a lying tongue like your heroes?
Posted by: what? | May 13, 2009 1:45:42 PM
In July 2007, the last of 500 METRIC TONS OF YELLOW CAKE WAS safely shipped from Irag to Canada. The US News Media did not report any of this to make it appear that the Bush administration was wrong on invading IRAQ. For you mental genuises, Yellow Cake is one of the ingredients to make nuclear grade uranium to CREATE NUCLEAR WEAPONS. Thus your WMD's. Why wasn't this reported by the US new media, while it was certainly getting much news media attention form the Canadian and British News Media. Along with the fact that as of December 2008, there were only 1500 insurgents left in IRAQ as the surge that was instituted earlier in the year was in fact the reason that we won the IRAQI war as reported by the London TImes?
Posted by: Stephen | May 13, 2009 1:39:19 PM
to the comments that liberals have not been able to see the truth since 2002. I dont know where the WMD's are that thousands have forsaken their life to find? Our president Obama was one of the few that stood up against this bold face deception firmly with truth on his side!!! the american people can also see this truth and that is why there took place a cleaning of the den of fascism that had resided in washington for the last 8 years. i do have respect for those that will sacrifice their life regardless if the cause is a bold face fabrication or not. but i do also know that not all soldiers are honorable, that not all war causes or actions are just.
Posted by: pvt ryan | May 13, 2009 1:04:18 PM
Bush & Cheney and republicans on torture
It was the right thing to do.
But by all means let's keep it secret.
gotta love those true 'convictions' of the 'right'
Posted by: Geeeeez | May 13, 2009 1:00:04 PM
debbie, so you should also be for waterboarding of your neighbors and citizens of urban areas with a high murder rate... YES? The odds are a million times more likely that an american will suffer abuse and die at the hands of another citizen than by a foreign combatant.
Posted by: where did reality go? | May 13, 2009 12:51:15 PM
CNO: while you are standing on the shores of another country, securing land rights and access to another countries resources for corporations to fill their pockets... millions are standing on our shores, on our land defending our country from tyranny from within. we will not receive medals or monuments, but daily we wake and stand for the same cause that millions stood for hundreds of years ago. to preserve the essence that led to lady liberty holding firmly her light of liberty, truth and justice!!!
Posted by: neo-con-job | May 13, 2009 12:44:34 PM
CNO and the rest of the clan: I get sick and tired of those whom refer to the lack of rights that others have in another country and how the vets of the last three wars have shored up and saved our liberties and constitution and thats why we can live, communicate and express ourselves. FIRST OFF, it was the noble men and woman of the revolutionary war that sealed our freedoms into concrete and forged Americas rights into the constitution. To compare vietnam, iraq I & II to that accomplishment is to spit in the face of the founding fathers and their true fight for independence and soverenty and freedom. SECONDLY, I see how those that wish to askew truth in order to corrupt our system, throw out parts of the constitution that does not fit their agenda, but grasp the amendment that allows one to bear arms with bold blood and glory. most of us do not own guns, we respect life and we live by the code of due onto your brother as you would have them do unto you. If this is the same lot that will reside in a heaven with all of those whom truly sacrifice their lives so as to eliminate suffering and torment for all, i am willing to send my soul to damnation in order to always maintain a distance and great divide from them.
Posted by: neo-con-job | May 13, 2009 12:36:54 PM
I just can't believe Liz dared to voice her own personal views. Doesn't she realize that only the left owns the right to express dissent? Everyone else needs to sit down, shut up, and pay their taxes to fund Obama's Utopia.
Posted by: Stacey | May 13, 2009 12:15:27 PM
'Debbie"
re: 'None of the officers that did this deed should be punished! they were doing there job, what they were told to do and it probably worked very well.'
using your reasoning,...
you've just justified the Nazi holocaust against the jews of Europe, and every other mass extermination throughout history
Posted by: How Times Have Changed | May 13, 2009 11:45:56 AM
I am all for waterboarding if it got the information they needed to protect us (THE AMERICAN PEOPLE)!! None of the officers that did this deed should be punished! they were doing there job, what they were told to do and it probably worked very well.
Posted by: Debbie | May 13, 2009 11:32:46 AM
For those people who see the world as 'an eye for an eye.' For those who believe that torture is acceptable when our enemies use them, I have a question:
When does it stop?
For the United States to authorize torture, war and invasion, we become the very thing terrorists accuse us of becoming.
I have 'worn the uniform.' I have served my country in time of war. And I believe torture is wrong. For those who think I have turned my back on my country I ask you, what happens if your child becomes a terrorist? Or if someone accuses YOU of being a traitor? What then? Would you endorse torture if it was being done to you?
Posted by: James Pagan | May 13, 2009 11:27:32 AM
Post a comment


