RECENT POSTS
- Under the Stars, Obama Toasts India’s Prime Minister
- White House State Dinner – Who Made the Exclusive Guest List?
- Admiral Mike Mullen To Geneva for START Talks
- VP Biden to Indian Prime Minister: “You’re the Hottest Ticket in Town”
- FLOTUS on the State Dinner: Like a Swan, "Calm and Serene Above Water, But We're Paddling Like Mad, Going Crazy Underneath"
- White House State Dinner: The Menu, Entertainment, and Decor
- Dan Pfeiffer, White House Blogger
- Guests Begin to Arrive for White House State Dinner Festivities
- President Obama on Afghanistan Strategy: “It Is My Intention to Finish the Job”
- The Obamas Kick off their First State Visit, Welcome India's Prime Minister to the White House
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
After Lawsuit, Obama Administration Releases Logs of Private Meetings With Health Care Industry Executives
July 22, 2009 8:01 PM
From Jake Tapper and Karen Travers:
Faced with a lawsuit from a government watchdog group, the Obama Administration tonight released a list of visits health care industry executives made to the White House since January.
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a left-leaning good-government group, filed a lawsuit today against the Department of Homeland Security after the Secret Service turned down its request for the White House visitor records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
In a letter to CREW’s chief counsel, Anne Weismann, White House Counsel Gregory B. Craig said that “given the compelling public interest in the health care debate and the president’s goal of increasing transparency in government,” the administration went back and reviewed the visitors records related to the group’s request.
Craig wrote that Obama “has decided to exercise his discretion” and release the dates of private, unpublicized visits by 14 health care industry executives including PhRMA’s Billy Tauzin and Karen Ignagni, president and chief executive officer of America's Health Insurance Plans.
Many of the health care industry executives included in the logs were present for a publicized meeting with Obama on May 11 at the White House.
According to CREW’s lawsuit, the Obama administration originally denied the FOIA request because the logs are presidential records, not agency records, and thus are exempt from public disclosure laws. The position is similar to an argument the Bush administration used for such requests.
“We are continuing to review your specific FOIA request, as well as the White House’s general policy governing the discretionary release of visitor records,” Craig wrote in his letter.
As a candidate, Obama pledged greater transparency and openness if elected president. He publicly committed to holding open health care reform negotiations, going so far as to say he would have them “televised on C-SPAN.”
“The people can see: Who is making arguments on behalf of their constituents?” Obama said last August. “And who is-- Who are making arguments on behalf of the drug companies or the insurance companies? And so that approach, I think, is what is going to allow people to stay involved in this process.”
CREW said the Obama administration’s initial refusal to release the visitor logs looked more like “backroom politicking” than transparency.
“Right now, the White House and Congress are debating colossal changes to the American health care system and taxpayers have a right to know who is sitting at the table influencing decision-makers. Unfortunately, the administration is refusing to release the names, preferring backroom politicking to transparency,” Melanie Sloan, executive director of CREW, said in a statement today.
This is not the first time CREW has filed suit against the Obama administration over visitors logs.
Last month, the group sued to force the White House to provide information related to meetings it had with top coal executives.
At the time, White House spokesman Ben LaBolt said, "We are reviewing our policy on access to visitor logs and related litigation.”
-Jake Tapper and Karen Travers
July 22, 2009 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (26)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
"Did Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington ever find out who was on board Air Force One during the flyby photo op which frightened and angered New Yorkers?"
Not sure but CREW did just file an ethics complaint against Eric Cantor for using taxpayers funds for party activities.
Posted by: Ryan C | Jul 23, 2009 1:21:30 PM
My 82 year old father in-law recently had a colonoscopy. He had no complaints or underlying illness. He dosen't have diabetes or high colesterol. He is beginning to show signs of aging, innability to walk and dementia. Basically he's in good health except his age is against him. During his last check-up the doctor sugggested he have a colonoscopy because "medicare will pay for it". Now, I'm all for preventitive medicine, but this was unnecessary.There is no cure for old age. Long story short, after the procedure he got dehydrated, dissoriented and confused. Got out of bed and fell,in the hospital, and broke his hip. Not only was the colonoscopy more than he could handle, now he has a broken hip and even after a hip replacement, will unlikely recover. So after 2 months in the hospital, paid for by medicare, we face the decision on what to do with him. The hospital and doctors will push for home health, but many people, including us, are not prepared to give someone 24 hour care.
Posted by: bea | Jul 23, 2009 10:54:50 AM
If nothing is going to change for the
majority of Americans regarding health
care...what are we doing????????
Posted by: wis134 | Jul 23, 2009 9:23:00 AM
Did Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington ever find out who was on board Air Force One during the flyby photo op which frightened and angered New Yorkers?
Posted by: WhereWasThePress? | Jul 23, 2009 9:06:02 AM
Where were the tough questions tonight? More importantly, where were the questions where when a journalist is NOT getting an answer they interject and say “excuse, but can I just get an answer to my questions please”?! I mean come one-Where were the questions about whether or not ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS will be covered under this health care that LEGAL CITIZEN Have to pay for? Where were the questions about whether or not paying for ABORTIONS is forced up on tax payers? Where were the questions about whether or not senior citizens are going to be forced to take “How to Die” Seminars and where EUTHANSIA will not only be advocated for with tax payers money, but will be paid for with tax payers money?!
Posted by: kmday | Jul 23, 2009 8:51:21 AM
impeach all of the obama and hillary adminstration and put all of them where they belong in prison for life not in the white house
Posted by: RAMBOW99 | Jul 23, 2009 8:00:37 AM
It took a lawsuit to reveal the names.
It took a lawsuit to finally show transparancy.
Obama must have known he was wrong or he wouldn't have buckled to the pressure of a lawsuit.
Posted by: what gives | Jul 23, 2009 12:48:48 AM
I know we tire. But so did the Founding Fathers. But they kept up the fight. Keep on the pressure. And keep speaking what is right at all costs. Because freedom and liberty is WORTH IT!
Posted by: clint
right....... yeah...lets have a tea party and talk about the birth certificate and more guns...
Posted by: SNAFU | Jul 22, 2009 11:51:32 PM
"The documented cases of hospitals performing tens of millions of dollars of unnecessary procedures under Medicare suggests your argument is not based in reality."
Anyone can say that. Then again, what's the point? You deny things that are irrefutable and proven in a few keystrokes.
Posted by: drjohn | Jul 22, 2009 10:23:10 PM
jhw, just as an aside, your answer to Clint's question about government-RUN programs that work is a little like Alanis M's "Ironic" song-- nothing in her examples in that song is actually ironic. It's tragic or upsetting, but not ironic. "A black fly in your chardonnay"-- gross, but not ironic.
Your list of things does not include anything that is RUN by the federal government. Built by it, yes-- Hoover Dam. Partially developed by people working for it, yes--- the Internet (not a completely government project, as you probably know, but that's a contentious subject, as I understand it). Funded by it, yes-- the interstate highway system, one of the jewels in our crown and an excellent program. Thank you, Mr. Eisenhower. Okay, it is still run by the government, but as you say, it is not a profit-making entity and it is not 'run' by the government so much as 'maintained.' The university system-- HUH? The government does funnel a lot of money to universities, to students, etc. But it does not 'run' universities. Neither did it create the system. I am totally confused about how 'universities' made your list, as it fits the question even less than anything else on the list.
Posted by: moderate | Jul 22, 2009 10:16:43 PM
The presidebt was worse than usual this evening.
Posted by: mad | Jul 22, 2009 10:10:52 PM
I am glad to see the White House, when pressured, did indeed release the list of names. That's a good thing.
Just glad they did the right thing, even if it took a lawsuit to get them to do it.
I thought the transparency question during the press conference was excellent. Notice it got the shortest answer of the evening.
Anyway, I wanted to give credit where credit is due. The president did the right thing.
Posted by: moderate | Jul 22, 2009 10:09:03 PM
Contents of the transcript(s)?
"Play ball, and I'll make sure some bonuses get ignored..."
Posted by: Eyes Open | Jul 22, 2009 9:58:10 PM
"unnecessary procedures under Medicare suggests"
What's "unnecessary"? Mightn't that be left to MEDICAL personnel to decide, for each particular -- indeed "unique" -- patient? Especially where older people are concerned?
With Oblabla's minions making medical decisions, instead of an array of doctors with different opinions and different approaches making medical decisions, how's medicine going to advance? (Heck, how's medicine going to CONTINUE?)
Posted by: Bet Noir | Jul 22, 2009 9:39:10 PM
drjohn:"When you lose money treating Medicare patients, there is little incentive to overtreat."
The documented cases of hospitals performing tens of millions of dollars of unnecessary procedures under Medicare suggests your argument is not based in reality.
Posted by: jhw539 | Jul 22, 2009 9:29:09 PM
clint:"Name me one government-run program that has EVER worked, or has EVER made a profit. It can't be done."
Hoover dam. The Internet. Interstates (not a direct profit, but their economic development payback is accepted by all parties). A world-leading national University system that has given rise to the minds behind everything from Amgen to Intel.
Those are just a few.
Again, do you have any actual facts to support your argument?
Posted by: jhw539 | Jul 22, 2009 9:27:56 PM
How will the government controlled healthcare bill work for you? How has government-controlled auto, banks, housing worked for you? How has a bankrupt Social Security system that costs us daily worked for you? Name me one government-run program that has EVER worked, or has EVER made a profit. It can't be done. And the American people know it!
You need to be vigilant and informed now, because the government has put the head of Fannie Mae in charge of the TARP program. What's next. I know we tire. But so did the Founding Fathers. But they kept up the fight. Keep on the pressure. And keep speaking what is right at all costs. Because freedom and liberty is WORTH IT!
Posted by: clint | Jul 22, 2009 9:20:21 PM
Concerned in OH:"I can't believe Obama just said doctors do unnecessary operations for sheer profit."
This is a known, documented problem that has resulted in a number of legal actions over the years. Medicare (under Republican and Democrat control) has been rather effective in documenting and prosecuting unnecessary treatment. For example, Tenet Healthcare was found guilty of frequently performing heart surgeries, including very invasive procedures like a triple bypass that are not done on a preventative basis, that review of medical records and imaging clearly shown were not required.
It is a documented fact that some doctors and hospitals have been found guilty of unnecessary procedures undertaken simply for profit (and Republicans deserve credit too for their efforts to root out such dangerous fraud).
Posted by: jhw539 | Jul 22, 2009 9:18:00 PM
drjohn asks: "So you have to ask yourself why a Soros group would threaten to sue Obama's white House."
This is just a smoke screen. They made a big deal about this so he could trumpet their being transparent. The people listed in the logs are the same people he met in public with, so no big deal for the admin to release this.
Posted by: Jason | Jul 22, 2009 9:14:35 PM
"I can't believe Obama just said doctors do unnecessary operations for sheer profit."
Well, look at Michael Jackson.
And Pamela Anderson.
But that's all with discretionary income and makes zero impact on the government.
When you lose money treating Medicare patients, there is little incentive to overtreat.
Posted by: drjohn | Jul 22, 2009 9:10:53 PM
Post a comment


