RECENT POSTS
- Under the Stars, Obama Toasts India’s Prime Minister
- White House State Dinner – Who Made the Exclusive Guest List?
- Admiral Mike Mullen To Geneva for START Talks
- VP Biden to Indian Prime Minister: “You’re the Hottest Ticket in Town”
- FLOTUS on the State Dinner: Like a Swan, "Calm and Serene Above Water, But We're Paddling Like Mad, Going Crazy Underneath"
- White House State Dinner: The Menu, Entertainment, and Decor
- Dan Pfeiffer, White House Blogger
- Guests Begin to Arrive for White House State Dinner Festivities
- President Obama on Afghanistan Strategy: “It Is My Intention to Finish the Job”
- The Obamas Kick off their First State Visit, Welcome India's Prime Minister to the White House
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
Judge Orders Gitmo Detainee Mohammed Jawad Freed
July 30, 2009 10:44 AM
District Court Judge Ellen Segal Huvelle Thursday morning granted Guantanamo detainee Mohammed Jawad, a writ of habeas corpus that could result in his being freed on August 21.
Justice Department officials 22 more days to determine whether or not they can try Jawad in a criminal court in the U.S.
Jawad was arrested by Afghan police in December 2002 for allegedly throwing a grenade into a vehicle containing two US troops and an Afghan interpreter. It's unclear how old Jawad was at the time, but he was almost certainly 17 years old or younger. Jawad confessed to Afghan police that he had committed the crime, but later told US officials that he only did so because he had been tortured by them, making the evidence unusable under President Obama's new rules for detainees.
The Justice Department says it has "newly available evidence" of Jawad's "involvement with the grenade attack on two U.S. servicemen." But the Justice Department isn't asking for more time to investigate the new evidence. And on Wednesday night Justice Department officials submitted a proposed writ of habeas corpus for Judge Huvelle to sign.
"We have informed the judge in this case that we will not contest the writ of habeas corpus and that we are not detaining Jawad in order to conduct a criminal investigation of his actions," Justice Department spokesman Matt Miller said in a statement last night. "Instead, we have informed the court that there are a number of steps the government must undertake to comply with Congressional reporting requirements before any transfer can take place. In the meantime, Department prosecutors are investigating whether they can make a criminal case against Jawad, an effort that is proceeding separate and apart from his habeas case.
Miller said that the Obama administration "made a dramatic break with the policies of the past by rejecting the use of torture without exception or equivocation and making it clear that we will not rely on statements obtained through such methods. This case is one of more than a hundred initiated during the last several years that continue to work their way through the federal courts. It is clear that, in addition to serving as a recruiting tool for terrorists, the status quo left behind by the previous administration at Guantanamo is legally unsustainable, which is why we are working to close Guantanamo and develop a new legal framework to govern detention policy that is grounded in the rule of law and will strengthen our national security."
Under the Obama administration's proposed writ of habeas corpus for Jawad, the US government would "no longer treat petitioner Mohammed Jawad as detainable under the Authorization for Use of Military Force…"
The government would be given seven days to submit the Congress the proper notification for Jawad's release in Afghanistan. Fifteen days after that, assuming Jawad is not brought up on criminal charges, the government would "promptly release petitioner Jawad from detention at the U.S. Naval Station at Guantanamo Bay and transfer him to the custody of the receiving government."
The Pentagon has asserted that Jawad in December 2002 "attempt(ed) to commit murder in violation of the law of war, by throwing a hand grenade into the passenger compartment of a vehicle transporting U.S. or Coalition Forces," namely Army Sgts. Michael Lyons and Christopher Martin, and interpreter Assadullah Khan Omerk.
"I received shrapnel and burns all along my left side," Martin later told a National Guard publication. The blast shattered his right eardrum, broke bones in his feet and left leg, and sprayed shrapnel into his eye, arm and leg. Lyons had similar injuries as well as damage to an artery in his right leg. Omerk had a head wound.
According to the Combatant Status Review Board report, Jawad, originally from Miran Shah, Pakistan, was recruited by six men attending the local Qari mosque to clear Russian mines in Kabul, Afghanistan. Affiliated with the Hezb-E-Islami organization, a terrorist group with long-established ties to Osama bin Laden, Jawad attended a "Jihad Madrassa" where he prepared to fight on the front lines. He attended a training camp in late 2002 where he received instruction on how to use AK-47s, shoulder-held rocket launchers and grenades, and he "told a senior Afghani police officer that he was proud of what he did and if he were let go, he would do it again."
The Pentagon said that according to Afghan policeman who witnessed the attack, there was only one suspect involved. In addition, the Pentagon said that a member of the Afghanistan National Security Council reported that Jawad "stated none of the people who trained him were around and he acted alone in the grenade incident." Jawad "also stated he was trained to target Americans and the Afghanistan government," the Pentagon said.
Jawad admitted having been there, but pleaded innocence. "I am not the person who threw the grenade," he said.
"I was there," he told the tribunal. "A person gave me something, but I did not know what the object was that the person gave me." After the incident, a "shopkeeper told me that it was a bomb and that I should go and throw it in the river. I put the thing back in my pocket and I was running and shouting to say 'Stay away, it's a bomb.' When I got close to the river, people [the police] caught me."
The Afghan police "tortured me. They beat me. They beat me a lot. One person told me, 'If you don't confess, they are going to kill you.' So I told them anything they wanted to hear. I told them anything they wanted me to say. By forcing me, beating me, and scaring me, I confessed."
Jawad's journey began, he said, when his uncle gave him money to go to the market in Pakistan. At prayer time he went to the mosque, where he was approached by a man who offered him a job to clear mines in Afghanistan, offering him 12,000 Pakistani Rupees to do the job. Whisked away by the man and another to a training camp, Jawad said, he was given "two small pills each day, which made me sleepy and forget my family. Two men came and told me to fire guns they said everybody does this and it is fun...They gave me injections in the leg and I hallucinated about many things, like my nose coming off and giving my ear to people. They showed me how to use the grenade, how to throw the bomb."
Jawad said that before the grenade incident, "they gave me orange chewing gum, chocolate candy and a tablet. When I took this pill I didn't know what I did. I was out of my mind. I couldn't think clearly."
During his detention at Gitmo, Jawad was subjected to sleep deprivation, according to his attorney, Air Force Major Reserve David Frakt, who referred to records indicating that prison guards had transferred Jawad "from cell to cell 112 times over a two week period, shackling, moving and unshackling him on average every two hours and fifty minutes," according to Human Rights First. "Just several months earlier, Jawad had attempted suicide."
The ACLU says that Jawad is one of two Guantanamo prisoners the US "has charged with war crimes for acts allegedly committed as juveniles...Jawad's former military prosecutor, Lt. Col. Darrel Vandeveld, supports the ACLU's legal challenge, and has stated that there is 'no credible evidence or legal basis' to justify Jawad's detention and prosecution, and that his release presents no risk."
But Military Families United holds the opposite view.
Referring to Jawad as "a terrorist who attacked and wounded two U.S. soldiers and an Afghan citizen in a grenade attack," Navy Commander Kirk Lippold (Ret.), former commander of the USS Cole and a senior fellow at Military Families United, asked, "How many more terrorists does the President need to release before he realizes the threat they pose to our troops? Our country and the brave troops that protect it should not be put at greater risk because vital national security decisions are being made to meet arbitrary deadlines and repay campaign debts to the ACLU. Americans ...We cannot allow terrorists to slip through our fingers because of misplaced and untrue political perceptions about Guantanamo Bay.”
Jawad's attorneys had requested that Judge Huvelle immediately order Jawad's release into the hands of the receiving government or "a neutral intermediary such as the International Committee of the Red Cross," but in a memorandum in support of their own proposed writ of habeas corpus, Justice Department officials say that isn't necessary since Jawad is currently being held in Camp Iguana, the least restrictive facility for Guantanamo detainees.
At Camp Iguana, the officials say, Jawad has "relative freedom of movement and opportunities for not only education, but also social interaction, physical exercise and recreational activities. Camp Iguana is a communal camp with wooden, hut-like living structures, which provide freedom to move about from different buildings designated for housing, prayer, library, laundry facilities, shower/bathroom, outdoor recreation, and lounge areas. Detainees also have free access to satellite television, books, newspapers, magazines, handheld games, puzzles, and art supplies."
-jpt
*This post has been updated with breaking news of Judge Huvelle's decision.
July 30, 2009 in guantanamo bay | Permalink | Share | User Comments (20)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Mohammed Jawad was a child soldier.He comes from Afghanistan.He never even knew there was such a thing as a world trade center.
On a street in Afghanistan somebody threw a grenade at some soldiers. Nobody really knew who did it, but young Mo got arrested for it, and was held at Gitmo 7 years.
In the entire history of armed combat no amy has ever invaded another country, and insisted that the people who live in that country cannot fight back.
Until now. The world's mightiest war machine attacks a defenseless country, Afghanistan, and claims that despite the invaders' overwhelming force, forbids the locals to resist this invasion of their homeland.
what pitiful cowards!
Posted by: paul siemering | Aug 24, 2009 10:53:56 PM
How many our troops have made a huge efforts to catch such a extream terrorists, Mohammed Jawad up at the battle of the wars, Iraq and Afganistan? Under the Obama's human rights, however, made a decision to free the terrorist on Aug. 21, 2009. I am so wondering whether Eric Holder or Obama have ever indirectly pressed the Judge, Ellen Segal Huvelle to free him.
I HAVE SO MUCH MISSED GW BUSH, JOHN MACCAIN AND SARAH PALIN.
Posted by: Unhappy w terrorists | Jul 31, 2009 4:36:58 PM
I hate to see what the "leaders" of this country has become! Everything our forefathers stood for has been thrown by the wayside so "this group" can gain power of the people. Shame!
Posted by: S Lunsford | Jul 31, 2009 8:56:52 AM
The judge is a vile, disloyal hack. This is why these cases should NEVER go into our court system, a moral sewer largely staffed by political hacks who despise our country. Of course the Administration should have appealed immediately, but the scum who currently run the Justice Department are no better than the despicable Segal.
Posted by: john patrick | Jul 30, 2009 9:21:40 PM
"So it was as well covered as the gates thing then? Was anyone invited to the WH for beer? 2nd fail, danita... "
It was well covered though I doubt the right wing media said a word about it.
Posted by: Ryan C | Jul 30, 2009 3:02:46 PM
"Yeah, when?"
As danita stated Obama just addressed the NAACP 100th Anniversary convention 2 weeks ago.
Are you actually concerned about black issues or just playing?
Posted by: Ryan C | Jul 30, 2009 2:58:19 PM
--President Obama gave a MAJOR address to the NACC just a few short weeks ago in which he addressed exactly what you're talking about.--
So it was as well covered as the gates thing then? Was anyone invited to the WH for beer? 2nd fail, danita...
Posted by: Choptank | Jul 30, 2009 2:57:48 PM
This should help Obama in the polls.
Will he invite Jawad over for a few beers?
Posted by: larry | Jul 30, 2009 2:56:45 PM
"Yeah, when?"
____________________________________
President Obama gave a MAJOR address to the NACC just a few short weeks ago in which he addressed exactly what you're talking about.
Posted by: danita | Jul 30, 2009 2:45:50 PM
--have heard President Obama directly address the problems in the african-american community a number of times, and with some pretty direct language.
I also know the Recovery and Reinvestment plan included a LOT of money to retain and hire additional police officers--
Yeah, when? Why not make a national issue over it like with Gates? This is a perfect opportunity. We need a natonal dialog. Where's the leadership? More cops like Crowley I guess too! Like I said, easy way out...
Posted by: Choptank | Jul 30, 2009 2:40:36 PM
"President Obama needs to address the real problems in the black community, like why over 12 people were shot in just 3 hours in Baltimore last weekend"
_____________________________________
I have heard President Obama directly address the problems in the african-american community a number of times, and with some pretty direct language.
I also know the Recovery and Reinvestment plan included a LOT of money to retain and hire additional police officers.
Posted by: danita | Jul 30, 2009 2:26:05 PM
President Obama needs to address the real problems in the black community, like why over 12 people were shot in just 3 hours in Baltimore last weekend, not nothing issues involving BFF professors. He took the easy way out.
Posted by: Choptank | Jul 30, 2009 1:21:50 PM
Posted by: talmag | Jul 30, 2009 11:06:29 AM
Well put.
However, as President, friend of Gates, and not knowing the facts, he should have recused himself. The President represents all Americans - unequivically and without prejudice.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | Jul 30, 2009 12:38:57 PM
As a white person, this is the rule I was taught growing up:
Never talk to the police unless you were the one who called them.
Posted by: Flash Override | Jul 30, 2009 12:30:02 PM
Posted by: KR | Jul 30, 2009 10:58:51 AM
Lots of "curious" stuff out there on the interwebs. Mostly NSFW...
Posted by: .com | Jul 30, 2009 11:17:40 AM
While I feel President Obama should have stayed out of the Gates incident, I understand that no white person can understand how the black race must raise their sons. To bring them up with the fear of the police is something that a white person will never experience. Even Colin Powell remembers telling his son to do as the police say or you will be beaten or worse. To deny that racial profiling is not done is like walking around with a bag over your head. It is still here and I think President Obama spoke like a black man which he is. We need to understand there is a difference even though we have come a long way. Too many times black men are not give a chance by the police department. Think about that groom who was innocent and killed by the police and the old man who walked with a limp, beaten by the police for no reason. These are current instances and we cannot make light of it. I know President Obama will handle the meeting today with grace and understanding as a president and a black man.
Posted by: talmag | Jul 30, 2009 11:06:29 AM
Camp Iguana is a communal camp with wooden, hut-like living structures, which provide freedom to move about from different buildings designated for housing, prayer, library, laundry facilities, shower/bathroom, outdoor recreation, and lounge areas. Detainees also have free access to satellite television, books, newspapers, magazines, handheld games, puzzles, and art supplies."
Sounds like a real concentration camp! Auschwitz on the Caribbean...The NGO's get their $$ from the same people who live in Berkeley, the Upper East Side, Malibu, Vermont. All liberal places. Yet oddly, there's no "room at the inn" for innocents like Jawad. I guess Barbara Boxer's and Nancy Pelosi's spare rooms are already occupied by some homeless people. Perhaps room for him could be found at Obama's place on Martha's Vineyard for the summer? There, after a refreshing brunch, Obama could personally apologize for this man's mistreatment. Of course the chances of that are even less than than his kids attending DC public schools.
Posted by: Charlie Babbit | Jul 30, 2009 11:05:35 AM
Interesting perspective for the curious here.
Go to google
at the end of the address line, type /trends
so google/trends
type in - torture, waterboarding, world of warcraft
On the bottom you'll see the large volume of news traffic about torture. On the top, the lack of search volume by individuals compared to those who search a video game.
Posted by: KR | Jul 30, 2009 10:58:51 AM
I propose releasing him immediately into my custody. I have a comfy room for him in my house.
I also have a few 'enhanced interrogation techniques' I'd like to introduce him to, then when I'm done, I'll take him on a vacation to NYC, where he can visit a few fire stations that lost hundreds in the 9/11 attacks.
I'm sure there are a few firemen that would love to get to know him better.
Posted by: J House | Jul 30, 2009 10:58:21 AM
By all means, let 'em all out. Why not just drop them into Manhattan, down town Berkeley, or Chevy Chase, where many of their sympathizers live?
The insanity of this country, and it's total inability to defend itself, will be studied by anthropologists and psychologists specializing in the collapse of civilizations hundreds of years from now.
Who are the human rights people (their names) involved in pushing for these releases? We know the soldiers' names, we need to know who these human rights NGO self-appointed do-gooders are, and where they get their money.
Posted by: jordan | Jul 30, 2009 10:53:22 AM
Post a comment


