Political Punch
Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper

« Previous | Main | Next »

Obama Administration Frees Three More Gitmo Detainees

September 26, 2009 8:22 PM

The Department of Justice Saturday evening announced that two detainees had been transferred from Guantanamo Bay to Ireland, and one had been transferred to Yemen.

There are more than 220 detainees remaining at the prison. In the last couple months, the White House has made it increasingly clear that the President will not make his self-stated January 22, 2010 deadline to close to prison.

Alla Ali Bin Ali Ahmed, a native of Yemen, was captured in Pakistan in 2002 and returned to Yemen today. The Yemeni Embassy to the US issued a statement saying the country welcomed, "with enthusiasm, the release and transfer of its citizen."

Known at Gitmo as Captive 692, the government labeled Ali Ahmed an "enemy combatant," saying he "was associated with Al-Qaeda. He was present on the front lines in Bagram, Afghanistan. He was identified by a senior Al-Qaeda facilitator as having been a resident at a safehouse in Kandahar, Afghanistan in 2000 (his individual also saw the detainee at a safehouse located in Faisalabad, Pakistan in February 2002 with a group of Yemenis who had fled Afghanistan). Finally, the Detainee was identified by another individual, a senior Al-Qaeda operational planner, as having resided at a safehouse located in Kandahar in 2001."

Al Ahmed denied almost all of the charges.

"I never went to Afghanistan, ever. You have to prove how you came to the conclusion that I am a member of the Taliban," he told a military commission.

Al Ahmed claimed he left Sana'a, Yemen around 2000 for Karachi, Pakistan to learn about textiles, with $3,500 -- most of which was from his mother -- in his pocket.

After several months of partying -- "We spent the whole six months going out, having fun, ladies," he says of one leg of his journey -- he ended up in a house full of university students in Faisalabad, Pakistan.

"I didn't have any relationships with anyone in that house," Al Ahmed testified. "They were trying to inspire me and to do the religious things, like look at my religion because most of the students were studying the Koran...They realized that we weren't really in harmony together because I used to use drugs and hashish and things like that. I used to read magazine. Most of the time, I would stay in the backyard, so I was keeping my distance from them."

"I stayed two weeks and the Pakistani government came and captured all of us," Ali Ahmed said.

The government alleged that the home in which Ali Ahmed was residing was "run by a high-ranking al Qaida operative...Several of the individuals arrested in the March 2002 raid on the guesthouse in Faisalabad, Pakistan were identified as al Qaida associates who had received training in, or fought in, Afghanistan."

In May, U.S. District Court Judge Gladys Kessler found the government's case rather wanting and ordered Ahmed released.

In her ruling, Kessler said that "it is clear that the accuracy of much of the factual material contained in those exhibits is hotly contested for a host of different reasons ranging from the fact that it contains second- and third-hand hearsay to allegations that it was obtained by torture to the fact that no statement purports to be a verbatim account of what was said."

Evidence that Ali Ahmed had traveled to Afghanistan or was associated with al Qaeda came from four sources, Kessler said.

One is "an individual whose credibility has been cast into serious doubt -- and rejected -- by another Judge in this District." That witness, a Gitmo detainee, claimed to have overheard conversations at Gitmo about Ali Ahmed's travels in Afghanistan. "He does not identify who made these statements and under what circumstances, or any details of the conversation."

The second statement was "riddled with equivocation and speculation," she said.

The third witness claims to have been tortured at Bagram or Dark Prison, and the "Government has presented no evidence to dispute the allegations of torture." He had made the claim against Ali Ahmed, recanted it, then reaffirmed it.

The fourth witness is believed to be Mohammed Al Qahtani -- believed to be a member of al-Qaeda who was planning on taking part in the 9/11 attacks -- though much of Kessler's ruling has been redacted. Al Qahtani stated that Ali Ahmed "received military training in Afghanistan near Kabul." But Kessler ruled that evidence to be a "nine word hearsay allegation" with no details to back it up.

She ruled that the government failed to prove Ahmed was "part of, or substantially supported Taliban or al-Qaida forces or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners."

**

The Ireland deal has been in the works since at least March.

On July 29, as we covered at the time, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs announced Ireland had agreed to accept two Uzbek detainees from Guantanamo Bay.

Taoiseach Brian Cowen told CNN at the time that "it is incumbent on us, those who called for [Guantánamo’s] closure, to assist the United States now in ensuring that certain prisoners be relocated elsewhere."

“Obviously we will keep an eye on them very closely,” he said.

Irish Justice Minister Demot Ahern said in July that Ireland would “adhere to the norms of official procedure in respecting the rights of the two men to their privacy."

The Obama administration did not name the detainees released to Ireland. "Pursuant to a request from the government of Ireland, the identities of these detainees are being withheld for security and privacy reasons," read a statement from the Justice Department. Amnesty International has been lobbying Ireland to accept Uzbek national Oybek Jamoldinivich Jabbarov, and another Uzbekh.

At the time of his detention by U.S. forces in 2001, Jabbarov, now 31, lived with his pregnant wife, infant son, and mother lived with other Uzbek refugees in northern Afghanistan in 2001 when fighting broke out between the Taliban and the Northern Alliance.

“Oybek was not captured on the battlefield, nor was he armed,” his attorney Michael Mone testified before Congress in May 2008. “Instead, he accepted a ride from a group of Northern Alliance soldiers he met at a roadside teahouse who said they would give him a ride to Mazar-e-Sharif. Unfortunately, instead of driving him to Mazar-e-Sharif, the soldiers took Oybek to Bagram Air Base where they handed him over to U.S. forces, undoubtedly in exchange for a sizable bounty. In a desperately poor, war-torn country, Oybek was an easy mark for soldiers responding to leaflets dropped throughout Afghanistan by the U.S. military offering thousands of dollars in cash rewards to anyone who turned over a Taliban or foreign fighter.”

Before the Combatant Status Review Board, Jabbarov was accused of having “supported the Taliban and al Qaida.”

The U.S. government claimed that Jabbarov “admitted that he was a member of the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan,” which appears in the United States Department of Homeland Security 'Terrorist Organization Reference Guide,’ and having attended IMU training camps.

The government said he “stayed in a safe house owned by the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group,” which also appears on the 'Terrorist Organization Reference Guide,” and “reportedly is used by al Qaida to obtain travel documents.”

“These allegations are not true,” Jabbarov said before the US tribunal. “I served in the national army of Uzbekistan; and I’ve been fighting against the IMU and these Islamic terrorist organizations. I agree that the IMU is a terrorist organization, but I have nothing to do with them. As a soldier in Uzbekistan, I have been fighting against these groups. I took the oath, and I swear it, that I will fight these groups, as a soldier, I took the oath.”

He denied having attended an IMU terrorist camp, having stayed in a safe house owned by the LIFG, never having heard of the LIFG before coming to Guantanamo, or ever even having seen any Arabs before he was brought to Guantanamo.

He said he was only in Afghanistan to buy and sell livestock to support his family. The government asserted that he “made a conscious decision to fight with the Taliban.”

“That’s not true,” Jabbarov said. “I never made that decision. I never supported the Taliban and I’m against their laws and rules.”

The government asserted that he “participated in fighting between the Taliban and the Northern Alliance.” “So far I haven’t seen any war,” he said. “I never picked up or touched a gun.” He asked of the woman reading the list of accusations: “where did she get all this information” Does she have any proof? At least if one of these had evidence, if it was true, people could read."

Jabbarov was cleared for release in 2007.

**

The Obama administration informed Congress and the Supreme Court earlier this month that it intends to transfer eight of the detainees to the obscure Pacific nation of Palau.

The eight are Uighurs -- a Turkic Muslim minority from the Xinjiang province of far-west China -- who were living in the Tora Bora mountains in Afghanistan run by the Eastern Turkistan Islamic Movement, a Uighur independence group the State Department designated as terrorist three years after their capture.

Evidence indicates that some of the Uighurs intended to fight the Chinese government and received firearms training at the camp.

They fled to Pakistan after U.S. aerial strikes destroyed their camp after September 11, 2001 and were turned over to the U.S. military and detained as “enemy combatants" though they had no apparent animus towards the U.S.

- jpt

September 26, 2009 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (101)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

What right does ANYONE have to let an enemy of our country who has vowed to take our lives just because we do not believe in the same religious ideals that they do, GO FREE? This action is called 'pandering' to others, trying to get points for 'forgiving' his enemies!! HE HAS NO RIGHT TO DO SO!
An old Muslim, Sa'id (1184-1291 said; "WHOEVER HAS HIS FOE AT HIS MERCY, AND DOES NOT KILL HIM, IS HIS OWN ENEMY."

How's that for an eye for an eye?

Posted by: 123coco | Sep 29, 2009 6:56:13 PM

Rumor is one of them will be running for Gov. in New York. He was hand picked by Obama for the job.

Posted by: Mark | Sep 29, 2009 4:12:27 PM

Letting the enemy go , is not that called Treason or something of that nature?

Just How do they get away with it ?
Buy putting it under a new name?

The USA is being dismantled and into what?
Certainly a much weaker position in the world .
Did not the roman empire allow the their enemies
room to work , before they where over thrown by them , and the rest is history , and may the USA if it continues on the present road of change.

Posted by: robby22 | Sep 29, 2009 3:06:58 PM

Barack Chamberlain Obama~

Appease in Our Time!

Posted by: profitsbeard | Sep 28, 2009 10:00:43 PM

This has to be the most anti-american president ever.. We just may not make it out of this. God help us.

Posted by: Carol | Sep 28, 2009 5:01:54 PM

I am disgusted. The lack of patriotism of the radical left is only exceeded by their stupidity. They have fallen out of the crackerjack box and they were not the popcorn. I never thought I would
wish death on a fellow american, but all those who work so hard to free terrorists should be the first to die by the terrorist hand. Harsh? not really, releasing terrorists is harsh. Because of their actions some parent will be visited by the military to be advised of a loved ones death. Those who free terrorists should know no less pain.

Posted by: Allan | Sep 28, 2009 4:09:35 PM

Candidate Obama in 2008 rattles the sabers:
“It’s time to heed the call from General McKiernan and others for more troops. That’s why I’d send at least two or three additional combat brigades to Afghanistan."

President Obama in 2009, not so much:
---The military general credited for capturing Saddam Hussein and killing the leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq says he has only spoken to President Obama once since taking command of Afghanistan.

“I’ve talked to the president, since I’ve been here, once on a VTC [video teleconferece],” General Stanley McChrystal told CBS reporter David Martin in a television interview that aired Sunday.

“YOU’VE TALKED TO HIM ONCE IN 70 DAYS?” Mr. Martin followed up.

“That is correct,” the general replied.

This revelation comes amid the explosive publication of an classified report written by the general that said the war in Afghanistan “will likely result in failure” of more troops are not added next year.---

Posted by: I'm Not a President, but I Play One on TV | Sep 28, 2009 10:45:37 AM

Sooooooooooo. Do we fight Iran before or after they get the bomb?

Posted by: Skullsplitter | Sep 28, 2009 9:28:37 AM

Its not about government efficiency or the "morale high ground" its about something many leftists cant fathom: SURVIVAL! The security of the United States comes second to leftists because they cant envision a day when we will not survive because they have never faced it themselves. Fools idealist fools.

Posted by: Dar | Sep 28, 2009 9:06:17 AM

President Barack Obama: "I'm not interested in victory."

Posted by: Appeasement Czar | Sep 28, 2009 8:35:20 AM

Is this the same gov't that is going to put me in jail for not getting health care? Then, they let terrorists go free? Obama is a child trying to do a grown ups job.

Posted by: Kathryn | Sep 28, 2009 8:23:50 AM

Frank Bernard, you have abslolutely no clue the kind of people these terrorists are. How would you like to go talk to one, and upon first seeing one for the very first time, not knowing a thing about the terrorist, he immediately starts the conversation with the way he was captured against the rules of the US Constitution, held against his will by the Dictator Bush, but that isn't why he wanted to talk to you, he wanted to let you know how he has now seen your face, and when he gets liberated he will track you down, kill your neighbors, then your dogs and cats, then your children, then your wife, then blow you to bits and the rest of your neighborhood. You are partially right, I think it is truly amazing we have allowed them to live this long with these promises, so that is what I have to be concerned about for the rest of my life. That and the fact that even with your liberal or progressive thoughts, I did it so you too could remain free.

Posted by: marion | Sep 28, 2009 2:29:26 AM

Have you been to GITMO and guarded these terrorists? I have. Trust me, there wasn't a single one down there that didn't belong there. I cringe every time I see a picture of one of them being let loose, especially after the conversations and hatred they showed towards me.

Posted by: marion | Sep 28, 2009 2:17:51 AM

what a bunch of cry-babies. We've long heard stories of soldiers kidnapping people and turning them in for bounties. If you are such strident taxpayers, why do you want your tax dollars to go for giving noncombatants three square meals a day? I thought this was about government efficiency? Oh, right, it's not your president. What a bunch of un-patriotic Kool-aid drinkers. Or is there anything that Glen Beck and Rush Limbaugh profess that you disagree with?

Posted by: barbarain_horde | Sep 28, 2009 1:20:23 AM

Obama is a complete imbecile. So half a dozen people place Ahmed at the scene, including Al-Qaeda, but we let him go because he said we can't prove it? Where are the soldiers who captured him? Probably killed by the last batch of Gitmo prisoners released. I'm sure Ahmed was just an innocent shuttle driver at Yemen International.

Posted by: Zeifus | Sep 28, 2009 12:08:37 AM

I am deeply offended by a government that would imprison its own citizens for failure to pay for government controlled health insurance. Let's put the oppressors in jail indeed Tom.

Posted by: sanfordsports | Sep 27, 2009 11:56:56 PM

I am deeply offended that we held these people as prisoners for 8 years on such weak evidence, this is what anti-democratic countries do. How would you like your mother or father, sister or brother held for years and years without a trial? I am disgusted as an american that anybody would support these type of fascist policies.

Posted by: Frank Bernard | Sep 27, 2009 11:40:52 PM

I am deeply offended that we help these people as prisoners for 8 years on such weak evidence, this is what anti-democratic countries do. How would you like your mother or father, sister or brother held for years and years without a trial?

Posted by: Frank Bernard | Sep 27, 2009 11:39:36 PM

This is just like living out the book, ATLAS SHRUGGED!

Posted by: stymee | Sep 27, 2009 11:34:56 PM

The Democrats had best get hold of this clown...and Princess Nanacy and Prince Reid, or there will be no Democrats in office above dog catcher.

Posted by: ringmaster76120 | Sep 27, 2009 11:27:04 PM

Post a comment





 

POLITICAL VIDEOS