RECENT POSTS
- Under the Stars, Obama Toasts India’s Prime Minister
- White House State Dinner – Who Made the Exclusive Guest List?
- Admiral Mike Mullen To Geneva for START Talks
- VP Biden to Indian Prime Minister: “You’re the Hottest Ticket in Town”
- FLOTUS on the State Dinner: Like a Swan, "Calm and Serene Above Water, But We're Paddling Like Mad, Going Crazy Underneath"
- White House State Dinner: The Menu, Entertainment, and Decor
- Dan Pfeiffer, White House Blogger
- Guests Begin to Arrive for White House State Dinner Festivities
- President Obama on Afghanistan Strategy: “It Is My Intention to Finish the Job”
- The Obamas Kick off their First State Visit, Welcome India's Prime Minister to the White House
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
$72,408 Per Stimulus Job? White House Says No
October 15, 2009 4:51 PM
Jake Tapper and Lisa Chinn report:
Five hundred billion dollars in stimulus monies for spending were appropriated last February. Of that, $143 billion in stimulus funds have been spent so far.
Just $16 billion of that was directly awarded by the Federal government; most of the money went to states and localities to spend.
Of the $16 billion awarded, $2.2 billion has actually gone to these contractors to create jobs.
Today the White House released data indicating that 30,383 jobs were directly created by these stimulus dollars.
"It is too soon to draw any global conclusions from this partial and preliminary data,” Recovery Act Chief Economist Jared Bernstein said in a statement, “but the early indications are quite positive. The direct count by Recovery Act recipients of jobs created or saved from this small percentage of the Recovery Act exceeds our projections. “
Basic math would indicate that $2.2 billion spent to create 30,383 jobs would indicate a cost per job of $72,408.
But the White House rejects this.
Recovery Act spokeswoman Elizabeth Oxhorn says that “this contract money doesn’t just go toward labor/wages for workers – it also funds things like purchase of equipment and supplies which also creates jobs.”
Moreover, she points out that “the job numbers reported by recipients and posted today are only direct jobs – or those workers whose paychecks are funded directly by the Recovery Act. That hits the labor/wages part of the equation, but there are also jobs created and saved from the purchasing of equipment and supplies (known as indirect jobs) and the additional purchasing power workers on these projects have that they wouldn’t without the job (known as induced jobs) that is not reflected in these numbers – which, of course, affects the bottom line of doing averages like this one. When you account for all of the non-direct jobs, much different scenario.”
(The 30,383 jobs figure will be updated; the White House “is temporarily withholding the data from two of the 5,232 federal contract recipient reports until the two recipients can correct their obviously incorrect submissions,” a statement on the Recovery.gov website says.)
Bernstein says that “All signs -- from private estimates to this fragmentary data -- point to the conclusion that the Recovery Act did indeed create or save about 1 million jobs in its first seven months, a much needed lift in a very difficult period for our economy. We look forward to the much larger, comprehensive report due on October 30th.”
On October 30, the Federal government will release information provided by the states (and handed in October 10) of how many auditable jobs they created that were directly attributed to the stimulus funds.
This number will be significantly lower than the one million jobs the White House says has been created, because their computations factored in the “indirect” and “induced” jobs created as well.
As White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said earlier this week: the state “reports themselves do not count a multiplier effect for jobs…. When we obviously know that in order to pave a road, it's not just the person paving the road. Somebody has got to make the pavement. Somebody makes those orange cones, so we don't crash into the people paving the road. So you know, we feel comfortable with our estimate.”
-Jake Tapper and Lisa Chinn
October 15, 2009 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (40)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
President Obama is destroying the country financially we are going to be bankrupt, the dollar is going to be worthless and we will be a memory in the minds of the rest of the world. Bush had his faults and was complicit in the start of this mess, but the demoncrats have been controlling the purse strings for long enough. All you idiots how voted for Obama vote for somee fiscal conservative candidates in the future.
God Bless our country
Posted by: King | Nov 17, 2009 9:55:13 PM
The "massive expense of war" argument precludes that liberal leadership would have done what, instead? Perhaps a trial would have sufficed? Good idea. Each time an American is killed because of something called Jihad, we'll have a trial. Hope and Change.
Posted by: poundnails | Nov 17, 2009 7:59:44 PM
wow, I thought I was the only one who remembered Rumsfeld's short-lived war on bureaucracy. Lasted about 3 hours, can you guess who won?
Posted by: kj1234 | Nov 17, 2009 4:22:32 PM
Smoke and Mirrors. If you watch the other hand closely, you can see them pulling your hard earned money out of your pay!!!
Posted by: KP | Nov 17, 2009 3:39:08 PM
I keep thinking about the banking salaries being slashed by Obama. Isn't he going to miss those income taxes and the money donated to charities? Charlotte NC is going to change big time when there is no money to pay contractors, small businesses, you know, main street.
Posted by: ella | Nov 17, 2009 3:30:43 AM
You have the love the ignorance of the average American. Apparently we can't do basic math. They teach long division in 3rd or 4th grade. At the Federal level $787 Billion = 640,000 jobs "created or saved". That's $1,229,687.50 per job. At the Mass level $4 billion = 12,000 jobs. That's $4 million for 12 jobs or $333,333 per job. It would be cheaper to the taxpayer to give people $100,000 to just stay the heck home.
Posted by: girlmiami | Nov 15, 2009 5:11:56 PM
The money is wasted. You are sending 15 billion to NJ to give state worker bigger pension and some more payoff. The big political payoff is happening. I think they gave 30 billion to the GM unions, Freddie Mac set asides and all those low income housing give away. If you pay tax get uses to it...you are going to pay alot more to Obama favorite Unions and inner city folks
Posted by: barry | Oct 25, 2009 2:58:54 PM
what surplus did Bush inherit? I know that we were told that Clinton balanced the budget and because we were told it happened we should believe it but, it never really happened. If the budget was actually balanced the national debt would not have increased. Believe the media hype if you like but it really just proves you are sheep blindly believing what you are told.
Posted by: mbp | Oct 21, 2009 5:11:43 PM
A little fuzzy math,You would have thought a Harvard Grad could do math a little better. 3-4 million jobs promised and only a little over 30K provable jobs created.What is going to happen in the states in 2 years when the excess medicaid provided by the stimulis runs out? and the Un-employment extended benefits? Get ready for more taxes,they are coming.
Posted by: marion | Oct 16, 2009 6:07:16 PM
What is this...the wing nutt forum of the internet?
Stop your bitching and whining and post something that's relevant to the current situation.
And keep in mind; Bush inherited a massive surplus and blew it. The housing debacle unfolded under his watch. 9/11 happened under his watch. Both wars were started under his watch.
Obama is trying to clean up the mess left behind...and of course, you already know that but don't have the ##### to admit it.
Posted by: Dalton | Oct 16, 2009 2:35:28 PM
30,000 jobs.
A little short of 3,000,000 promised, no?
Sham.
Posted by: Ster | Oct 16, 2009 2:34:57 PM
"Additionally, it's said that each dollar of income funneled into a depressed area generates up to $6 in other earnings"
What planet are you from?
Adding a single dollar to the economy adds... ONE dollar to the economy.
That SINGLE dollar may get passed around many times, but it's still only ONE SINGLE dollar additional.
Posted by: Ster | Oct 16, 2009 2:34:36 PM
JA- "THIS is the change you fools voted for and the media fell in love with. Hows that working for you?"
Compared to what we've had via Bush & Company for 8 years? (Spent surplus, two massively expensive wars). How do you suppose we got into this situation in the first place? The Republicans have had the majority in Congress for 12 of the last 14 years and the White House for 8 of the last 8 1/2.
YOU figure it out, smart guy.
Posted by: Dalton | Oct 16, 2009 2:32:56 PM
We have a small family contracting co. It was started in 1961, have done over 700 contracts at military installations over the last 45 yrs. In the last 4 or 5 yrs, all the Procurement from DOD has gone to "S.A.B.E.R." contracts, only ones who can bid are minority 8A set aside companies. Have put or is putting small companies out of business. All the recovery work here in ga has gone to these contractors, not to anyone else
Posted by: Ja | Oct 16, 2009 11:03:52 AM
THIS is the change you fools voted for and the media fell in love with. Hows that working for you?
Posted by: DANIEL | Oct 16, 2009 8:05:28 AM
I suppose the people in Detroit Cobo Hall that were on the verge of rioting,standing in line to get Obama money(That is what they called it)were a part of the Stimulus Plan.Paying people to do nothing is not a plan.
Posted by: Johnny L | Oct 16, 2009 8:01:15 AM
Since most of the jobs are not going to millionaires who average 19.6%, we can figure that at least 20% of their gross incomes goes to federal taxes. And another 15.3% (7.65% matched by employer) comes back as FICA taxes. And more goes in to state and local income and sales taxes.
Additionally, it's said that each dollar of income funneled into a depressed area generates up to $6 in other earnings: the guy with the stimulus job gets his hair cut, giving the barber money to buy new scissors, the scissors clerk gets her hair done, the hair stylist eats at a restaurant, etc.
Consequently, in this recession, it would interesting to see how much in taxes is generated by the stimulus. It's got to be at least $500B and I wouldn't be surprised if the $787B generates $1000B in taxes when all is said and done.
Posted by: The_Mick | Oct 16, 2009 7:05:49 AM
Try to get some perspective, this money is nothing compared with the 9 BILLION the Bush/Cheney contractors 'misplaced' in Iraq.
You'll also remember the several BILLION Rumsfeld was about to annouce as 'missing' in the Pentagon budget just as 9/11 was happening.
If you're going to carp over corruption and incompetence, pay a little attention to precedents set by the Republicans. They are the masters of it.
"Liberals apparently aren't able to defend Obama's policies so they need to attack republicans."
No, liberals are just smart enough to compare the behavior of both parties and find that the Republicans come out as the far worse of the two.
Posted by: julieterra | Oct 16, 2009 12:34:19 AM
"...pay a little attention to precedents set by the Republicans. They are the masters of it."
Liberals apparently aren't able to defend Obama's policies so they need to attack republicans. I think that is right out of Saul Alinsky's rules for radicals.
Posted by: Gwen | Oct 16, 2009 12:27:50 AM
Try to get some perspective, this money is nothing compared with the 9 BILLION the Bush/Cheney contractors 'misplaced' in Iraq.
You'll also remember the several BILLION Rumsfeld was about to annouce as 'missing' in the Pentagon budget just as 9/11 was happening.
If you're going to carp over corruption and incompetence, pay a little attention to precedents set by the Republicans. They are the masters of it.
Posted by: julieterra | Oct 15, 2009 11:46:18 PM
Post a comment
