RECENT POSTS
- Oprah, Health Care Lobbyists, Among Recent Visitors to White House
- An Obama Thanksgiving Menu, with an Extra Serving of Pie
- White House Thanksgiving Traditions: Broken and Observed
- Obama, GOP Air Differences Over Jobs, Economy In Thanksgiving Addresses
- White House State Dinner Party Crashers
- Obama to Lay Out Emissions Goals in Copenhagen
- Free Bird
- The "Good" War
- The Presidential Planner
- Under the Stars, Obama Toasts India’s Prime Minister
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
Obama Pushes Small Business Aid, Says the American Dream Needs a Loan
October 24, 2009 6:01 AM
ABC News' Rachel Martin reports:
President Obama invoked the American dream in his weekly address today -- putting the spotlight on small businesses and his efforts to get these businesses the credit they need to grow.
These are the millions of Americans who "embody the spirit of possibility, the relentless work ethic and the hope for something better," the president said.
But he noted that this segment of the population has been hardest hit by the current recession.
"Over the past couple of years, small businesses have lost hundreds of thousands of jobs," he said. "Many have struggled to get the loans they need to finance their inventories and make payroll. Many entrepreneurs can’t get financing to start a small business in the first place. And many more are discouraged from even trying because of the crushing costs of health care."
While the focus of his remarks were on the need for small businesses to access better lines of credit, the president worked in another pitch for health care reform.
"In addition, our health reform plan will allow small businesses to buy insurance for their employees through an insurance exchange, which may offer better coverage at lower costs -- and we’ll provide tax credits for those that choose to do so," he said.
President Obama said small businesses are the key to economic recovery, adding that if they are going to grow, they need help.
To that end, the president called on Congress to "increase the maximum size of various SBA loans, so that more small business owners can set up shop and grow their operations. I also announced that we’ll be taking additional steps through our financial stability plan to make more credit available to the small local and community banks that so many small businesses depend on."
The president said that though large businesses are back on solid ground with the help of the stimulus bill, small businesses are still struggling.
"These are the very taxpayers who stood by America’s banks in a crisis -- and now it’s time for our banks to stand by creditworthy small businesses and make the loans they need to open their doors, grow their operations, and create new jobs," he said. "It’s time for those banks to fulfill their responsibility to help ensure a wider recovery, a more secure system and more broadly shared prosperity."
And any real, long term economic recovery, he said, means building up the American middle class and the small businesspeople who built it.
"This country was built by dreamers," President Obama said. "They’re the workers who took a chance on their desire to be their own boss, the part-time inventors who became the full-time entrepreneurs, the men and women who have helped build the American middle class, keeping alive that most American of ideals. ... We need to do everything we can to ensure that they can keep taking those risks, acting on those dreams, and building the enterprises that fuel our economy and make us who we are."
--Rachel Martin
October 24, 2009 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (127)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Absolutely right! i am totally agreed over not paying those big salaries. Obama is doing right for the taxpayers, the Americans. I liked this strategy!
Posted by: Insurance Reviews | Oct 27, 2009 7:26:38 AM
Only the little people pay taxes.
Posted by: Ghost of Leona Helmsley | Oct 26, 2009 11:42:21 PM
Actually the fact that the top 1% of the nation's wage earners account for 40.42% of the total federal income tax revenue; and the top 5% of the nation's wage earners account for 60.63% of the total federal income tax revenue; are from the Tax Foundation website citing the Internal Revenue's data for 2007.
Posted by: James Danley | Oct 26, 2009 10:20:47 PM
"Yes taking advantage of the tax law loopholes does lower one's tax liability. So what is your point? Even with the lowered tax liability they still pay millions in taxes."
So to recap, multi millionaires paying much less of a percentage of their income income in taxes than the working class is a good idea according to the right wing.
But at least you acknowledge that advantages are taken and the Heritage Foundation numbers you post are completely bogus.
Posted by: Ryan C | Oct 26, 2009 8:09:09 PM
Yes taking advantage of the tax law loopholes does lower one's tax liability. So what is your point? Even with the lowered tax liability they still pay millions in taxes.
Warren Buffett may have a net tax rate that is lower than his secretary and his cleaner but he still pays millions more in taxes.
Posted by: James Danley | Oct 26, 2009 6:45:13 PM
For me there's no amreican dream anymore, anyway something must be done in order to reduce unemployment rate.
Posted by: Craig Miller | Oct 26, 2009 4:46:16 PM
"The so-called "greedy" CEOs"
What would you call a CEO who runs the company into the ground while walking away personally wealthier by the experience?
"are paying millions of dollars in federal, state (where applicable) and local (where applicable) income taxes. You cut their income by 90% and you cut their tax liabilities by about 90%."
How laughable.
CEO can hire accountants with the money they make dramatically decreasing their tax liability.
"Warren Buffett, the third-richest man in the world, has criticised the US tax system for allowing him to pay a lower rate than his secretary and his cleaner."
Posted by: Ryan C | Oct 26, 2009 3:25:15 PM
The so-called "greedy" CEOs are paying millions of dollars in federal, state (where applicable) and local (where applicable) income taxes. You cut their income by 90% and you cut their tax liabilities by about 90%. That means dramatically LESS REVENUE for the federal, state (where applicable) and local (where applicable) governments. The federal, state and local governments will then have to raise taxes on the middle class or drastically cut services.
By the way that also means hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of dollars less in contributions to charities.
Posted by: James Danley | Oct 26, 2009 3:21:16 PM
Small businesses do need some help. They find it hard to compete for good employees, as most can't afford to pay for a share of health insurance for their employees. As well, they have to compete with corporate chains that can under-price their goods because of their huge volume of wholesale purchases.
Posted by: Lydia | Oct 26, 2009 1:34:53 PM
James Danley, do you realize that the President's salary is only $400,000 to run the whole country. So don't compare some greedy ceo who's job is only running a bank, earning a salary in the millions getting his pay cut. That's just silly.
Posted by: Lydia | Oct 26, 2009 1:31:00 PM
If the American Dream needs a loan then they should stop with the Consumer Financial Protection Agency. It will put such restrictions on some companies that most Americans will have no where to go and borrow unless they can get it from a bank. Oh I forgot banks are not lending. Seriously you need to get informed on the CFPA I know it sounds like a good thing but it will put companies who lend out of business.
Posted by: 'Un-American' | Oct 26, 2009 11:59:13 AM
Julieterra, so why is the Left all up in arms about the Healthcare Insurance Industry executives making their millions? Or the gas company executives making their millions? They aren't getting federal bailout money! It has more to do with simple class warfare then taxpayers' money.
The Left is always whining that the wealthy don't pay their fair share in taxes, yet the top 1% of the nation's wage earners account for 40.42% of the total federal income tax revenue; and the top 5% of the nation's wage earners account for 60.63% of the total federal income tax revenue. And now we learn that the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center estimates that nearly 47% of the nation's households will have either no federal income tax liability or a negative tax liability (receive a net credit due to tax credits). Nearly 9% of households with an income between $75,000 and $100,000 will have no federal income tax liability or a negative tax liability.
Posted by: James Danley | Oct 26, 2009 8:44:18 AM
"It's not the dollar amount, it's the principle of the thing."
________________________________
Nonsense, taxpayers don't want executives paid millions in salaries when their companies are propped up by taxpayers' dollars.
Posted by: julieterra | Oct 26, 2009 2:04:20 AM
It's not the dollar amount, it's the principle of the thing.
Posted by: James Danley | Oct 26, 2009 12:07:19 AM
"If the government is going to mandate executives cut their pay then the government should lead by example."
__________________________________
Nonsense. Bank executive salaries cut were in the MILLION dollar range.
There is no way corporations floated on taxpayers' money should be paying executives astronomical salaries, bonuses and perks. When the companies are making great profits and the tax payer has been paid back - fine.
Posted by: julieterra | Oct 25, 2009 10:37:41 PM
If the government is going to mandate executives cut their pay then the government should lead by example.
Posted by: James Danley | Oct 25, 2009 8:06:17 PM
"Well, then I say that the President, Vice-President, Senators, Representatives, Cabinet Secretaries, Czars AND all of their respective staffs members, should take a 90% cut. ALL of their salaries and staff budgets are from taxpayers money!"
_______________________________________
Obama did freeze senior White House salaries immediately upon taking office.
p.s. - government salaries are supposed to be paid by government money. Astronomical executive salaries of private industry are not.
Posted by: julieterra | Oct 25, 2009 7:54:42 PM
Biz2Credit, or these individuals can visit their local ACORN office!
Posted by: James Danley | Oct 25, 2009 7:12:24 PM
Well, then I say that the President, Vice-President, Senators, Representatives, Cabinet Secretaries, Czars AND all of their respective staffs members, should take a 90% cut. ALL of their salaries and staff budgets are from taxpayers money!
Posted by: James Danley | Oct 25, 2009 7:09:31 PM
Financial education is a necessary step to ensure that the business owner understands the structure of the loan and how successfully manage their business's debt exposure. I run a small business marketplace that connects business owners to financing options
We frequently receive questions and concerns surrounding a persons eligibility for various lending programs - both conventional and SBA financing. A large majority of business owners do not know the fundamentals of business financial management. For example, yesterday we received a request from an entrepreneur looking to purchase a business with no money down, a poor credit history and little knowledge about the assets involved in the acquisition. Businesses need to know the right questions to ask and access to the fundamentals of financial management. There’s a lot of freely available information and advice from our expert network for business owners. However, I think the government needs to take a lead in launching more seminars and workshops to help businesses scrutinize their finances and growth projections.
Posted by: Biz2Credit | Oct 25, 2009 6:58:51 PM
Post a comment


