RECENT POSTS
- White House Study Looks at Job Creation in Illinois if Gitmo Prisoners Transferred There
- President Obama: Asia Trip Helped Usher in a New Era of American Engagement
- Secretary Sebelius Celebrates the Tenth Anniversary of National Adoption Day
- Organizing for America Targets Sarah Palin
- Obama Administration Starts to Publicly Raise Issue of Detained US Citizen Xue Feng
- President Obama Gives Interview (of Sorts) to Dissident Cuban Blogger
- "You Guys Make a Pretty Good Photo Op," President Obama Jokes to Troops at Osan Air Base
- Did the Chinese Government Crack Down on an Obama Interview?
- Our Trip to the DMZ
- President Obama Greets U.S. Troops in South Korea, Wraps Up Week in Asia
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
White House Gears Up for Disappointing Election Day
October 31, 2009 9:53 AM
With Democrats poised to lose the governor's race in Virginia, and to possibly lose the governor's race in New Jersey and a special election for a House seat in New York, the White House has started insisting any pending losses will not have any significance.
"Whatever the results are I don't think they portend a lot in dealing with the future," White House press secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters on Friday, pointing to the fact that Democrats won the Virginia and New Jersey governors' races in 2001 despite a very popular President Bush, with Republicans picking up seats in Congress in 2002.
"I think we continue to take the long view on what's going on in Washington and throughout the country," Gibbs said.
In Virginia, Democrat Creigh Deeds trailed Republican Bob McDonnell, 44% to 55%, in the latest Washington Post poll through October 25. Since the early 1970s, the party not in power in the White House has won the Virginia governor's race, and even Democratic supporters of Deeds' have been saying he certainly played a role in this tradition likely being continued on Tuesday.
President Obama will appear at campaign rallies in New Jersey Sunday to help the struggling and unpopular incumbent governor, Jon Corzine, who polls show is in a statistical dead heat with the Republican nominee, former U.S. Attorney Chris Christie.
On Monday, Vice President Joe Biden will appear at a campaign rally in Watertown, N.Y., to help the Democratic candidate in the special election for that New York House seat, Bill Owens, who is in a tight race with Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman.
One bright spot for Democrats in this tough atmosphere has been infighting among conservatives and Republicans in that House race. The Republican nominee, Assemblywoman Dede Scozzafava, is in third place in many polls, having largely been abandoned by national Republican figures. That Scozzafava is liberal to moderate on some issues -- same sex marriage, abortion rights -- has angered many in the Republican base, and Hoffman has benefited from that outrage, drawing the endorsements of such GOP stars as former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty and former New York Gov. George Pataki.
One notable exception has been former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, R-Ga., who told Fox News that "this idea that we're suddenly going to establish litmus tests and all across the country we're going to purge the party of anybody who doesn't agree with us 100 percent; that guarantees Obama's reelection, that guarantees Pelosi as Speaker-for-life." Gingrich pointed out that Scozzafava has been endorsed by the National Rifle Association, and opposes Democratic legislation on health care reform and climate change.
President Obama is responsible for the need for a special election in the Upstate New York district, having tapped the former congressman in the district, Rep. John McHugh, R-NY, as his new Army Secretary.
- jpt
UPDATE: Republican nominee for Congress Dede Scozzafava announced Saturday that she has dropped out of the race, according to the Watertown Daily Times.
October 31, 2009 in White House | Permalink | Share | User Comments (211)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
nice written Skip, in last comment.
Posted by: Aery | Nov 3, 2009 7:47:10 AM
If NJ votes for Corzine again, then all hope is lost for the state. As California goes, so goes New Jersey - right down the sewer.
Posted by: ConservativeWoman | Nov 2, 2009 8:56:48 PM
We can only hope!!!
Posted by: Parallex View | Nov 2, 2009 5:13:34 PM
ACORN trolls are out with the Alinski propaganda tactics with the elections looking like a massive repudiation of the tax em to death & redistribute the wealth radicals.
Posted by: Lincoln | Nov 1, 2009 9:18:39 PM
Do you get bonus dollars for that many teabot buzzwords in one post?
__________________________________
The moronic, robotic right mumbling through their list. Free thinkers every one.
Posted by: tierra | Nov 1, 2009 11:52:49 PM
NJ has the highest property taxes in the nation with more on the way if Corzine is allowed to continue to stay in his feathered nest.
Posted by: Lincoln | Nov 1, 2009 9:19:43 PM
I see Alyson and the usual ACORN trolls are out with the Alinski propaganda tactics with the elections looking like a massive repudiation of the tax em to death & redistribute the wealth radicals.
Posted by: Lincoln | Nov 1, 2009 9:18:39 PM
"These conservatives’ whiny cries of victimization also parrot a tic they once condemned in liberals."
Posted by: Alyson | Nov 1, 2009 8:14:38 PM
"The more rightists who win G.O.P. primaries, the greater the Democrats’ prospects next year. But the electoral math is less interesting than the pathology of this movement. Its antecedent can be found in the early 1960s, when radical-right hysteria carried some of the same traits we’re seeing now: seething rage, fear of minorities, maniacal contempt for government, and a Freudian tendency to mimic the excesses of political foes. Writing in 1964 of that era’s equivalent to today’s tea party cells, the historian Richard Hofstadter observed that the John Birch Society’s “ruthless prosecution” of its own ideological war often mimicked the tactics of its Communist enemies.
The same could be said of Beck, Palin and their acolytes. Though they constantly liken the president to various totalitarian dictators, it is they who are re-enacting Stalinism in full purge mode."
Posted by: Alyson | Nov 1, 2009 8:14:04 PM
Also from Rich's column: "Hoffman doesn’t even live in the district. When he appeared before the editorial board ... he “showed no grasp” of local issues... Last week it turned out that Hoffman’s prime attribute to the radical right — as a take-no-prisoners fiscal conservative — was bogus. In fact he’s on the finance committee of a hospital that happily helped itself to a $479,000 federal earmark. "
Posted by: Alyson | Nov 1, 2009 8:12:26 PM
I read a great op-ed this morning about this race and hope you all have had a chance to read it. It's Frank Rich's column titled " The GOP Stalinists Invade Upstate New York." It's spot on in many, many ways. A couple of tastes:
"The battle for upstate New York confirms just how swiftly the right has devolved into a wacky, paranoid cult that is as eager to eat its own as it is to destroy Obama. The movement’s undisputed leaders, Palin and Beck, neither of whom has what Palin once called the “actual responsibilities” of public office, would gladly see the Republican Party die on the cross of right-wing ideological purity. Over the short term, at least, their wish could come true."
Posted by: Alyson | Nov 1, 2009 8:11:24 PM
"It's time to elect politicians that are anti-Washington."
_____________________________________
And that would be Republicans right? Hahahaha . ..
Posted by: tierra | Nov 1, 2009 5:13:34 PM
Good riddance Scozzafava.
Drain the swamp.
It's time to elect politicians that are anti-Washington.
Scazzafava up to her neck with the unions--and Obama gives her a thrill up her leg.
Posted by: hank | Nov 1, 2009 4:53:27 PM
Scozzafava has endorsed her previous opponent- Bill Owens. Doesn't this prove tha argument that Scozzofava is in the wrong party? How could she have ever been nominated by the local GOP?Is there a local GOP?
Posted by: Nephron | Nov 1, 2009 3:28:04 PM
Valerie Jarett say the GOP is becoming more extreme.
This from an administration to the left of France and Germany.
So extreme that Chavez was complimenting them for taking over a car company.
____________________________________
I think you just helped to prove her point.
"To the left of Germany"? As if that is meaningful. Are you not aware Germany currently has a right leaning government?
Are you aware Chavez is democratically elected? Do you understand the concept of democracy?
Posted by: tierra | Nov 1, 2009 3:13:48 PM
Valerie Jarett say the GOP is becoming more extreme.
This from an administration to the left of France and Germany.
So extreme that Chavez was complimenting them for taking over a car company.
Pot..meet kettle.
Hypocrites
Posted by: hank | Nov 1, 2009 3:00:00 PM
Hey what does a win by a Dem gov in California say about Obama and the GOP loss of the seat? just asking or CA doesnt matter any more?
===========
Do you mean the election scheduled for a year from tomorrow, Bill?
Posted by: MayBee | Nov 1, 2009 12:56:02 PM
Netanyahu 1, Bammy 0.
Posted by: tanarg | Nov 1, 2009 12:41:24 PM
Hey what does a win by a Dem gov in California say about Obama and the GOP loss of the seat? just asking or CA doesnt matter any more?
Posted by: Bill | Nov 1, 2009 12:30:12 PM
'Difference between Obama and Reagan is that within minutes of Reagan's inauguration the Iran hostages were RELEASED..."
Isn't it interesting how that worked out? It's almost like Reagan was negotiating with our enemies before he was even elected... Should we think it was just coincidence then that this same administration then covertly allowed the sale of arms to the former home of the hostage takers to fund terrorist activities in Central America that killed thousands of civilians including women and children? Reagan bought the hostages freedom for blood money.
Posted by: Skip | Nov 1, 2009 12:13:49 PM
MayBee posted "Obviously, the Republicans spent too much...but they haven't controlled Congress in almost 3 years. Bush has been out of office 9 months.
How long can Democrats go without claiming responsibility for something?"
---------------------------------------
Faurtz8 posted "I'm still waiting for the Republicans to claim responsibility for something?"
Most of them claim the same old BS story about how everything went bad after the Democrats took control.
You are acting like the prior 6 years of total Republican control had absolutely zero effect on our country. BS!"
---------------------------------------
To which Fascist responded: "I'm still waiting for the Republicans to claim responsibility for something?"
What the heck--why don't we start with, say, the crumbling of the Berlin wall, the liberation of Eastern Europe, and the disappearance of the Soviet Empire? Will that do?
--------------------------------------
I think Maybee was asking the Democrats to take responsibility for things that she perceives as being problems. Faurtz8 then asked for the Republicans to take responsibility for the current state of our country which I believe the consensus is that it's not very good. -To which Fascist responds by lauding the same old Reagan laurels that the Republicans have been lounging around on for decades now. Either he believes that the collapse of the Soviet Union was a problem or it's clearly a cheap non-sequitur that, even though Faurtz8 cared to continue, really didn't warrant further debate.
Posted by: Skip | Nov 1, 2009 11:31:07 AM
Post a comment


