RECENT POSTS
- Under the Stars, Obama Toasts India’s Prime Minister
- White House State Dinner – Who Made the Exclusive Guest List?
- Admiral Mike Mullen To Geneva for START Talks
- VP Biden to Indian Prime Minister: “You’re the Hottest Ticket in Town”
- FLOTUS on the State Dinner: Like a Swan, "Calm and Serene Above Water, But We're Paddling Like Mad, Going Crazy Underneath"
- White House State Dinner: The Menu, Entertainment, and Decor
- Dan Pfeiffer, White House Blogger
- Guests Begin to Arrive for White House State Dinner Festivities
- President Obama on Afghanistan Strategy: “It Is My Intention to Finish the Job”
- The Obamas Kick off their First State Visit, Welcome India's Prime Minister to the White House
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
Official: 'Sense' is President Obama Has 'Pretty Much Decided' on Af-Pak Strategy
November 15, 2009 1:30 PM
SHANGHAI -- A senior administration official told some reporters in Singapore that his "sense" is that President Obama has "pretty much decided" on which Af-Pak strategy he will pick but hasn't yet made a firm decision and is still working out details.
The official said his sense was the President's chosen strategy isn't going to be everything the Pentagon wants.
The White House is discussing how to roll out the announcement, whenever it's final.
-jpt
November 15, 2009 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (41)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Interesting. I just read that UK's Prime Minister Gordon Brown said today that he wants to agree a timetable for international withdrawal from Afghanistan, offering London as a venue for a conference to set that timetable. The gov't is under pressure to commit to a very clear exit strategy-- you know, like the one our president requested during a White House meeting with his war council last week. Glad we have a president than doesn't have to be pressured to provide an exit strategy-- he actually has the clear head to ask for one while being pressured by and receiving sometimes hostile criticism from Republicans and conservatives.
Posted by: @Octavia | Nov 16, 2009 9:52:13 PM
ohbummer.
Posted by: gatorsnc81 | Nov 16, 2009 8:27:33 PM
I hope his judgment on Afghanistan is wise. We don't want the next generation still fighting this war.
Our troops deserve the best
***
I can agree with that much. (Sorry for being testy the other day.)
Posted by: Alyson | Nov 16, 2009 5:55:31 PM
I hope his judgment on Afghanistan is wise. We don't want the next generation still fighting this war.
Our troops deserve the best
***
I can agree with that much. (Sorry for being testy the other day.)
Posted by: Alyson | Nov 16, 2009 5:55:27 PM
now that you've spent hours rehashing the past, and playing the blame game. I repeat...
Slurring the prior administration isn't making this administrations decisions any more palatable.
Obama is faced with many difficult decisions...so far his administration has made numerous bad ones.
I hope his judgment on Afghanistan is wise. We don't want the next generation still fighting this war.
Our troops deserve the best, lets HOPE for it.
Posted by: wow | Nov 16, 2009 5:13:35 PM
uh oh, right wingers quoting CNN....
the apocalypse is near
Posted by: PO'd | Nov 16, 2009 3:16:12 AM
I'm getting the impression that statements like these could actually be taken seriously by some. May I suggest keeping chill pills handy when you mention the apocalypse?
Posted by: @Octavia | Nov 16, 2009 2:12:37 PM
In his town hall,I read that Obama said definitively al Qaeda is no longer in Afghanistan, but rather is in Pakistan (which isn't the first time.) He also said the United States’ job in Afghanistan is to “stabilize” the country. On “Meet the Press” Hillary said, “We're going to expect more from the Afghan government going forward, and we've got some very specific asks that we will be making. In addition, Pakistan’s civilian and military leaders are entangled in political confrontations that could potentially lead to a constitutional crisis. another complication. What a hot mess.
I sincerely hope the President can figure out a strategy that gets us out of it in a way that keeps us safe.
Overall, the tea leaves seem to suggest that exit strategies are vital and that the admin wants some sort of "trigger" that enables them to pull out on the Afghan government, if it doesn’t meet certain conditions. I hope that is the case as I don't want a repeat of the quagmire in Viet Nam.
I don't get the "sense" that the President is clueless at all. I agree with Axelrod-- many of the critics have never been, and never will be, in the President's position. Not many Presidents have been in his position.
Oops, several people have answered your question. He will make and announce his decision and roll out the strategy to the American public when he is ready. I believe it will be just before or immediately after Thanksgiving, after he returns from DC. Patience is a virtue.
Posted by: @Octavia | Nov 16, 2009 2:07:18 PM
I get the "sense" that Obama is, and
will remain, clueless. A change of
Congress in 2010 makes more sense
every day.
Posted by: grizzlybare | Nov 16, 2009 1:45:55 PM
Obama being in office was accomplished via a major sham. I've talked to some who voted for him who have buyer's remorse. He won't win Va again either. He has no leadership skills and shows it time and time again. He is working a long con on the troop decision. He is just stringing the public along. He will probably send few if any reinforcements. He will betray US and New Yorkers in particular if he pulls out of Afgh b/c they will regroup and attack NY again. His speech in Japan was like a stoner on a job interview. He was either on something, inept or both.
Posted by: stryker | Nov 16, 2009 11:21:02 AM
CNN reported
Posted by: Oops
uh oh, right wingers quoting CNN....
the apocalypse is near
Posted by: PO'd | Nov 16, 2009 3:16:12 AM
Just think what would happen if ANY Rep said that...
you mean like often repeated 'America is a christian nation' complete with faulty 'founder' attributions?..
Posted by: PO'd | Nov 16, 2009 3:14:31 AM
The commander BHO picked for Afghan stated the war will be lost within 1 year if he doesn't receive 40k troops soon. BHO doesn't have 8 years to decide.
BHO has stated in March he had a policy AND strategy that he was implementing in Afghan. 3 months ago BHO announced he doesn't have a clue as to what he may do in Afghan. Today he is still dithering, undecided and clueless as to what to do after all the facts have been given.
As to religion, CNN reported of Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) reaching for the stars while addressing an evangelical congregation in South Carolina:
"We're going to keep on praising together. I am confident that we can create a Kingdom right here on Earth."
Just think what would happen if ANY Rep said that...
Posted by: Oops | Nov 16, 2009 2:47:16 AM
The request for additional troops in Afghanistan sat on Bush's desk for 8 months – and no action was taken.
Why? Because they knew it was a difficult decision, and they decided instead of manning up and making it, they'd wait until after the election.
You know, in case things went badly, it would once again remind Americans just how incompetent they were. It would have reflected badly on them, then-candidate McCain and the GOP in general.
Lovely, wasn't it, the way Bush played politics with our soldiers' lives?
Posted by: dose of reality | Nov 16, 2009 2:42:58 AM
Perhaps BHO will make his decision right after he chooses which church to start attending again
Posted by: Oops
funny...., but the fraud religious appeal of folks like the republican/conservative christians of the 'C Street' cabal certainly clarify the 'right wing' along with Sanford, Vitter, Palin and the witchdoctor...Gingrich and the rest
Posted by: PO'd | Nov 16, 2009 2:19:52 AM
When will Obama make his decision?
Posted by: Oops
when he is ready...
I am amazed with the impatience of the 'right wing' who want definitive solutions to Afghanistan in less than 1 year, after 8+ years of neglect from Bush & Cheney. It is that very kind of short sighted 'gut' thinking which led to the Iraq fiasco and the neglect of the American military in Afghanistan by Bush/Cheney.
you all seem to voice this constant 'concern' for the troops,.. this year..... but were silent for the previous 8 years...... why?
Posted by: PO'd | Nov 16, 2009 2:11:20 AM
Perhaps BHO will make his decision right after he chooses which church to start attending again. Has Rev Wright set up shop in DC?
Posted by: Oops | Nov 16, 2009 1:58:18 AM
PO, YO and Octavia, When will Obama make his decision? What is he waiting for now?
Everything he said he needed to make a decision has been done. What now?
Posted by: Oops | Nov 16, 2009 1:53:42 AM
Bush called not only the commander in Iraq EVERY day but also a lower level commander in the field down to the company level to get their assessment.
Posted by: Oops
'very impressive', too bad there was no reason to invade Iraq, but hey, Bush spoke to God to get an OK for getting americans killed..
I always loved the line, 'major combat is over',
as the battles raged on
Mission Accomplished
Posted by: PO'd | Nov 16, 2009 12:50:45 AM
As the Axe put it on CNN (in response to Romney: "I know that Governor Romney has never had responsibility for any decision akin to this, so he just may not be familiar with all that it entails. But I think the American people are being well served by a process that is assiduous and in which every aspect of this is considered. Because, after all, lives of American servicemen are involved here. An enormous investment on the part of the American people, we ought to get it right"
Posted by: @Octavia | Nov 16, 2009 12:44:03 AM
Bush... completely off guard by 9/11"-just like Obama was caught off guard by Ft. Hood.
Posted by: Nephron
of course the difference is that Bush was presented a PDB stating attack was imminent
btw: if you really want to delve, wasn't the Ft. Hood shooter already in the military while Bush was president...... how come he didn't know about him?
Bush/Cheney: keeping America safe?; 0 for 2
Posted by: YO | Nov 16, 2009 12:43:02 AM
Post a comment


