- Daily Photo: Obama Jokes Around at G-20
- Blackwater gets replaced in Iraq
- Daily Photo: U.S. Marines Look Out for Taliban in Afghanistan
- Hillary Clinton the Tomboy and Her "Ah-Ha" Moment
- Obama Administration Sudan Envoy Headed to Region
- Daily Photo: Potential Flashpoint in Iraq
- Clinton Says New Afghanistan-Pakistan Plan Depends on Diplomacy
- Exclusive: Three Israeli Airstrikes Against Sudan
- Additional 4,000 Troops to Be Ordered to Afghanistan
- Daily Photo: Navy Submarine Trains in the Arctic
- Alarm Over North Korea Missile Prep
- Anti-Terror Stimulus? US Offers Rewards for Top Terrorists
- Daily Photo: Pakistani Women in Refugee Camp
- Condoleezza Rice Appears on "The Tonight Show"
- Diplomat and Aid Group Sound the Alarm on Darfur Camp Situation
- auto industry rescue
- Ballotwatch
- Biden, Joe
- Bush, George W.
- Clinton, Bill
- Clinton, Hillary
- Dodd, Chris
- Edwards, John
- Giuliani, Rudy
- Gravel, Mike
- Huckabee, Mike
- Hunter, Duncan
- Inauguration
- Iraq
- Kucinich, Dennis
- McCain, John
- Obama, Barack
- Palin, Sarah
- Paul, Ron
- Romney, Mitt
- Tancredo, Tom
- Thompson, Fred
- Veepstakes
- Vote 2008: Democrats
- Vote 2008: Republicans
- Washington
- White House
« Previous | Main | Next »
Schumer Mocks GOP Iraq Rhetoric
October 19, 2006 1:51 PM
ABC News' Karuna Seshasai reports: In a conference call today, DSCC Chairman Chuck Schumer discussed the challenge many Republicans seem to be facing when explaining their position on the war in Iraq. The "trend has Republicans tied up in knots" as the American people now "intuitively agree" that Democrats would do a better job on foreign policy issues, said Schumer.
Citing the irony with specific examples, Sen. Schumer mocked the Republicans' efforts to inform the American public of their Iraqi end-game. Sen. Conrad Burns (R-MT) recently told his Democratic opponent that the President has a plan for Iraq, but "we're not going to tell you what our plan is." Schumer called Burns' words "Nixonesque."
Schumer tried to contain his elation when citing Sen. Rick Santorum's (R-PA) allusion to the Lord of the Rings trilogy. "As the hobbits are going up Mount Doom, the Eye of Mordor is being drawn somewhere else," Santorum said. "It's being drawn to Iraq and it's not being drawn to the U.S. You know what? I want to keep it on Iraq. I don't want the Eye to come back here to the United States."
"It's no surprise that the public now has more faith in Democrats," Schumer reiterated. "When candidates are talking about using wizards and hobbits" on "majority security concerns," obviously "it raises red flags in voters."
October 19, 2006 | Permalink | User Comments (14)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Schumer is right, Americans are fed up with every aspect of the war and how it's been politicized. Most Americans have figured out that the War in Iraq has made the terrorist threat worse. It's getting harder and harder for Republicans to exploit national security for political purposes. A majority of voters, including many conservatives, are against the Iraq War, torture, and illegal wiretapping, so voters now applaud the Democrats for not supporting these misguided GOP policies.
Posted by: Bill Higgins | Oct 19, 2006 2:26:36 PM
As usual, Senator Schumer offers us his wonderful sence of humor but no Democratic plan for the American people to consider. President Bush faces tough alternatives with no easy answers but he is not afraid to face these issues head on.
Posted by: YAFer in Jerusalem | Oct 20, 2006 4:04:37 AM
Sen. Santorum's comparison of the war in Iraq to the Lord of the Rings will go into rhetoric textbooks as one of the best examples of when NOT to draw an analogy.
Posted by: chuck | Oct 20, 2006 9:34:52 AM
So YAFer, what is Bushes plan? I would like to know it. How is 'staying the course' facing tough alternatives?
Just curious.
Posted by: hostiledm | Oct 20, 2006 10:23:08 AM
This is for YAfer.
Democrats deserve a chance now. The republicans have messed up big-time. We did not need any more "john wayne" tactics by Bush and congress. You are in denial just like congress and the administration. Such Arrogance in this world.
Posted by: CR Adams | Oct 20, 2006 10:57:42 AM
In Arabic, Iraq War is spelled Viet Nam.
I don't see any humor in this war that is based on a doucumented lie.
In English, Iraq War is spelled: Hell On Earth.
Adam.
Posted by: Adam Young | Oct 21, 2006 4:04:13 PM
President (to all the illiterates) Bush's plan in Iraq is VERY SIMPLE: All you Liberals and Move-On.org lovers, listen closely now. The President's plan (what a concept) IS TO W-I-N! Now don't go telling all your Liberal friends, as they will ask you to explain it to them--and of course you won't know how to explain.
All those not understanding this rationale are most certainly the 35% of the American populace known as lemmings. Most of you know what lemmings are I'm sure. They are led around by the ilk (aka likes) of Pelosi, Reid, Clinton and Clinton, Dean, Kennedy and Kerry, all not very intelligent (as a group nor individuals) but all are very capable lemming leaders.
Let me be somewhat politically incorrect (as far as the Left and Liberalism is concerned) as I can be. God! It's hard to explain win or lose, right or wrong, up or down, male or female, to some people and be nice about it. God bless them anyway.
Posted by: chasaragdy | Oct 21, 2006 6:00:33 PM
To chasaragdy
Yes, Bush's goal is to "Win". Which is why he sub contracted outBin Ladin's capture, I suppose. Meanwhile, what could "Win" mean? To get control of the oil fields? That has been done. Exxon Mobile is getting about two and a half million barrels of oil out of Iraq per day. Does "Win" mean getting the Iraqis to stop shooting each other? Its been happening for hundreds of years and will continue for hundreds of years, regardless if we are in the line of fire or not. Bush does not want to withdraw because the Iraqis will throw all American corporations out of the oil fields. And who are Bush's biggest contributors? Thanks for reading.
Posted by: Chris Brudy | Oct 22, 2006 12:05:51 PM
Well, maybe you missed something, there, Chas.
Seems like almost the whole Republican establishment, at least those who are grounded in reality, have admitted that "Winning" is just not possible in Iraq, regardless of what Bush thinks in whatever little world he's inhabiting.
And, the military leaders, especially those at the levels closest to the action, admit the same thing.
Those of us who went through the Viet-Nam nightmare see more and more disturbing parallels, the most disturbing of which is a president who continues to deceive us, but more importantly, himself, about the whole issue.
Win? Not likely.
It pretty much boils down to a war we shouldn't have started, in a country that doesn't want us there, led by political leaders who don't have a clue where we are, how we got there or how to get out.
Posted by: Jim | Oct 22, 2006 12:23:58 PM
Don't wrtie the GOP off yet! Polls have been proven wrong before. The GOP may come back with both houses intact.
Posted by: Kottaras | Oct 22, 2006 7:28:57 PM
The disgusting part is Bush and the GOP have been using Iraq as a political weapon as Dems. Soldiers blood and their families agony be damned. Bush will be happy to continue the war as long as they can use it to win elections.
Iraq started because Rove wanted to use it to win elections and Cheney wanted to use it to dominate Arabs, build an Empire and enrich their oil friends. Soldiers are just pawns in this sad political tragedy. Soldiers are dying so that Haliburton and others can get richer. Soldiers are dying so that Bill Frist and John McCain can become presidents someday. How sad. and 40-45% of Americans don't really care.
Posted by: dan | Oct 23, 2006 3:46:59 AM
>.he is not afraid to face these issues head on.
What is Bush's plan? Tell us please.
Posted by: dan | Oct 23, 2006 4:12:12 AM
As usual, republican supporters are a calling for a democratic plan to handling our nation's problems (Iraq, Immigration, Terrorism), but keep forgetting to espouse exactly what plan the republican party has to offer on anything, besides citing tax cuts for the rich as a solution to maintaining a good economy.
Posted by: Kon-Serv-a-tiv | Oct 23, 2006 12:20:33 PM
Since we are now presenting a big target in Iraq --- the terrorists do not have to go far to kill Americans.
Staying the course is stupid and immoral policy to our young troops and to the innocent Iraqui people. It's time for the Bush team to answer to the American people in war tribunal in our new Congress come November.
Posted by: Robert Wiseman | Oct 23, 2006 6:41:28 PM
Post a comment



