- Daily Photo: Obama Jokes Around at G-20
- Blackwater gets replaced in Iraq
- Daily Photo: U.S. Marines Look Out for Taliban in Afghanistan
- Hillary Clinton the Tomboy and Her "Ah-Ha" Moment
- Obama Administration Sudan Envoy Headed to Region
- Daily Photo: Potential Flashpoint in Iraq
- Clinton Says New Afghanistan-Pakistan Plan Depends on Diplomacy
- Exclusive: Three Israeli Airstrikes Against Sudan
- Additional 4,000 Troops to Be Ordered to Afghanistan
- Daily Photo: Navy Submarine Trains in the Arctic
- Alarm Over North Korea Missile Prep
- Anti-Terror Stimulus? US Offers Rewards for Top Terrorists
- Daily Photo: Pakistani Women in Refugee Camp
- Condoleezza Rice Appears on "The Tonight Show"
- Diplomat and Aid Group Sound the Alarm on Darfur Camp Situation
- auto industry rescue
- Ballotwatch
- Biden, Joe
- Bush, George W.
- Clinton, Bill
- Clinton, Hillary
- Dodd, Chris
- Edwards, John
- Giuliani, Rudy
- Gravel, Mike
- Huckabee, Mike
- Hunter, Duncan
- Inauguration
- Iraq
- Kucinich, Dennis
- McCain, John
- Obama, Barack
- Palin, Sarah
- Paul, Ron
- Romney, Mitt
- Tancredo, Tom
- Thompson, Fred
- Veepstakes
- Vote 2008: Democrats
- Vote 2008: Republicans
- Washington
- White House
« Previous | Main | Next »
Gonzales: 'I'm Not Going to Resign'
March 22, 2007 12:12 PM
ABC's Pierre Thomas Reports: Attorney General Alberto Gonzales told a crowd in St. Louis, Mo. that he's happy to be out of Washington - if just for a day. The embattled head of the Justice Department is standing firm amid calls for him to step down, telling reporters, "I'm not going to resign. I'm going to stay focused on protecting our kids," a nod to the Project Safe Childhood program, a Justice Department initiative against online predators and child exploitation.
Gonzales traveled to St. Louis for a round table discussion on the program with Missouri's two U.S. attorneys. This is his first public appearance since he responded to questions about last year's controversial firing of eight U.S. attorneys March 13. It's also the first of a series of stops aimed at shoring up support among the 93 current U.S. attorneys.
"There's a lot work that needs to be done around the country," said Gonzales. "The department is responsible for protecting our kids, for making our neighborhoods safe, for protecting our country against attacks of terrorism, to going after gangs, going after drug dealers. I'm staying focused on that."
Gonzales might be keeping his focus on projects at his department, but Congress is charging ahead with its investigation into the firings.
The Senate Judiciary Committee has cleared the way to issue subpoenas compelling Justice Department staff to testify on the matter, and will hear from Gonzales former chief of staff, D. Kyle Sampson, next week. Sampson resigned after e-mails showing his communications with the White House counsel’s office over the matter were made public.
Monday, the Justice Department released more than 3,000 pages of internal documents and e-mails detailing the firings process.
March 22, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (37)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Stand firm Mr. President! You are doing what is best for our country. We republicans are with you. God Bless President George W. Bush!!!
Posted by: Cathie T | Mar 22, 2007 10:44:08 PM
the funny thing is..
everyone is making a big deal out of the firing of what.. 8 attorneys?
when Clinton first took office, he asked for the resignation of ALL the attorneys.
come on, try to explain this in a way that makes it less hypocritical. you won't succeed.
Posted by: K | Mar 22, 2007 10:52:03 PM
For all of you folks that don't read past the headlines, this isn't about the firings which was perfectly legal. When asked why, heck-of-a-job-Gonzales testified and stated as a fact-of-record that the firings were based on performance, but when the justice department turned over the emails, it turned out that the attorney's had all recieved stellar performance ratings, and that they were fired for not pursuing agendas that two congress members wanted, to try to curb votes for their reelections. Gonzales lied or misled congress. That's against the law. He said the White House had no role in the firings, but the emails say different. That is why the subpoenas. Check your facts.
Posted by: Builder03 | Mar 22, 2007 11:21:35 PM
Because "protecting our kids" is the last refuge of this and every other traitorous scoundrel, NOT patriotism...
Posted by: JON | Mar 22, 2007 11:38:26 PM
Americans voted in this lousy president for another 4 years, so we should stop complaining. We knew that he was unethical and that his cabinet was unethical as well. And we knew that he was incompetant. Bush has taken America from a once proud nation with good ideals and turned it into an embarresment. Lets hope our new president in 2008 will be able to dig us out of the hole he's gotten us into.
Posted by: Gary | Mar 23, 2007 1:04:18 AM
What a bunch of phonies the Demos are! They lie when they inhale and they lie when they exhale, and they depend for their existence on the falsification of reality.
Now, Sick Willie Clinton blew away the 93 or 96 US attorneys when he assumed office, several of whom were investigating him and his thieving, sticky-fingered wife, Petunia Rodham Clinton.
As well, Bush's people fired only 8 US attorneys --- all of them Republicans. If the process has been "politicized," then it has been politicized by the Democrats and their willing accomplices in the drive-by media. Bush, as usual, is under attack by nature's routinely dishonest critter --- the Democrat.
Yi Ha, Minister of Information
Posted by: Yi Ha | Mar 23, 2007 1:14:05 AM
Of course Gonzales should not resign. He did absolutely nothing wrong. The President has the power to remove U.S. Attorneys for any reason or for no reason whatsoever.
Democrats who are making an issue of this know that fact. Therefore, they are being incredibly disingenuous when they feign concern or anger. They are manufacturing a scandal.
To those people who posted on here claiming that Bush has to keep Gonzales in order to "cover up" some "unethical" behavior by his administration: I challenge you to provide one example of unethical conduct. You cannot do so.
Posted by: poster | Mar 23, 2007 1:48:04 AM
The difference between Clinton firings and Bush firings, - is that Bush is firing Republicans who won't do his right-wing bidding.
Posted by: Mike - Alexandria | Mar 23, 2007 1:59:14 AM
It all boils down to this. The Dems have nothing of any value to offer this country. Now that the dummed down electorate gave them the power they crave, they still hate Bush.
Even Leaky Leahy said last week that no crime had been committed. They want to get rid of AG Gonzales strictly because he is a good friend of the President. And the reason they want Testimony under Oath is because they are desparate to get another "Process Crime" perjury case.
Now that the Justice Department has released all of the documents, real reporters are now finding out that the 8 US Attorneys were fired for just cause.
And for Builder3, your Dems lie through their teeth everyday. Besides your god, Bill Clinton, lied under Oath to a Grand Jury to obstruct Justice. And you probably though that was okay.
Posted by: wjackman | Mar 23, 2007 6:30:59 AM
When will congress tackle really important issues? Medicare and pending baby boomers, Social Secuity, Health Savings Accounts, Tax reform, immigration? The rancor over legal attorney firings is much to do about nothing and cover for an inept congress.
Posted by: Jim | Mar 23, 2007 7:49:13 AM
Mike-Alexandria, I am a republican and voted for the administration, however since we now as a party, only have 23% of the population on our side, that puts us in deep do-do. The more arrogant and confrontational GWB and Co. becomes, the less we will ever gain in another election. If these actions don't offend you, you're not paying attention. I'll never pull another voting handle for a republican president, and there are many, many who feel the same way. Get your head out of the sand. This affects you too.
Posted by: Builder03 | Mar 23, 2007 8:04:29 AM
Good for Gonzales! Why should he resign when all he did was to fire ineffective judges! If ANY research had been done by the left wing media, this would all be OVER by now but they simply saw a false chance to get at Bush. Boy, this gets SO TIRING!
Posted by: mary | Mar 23, 2007 8:51:06 AM
AG Gonzales would do a whole lot better in convincing America that he really is interested in "protecting" Americans if HE'D LOCK DOWN OUR BORDERS...!
Anything said or done short of ENFORCING OUR IMMIGRATION LAWS is mute Mr. Gonzales. You're just another meely mouthed, do nothing politico.
You are right about one thing;
"There's a lot work that needs to be done around the country..." and you should start by resiging your position immediately.
Posted by: s taff | Mar 23, 2007 9:29:08 AM
Some of the most honest, plain-speaking, truthful politicians of all time are Republicans from my dear home state of Texas. It has always been amazing that such a great group of men lived at the same time and worked together to form this country.
We are now at another turning point in our history and we are fortunate to have Tom DeLay, Karl Rove, Albert Gonzales, and George Bush as our leaders. Don't you agree???
Johnny Hughes
Posted by: Johnny Hughes | Mar 23, 2007 9:45:56 AM
Yes the U.S. Attorneys serve at the PLEASURE of the President, however the LAW does not serve at the pleasure of the President. The arguement is about whether or not the firings were to help certain freinds of this administration avoid criminal prosecution.
Posted by: Sanford Roberts | Mar 23, 2007 4:30:04 PM
I challenge you to provide one example of unethical conduct. You cannot do so.
The Vice President's Chief of Staff was convicted of perjury and obstruction of justice. Maybe that's ethical in your world.
Posted by: Sam | Mar 23, 2007 10:30:55 PM
johni - buh buh buh clinton ....
No. The were largely fired for NOT investigating DEMOCRATS MALFEASANCE.
Posted by: philmon | Mar 27, 2007 11:21:07 AM
Post a comment



