« Previous | Main | Next »

McConnell to Taunt Dems on Iraq

Share

March 01, 2007 8:35 AM

ABC News' Teddy Davis Reports: Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., plans to paint Democrats as wanting to "unring the bell" on Iraq when he speaks Thursday to the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, D.C.

“The thousand cuts strategy was obviously radioactive to a lot of Democrats," McConnell plans to say according to excerpts of his speech obtained by ABC News, "so now they’re looking to change the original authorization, to unring the bell so to speak."

"Well, as I’ve said," McConnell plans to say, "you can’t unring the bell. And the Democrats now seem to realize that. They’ve decided now to back away from that one too. The American people are right to demand common sense in Washington.

They’re not getting it from the Democrats." The Associated Press' Julie Hirschifeld Davis REPORTED earlier this week that Democratic efforts to limit President Bush's war authority and force a change of course in Iraq are "faltering amid party divisions over how quickly and aggressively they should act."

Some Senate Democrats have voiced support for narrowing the 2002 Iraq war authorization. In the House, Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., wants to use Congress' power of the purse to force Bush to scale back American involvement in Iraq.

"Both plans," according to the AP, "appear to lack the support they would need to prevail, however, as Democratic leaders struggle to form a party consensus on how to move forward."

McConnell also plans to compare the current fight over collective bargaining rights for the Transportation Security Administration to an earlier fight over the Department of Homeland Security.

“We’ve been down this road before," McConnell plans to say. "We had a huge debate in Congress over collective bargaining rights for security personnel when we created the Department of Homeland Security.  Americans didn’t like the idea of worker slowdowns and other labor tactics at a department that was created to ensure a rapid response to threats and crises. And they said no at the polls.  Two Democratic senators lost their seats over the issue that year, and voters would be shocked to know that Democrats are at it again.”

March 1, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (5)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I grew up in KY and currently live in IA. I watched Mitch McConnell come out of nowhere in the 1980's to beat a 3 term popular Democratic Senator (Walter Dee Huddleston). He did it by using smear tactics and negative campaigning. In my opinion, Mitch brought the use of personal attacks in campaigning to a whole new level, He has taught others to use it with great success (Ann Northup, Jim Bunning, and David Williams. In my opinion, the problem of this "win at any cost" and "stay in power whatever you have to do" philosophy is three fold. It has discouraged very talented people who would make excellent public servants from running for public office. It has convinced others who have been excellent public servants (for instance, former congressman Lee Hamilton) that it just isn't worth all the crap you have to go through to stay in office and to try to work on the issues, and finally, this philosophy distracts congress from dealing with issues that matter to peoples lives and the over all political health of this incredible fantastic country. Senator McConnell will keep doing what he is doing because it works. As long as people want to believe the worst in other people, the negativity that he has used will continue to be effective. In my opinion, his use of personal attacks during the Iraq debate (or lack of it in the Senate, again thanks to Senator McConnell), is just another example of how effective this philosophy is at keeping someone in power and totally distracting the discussion from the issues that really make a difference in the lives of Americans. He is one talented guy.

Posted by: K Walker | Mar 1, 2007 11:53:10 AM

McConnell is speaking truth to power. Dems are weak on National Security. They really are the mommy party.

Posted by: maryrose | Mar 1, 2007 12:40:23 PM

The Republicans are again trying to frame the debate and set the tone. From "where is your plan" to "unringing the bell", they come up with snazzy phrases in an attempt to cover up the abject failure of their Iraq policies. We have wasted over a trillion dollars and thousands of lives on Mr. Bush's Wild Ride and have nothing to show for it. Now they are trying to blame the Democrats for the mess. Next, Sen. McConnell will pull a Joe McCarthy by standing up in the Senate, holding up a piece of paper, and saying "I hold in my hand a list of names. These names are of terrorists in the Democrat Party." The Republicans are doing everything they can to avoid accountability for their failure in Iraq. If the Democrats fall for this craven strategy and are tied up in knots of parliamentary procedure to the point of being unable to get us out of the morass of Iraq, the time will come to hit the streets and stop this war there - perhaps a brigade of wounded soliders who have managed to survive substandard medical care at Walter Reed could lead the protests. I don't question the patriotism of the Republican Party, I question it's judgement and it's morals. The unethical actions of this Senator are worthy of censure.

Posted by: Dirik Lolkus | Mar 1, 2007 3:19:49 PM

The truth is Sen. Mitch McConnell own military experience is not much to speak of… The inconvenient truth of 1969. I am left with the impression that Sen. McConnell is somewhat obligated to go to bat for the Bush administration because his wife is on the administration’s payroll as Secretary of Labor. At least makes one wonder since he lacks the credibility of military service and sacrifice.

Posted by: Richard | Mar 1, 2007 3:39:43 PM

checked past equal to that of satin 2, not a person to trust by far, all he wants his money and in retrun FAVORS big business

Posted by: knowhimtowell | Mar 1, 2007 4:07:55 PM

Post a comment