- Subliminal Messaging, or Over-Active Imaginations?
- VEEPBEAT: Contenders Off Radar as Obama Travels
- Team Clinton Gearing Up for 2012?
- Rice to Meet with North Korea Next Week
- The Note: Obama Poised for High-Profile Trip
- McCain Touts Surge Success Before Obama's Overseas Trip
- Hearing-Gate Exposed! McCain Has Worse Afghanistan Hearing Record Than Obama
- Bill Clinton Says He's Ready to Campaign for Obama
- Obama Blasts Conservative Attacks Against Wife: 'Debate Me Not Her'
- Biden hits back - More on Obama's Committee
- Obama Hits the Gym, With Multiple Repetitions
- Gore To Issue Clean Energy Challenge
- The Note: Foreign Trip Taking Shape for Obama
- Obama Raises $52 Million in June
- Religious Group Demands McCain Staffer's Ouster
« Giuliani Misusing Reagan's 11th Commandment, Says Gilmore | Main | Senate Pauses For Moment of Silence »
McCain Still Wants GOP's Abortion Platform Changed
April 16, 2007 7:23 AM
ABC News' Teddy Davis Reports: Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., told ABC News Saturday that he still wants to change the GOP's abortion platform to explicitly recognize exceptions for rape, incest, and the life of the mother.
McCain reaffirmed his difference with party doctrine on permissible abortion exceptions after speaking to the Iowa Republican Party's Lincoln Day Dinner in Des Moines.
McCain focused most of his speech on Iraq but he included a passage at the top of his speech which highlighted his long-standing opposition to federal abortion rights.
"I am pro-life because of my belief in the dignity of human life," McCain told the GOP dinner.
McCain's description of himself as being "steadfast" in supporting the "rights of the unborn" for "24 years, without changing" provided an implicit contrast between himself and his top two rivals for the GOP's presidential nomination. Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani says he personally hates abortion but he has long supported abortion rights. Former Gov. Mitt Romney, R-Mass., switched from supporting abortion rights to opposing them less than two and a half years ago.
Even though McCain has had his own share of conservative apostasies over the years, his camp expects his abortion position to help him against Giuliani and Romney. It is unlikely, however, to assuage the concerns of Republican presidential candidates with less funding who have been more vocal than McCain on the abortion issue over the years.
Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., the Republican presidential candidate with the most visible support at Saturday's Lincoln Day Dinner among young Iowans for whom abortion is a top concern, took issue with McCain's continued desire to modify the GOP's abortion platform.
"We should not change the platform," Brownback told ABC News. "It should not be changed."
McCain clashed with then-Gov. George W. Bush on the GOP platform's lack of exceptions for rape, incest, and the life of the mother during a Feb. 15, 2000 CNN debate moderated by Larry King.
Read the 2000 debate transcript.
April 16, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (6)
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/433071/17761692
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference McCain Still Wants GOP's Abortion Platform Changed:
Republicans seem to think Roe vs Wade is something to talk about during election time. Women represent more than half the USA's population. I think many women, no matter how they vote, don't want a return to the dark ages of illegal, or self-abortions. May I remind these high-minded politicians that they know of someone who died in such a manner. And, will these same politicians be willing to pay for the Homes for Unwed Mothers that were still in existence in 1970's?
Posted by: Lynn Harris | Apr 16, 2007 1:29:31 PM
I wonder why McCain decided to stick his hoof in his mouth? It seems like he'd be smarter to just state his opposition to abortion and be done with it. Oh well, it can only help Sam Brownback. That's good for conservatives.
Posted by: Psycheout | Apr 16, 2007 4:12:06 PM
Because McCain and Brownback are trying to rein in the Christian conservative right-wing votes, which in their respective states of Arizona
and Kansas are as rabid aboutpro-life as the Bible Belt states.
Don't tell me they are protecting women. Women have rights to their own
bodies and government has no right to
say they MUST carry a child to term!
Posted by: Lynn Harris | Apr 17, 2007 12:47:10 AM
Yes, we republicans do think that Roe Vs. Wade is something to talk about during election time. Just as the US has made, then changed, other laws, it, too, can be overturned again. Since when is the protection of life a "return to the dark ages?" I rather think it's the reverse. If you don't want to carry a baby (and isn't it interesting that you did call it a "child?") to term, then don't have sex. Be responsible. And grow up. Life is never certain. Ask the hundreds of women who desperately want to be mothers and are unable to do that, who would give just about anything to adopt a child, babies which no longer exist in "homes for unwed mothers." All of life is about giving and serving others. Think about it.
Posted by: jane | Jan 10, 2008 1:58:43 PM
We should make sex education and contraceptives readily available. In this day and age, there is no reason to use abortion as birth control.
I believe that women have the right to make decisons concerning their own bodies, but when they are carrying a child, it is not just "their" bodies that are being affected. Abortion is murder, any way you look at it.
I disagree with McCain's proposed changes. If a person is raped or a victim of incest, killing the resulting child doesn't make the horror go away...it just adds to it. If considering a woman's health is written in, there will be doctors ready and waiting to say that the child is a health risk.
Posted by: Jinna | Jan 14, 2008 3:05:24 PM
This generation's culture of death has not departed from "The Dark Ages". We are living them. Abortion is sympomatic of our lack of compassion for others. Hate, sexual perversion, violence, divorce and cohabitation, greed, denial of God and HIS ordinances are attacked daily as an anachronism; the idolatry of the twenty-first century is horrific. Justice demands personal responsible behavior.
Posted by: joe | Mar 31, 2008 10:10:33 AM
Post a comment



