- Daily Photo: Obama Jokes Around at G-20
- Blackwater gets replaced in Iraq
- Daily Photo: U.S. Marines Look Out for Taliban in Afghanistan
- Hillary Clinton the Tomboy and Her "Ah-Ha" Moment
- Obama Administration Sudan Envoy Headed to Region
- Daily Photo: Potential Flashpoint in Iraq
- Clinton Says New Afghanistan-Pakistan Plan Depends on Diplomacy
- Exclusive: Three Israeli Airstrikes Against Sudan
- Additional 4,000 Troops to Be Ordered to Afghanistan
- Daily Photo: Navy Submarine Trains in the Arctic
- Alarm Over North Korea Missile Prep
- Anti-Terror Stimulus? US Offers Rewards for Top Terrorists
- Daily Photo: Pakistani Women in Refugee Camp
- Condoleezza Rice Appears on "The Tonight Show"
- Diplomat and Aid Group Sound the Alarm on Darfur Camp Situation
- auto industry rescue
- Ballotwatch
- Biden, Joe
- Bush, George W.
- Clinton, Bill
- Clinton, Hillary
- Dodd, Chris
- Edwards, John
- Giuliani, Rudy
- Gravel, Mike
- Huckabee, Mike
- Hunter, Duncan
- Inauguration
- Iraq
- Kucinich, Dennis
- McCain, John
- Obama, Barack
- Palin, Sarah
- Paul, Ron
- Romney, Mitt
- Tancredo, Tom
- Thompson, Fred
- Veepstakes
- Vote 2008: Democrats
- Vote 2008: Republicans
- Washington
- White House
« Previous | Main | Next »
Gore Against Funding U.S. Troops Without Timetable for Withdrawal
May 29, 2007 9:39 PM
ABC News' Teddy Davis and A'Melody Lee Report: Former Vice President Al Gore tells ABC News that if he were still in the United States Senate, he would have voted "no" on a war funding bill without a timetable for U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq which passed both house of Congress last week and was signed into law by President Bush.
Gore staked out his position for ABC News after speaking about his new book, "The Assault on Reason," at The George Washington University on Tuesday evening.
While Gore’s position puts him out of step with 80 of 100 United senators, it puts him in line with votes cast last week by Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., and Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn. -- three sitting senators actively seeking the Democratic Party’s 2008 presidential nomination. Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, is alone among the Democratic senators seeking the White House in 2008 who voted in favor of the bill which would fund U.S. troops without a timetable for U.S. troop withdrawal.
Gore, who opposed the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq before it began, argues in "The Assault on Reason" that the "degradation of the public sphere" gave rise to an unnecessary war which he dubbed "a big mistake" on Tuesday.
The former vice president who won the popular vote for president in 2000 says that he has no plans to run for the White House in 2008 but he has stopped short of completely ruling out another presidential bid.
May 29, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (18)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
I think that Al Gore should get in the 2008 race; and, after winning the party's nomination, select Hillary as his running mate -- a stunning Clinton-Gore role reversal.
Posted by: kenrev | May 30, 2007 4:30:43 AM
The ideal campaign would be late-arriving Al Gore vs. late-arriving Mike Bloomberg. The Republicans absolutely *need* to restore the legacy of the Rockefeller - Javits Republican Party, and Mike could do it. And as to Al... would you pay 3x as much for your daily commute to save the planet? An interesting topic. He'd be asking a lot, but after 8 years of the current Bozo in the WH, many people would be willing to take such strong medicine.
Posted by: John Ginnane | May 30, 2007 9:29:34 AM
"While Gore’s position puts him out of step with 80 of 100 United senators"
How is that relevent? Nice try at attempting to make Gore position seem out of the main stream. Unfortuantely 80 senators are out of step with 210 million americans.
Posted by: indio007 | May 30, 2007 10:14:40 AM
to indio007 : EXACTLY RIGHT AND WE NEED TO MAKE OUR CONGRESSMEN UNDERSTAND THAT COME 2008 - VOTE OUT THE DO NOTHINGS.
Posted by: Chris Ely | May 30, 2007 11:28:40 AM
How about an Al Gore/Ron Paul ticket in '08! That would be Bipartisian, American and patriotic!
Posted by: grnft | May 30, 2007 11:58:14 AM
While Gore’s position puts him out of step with 80 of 100 United senators"
indio007 you got that exactly right.
Somebody showed their bias right there. I wish ABC would be so obvious this way.
Posted by: NCJim | May 30, 2007 12:25:40 PM
I think a bipartisan ticket with teeth would be Gore/Powell.
BTW John Ginnane
You'll be paying for that Gas reguardless to Gore. There is a reason of course, and its better to get on the road to energy independence before it is too late.
t3
Posted by: Teatimetim | May 30, 2007 2:13:05 PM
Right about Iraq, right about global warming, right about the Internet, right about the Constitution, and far and away the most experienced potential candidate in the field.
2008 will be the most important election of our lifetime, because the next President has to right the wrongs (and there are many!) of Bush. We need Al Gore because he's the best one to do that.
Posted by: James | May 30, 2007 2:19:35 PM
I like Al but I doubt he will run. To bad we can't get Bill and Al to run again that way we might be able to fix the problems in about 8 more years.
Posted by: ant | May 30, 2007 2:43:53 PM
I think a bipartisan ticket with teeth would be Gore/Powell.
BTW John Ginnane
You'll be paying for that Gas reguardless to Gore. There is a reason of course, and its better to get on the road to energy independence before it is too late.
t3
Posted by: Teatimetim | May 30, 2007 3:25:49 PM
I agree with Gore's comments regarding the outlandishness of the current admin. When Bush won re-election, his first comment was that he got a "mandate" to govern. But he has been running the country like he's some kind of dictator, ignoring the majority of people's opinions and trampling on everyone's rights. He wants to be remembered as a great president, but he is so foolish that he cannot see that the opposite is true. Time is running out on him; the Dems must elect a true leader, hopefully one that is less of a charismatic and more of a leader.
Posted by: Beto L | May 30, 2007 4:06:12 PM
Al Gore is by far the most qualified and well versed individual to occupy the White House. Gore needs to realize that if the Republican win the White House in 2008 and he could have been the one to prevent it, he may not have the legacy that he is on his way to shaping. There could well be some bitter people from within his own party. This might be a good question for G. S. to ask him.
Posted by: gbenson | May 30, 2007 4:47:42 PM
Al Gore is by far the most qualified and well versed individual to occupy the White House. Gore needs to realize that if the Republican win the White House in 2008 and he could have been the one to prevent it, he may not have the legacy that he is on his way to shaping. There could well be some bitter people from within his own party. This might be a good question for G. S. to ask him.
Posted by: gbenson | May 30, 2007 4:50:04 PM
Whether you run or not, Al, I appreciate that you're out there saying what so many of us are saying at home but feel that the media (proven here with the 80 votes nonsense) and politicians are not hearing. Thank you for being our voice!
-M
Posted by: momto3GA | May 30, 2007 5:03:31 PM
I hope Gore does not run, but not for the reason you may think. He would have to spend the first four years trying to get re-elected, most likely compromising his values and beliefs in the process. He is an incredibly powerful and influential man in the position he is in now.
Posted by: survivor1962 | May 30, 2007 7:05:54 PM
Gore will not run simply because: He is the best person for the job. American politics is so tainted that anyone with a willingness to follow there spirit will never be allowed to be President. You have to be willing to be ruled in order to rule in America. Inconvienent Truth but still Truth.
Posted by: GeorgeO | May 31, 2007 9:26:30 AM
After seeing Al Gore on "Charlie Rose" the other night, I am a convert.
.
Not so much because of his positions, which as James pointed out, Al's been the only one who called most of the shots correctly; but rather because Al is clearly a disciple of Peter Senge, the major advocate of using "Systems Thinking" to solve problems, rather than Linear Thinking.
.
Systems Thinking goes beyond the apparent problem, and on to identifying and finding the tipping points necessary to solve Root-Causes of the apparent problem. It is the method Gorbachev used to reverse the Cold War.
.
Any politician using this method, and getting away from myopic short-term political solutions, has my vote!
.
Ross
Posted by: yes1fan | May 31, 2007 1:04:27 PM
Gore wants to tell Al Queda when they can have Iraq to themselves. Outstanding. Shouldn't Gore be on a diet? Looks like losing the election caused him to turn to food to mask his depression.
Posted by: MLE | Jun 1, 2007 9:54:56 AM
Post a comment



