- Subliminal Messaging, or Over-Active Imaginations?
- VEEPBEAT: Contenders Off Radar as Obama Travels
- Team Clinton Gearing Up for 2012?
- Rice to Meet with North Korea Next Week
- The Note: Obama Poised for High-Profile Trip
- McCain Touts Surge Success Before Obama's Overseas Trip
- Hearing-Gate Exposed! McCain Has Worse Afghanistan Hearing Record Than Obama
- Bill Clinton Says He's Ready to Campaign for Obama
- Obama Blasts Conservative Attacks Against Wife: 'Debate Me Not Her'
- Biden hits back - More on Obama's Committee
- Obama Hits the Gym, With Multiple Repetitions
- Gore To Issue Clean Energy Challenge
- The Note: Foreign Trip Taking Shape for Obama
- Obama Raises $52 Million in June
- Religious Group Demands McCain Staffer's Ouster
« Clinton Skips the Heartland? | Main | Bush In Line of Fire »
Obama Has His Own Iowa Memo
May 23, 2007 8:15 PM
ABC News' Jonathan Greenberger Reports: Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., wasn't the only Democratic presidential candidate with a memo out today about the odds of success in the Hawkeye State. <a href=http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2007/05/clinton_skips_t.html">LINK</a><p>
The campaign of rival Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., spent today distributing a memo in Iowa examining recent polling data there and concluding that Obama is fast "emerging as the most formidable general election candidate."
The document, written by Obama's Iowa Communications Director Josh Earnest, looks at polls released within the past week by Research 2000 and the Des Moines Register, both of which show Obama faring well among Iowa voters in hypothetical general election matchups against the Republican frontrunners.
But nationally, recent polls by Newsweek, WNBC/Marist, and Quinnipiac University have all shown Obama with no clear advantage over his Democratic rivals in hypothetical general election matchups.
Still, Earnest concludes his memo by writing that the Iowa polls indicate the campaign's "aggressive ground campaign is already paying dividends" in the state that's home to the nation's first presidential caucus.
Obama's Iowa memo was released the same day a leaked memo from the Clinton campaign surfaced, which questioned whether Clinton should consider skipping Iowa altogether. Clinton's campaign swiftly dismissed the leaked memo as one that "does not reflect the thinking of the campaign." There is no indication that the release of the two memos was related.
May 23, 2007 in Vote 2008: Democrats | Permalink | User Comments (16)
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/433071/18738874
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Obama Has His Own Iowa Memo:
I would leak that memo, too, if it were all about how strong a candidate I was.
Posted by: Portland Web Design | May 24, 2007 12:04:33 PM
Electing Sen Obama would constitute a mandate for change that no candidate in the first tier of either party can challenge, even remotely.
If we want a fundemental reordering of our politcal life in this country, Obama's the one to make it happen. A supermajority in both houses of congress would be handy as well.
Posted by: Sachem | May 24, 2007 12:23:54 PM
I don't know, Edwards still makes more sense to me. At least, that's where my money has been going.
Posted by: Robert | May 24, 2007 12:56:23 PM
Obama in 2008! He is the only one who can change the course of this nation and our politics. Get the word out about him.
Posted by: Donn | May 24, 2007 12:56:50 PM
It's actually refreshing to see that staff members of Obama and Clinton are (justifiably) fearful of Edwards. Iowa deserves some very sincere congratulations for its ability to force potential candidates to face real people in authentic situations.
Anyone who skips Iowa should be automatically excluded from our consideration.
Posted by: Juliana Texley | May 24, 2007 1:26:00 PM
Without a doubt, Obama in '08! I admire his intelligence, charisma, bipartisanship, and eloquence. I am, and will continue, to work diligently on his campaign here in Arizona!
Posted by: Lily | May 24, 2007 1:50:44 PM
we gotta put the FLUSH on John Edwards
Posted by: | May 24, 2007 2:23:22 PM
The expanding waistlines of many of our poor people?
Maybe you should start looking into the food system in the US, and realize that the government (and the president) have stacked the decks against poor people being able to eat healthy food. The poor don't shop at Whole Foods, they shop at Walmart, which is stuffing us all full of High Fructose Corn Syrum on government subsidies. But yeah Phylo, poor people are getting fatter, so screw 'em.
Posted by: Paul | May 24, 2007 2:29:30 PM
To me, all the main Democratic candidates are highly credible choices for President. But I do feel that Obama could cause a sea change in the world's perception of the US. And that is no small thing. Just imagine how the Third World would view the shift from Bush to Obama.
One cannot underestimate the power of symbolism. We need healing more than ever.
Posted by: Albert G | May 24, 2007 2:35:40 PM
Obama cares about poor people too, hey, he wants to base public school funding on something more equitable than property taxes, which is a completely radical position, and way overdue. He doesn't present himself as the poverty guy, but you're not voting to "screw the poor" if you vote for him. Just saying.
Posted by: Phoebe | May 24, 2007 2:56:17 PM
Easy Paul, I never said that nutrition wasn't a problem. I'm comparing the severity of one problem (poverty) with the severity of the other (divisive rhetoric) and the abilities of each candidate to address each problem. Remember the war on poverty? It's a nice idea but throwing money at poverty simply doesn't work; it's a pipedream. Poverty is primarily an issue of one's own personal values and those aren't in order, a person is pretty much destined to miserable life.
Posted by: Phylo Se Fiser | May 24, 2007 2:59:44 PM
Obama is nothing but an empty suit......
at least Edwards offers substance. He just doesn't offer empty rhetoric, which is all I see from Obama...
Posted by: john | May 24, 2007 3:01:25 PM
Obama lost me when he said that the Palestinians suffered because Hamas does not recognise Israel.
The Palestinians suffer from 40 years of occupation by Israel, Barak!!
This guy would not change the world's perception of the U.S. after he had been is office one week. After reading his book and listening to him talk he has no new ideas and wishy washy proposals on EVERTHING.
Posted by: james phillips | May 24, 2007 3:44:26 PM
As an exdemocrat and a Nonrepublican,my vote is going to Ron Paul.The Majority of democrats and republicans are owned by aipac,military industrial complex, Pharmacueticals,hmos etc....,They both cave in to the morons in the white house.
Posted by: rudy llanes | May 24, 2007 6:02:28 PM
To James Phillips, responding to your first sentence about being lost...
Obama is simply saying that the Palestinians are suffering not because of America, Isreal, or anybody but their leadership(Hamas).
Meaning, Hamas should recognize Isreal so as to better the lives of their citizens. Obama makes sense to me.
I am not sure your second paragraph is correct.
Posted by: John | May 24, 2007 9:30:59 PM
Obama has more guts and smarts than the other leading Democratic candidates and conveys a sense of greater insight into what this country need both domestically and on the world stage. Besides, I am tired of Presidents with Southern accents, particularly Hillary's fake one.
Posted by: Perry | May 24, 2007 11:26:40 PM
Post a comment



