« Previous | Main | Next »

Sex Ed for Kindergarteners 'Right Thing to Do,' Says Obama

Share

July 18, 2007 1:13 PM

ABC News' Teddy Davis and Lindsey Ellerson Report: Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., told Planned Parenthood Tuesday that sex education for kindergarteners, as long as it is "age-appropriate," is "the right thing to do."

"I remember Alan Keyes . . . I remember him using this in his campaign against me," Obama said in reference to the conservative firebrand who ran against him for the U.S. Senate in 2004. Sex education for kindergarteners had become an issue in his race against Keyes because of Obama’s work on the issue as chairman of the health committee in the Illinois state Senate.

"'Barack Obama supports teaching sex education to kindergarteners,'" said Obama mimicking Keyes' distinctive style of speech. "Which -- I didn’t know what to tell him (laughter)."

"But it’s the right thing to do," Obama continued, "to provide age-appropriate sex education, science-based sex education in schools."

Watch the video:
http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=3386492

Speaking to a young woman who asked a question about sex education, Obama said, "You, as a peer, can have enormous power over your age cohort but you’ve got to have some support from the schools. You certainly should not have to be fighting each and every instance by providing accurate information outside of the classroom because inside the classroom the only thing that can be talked about is abstinence."

"Keep in mind: I honor and respect young people who choose to delay sexual activity," Obama continued. "I’ve got two daughters, and I want them to understand that sex is not something casual. That's something that we definitely want to communicate and should be part of any curriculum. But we also know that when the statistics tell us that nearly half of 15 to 19 year olds are engaging in sexual activity, that for us to leave them in ignorance is potentially consigning them to illness, pregnancy, poverty, and in some cases, death."

When Obama's campaign was asked by ABC News to explain what kind of sex education Obama considers "age appropriate" for kindergarteners, the Obama campaign pointed to an Oct. 6, 2004 story from the Daily Herald in which Obama had "moved to clarify" in his Senate campaign that he "does not support teaching explicit sex education to children in kindergarten. . . The legislation in question was a state Senate measure last year that aimed to update Illinois' sex education standards with 'medically accurate' information . . . 'Nobody's suggesting that kindergartners are going to be getting information about sex in the way that we think about it,' Obama said. 'If they ask a teacher 'where do babies come from,' that providing information that the fact is that it's not a stork is probably not an unhealthy thing. Although again, that's going to be determined on a case by case basis by local communities and local school boards.'"

In addition to local schools informing kindergarteners that babies do not come from the stork, the state legislation Obama supported in Illinois, which contained an "opt out" provision for parents, also envisioned teaching kindergarteners about "inappropriate touching," according to Obama's presidential campaign. Despite Obama's support, the legislation was not enacted.

July 18, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (531)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

this reminds me of a south park episode...i remember learning the differences in anatomy in preschool...so in kindergarten does it need to go any further than that? if one cannot come up with details of the proposed "age appropriate" sex education for kindergartners..then it becomes difficult to decide which side of the fence to be on.

Posted by: MissShooter | Jul 18, 2007 2:27:56 PM

oh the horror!! sex education!! bring back the abusive nuns who would lash our pupils hands into bloody pulps for even asking!! the more you lie to the youth about sex, they more they will explore and figure it out on their own, at younger and younger ages. GROW UP AMERICA, AND EDUCATE YOUR KIDS, NOT INDOCTRINATE THEM.

Posted by: J | Jul 18, 2007 2:46:49 PM

Am I the only one who thinks that sex education for kids in kindergarten is crazy? I respect Obama, but I have to disagree with him. Before puberty, what purpose could sex education serve? At what point does teaching sex education to pre-pubescent kids become absurd? Should we teach sex education to children who cannot walk or talk? There is nothing appropriate about this. The fact that he needs to re-explain himself on this issue, should have been a hint that this idea is half-baked. This is a dumb position for Obama to take. Good luck on formulating a curriculum. Let kindergarten kids be curious. Don't indoctrinate them.

Posted by: Sean O'Brien | Jul 18, 2007 4:22:22 PM

Teaching sex education to Kindergarteners is totally inappropriate!

Posted by: MJ | Jul 18, 2007 5:57:22 PM

Just one more reason not to send your kids to public schools.

Posted by: mickey | Jul 18, 2007 6:30:39 PM

J...I think it's hard to lie about sex when children don't ask about it at that age. Of all the things that can be taught in a limited school day, sex ed in kindergarten doesn't seem that necessary...if this is Mr. Obama's solution to decreasing teen pregnancy rates (which are already at record lows) than I think his urban agenda may have some problems.

Posted by: taylor | Jul 18, 2007 6:32:16 PM

This is the case of another politician who think he knows how to teach your kids better than you...

Posted by: tom S | Jul 18, 2007 6:32:27 PM

Here's an idea- leave it completely up to parents.

Posted by: mmljg | Jul 18, 2007 6:32:56 PM

Wouldn't it be more valuable to teach them the ABCs and how to add?

Posted by: Steve | Jul 18, 2007 6:33:17 PM

To J, it seems to me that there was less teen sexual activity decades ago and I don't think that it was due to additional instruction in the classroom at early ages.

Posted by: B | Jul 18, 2007 6:34:03 PM

...and why can't a teacher just tell a child who asks the where do babies come from question to talk to their parents??? Heaven forbid they have any say on how a child learns about sex.

Posted by: taylor | Jul 18, 2007 6:34:11 PM

Bwaaaaaaa! LOL!!! Ahhhh ha hah ha ha ha! This clown thinks children 4, 5 and 6 need to learn about sex?
Right, forget about being a child, playing with toys, learning to share and to interact and reading, writing and math we should get our children to be promiscuous “progressives”. What an idiot, I can’t believe there are enough delusional people in this country to give this fraud a chance.

I don’t recall ever hearing about sex education until high school but then my generation was not pregnant at 14 and sporting 4 different children from 4 different fathers, gotta love “progressives”.

Posted by: Liberal Fruitcake | Jul 18, 2007 6:35:10 PM

Reminds me of Kindergarden Cop:
"Boys have a penis, girls have a vagina."
And THAT IS sex ed in kindergarden.

Posted by: Justa Thought | Jul 18, 2007 6:35:12 PM

I simply can not understand how anyone could think that anything to do with sex would be relevant to a KINDERGARTNER. Unfortunately, there is an assumption out there that a "curriculum" can solve social ills. How much money has been poured into "educating" people about AIDS and everthing else? It does not work. The government can NOT be the answer. We don't even trust government with our money! Why would we trust it with a decision such as this?

Posted by: GregPierson | Jul 18, 2007 6:36:06 PM

You have to be kidding. Sex Ed for 5 and 6 year olds. This is a perfect example of what is wrong with this country. Why don't we give 5 year olds condoms?

Posted by: gary | Jul 18, 2007 6:36:08 PM

Funny thing about all the opposition to abstinence based education- the most recent meta-study- which examined programs of abstinence and non-abstinence based sex ed programs in both suburban and inner city schools - found that the kids in ALL groups had the same rate of knowledge, condom use, STD diagnosis rate, pregnancy rate- and SO DID the kids who got NO SEX ED IN SCHOOL !
So when does THAT hit the headlines so we can stop wasting money on what parents should be doing, and start buying math books ???

Posted by: Kit | Jul 18, 2007 6:36:29 PM

don't be silly. like he said. age appropriate. It is VERY IMPORTANT that you LISTEN to words. That you READ them to understand what the person is actually SAYING. Age approproate means very vague, very general, not at all explicit or physically descriptive.

eg. "Babies come from mommy's tummy." Case closed. Job over. Kindergartener curiosity satisfied.

Posted by: Sam | Jul 18, 2007 6:36:48 PM

I send my kids to school so that they can learn how to read, write and do math ... not to learn how to multiply (pun intended).

Let me teach them about sexuality at home. Its my responsibility as a parent, not the state's.

Posted by: paul | Jul 18, 2007 6:37:03 PM

This man will NEVER be president. He is very disturbed. Liberalism is a MENTAL DISORDER!!!

Posted by: Suzanne LePonte | Jul 18, 2007 6:37:37 PM

Schools have a hard enough time just teaching the basics let alone trying to teach 6 year olds about sex. I've never understood the concept of sex education in school in any grade level. I am sure it is a complete waste of time and for Obama to say kids who don't have this in school will grow up getting sick and pregnant and perhaps dying is pathetic and condescending.

Posted by: Mark | Jul 18, 2007 6:37:58 PM

Post a comment