- Daily Photo: Obama Jokes Around at G-20
- Blackwater gets replaced in Iraq
- Daily Photo: U.S. Marines Look Out for Taliban in Afghanistan
- Hillary Clinton the Tomboy and Her "Ah-Ha" Moment
- Obama Administration Sudan Envoy Headed to Region
- Daily Photo: Potential Flashpoint in Iraq
- Clinton Says New Afghanistan-Pakistan Plan Depends on Diplomacy
- Exclusive: Three Israeli Airstrikes Against Sudan
- Additional 4,000 Troops to Be Ordered to Afghanistan
- Daily Photo: Navy Submarine Trains in the Arctic
- Alarm Over North Korea Missile Prep
- Anti-Terror Stimulus? US Offers Rewards for Top Terrorists
- Daily Photo: Pakistani Women in Refugee Camp
- Condoleezza Rice Appears on "The Tonight Show"
- Diplomat and Aid Group Sound the Alarm on Darfur Camp Situation
- auto industry rescue
- Ballotwatch
- Biden, Joe
- Bush, George W.
- Clinton, Bill
- Clinton, Hillary
- Dodd, Chris
- Edwards, John
- Giuliani, Rudy
- Gravel, Mike
- Huckabee, Mike
- Hunter, Duncan
- Inauguration
- Iraq
- Kucinich, Dennis
- McCain, John
- Obama, Barack
- Palin, Sarah
- Paul, Ron
- Romney, Mitt
- Tancredo, Tom
- Thompson, Fred
- Veepstakes
- Vote 2008: Democrats
- Vote 2008: Republicans
- Washington
- White House
« Previous | Main | Next »
AFL-CIO Can't Agree on Single '08 Dem
Email
ShareAugust 08, 2007 1:27 PM
ABC News' Teddy Davis Reports: Unable to agree on a single presidential candidate to support, the AFL-CIO decided Wednesday to open the door for each of its 55 unions to make their own primary endorsement.
The decision comes one day after seven Democratic presidential candidates took part in an AFL-CIO forum in Chicago which was televised by MSNBC.
Even before yesterday’s forum, the AFL-CIO anticipated that it would be difficult to get behind a single candidate.
In order for the AFL-CIO as a whole to make an endorsement, there must be two-thirds support behind a single candidate.
The individual unions look for a consensus but they are not uniformly governed by the two-thirds rule, making it more likely for some of them to make endorsements during the critical run-up to next year's nominating contests.
Edwards Heats Up Debate
Edwards blasts Clinton for recent appearance on the cover of Fortune(MSNBC). LINK
Candidates Spar over Obama Pakistan Plan
Dodd, Obama and Clinton debate foreign relations policy(MSNBC). LINK
Highs and Lows of Democratic Debate
Who's leading the pack after Tuesday night's debate at Soldier Field? LINK
August 8, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (2)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
As the competitions between presidential candidates increase and tense up, the candidates need to be reminded of the critical issues that still trouble our society today. Issue such as global poverty needs to be address by our candidates to each and to the general public. As one of the nation that has pledge to fulfill the goals of Millennium Development Project, whose goal is the elimination of world hunger and poverty, the Bush Administration has not shown any substantial action to bring this fundamental problem to a stop. According to the Borgen Project, dedicated to fighting and ending Poverty around the world, only $19 billion dollars are needed annually to stop world wide poverty, hunger and malnutrition. However, more than $340 billion dollars has been poured into this “war on terror.” And each year, our country has a military budge of $522 billion dollars. It's time for a new leader who will be addressing an issue that affects 1.2 billion people everyday worldwide.
Posted by: Mstessyrue | Aug 8, 2007 5:46:15 PM
Why are the unions wasting their time on who to endorse? Kos will decide who wins the Dem nomination. After all, the fightin' netroots! at DailyKos and MoveOn.org bought and paid for the DNC; it's theirs. The unions' role now is simply to provide the muscle to get out votes on election day. Their days of deciding have passed.
Posted by: carl | Aug 9, 2007 9:32:10 AM
Post a comment
