« Previous | Main | Next »

Obama: 'No Mas' on Debates

Share

August 18, 2007 6:35 PM

ABC News' Rick Klein Reports: Sen. Barack Obama will be on the crowded stage for ABC's Iowa debate Sunday morning -- but enjoy it while you can: He's sharply limiting his participation in future presidential forums.

In a statement posted on his campaign Web site, Obama campaign manager David Plouffe writes that Obama, D-Ill., will only commit to eight debates after this week -- five that are sanctioned by the Democratic National Committee, two that will be held in Iowa in December, and an additional forum sponsored by Univision.

"Unfortunately, we simply cannot run the kind of campaign we want and need to, engaging with voters in the early states and February 5 states, if our schedule is dictated by dozens of forums and debates," Plouffe writes. "Ultimately, the one group left out of the current schedule is the voters and they are the ones who ask the toughest questions and most deserve to have those questions answered face to face."

The announcement seems likely to prompt other major candidates -- including Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., and former senator John Edwards, D-N.C. -- to skip some of the scores of forums being organized by various interest groups and constituencies.

Though the Obama campaign says the move is driven by time constraints, Obama has delivered several spotty debate performances, with answers that have allowed Clinton and other candidates to cast him as unprepared for the presidency.

Obama himself told The Washington Post this week that the debates have not been his strong suit. "There's no doubt that the 60-second-format debates, or even 90-second, are tough for me," he told the newspaper.

August 18, 2007 in Tancredo, Tom | Permalink | User Comments (10)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I think that a great idea to spend the most of his time talking to the people face to face an answer the people question that way his answer canot be distorted good luck senator Obama god speed an i hope the people will be smart enought not to believe the reason some will try to make up of why he will cut back on some debates let the spin doctors spin and we as a people continue to push for change by suporting Obama.

Posted by: Audrey | Aug 19, 2007 1:26:14 AM

I agree with Audrey it's time for change and a complete change our government is not in touch with the people. We should come first, not all these other countries. If someone attacks the United States we should go after that group no matter where they are.

Posted by: Ronald Washington | Aug 19, 2007 10:42:46 AM

Wow! Obama now wants to become more like Bush, limit the opportunities for people to hear what you are all about since he only performs well under controlled circumstances with scripts and talking points... NO way, Obama can't win.

Posted by: regularguywhovotes | Aug 19, 2007 3:02:28 PM

Actually, it sounds like he wants to spend time answering the questions of actual voters which is a good thing because they usually present much tougher questions.

I love Obama. He's actually honest enough to admit his weaknesses. I don't want a sound-bite president. I want one who is thoughtful and recognizes that many of the issues confronting a president are complex and with no easy answers. I plan to vote for Obama because I really, really don't want to suffer through a Clinton 3rd term.

Posted by: Debbie | Aug 19, 2007 8:30:31 PM

Obomber ducking out of debates?
Good, maybe more people will get to hear Kucinich. He's on our side and we need him desperately. We shouldn't look twice at any of the war hawks who won't give up the new Bush powers.

Posted by: p.w. | Aug 20, 2007 2:36:24 AM

P.W. - Obama is not a war hawk. In fact stood up in a hot contested race for the Senate seat in Illinois and said he was against the war. This was a time when it was unpopular to speak out against the war. I agree with Debbie when she said she does not want a soundbite president. I also don't care to have Hillary because she is ESTABLISHMENT. Given what we have seen from our Congress we know there are enough Republicans and Democrats working for the Establishment and not US!

Posted by: moonsha | Aug 20, 2007 8:40:04 AM

I was very impressed with the knowledge and intelligence and analytical powers of the Democrats, Sunday morning, especially in realizing that George Stephanopolis was setting them up. Those stooges who asked the loaded questions about 'prayer stopping the bridge fall-down' were allowed on so they could embarrass the candidates, but it didn't happen. Watch for the puff-ball questions that the Republicans will get from their buddy-boy George. The candidates, after Dennis Kucinich identified it, 'got it' that George was trying to turn them against one another, and dismissing/dissing the most informed, bravest guy up there, Dennis Kucinich, while he was at it. Of course, we knew the invasion of another country was wrong. All of them knew it, the thousands of us in the streets knew it.
Just political posturing by Clinton, especially. Dennis and Edwards were the most honest up there.

Posted by: Alice Brown | Aug 20, 2007 5:30:35 PM


America has now a chance to become credble again and to stand for hs values. You have a candidate, Obama, who can make a new leadershp. This decade, America has lost his prestge around the world by supporting the Bush administration. The war n Irak was a mistake. People did not understood how a great nation such as America reelected Bush and accepted to loose his own values. I hope, Barack Obama, is a chance for your country to help americans connect with politics and with the world. We are living in dangereous world, we need at the world level a New leadership. Let's hope that american people will provide a New leadership who will the world for good. My english is not a good, I'm in Paris

Posted by: Henry | Aug 21, 2007 3:34:47 PM

It's amusing, how liberals, when questioned, demand meaningful debate; but only at their convienience. Isn't it obvious that it's much more palatable to assail the opponents of both the party, and the opposition than continue to have to answer, and ask, the important questions? After all, the whole point of campaigning is to make promises, not justify positions.

Posted by: Carl Zschering | Aug 21, 2007 11:03:06 PM

It's informative to hear the candidates discuss issues both within and beyond the debate format. Some of the toughest questions are asked outside organized debates--even the Bush administration has had to face them. I agree that Barack Obama is an exceptionally strong candidate and I hope that Democrats have the courage to give him a chance to run.

Posted by: Suzanne | Aug 24, 2007 1:06:09 AM

Post a comment