- Daily Photo: Obama Jokes Around at G-20
- Blackwater gets replaced in Iraq
- Daily Photo: U.S. Marines Look Out for Taliban in Afghanistan
- Hillary Clinton the Tomboy and Her "Ah-Ha" Moment
- Obama Administration Sudan Envoy Headed to Region
- Daily Photo: Potential Flashpoint in Iraq
- Clinton Says New Afghanistan-Pakistan Plan Depends on Diplomacy
- Exclusive: Three Israeli Airstrikes Against Sudan
- Additional 4,000 Troops to Be Ordered to Afghanistan
- Daily Photo: Navy Submarine Trains in the Arctic
- Alarm Over North Korea Missile Prep
- Anti-Terror Stimulus? US Offers Rewards for Top Terrorists
- Daily Photo: Pakistani Women in Refugee Camp
- Condoleezza Rice Appears on "The Tonight Show"
- Diplomat and Aid Group Sound the Alarm on Darfur Camp Situation
- auto industry rescue
- Ballotwatch
- Biden, Joe
- Bush, George W.
- Clinton, Bill
- Clinton, Hillary
- Dodd, Chris
- Edwards, John
- Giuliani, Rudy
- Gravel, Mike
- Huckabee, Mike
- Hunter, Duncan
- Inauguration
- Iraq
- Kucinich, Dennis
- McCain, John
- Obama, Barack
- Palin, Sarah
- Paul, Ron
- Romney, Mitt
- Tancredo, Tom
- Thompson, Fred
- Veepstakes
- Vote 2008: Democrats
- Vote 2008: Republicans
- Washington
- White House
« Previous | Main | Next »
Top Army General Calls Army 'Out of Balance'
August 14, 2007 4:14 PM
ABC News' Z. Byron Wolf Reports: Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Casey told reporters today his branch of the military is "out of balance" and said that the six years of constant conflict since 9/11 has "stretched and stressed our all volunteer force."
Speaking at the National Press Club, Casey said he still thinks success in Iraq is "eminently attainable," though he admitted there are limits beyond which the current Army could not go. Before he became Army Chief of Staff, Casey was replaced as the commander of US forces in Iraq after the November 2006 election to make way for Gen. David Petraeus and the surge strategy.
Casey's deputy, Army Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Richard Cody, said at Ft. Hood that troops should be prepared to continue with the current, extended 15 month troop deployments associated with the surge of US troops in Iraq through next June. Casey said he "would not be able to recommend" extending the longer tours beyond next Spring.
Casey pointed to plans to grow the Army by nearly 50,000 troops in the coming years and said he is generally satisfied with the commitment on Capitol Hill to give appropriate funding to the Army.
When asked if the military has considered a move to reinstate the draft, Casey said "the demand for forces exceeds the supply and if the demand doesn't go down" the Army will need a mechanism to provide more forces. Case said the draft is "absolutely not under consideration" at the moment.
While he warned against continuing the surge for too long, Casey said the troops currently having their tours extended are capable for the moment of bearing that burden. "Ninety days in Iraq goes like that," he said, snapping his fingers.
Casey remarked that in addition to taking a toll on soldiers, the surge is leaving its mark on their families too. Many soldiers currently in Iraq will miss two Christmases with their families.
"There is no question the repeated deployments are having a debilitating effect on the families and children," but he pledged to improve the support infrastructure the military has in place.
Casey also said in his speech that he thinks the coming decades will be marked by "persistent conflict" and confrontation with both "state and non-state" actors."
August 14, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (27)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Would love to see your credentials
you are obviously the product of a very determined Democratic attack machine
Posted by: Boudoures | Aug 14, 2007 5:14:38 PM
I keep hearing radio spots for Selective Service. Reinstating the draft will be this president's final "gift" to the American people, on top of the ridiculous war.
Posted by: DaveM | Aug 14, 2007 5:24:33 PM
Your can only get the foolish, and the hard core unemployed, for so long.
Sooner or later, you must have other options, and the rich guys are getting off scott free, when it comes to service.
That's really what the volunteer service is.....a way for the wealthy to avoid the military.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | Aug 14, 2007 5:26:23 PM
I say we definitely need to reinstitute the draft.
First, we should poll every single man in the U.S. between the ages of 18 and 60 years old and for every one of them that votes, 'yes' I do support Bush's bone-head war in Iraq, then they're drafted, given 'quick' training and shipped to Baghdad in 60 days.
The war would be over in a month.
Posted by: Stram | Aug 14, 2007 5:34:58 PM
This war is going to last 10 years and cost 10,000 American lives.
The Republicans won't admit the mistake and simply want to stay the course.
The Democrats want to make the war the central issue in the 2008 campaign so it's in their best interests for the war to continue for the time being.
Bottom line: no matter what happens or which party wins the 2008 election, I believe the war will go on for at least another 2 years, most likely 4.
What ever happened to "when the Iraqi's stand up, we'll stand down"? we've been over there 5 years and what's been done? how long does it take to train an Iraqi police and army divisions?
Someone please answer me the following questions, because I sure as heck am not
getting them answered from the current administration or the enws media:
1). How many Iraqi divisions are now in place?
2). How many Iraqi police officers are there?
3). What is the desertion rate amongst these troops/police officers?
4). Where are the terrorists opposing the duly elected government in Iraq getting their weapons and stuffs of war?
5). What if anything are we doing to interdict this flow of supplies?
I could go on, but I think that's enough for now.
Hal
Posted by: hal09i | Aug 14, 2007 6:16:04 PM
I am a Vietnam Veteran and right now I would not advise man, woman, nor beast to enter the US Military, Border Patrol, or big city police force. One mistake in the heat of battle and you will be crucified. Criminals, terrorists, and illegal aliens have more rights than law enforcement or the US Military. Besides, most Americans are sure as hell not worth dying or getting shot to pieces for.
Posted by: howard | Aug 14, 2007 6:17:13 PM
finally the truth comes out, but as usual ABC has us commenting like this instead of the usual posting where we can all debate the issue. No surprise? Another quality effort from Always Bush's Cronies.
Posted by: newzjunky | Aug 14, 2007 6:22:52 PM
"Duh."
Posted by: Scott | Aug 14, 2007 7:21:05 PM
Stop abusing our all volunteer soldiers and reinstate the draft!!! Then people will appreciate their military better that what they do now!!! If they don't want to join make them join!!! I don't blame soldiers for deserting the military it is a form of slavery what they are doing to these troops and it makes me sick!!!
Posted by: usaman | Aug 14, 2007 7:44:26 PM
It burns this veteran’s butt hearing chicken hawks say: “They knew what they were signing for!” Few soldiers imagined they would journey to Iraq five times. Each time they start anew. They endure fifteen months were death is everywhere.
Defending our nation should be shared more evenly. Once, Americans were fair dealers. Americans pulled their own weight. They felt it was morally wrong to expect a few to shoulder the whole burden.
Posted by: Mike Johnson | Aug 14, 2007 8:06:30 PM
I hope Bush tries to re-instate the draft. Maybe then, the average American citizen will tell their representatives and Senators to go straight to hell and riot in the streets. That's what this country needs. I am tired of being screwed by this administration. I don't understand where the voice of the people went. I am absolutely disgusted with the democratic party. Spineless wastes of skin.
Posted by: Mary | Aug 14, 2007 8:14:37 PM
I wonder if We are going to wait until the army breaks before we do anything about it. We either have to redeploy from Iraq or reinstate the draft. There are no other options.
Given the facts I would prefer a redeplyment to another arab country. If the Iraq's don't care enough about there country to do what is neccessary to save it, then why should we.
Saving the president's pride is simply not worth people dying in Iraq. Its time to admit a mistake and get out.
Posted by: ARG | Aug 14, 2007 8:15:39 PM
Who would I be able to call to get my son into the Texas Air National Guard?
Posted by: Chuck | Aug 14, 2007 9:02:38 PM
Does anyone know if "we the people " can impeach a president?
Posted by: Brenda | Aug 14, 2007 11:53:08 PM
as long as we remain dependent on middle eastern oil, we will be involved in resource wars in the area. when we become energy independent, we will no longer have need of the middle east. its really that simple. when that happens, they will need us more than we need them, then the fight will be over. but, we refuse to drive smaller plugin hybrids to work or drive slower or build nuclear plants to power the hybrids. therefore, conflict is inevitable. it will always be about the energy. its the pirates treasure of the modern world, and its getting more scarce each day.
Posted by: lbk | Aug 14, 2007 11:55:32 PM
The Selective Service is already to go.
They had money bugeted to test run it.
The question is what will be the age requirement. Will females be required?
This is a go unless we stop the war.
It's the only other alternative.
Posted by: Adams684 | Aug 15, 2007 1:27:19 AM
Another Bush clown. He commanded Iraq but never spoken **** then, why now? He is a big dis-service to our man in uniform.
Posted by: marc | Aug 15, 2007 9:07:20 AM
Of course the military is "out of balance". All things flow from the top down - since Bush, the top dog, has always been "out of balance" how else can anything run by him be otherwise? No surprise here. Any business either flourishes or fails because of it leadership. Government is no different. The whole administration has been out of balance since day one. I just hope we can survive the balance of his term.
Posted by: Ron | Aug 15, 2007 10:10:02 AM
When he was the Commander in Iraq, he said just about everything what Bush wants to hear. Is he a looney, singing/talking a different tune now?
Posted by: marc | Aug 15, 2007 1:56:40 PM
It's always nice to know that our military is so stretched out in the world that we wouldnt be able to properly defend ourseleves at home. All over the nation we are of supplies and men, yet we can afford to send those things out to Iraq and the world? Nonsense...
Posted by: Kim | Aug 15, 2007 5:12:49 PM
Post a comment



