« Previous | Main | Next »

Ron Paul: 'U.S. Has Dug a Hole for Itself in Iraq'

Share

September 11, 2007 12:21 PM

ABC News' Nitya Venkataraman and Nancy Flores report: While his 2008 rivals in Washington, D.C. spent the morning in congressional panels debating the future of US involvement in Iraq, GOP Presidential candidate Rep. Ron Paul charged the U.S. has "dug a hole for [itself]" in Iraq, and simultaneously  defended his anti-war place in the Republican party and jabbed the current administration saying, "you don't have to be a war monger to be a conservative."
 
At a policy forum at Johns Hopkins University in Washington, D.C., Paul described Iraq as a "preemptive war" saying it was a "planned invasion and occupation" of a "country that was no threat to us whatsoever."

What might seem like bold rhetoric from the fiery Texas Republican on the anniversary of a historic day is actually nothing new for Paul. His assertions at the forum were consistent with his presidential platform and congressional career, both of which draw heavily from libertarian and constitutionalist ideals.

Though a lesser known candidate in the GOP's 2008 pool, Paul's swell of grassroots and web-savvy supporters, strict anti-abortion philosophies, and challenges to party dogma surrounding the war, fuel fire and debate in the conservative spectrum.

In fact, Paul's most recent headline-garnering 9/11 remarks in May were revisited Tuesday.

During a May Republican presidential debate in South Carolina Paul made headlines when he linked the September 11th attacks to previous United States involvement in the Middle East. "They attack us because we've been over there. We've been bombing Iraq for 10 years." Paul said.

Paul suggested "we listen to the people who attacked us and the reason they did it."

At the time, Rudy Giuliani pounced on Paul's comments, calling them "extraordinary" and demanding a retraction.

Paul stood his ground in the debate, putting himself on the anti-war map, "If we think that we can do what we want around the world and not incite hatred, then we have a problem."

Today, when asked to clarify who was to blame for the 9/11 attacks, Paul blamed " bad policy", but said the "ultimate responsibility fell on the people who committed the crime."

September 11, 2007 in Thompson, Fred | Permalink | User Comments (23)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

How many of the war neo-con politicians have had their family fight against the "war on terror"? I'm proud of my son, Major Dave, who has flown a total of 40 combat missions in Afghanistan & Iraq's "no fly" zone. And I thank the Lord he has not participated in our criminal imperialist invasion of Iraq!!!
Dr. Ron Paul lives family values - one wife, 5 children (2 MDs) 2 brothers who are ministers, pro-life from conception, anti-death penalty etc. Dr. Paul has the prescription for America's ills of WAR, IRS, NAFTA, JOB DRAIN, NORTH AMERICAN UNION, UNSOUND MONEY, etc.!!!
Wake up young men & women, register to vote - (DRAFT is seriously contemplated) You will be the cannon fodder during our inevitable invasion of IRAN. Support and work for DR. RON PAUL!!!

Posted by: ART DeANGELIS | Sep 13, 2007 1:43:48 AM

Virtually every single socio-political-economic maladay affecting the U.S. -- and the globe in general -- can be traced to going off a hard commodity monetary standard, such as gold, and the moral philosophy underlying that.

The non-understanding of the fundamental difference between real money and a paper receipt for real money, and the complete replacement of the former with the latter by those private corporations of central bankers who do know, will be the downfall of not only America and Western Civilization but also finish off killing the underlying concept of a apriori natural rights -- i.e., individuals obtain their rights from Nature, not from governments. Ron Paul is correct in stating that the U.S. Constitution is not a "granting" document, it is a "prohibiting" document, prohibiting infringements against natural rights obtained before the existence of any government.

This inability to conceptualize the true definition of money, as opposed to fiat currency, and the unconstitutional institutionalization of the private Fed Reserve to "manage" the free market (an oxymoron), allows all manner of spending w/o taxation, all manner of creating more fake commercial paper by the subsidiaries of the Federal Reserve including sub-prime mortgages to derivatives to hedge funds to the Yen Carry Trade to Black Box Trading to You-Name-It fake paper, all of which encompass the same concept: i.e., non-collateralized paper, much of which is supposedly "backed" by other non-collaterized paper etc.

Nor is it true that the dollar is backed by America's GDP. The Fed Reserve does not own each citizen's property and thus it cannot be pretended to act as redeemable collateral.

The War in Iraq, Congressional earmarks, deficit financing, and America's onward tromp towards a giant Welfare State to redistribute and control every individual's assets is the direct result of going off the gold standard. By moulding the average citizen's moral philosophy into altruistic collectivism, the only thing left for the Power Brokers was to strip us of a true monetary system and replace it with paper.

The solution to all this madness is to re-institutionalize the concept of true money, commodity money, and redeemable certificates for such, with no fractional reserve banking, and thus allow all citizens to reclaim their inalienable a priori rights in a truly free market rather than the current fake free market of special interest groups.

Quack Off
by Free Market Duck

Posted by: FM Duck | Sep 13, 2007 12:04:03 PM

Ron Paul takes a straight-up approach to governing. I have liked that since I first saw a video of him.
Rudy, took a very McCarthy-like shot at Paul during the debates in May--trying to paint Paul as a sort of unpatriotic conspirator against the American people. Rudy may have just said, "Retract what you said or be hung." But Paul stood his ground.
These comments about how Paul must hate freedom, or that he is a surrender monkey make no sense at all. Was George Washington being unsympathetic to American interests when he said, "Beware of foreign entanglements?" I think Ron Paul is just following our first president's advice.

Vote Ron Paul. WE NEED A CHANGE!! We just need to be the initiators of that change.

Posted by: Matt | Sep 13, 2007 12:51:35 PM

Post a comment