« Previous | Main | Next »

Dems' Poster Child Faces a Firestorm

Share

October 08, 2007 3:05 PM

ABC News' Rick Klein Reports: With debate raging in Washington over children's health insurance, congressional Democrats found a new way to make their case for an expansion last weekend: Rather than have a senator or a congressman respond to President Bush's weekly radio address, they decided to have a child who was helped by the program speak directly to the public.

But the 12-year-old boy whom Democrats chose as their poster child is now at the center of a firestorm in Washington and beyond. Conservative bloggers who uncovered some details of the family's finances are blasting the family, calling the fact that they rely on federal insurance an example of how the State Children's Health Insurance Program has expanded beyond its original intent.

According to Senate Democratic aides, some bloggers have made repeated phone calls to the home of 12-year-old Graeme Frost, demanding information about his family's private life. On Monday, a spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid accused GOP leadership aides of "pushing falsehood" in an effort to distract from the political battle over S-CHIP.

"This is a perverse distraction from the issue at hand," said Jim Manley, a spokesman for Reid, D-Nev. "Instead of debating the merits of providing health care to children, some in GOP leadership and their right-wing friends would rather attack a 12-year-old boy and his sister who were in a horrific car accident."

Manley cited an e-mail sent to reporters by a Senate Republican leadership aide, summing up recent blog traffic about the boy's family. A spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., declined to comment on Manley's charge that GOP aides were complicit in spreading disparaging information about Frosts.

In making the case for a proposed expansion of the S-CHIP program, Democrats found a boy who seemed like an ideal poster child in Graeme Frost, a Baltimore native whose family does not have private health insurance.

When Graeme and his sister were seriously injured in a 2004 car crash, their parents relied on S-CHIP coverage to help them recover. After House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's office became aware of the Frosts through a healthcare interest group, FamiliesUSA, Democratic leaders turned to Graeme to deliver the party's weekly radio address Sept. 29.

"If it weren't for CHIP, I might not be here today," Frost said in the address, which was written by Senate Democratic aides. "We got the help we needed because we had health insurance for us through the CHIP program. But there are millions of kids out there who don't have CHIP, and they wouldn't get the care that my sister and I did if they got hurt."

But after a largely positive story about Frost appeared in the Baltimore Sun, conservative-leaning bloggers began focusing on details of Frost's family situation. They suggested the family makes the conservative argument -- that the children's health insurance program has strayed from its original purpose by subsidizing healthcare for middle-class families, not just poor children.

A blogger on FreeRepublic.com discovered that Frost and his sister, Gemma, attend a private school where tuition costs $20,000 a year. Their father, Halsey, is a self-employed woodworker, meaning that if his family doesn’t have health insurance, it’s because Halsey Frost -- as his own boss -- chooses not to purchase it for himself.

"One has to wonder that if time and money can be found to remodel a home, send kids to exclusive private schools, purchase commercial property and run your own business . . .  maybe money can be found for other things," a blogger with the handle "icwhatudo" wrote on FreeRepublic.

That posting was widely circulated in the blogosphere, making great fodder for conservatives who argue that President Bush was right to veto the Democrats’ bill expanding S-CHIP.

"People make choices and it's clear the Frosts have made choice to invest in property and a business, but not in private health insurance," Mark Tapscott, editorial page editor of The Washington Examiner, wrote on his blog.

But Manley say conservative bloggers didn't dig deep enough. It turns out that the Frost children attend Baltimore’s Park School on near-full scholarships; they pay roughly $500 per child per year in tuition, he said.

Like many small-business owners, Halsey Frost can't even afford to provide health insurance to himself, Manley said.

"Last year, the Frost's made $45,000 combined," Manley said. "Over the past few years they have made no more than $50,000 combined depending on Halsey's ability to find work."

The Frost family did not immediately return calls seeking comment.

October 8, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (125)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I agree S-chip should be expanded but they should investigate better who they give it to. This is a perfect example of how people cheat the system. And Democrats want to socialize health care if we cant do it for children how are we going to do everyone else.

Posted by: Christopher | Oct 8, 2007 3:47:44 PM

did you even bother to read ANY of the above?

Posted by: David Lelsz | Oct 8, 2007 5:21:07 PM

Nice duplicitous lead. Why is the story not the republican smear campaign?

This is a lot closer to the truth:

The right-wing immediately condemned Democrats for daring to put a human face on the SCHIP program at a time when Bush was proposing a “diminishment of the number of children covered.” Rep. John Boehner (R-OH) — who has posed with children to advance his own political agenda — claimed Graeme was being used “as a human shield.”

Conservatives have more recently turned their targets on young Graeme Frost himself. ...

The smear attack against Graeme has taken firm hold in the right-wing blogosphere. The National Review, Michelle Malkin, Wizbang, Powerline, and the Weekly Standard blog have all launched assaults on the Frost family. The story is slowly working its way into traditional media outlets as well.

Here are the facts that the right-wing hasn’t bothered to figure out before attacking young Graeme:

1) Graeme has a scholarship to a private school. The school costs $15K a year, but the family only pays $500 a year.

2) His sister Gemma attends another private school to help her with the brain injuries that occurred do to her accident. The school costs $23,000 a year, but the state pays the entire cost.

3) They bought their “lavish house” sixteen years ago for $55,000 at a time when the neighborhood was less than safe.

4) Last year, the Frost’s made $45,000 combined. Over the past few years they have made no more than $50,000 combined.

5) The state of Maryland has found them eligible to participate in the CHIP program.

Desperate to defend Bush’s decision to cut off millions of children from health care, the right wing has stooped to launching baseless and uninformed attacks against a 12 year old child and his family.

Right wing bloggers have been harassing the Frosts, calling their home numerous times to get information about their private lives. Compassionate conservatism indeed.

Posted by: sy | Oct 8, 2007 5:33:20 PM

Question - why did bush re-open Pandora’s Box? Answer; to let out more wing nuts.
This attack on children is unbelievable!
Thank goodness, there is a God; otherwise, these people would destroy what is left of human decency!

Posted by: TYSPOCK | Oct 8, 2007 5:59:31 PM

This is a NEW LOW for the toe tapping, morally bankrupt republicans!

Posted by: Bec67 | Oct 8, 2007 6:47:15 PM

go ahead and expand it.
let the 50 million or so people who vote democrat every year pay $150-200 each and they can pay for it all they want to.
or is it cause libs are to cheap with their own money and only like spending other peoples money?

Posted by: darknessesedge@yahoo.com | Oct 8, 2007 6:56:10 PM

The family qualified for aid under the law. If your child is hurt and you need help, and you qualify for some kind of assistance, you take it. It's that simple.

That's the end of the story.

The real story that's emerging now is that a 12-year-old child and his family are being attacked and harassed for speaking out on an issue of public policy.

If you really want to evaluate the utility and effectiveness of the CHIP program, you would examine the statistics gathered by the agencies that administer the program. If that was really your intent, you wouldn't pick a single family that had taken a public stance on the issue and form conclusions based solely on that family's circumstances.

You would do that, however, if you wanted to create a chilling atmosphere for dissent.

Why is the right-wing harassing a 12-year-old and his family?

Posted by: Benny | Oct 8, 2007 7:01:02 PM

I have mixed feelings about this one.

On the one hand, it's just disgusting that the Republican Party would stomp all over these people. What on earth would make them want to smear a kid like that? Graeme Frost isn't the sick one here, it's the Republican Party that's the sick one.

On the other hand, maybe it's a good thing when they let the mask slip from time to time, so everyone can see how hateful and selfish they really are.

Posted by: Charles Pluckhahn | Oct 8, 2007 7:31:25 PM

We can dump pallets of money on Iraq, no questions asked, and argue about healthcare to kids? That's mighty Christian.

Didn't Jesus say, 'whatsoever you do the least of my brothers...'

Posted by: Marie | Oct 8, 2007 8:40:32 PM

The sickness that is modern conservatism turns my stomach

Posted by: Louie | Oct 8, 2007 8:45:00 PM

Bush and republicans can tell any d.... lie they wish, but you can not tell the truth about them if it hurts their agenda. Even our democrats (republicans) in office will support them.
You have to remember that Bush's supreme court voted that a person could lie about another's record or their own or anything they wish and it is a form of FREE SPEECH, but I wonder what will happen when it is someone like MoveOn.....
Look at the way they smeared MoveOn about their true statement and now Pelaeus is at the front using propaganda for Cheney & Bush's war in Iraq.
Petraeus says to prove him wrong in what he says about Iran revolutionary guards being involved in supplying Iraq with arms, when he even says he has no prove they they are. Everything he states about Iran is not facts but is HERE SAY.

Posted by: Sporty | Oct 8, 2007 8:47:07 PM

"It appears that some folks feel that some victims should never be questioned, no matter their veracity."

Dude: The whole point is that this family's story is TRUE, yet wingnuts like Michelle Malkin still feel no qualms about harassing a 12-year-old boy and his family anyway. Go ahead and ask questions, but don't turn the whole thing into an ugly hatefest when you don't get the answers you want. I'd be so embarrassed to be a conservative these days! But then, I actually have a conscience.

And as for "trotting kids out to make political points," I seem to remember a fancy ceremony at the White House not too long ago featuring dozens of "snowflake babies."

Posted by: Rachel | Oct 8, 2007 9:29:15 PM

"go ahead and expand it.
let the 50 million or so people who vote democrat every year pay $150-200 each and they can pay for it all they want to.
or is it cause libs are to cheap with their own money and only like spending other peoples money?"

These numbers are magical!

Have you ever considered the deleterious secondary effects that an uninsured populace has on a country? No you haven't because you're too busy parroting whatever radio talk show talking points memo you go in your inbox this morning.

You know why it won't cost everybody "150-200" dollars? Because unlike private insurance companies, public health insurance doesn't inflate their overhead costs. It's called a company based on the public interest NOT in the interest of filling the coffers of a bunch of executive MBAs who care more about their Cayman Islands accounts than the general well-being of the American people.

You wanna know how we can pay for S-CHIP? How about we start making the disgusting CEOs who last year successfully managed to hide an estimated $75 BILLION dollars in offshore accounts and tax shelters pay their share like they're supposed to. But no, instead we have to spend our days deliberating whether or not it's fair to harass a 12 year old boy and his family in a public smear campaign that is run by amateurs who are more interested in their argument than in the truth.

Posted by: thesimulacra | Oct 8, 2007 9:32:20 PM

"GOP aides were complicit in spreading disparaging information about Frosts"?

Those same aides who are covered by the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program - whose premiums those aides pay out of the salaries the taxpayers provide?

And then they still got their facts wrong. Unintentionaly, or not.

Sweet. Hypocrisy rocks, doesn't it?

Posted by: ibsteve2u | Oct 8, 2007 9:33:19 PM

Have any of these right wingers priced an individual policy?

I am involved in my employer's purchase of group coverage. Family coverage is $1,000 per month and it is definitely not a "gold plated" plan. An individual policy would be substantially more. This, of course, assumes no pre-existing conditions and the usual private insurance caveats.

Posted by: Frank | Oct 8, 2007 9:40:36 PM

It is really pathetic to attack the messenger. This kid and his family are facing these bloggers who will do anything to stop anything they see as socialized medicine. This is an outrage! Maybe it is time that the people start investigating the rightwing bloggers. I am sure there are other Jeff Galooley types in there who have something to hide. Time to bring them down a peg or two. I am sure once someone actually starts calling their homes and harrasing them they might then know a taste of how it feels.

Posted by: sk8boardgrind | Oct 8, 2007 9:49:04 PM

Huh. I wonder how the wingnuts would have responded if his sister had a feeding tube and was brain dead?

Silly wingers.

I think the boys' family should sue and file police complaints for harassment.

I can't believe how unbelievably ugly GOoPers are just under their flag decals and lapel pins.

Posted by: Ellen | Oct 8, 2007 9:49:08 PM

"But Manley say conservative bloggers didn't dig deep enough. It turns out that the Frost children attend...on near-full scholarships..."

I got a chuckle out of that, seeing as how it suggests conservative bloggers even CARE what the truth is, and that they would stick to truths when presenting their arguments. Although not related to S-CHIP, the best example of this might be CNN correspondent Michael Ware's "outrageous heckling" of John McCain in Baghdad last April 1st. (Conservatives hate Ware because he won't regurgitate the White House line on Iraq as Fox News does.) Conservative bloggers, led by the Drudge Report, were universally outraged by Ware's supposed transgression. Only one problem: The videotape later released shows Ware DIDN'T UTTER A WORD DURING THE PRESS CONFERENCE, JUST AS HE SAID HE DIDN'T. And yet Drudge has yet to retract the lies he printed that day. Anyone who thinks conservative bloggers would have halted their attacks on the Frosts if they "had all the facts" is exceptionally naive. Just ask the Swift Boat Liars for Lies -- they'll happily confirm this.

Posted by: TC | Oct 8, 2007 10:02:04 PM

One of the big details that dogmatic, simplistic right-wingers conveniently forget, ignore, or are too stupid to notice, is that many people do indeed purchase health insurance for themselves and their dependents, paying exorbitant premiums for decades....And they're still financially broken if they go to the doctor for a serious illness, much less overpriced prescriptions.

Public health insurance isn't about 'socialism,' or 'taking your money,' it's about bulk-purchase rates, economies of scale, reducing grotesquely fraudulent billings, and eliminating multiple layers of useless middleman gougers in the health care business.

That's just sound economics, not socialism.

Posted by: Atlas Spanked | Oct 8, 2007 10:36:26 PM

"...or is it cause libs are to cheap with their own money and only like spending other peoples money?"

We're not actually, but you Republicans sure are.

Year after year, us bluestaters pay more in taxes than we get back, while you redstaters feed off the treasury.

Here in California, I get about 70 cents for every dollar that I send to the federal treasury. Likewise, Connecticut, Maryland (where the Frost family lives), New Jersey, Mass, NY, etcetera.

For once we'd (liberal Democrats to liberal Republicans) like to spend our money as we see fit, not to support the idiot rednecks. Our kids will turn to SCHIP.

Posted by: MaxPower | Oct 8, 2007 10:52:23 PM

Post a comment