- Daily Photo: Obama Jokes Around at G-20
- Blackwater gets replaced in Iraq
- Daily Photo: U.S. Marines Look Out for Taliban in Afghanistan
- Hillary Clinton the Tomboy and Her "Ah-Ha" Moment
- Obama Administration Sudan Envoy Headed to Region
- Daily Photo: Potential Flashpoint in Iraq
- Clinton Says New Afghanistan-Pakistan Plan Depends on Diplomacy
- Exclusive: Three Israeli Airstrikes Against Sudan
- Additional 4,000 Troops to Be Ordered to Afghanistan
- Daily Photo: Navy Submarine Trains in the Arctic
- Alarm Over North Korea Missile Prep
- Anti-Terror Stimulus? US Offers Rewards for Top Terrorists
- Daily Photo: Pakistani Women in Refugee Camp
- Condoleezza Rice Appears on "The Tonight Show"
- Diplomat and Aid Group Sound the Alarm on Darfur Camp Situation
- auto industry rescue
- Ballotwatch
- Biden, Joe
- Bush, George W.
- Clinton, Bill
- Clinton, Hillary
- Dodd, Chris
- Edwards, John
- Giuliani, Rudy
- Gravel, Mike
- Huckabee, Mike
- Hunter, Duncan
- Inauguration
- Iraq
- Kucinich, Dennis
- McCain, John
- Obama, Barack
- Palin, Sarah
- Paul, Ron
- Romney, Mitt
- Tancredo, Tom
- Thompson, Fred
- Veepstakes
- Vote 2008: Democrats
- Vote 2008: Republicans
- Washington
- White House
« Previous | Main | Next »
Romney Wins Conservative Straw Poll
October 20, 2007 3:36 PM
ABC News' Karen Travers reports: Mitt Romney won the Family Research Council Values Voters' Summit straw poll in Washington Saturday, barely beating out Mike Huckabee with just 30 more votes.
Romney garnered 1595 votes to Huckabee's 1565 in the poll of conservative activists. Ron Paul was third with 865 and Fred Thompson was fourth with 564 votes. Rudy Giuliani, who addressed the crowd Saturday, finished eighth.
Romney spoke at the summit Friday and called for ending the "marriage penalty" and decreasing out-of-wedlock birth.
In a veiled hit at his rival, former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, and his more liberal positions on gay rights and abortion, Romney said, "We won’t win the White House with only two out of three or one out of three… We’re not going to beat Hillary Clinton by acting like Hillary Clinton."
Romney reiterated his belief that "two parents are the ideal setting for raising a child." On abortion, Romney declared he would be "a pro-life president," acknowledging that he was a "convert to this cause," referencing his 2005 change from an "effectively pro-choice" position to a pro-life stance.
More than 2,000 conservative activists attended the summit and heard from the Republican presidential field over the last two days.
Family Research Council President Tony Perkins said 5,776 votes were cast in the straw poll by voting in person, online or by mail. Romney's campaign actively petitioned supporters to vote online whether or not they had attended the conference.
The straw poll is non-binding, unscientific, and does not necessarily reflect the social conservative movement as a whole.
The following three questions were on the straw poll ballot:
1. Which of the following candidates for president would you be most likely to vote for?
RESULTS:
Romney- 1595
Huckabee- 1565
Paul- 865
Thompson- 564
Brownback- 297
Hunter- 140
Tancredo- 133
Giuliani- 107
McCain- 81
2. Who of the following candidates would be least acceptable to you as President of the United States? Clinton- 4141 (71.7 percent)
Giuliani- 532 (9.21 percent)
Obama- 278 (4.81 percent)
Kucinich- 196 (3.39 percent)
3. Please indicate which issue is the most important in determining your opinion of the candidate that you will most likely vote for – choose one:
RESULTS:
-abortion
-defending marriage
-tax cuts
-permanent tax relief
ABC News' Matt Stuart contributed to this report.
October 20, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (29)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
These Republican candidates offer America nothing. These Religious Right people are an embarrasment to this country and themselves.
Time to vote for change in 2008!!!
Posted by: Jeffrey1234 | Oct 21, 2007 11:31:57 AM
Aren't the "value voters" the ones who ultimately placed the majority of the people without values that we've been hearing about for their deviant behavior in the Senate and House in the last several years? Um-hum. I thought so.
Posted by: fletch | Oct 21, 2007 12:23:54 PM
Romney had a ton of support "in the room" but, his campaign told them to vote online rather than in the booth. That is why you see the contrast. Romney helped himself out drasticallly by winning the value vote.
Posted by: Micah | Oct 21, 2007 1:38:38 PM
Romney is a slicked up corporate sleaze bag, Rudy is a criminal and should be investigated for his criminal negligence in the NYPD and NYFD radio scandal. Thompson? He flips like a fish on a hot dock and why wont he answer a question without rambling? Huckaby, nice guy, Tancredo too, but they kinda miss the importance of the constitution. I'm a registered democrat who is supporting Ron Paul for president. I want a president of honest and long term integrity. I want a president who wont be owned by corporate America. I want a president like Ron Paul.
Posted by: stu1203 | Oct 21, 2007 5:59:55 PM
There seems to be quite a disparity between the recent Zogby poll asking which candidates the surveyed would NEVER vote for versus what it appears straw poll participants say. The more informed the surveyed person is about the candidates' positions, the worse the current "top-tiered" candidates do and the better the up-and-comers like Paul and Huckabee do. Which begs the question, when the general election run is in full gear, and the general public is paying closer attention to what the candidates are saying, who would do better... the current "top-tier" or the ones who are addressing the issues seriously instead of engaging in strategic demagoguery?
Posted by: Darryl Schmitz | Oct 21, 2007 7:27:29 PM
David V, it's easy to call them all hypocrites when they actually have high standards to aspire to. No one is perfect, and just because you can't meet those standards, doesn't mean they aren't worth aspiring to. It's alot better thatn teh secualarists who, of course, can never really be hypocrites to the same extent becasue they are a law unto themselves and do as they wish. They are accountable to nothing but what they choose to feel good about..
Posted by: hamlin | Oct 22, 2007 10:20:02 AM
Seems a lot of Ron Paul supporters will accept only Ron Paul. Paul will not get the Republican nomination. He will presumably then run as an independent which will pull votes away from whoever does get the Republican nomination. A vote for Ron Paul as an independent is by default a vote for Hillary. Push for Paul all you want, but don’t run Thompson and Huckabee down too far. They might be your only hope to keep Hillary or Obama out of the White House. ... Unless Giuliani gets the Republican nomination, then I’ll vote for an independent.
Posted by: Royce | Oct 22, 2007 10:20:37 AM
There was only one true winner in the assorted crop of never do wells and lack luster former Attorneys. That is the man of impeccable principal, who for 10 terms in the House of Representatives has walked like he talks.
That moral and prestigious man is Dr. Ron Paul. Who says what he means and means what he says, unlike the phony word of art players on stage that say one thing and then do another. CHEERS
Posted by: Ronald Murphy | Oct 22, 2007 6:28:17 PM
No such thing as "conservative" and "principaled" in the same sentance. I can't stand people that try to push their values down other people's thoats.
Posted by: m | Oct 23, 2007 4:55:50 AM
Post a comment



