« Previous | Main | Next »

ABC News, WMUR-TV and Facebook Host Back-To-Back Debates in New Hampshire

Share

November 26, 2007 9:38 AM

ABC News' Tahman Bradley Reports: Days before Granite State residents head to the polls to vote in the nation's first presidential primary, ABC News, Hearst Argyle's WMUR-TV and Facebook host back-to-back Democratic and Republican presidential debates in New Hampshire on Saturday, Jan 5, 2008.

The 90 minute debates, which take place on the campus of St. Anselm in Manchester, come two days after the Iowa caucuses.

ABC's "World News" anchor Charles Gibson will moderate with additional questions from WMUR anchor and political director Scott Spradling.

The first debate airs at 7:00 pm ET/PT on the ABC Television Network with the second debate immediately following it.

The order of the debates will be decided later by a coin toss.

"Coming on the heels of the Iowa Caucuses, these back-to-back primetime events will let voters in New Hampshire and throughout the country see the candidates challenge each other at a moment in the campaign when the stakes couldn't be higher," ABC News President David Westin said in a statement.

"WMUR is proud of its tradition of informing New Hampshire voters," added WMUR President and General Manager Jeffrey Bartlett. "We're excited to once again produce these important debates."

November 26, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (34)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Why would the media not include all candidates?..If you need more time then add more time....Even though my mind is already made up for Ron Paul, I think every candidate deserves the chance to defend their positions and challange their competition...
What are they afraid of?
Jill

Posted by: Jill Duncan | Jan 4, 2008 5:20:04 AM

When are we going to get a truly fair and balanced news network????
If Ron Paul is excluded, I will be making the largest donation I can to Dr. Paul DURING the debate!

Posted by: bobp sr | Jan 4, 2008 8:56:48 AM

I think it is way too early for the campaigning. 90 days before election would be more then enough time for a person to make their mine up. All the money spent could be spent in better ways such as helping the seniors or the hungary. Give us some happy news.

Posted by: Bob | Jan 5, 2008 8:33:56 AM

Here is a question suggestion for Charles Gibson - In the spirit of cooperation, How would you incorporate the other parties methodology into tax reform or improvement? This question is for any candidate. Taxes are an example. This question would work for any issue.

Posted by: Alex | Jan 5, 2008 9:51:06 AM

Is this to be sent on the net somewhere or on ABC News Now? I am currently in Denmark and can“t receive ABC News proper here...

Posted by: Anders | Jan 5, 2008 2:05:58 PM

why is it so difficult to find out what time the debates start and where to stream them over the internet. After searching thru this entire site for 15 minutes now, I can find no concrete info on the debates. nothing but little video snippets, interactive nonsense, polls, 'live blogs', and pseudo-news. I'm never going to hang out at ABC News website, so why do I have to be treated like a teenager with Facebook and Fun. I'll bet theres not even a stream. Unbelievably frustrating and unimpressive.

Posted by: randy | Jan 5, 2008 7:16:04 PM

This question is for Mr. Huckabee: Mr. Huckabee, why would a minister that is suppose to be called by God, leave his calling for two other for a position called by man? And do you think God would call a prevaricator?

Posted by: LARRY GEE | Jan 5, 2008 7:24:18 PM

I missed most of the Republican debate. :(
Where can I see it again (or see it for the first time)?

Posted by: Leslie Redweik | Jan 5, 2008 9:11:24 PM

Larry Gee, that is one of the most thinking-challenged comments I've probably ever heard. God never changes directions for people? Wow, then we should never marry or have children by that logic either. EVERYONE is called to serve him, regardless what occupation you have for that matter (providing it doesn't break his rules to begin with, prosititution for example). Guess what, many full time ministers (missionaries also etc..) also have 'Earth' jobs. Rulers and leaders? Deborah? David? Joseph? Daniel? One doesn't preclude the other.

Posted by: Leslie Redweik | Jan 5, 2008 9:19:22 PM

Impressed with the depth and specificity of Hilary Clinton. Clearly could step right in and make needed changes. It is clear to me that she is the best candidate for this critical time.

John Edwards shows compassion and commitment toward the middle class. He would be my second choice.

Obama is likable, but doesn't seem to have the depth in what he says or experience to show Americans that he could do what is needed in this critical time for the US. I see Obama as a presidential candidate in the future.

Posted by: Nancy Nelson | Jan 5, 2008 10:55:10 PM

The debidate included the four best canidates for the Democrats. Hilary Clinton may have lost in Iowa, but she is 1st in the New Hamphire debate!

Posted by: Maria Matos | Jan 5, 2008 10:59:34 PM

R.U. kidding me? Rudy feels he should be President because during 911 he was mayor, and he also feels that being like Ronald Regan will get him elected how crazy is that? Rudy is a Fake. John McCain will have us in a war with Iran his 1st year, remember the commit he made making a paridy to the Beach Boys song Barbaran, where he said: "Bomb Bomb Bomb Iran".I don't trust him one bit, remember what I say he will not do anything for the people he will only do what he wants, his way or the highway. Law and Order producers need to offer Fred more money to come back to the show, thats his true calling. As much as he sleep I would not trust him being at the wheel. Mitt is only in-touch with lilly white america, he will set us back 20years. Huckabee is getting pushed around like he does not belong, he needs to stand up.

Posted by: Terry B. | Jan 5, 2008 11:18:05 PM

For over forty years I been a loyal and active Democrat.
I joined the Marine corp in 1964 and a taxs payer sence then.
The ILLEGAL Immigration issue is very
important to me as a Democrat.
Why then, was the Democratic candidates
not ask one question on ILLEGAL Immigration?

Posted by: Thomas Lee | Jan 5, 2008 11:25:05 PM


Maria - I agree with you, Hillary was 1st in tonight's debate.

Posted by: Nancy Nelson | Jan 5, 2008 11:44:17 PM

Post a comment