That is exactly why I don't care for John Edwards! He's a big baby who is going to take his ball and go home if he doesn't win. (And he's not going to win). He doesn't support his party. I truely believe that Kerry hurt himself in 04 when he chose Edwards as his running mate.

John Edwards has changed.

Why does he have to support Hillary? Just because she's a Democrat? I personally don't care for either Edwards or Clinton, but at least he isn't blindly supporting another lib.

Please. He's one of the few people out there pointing out the obvious truth -- the establishment dems and repubs are just flip sides of the same coin. In both cases, the corporations and their money control the agenda. We need to upend this whole system to see real positive changes in this country. Edwards has changed for the better, he is much more passionate about issues that really matter to our people, and he's got nothing to lose. I just wish the media would give him half as much attention as they give to our "anointed" candidates.

I thoroughly agree with Edwards here as well. The concept of 'support your party' goes against the decisions that people make with thought, blind support. Its not a question of taking his ball and going home, it is an issue of his belief for not supporting someone he may or may not believe supports his beliefs.

I don't blame him for not supporting Hillary. I don't support Hillary.

I disagree with the 2 comments above. If he wants to run as a 3rd party candidate, great. As it is, he is running as a democrat and ran in 04 as an establishment democrat with John Kerry.---This is not the same thing as the individual voter out there who doesn't vote democrat if they don't like the choice or republican if they don't like the choice.----He is supposed to be a democratic politician and should stand by his party. Otherwise, he simply looks like a whiney, little boy who is ticked off because the majority preferred somebody else.

Just ask yourself these two questions:

-Are you happy with the status quo in this country?

and:

-Do you think that Hillary really wants to change the status quo?

Edwards may have become more angry, but he is getting "the treatment" that any candidate gets who truly supports change. Just remember that the people who are paid analysts for the media profit under the current system. 'nuf said.

I don't know why you would expect Edwards at this point to say he would support Hillary. He is after all running against her right now. His concentration should be on trying to get the nomination.Seems moree like Sen Dodd trying to make a few cheap headlines and stroking his own ego before the inevitable crushing defeats he is about to receive.

Edwards is a rich pretty-boy populist-wannabe Buffoon!

Today he threatened that, if elected, he would take away healthcare benefits from members of Congress, unless they pass Universal Healthcare in 6 months.

Never mind that the President has Absolutely no power to take away Any benefits from members of Congress! He must assume we are all morons. It's all about cheap headlines.

The only non-establishment democrats are John Edwards and Barak Obama. I don't blame Edwards for refusing to endorse part of the reigning good Ole boys. We need change, not the same old stuff that's been sold to us from both sides of the aisle. Go get "em" John, and Barak, follow his lead!

I am a democrat and do not and will not support Hillary Clinton. I will not blindly vote for her in the general election simply because she is a democrat.Because "Honesty and Integrity" matters and I do not feel that she is honest and do beleive she lacks integrity. I care deeply for this country and voting for a "President" overrides party loyalty. I would encourage all to choose carefully and not forget the past 16 years. I hope John Edwards feel the same.

Now is not the time to vow your support IF you're the loser. Edwards is in a race and he wants to win. It's ludicrous to condemn him for not supporting his opponent at this point in the race.

Is Chris Dodd looking to get the nomination for VP? hmmmmmmmm? Seems HE might have already conceded...

John Edwards is leaving a bad taste in my mouth. I liked him in 2004, too bad he went and got all negative. I'll support Hillary and call it a day.

Look for Georgie Stepanofalalfalous to corner a democrat with his cutsie question..."who is your favorite philosopher"? again like he cornered Edwards last time out.

It never ceases to amaze me how short people's political memories are. I'm a dyed in the wool Democrat and loved much of what Bill Clinton stood for and accomplished, but who in their right minds could want to go back to the extremely bitter partisanship that the Clintons evoked? Contrary to the spin coming out of Hillary's campaign, the Clintons don't hold a monopoly the ability to move our country in a more progressive direction. Ironically, given the visceral level of hatred associated with the Clintons, she may be the only Democrat who couldn't move us in a more positive direction if she were elected.

Clinton does'nt need endorsing from Edwards. Edwards is having a tough enough time... He'll regret it though because,i'm sure Hillary will not be asking him to be V.P. anytime soon..greg

Sore Loser, that what he is!

If a candidate wants my vote then tell me what we can accomplish to make things better. Enough of the b.s about the parties!!!I don't care if you are republican or democrat.We need to have an old-fashioned Boston Tea Party and let all of them take a swim. None of the candidates can straighten out this mess in 4 years and all of them are wishy-washy.Do your job!!!This should be a wake up call for all of us.Stop re-electing the same ones and crying about their mess!!!!!

I stopped supporting John Edwards over two months ago. When he started going after Bill Clinton, that was it for me.
My son said John Edwards doesn't even seem like a Democrat anymore.