Sen Clinton will make a good president.
She is attacking problem facing America.
She not attacking others candidates, like they are attacking her. When the others candidates talk about Sen Clinton,
she taking about ways to help America. She may not have all the answer. But she is trying. Good for her.
So yes we need Sen Clinton in the White House. Vote for Sen Clinton!

This "can't we all just get along" stuff is nonsense. Candidates like Edwards that are genuinely passionate about issues like providing truthful answers to voters and getting lobbyists out of politics, are not just going to roll over and admit that they would endorse a candidate who takes the opposiste position on such matters. To do so would prove that they don't really stand for anything, they've just staked out their positions for political expediency.

Some of the greatesst and most genuine political theater of recent times occurred in at the 1980 Democratic Convention when, after a hotly contested two-horse race for the nomination, the nation waited to see whether one of the greatest Democrats of all time, Ted Kennedy, would endorse the incumbant president, Jimmy Carter, and hold his hand in unity at the close of the convention. (In his address to the convention, Kennedy called for a Democratic win in November, never mentioned Carter by name, nd did not hold hands in unity. Carter, hamstrung by the Iran hostage crises and high inflation fed mainly by the creation of OPEC/subsequent much higher oil prices, predictably got destroyed by Reagan in the general election that year.)

There are parallels, primarily principled challengers trailing/losing to nominees that, because of their high negatives, were reasonably sure to lose in November. Democrats marched off the cliff in lock-step with Carter in 1980, and may be poised to do the same with Hillary Clinton in 2008.

I must say I am surprised at the brilliant behavior of John Edwards. He is obviously very smart when choosing to refrain from voicing his (nonexistant) support for someone as useless as Hilary Clinton. She's already had two terms in office. My four-year-old cousin can give a straighter answer to a question that she can. I'm not saying I necessarily support Edwards, but I am definitely saying I do not support Clinton. She would be useless in office. Oh, wait...no, she would be very useful in office. She'd give me something to laugh about every day.

Let's get real folks. This country has gone through a period of ineffective leadership for the past sixteen years. We have had a total collaspe of moralleadership during this period that have very litttle to do with the political parties. We simply have had leaders who were more interested in self promotion,disregard for the truth and in several ways simply incomponent. Hillary Clinton was and remains directly linked to this dismal period and I beleive it would be a mistake to elect her as president. She has demonstrated that she lacks the capacity to accept responsibility for her positions and she will retract her positions if they prove unacceptable or unpopular. She has a history of blaming others for her and her husband failures.It will be another failure of our system if she is elected. The American people need truth and a leader who will be open and honest in his/her approach to governing. A "Democrat" who will not vote for Hillary am I.

Hey, Edwards isnt alone. Hilary will spell doom for the Dems, Mass exodus of independents to the republicans. I dont support Obama either but should this guy win the nomination everyone will want to be part of History. It wont be an election but a movement to make history.

Believe me or not, this Obama guy is extraordinary. A guy whom even diehards republicans cant hide their admiration for.Some simply adandon other campaigns to meet Obama when they hear he is around. It just amazing the enthusiasm building around this Obama guy!