- Daily Photo: Obama Jokes Around at G-20
- Blackwater gets replaced in Iraq
- Daily Photo: U.S. Marines Look Out for Taliban in Afghanistan
- Hillary Clinton the Tomboy and Her "Ah-Ha" Moment
- Obama Administration Sudan Envoy Headed to Region
- Daily Photo: Potential Flashpoint in Iraq
- Clinton Says New Afghanistan-Pakistan Plan Depends on Diplomacy
- Exclusive: Three Israeli Airstrikes Against Sudan
- Additional 4,000 Troops to Be Ordered to Afghanistan
- Daily Photo: Navy Submarine Trains in the Arctic
- Alarm Over North Korea Missile Prep
- Anti-Terror Stimulus? US Offers Rewards for Top Terrorists
- Daily Photo: Pakistani Women in Refugee Camp
- Condoleezza Rice Appears on "The Tonight Show"
- Diplomat and Aid Group Sound the Alarm on Darfur Camp Situation
- auto industry rescue
- Ballotwatch
- Biden, Joe
- Bush, George W.
- Clinton, Bill
- Clinton, Hillary
- Dodd, Chris
- Edwards, John
- Giuliani, Rudy
- Gravel, Mike
- Huckabee, Mike
- Hunter, Duncan
- Inauguration
- Iraq
- Kucinich, Dennis
- McCain, John
- Obama, Barack
- Palin, Sarah
- Paul, Ron
- Romney, Mitt
- Tancredo, Tom
- Thompson, Fred
- Veepstakes
- Vote 2008: Democrats
- Vote 2008: Republicans
- Washington
- White House
« Previous | Main | Next »
Edwards to Hit Rivals on Trade
Email
ShareNovember 09, 2007 12:06 PM
ABC News' Rick Klein Reports: Former senator John Edwards is set to pounce on his rivals' support of a free-trade deal with Peru, as he seeks to exploit an opening on an issue that speaks to growing concerns about the economy and the impact of globalization.
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., said in a statement released Thursday night that she would support the Bush administration's trade agreement, though she is opposing pending agreements with South Korea, Colombia, and Panama.
"It has very strong labor and environmental protections," Clinton said in the statement, referring to the Peru pact. "This agreement makes meaningful progress on advancing workers' rights, and also levels the playing field for American workers."
Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., has also said he plans to vote for the Peru deal when it comes to the Senate floor as soon as next week.
But Edwards, D-N.C., is fiercely opposing the deal. Friday afternoon in Iowa, he plans to criticize Clinton in particular for supporting it, casting the measure as a "flawed trade deal that expands the NAFTA model," a campaign official tells ABC News.
The Peru pact has split the Democratic Party, reviving memories of President Bill Clinton's battle to pass NAFTA more than a decade ago. On Thursday, 109 House Democrats voted with the vast majority of Republicans to approve the Peru deal, while 116 Democrats voted no.
Trade has long been a hot-button issue among Iowa caucus-goers; many observers believe Dick Gephardt won the 1988 Iowa caucuses in part based on his opposition to free-trade agreements. Two of Iowa's three Democratic House members came out against the Peru pact, and both New Hampshire Democrats voted no.
A March Wall Street Journal/NBC poll found that 54 percent of Democratic voters believe free-trade agreements have hurt the United States, while 21 percent said they have helped.
David Sirota, a Democratic strategist and commentator, said Clinton and Obama have created an opening for Edwards by supporting the Peru deal. With spiraling oil prices, plant closings in Iowa, and economic insecurities related to the housing market, free-trade deals are growing less popular among Democrats, he said.
"I'm pretty stunned politically that Clinton is doing this," Sirota said. "The word 'NAFTA' has become a symbol for, 'You are selling me out.' Hillary Clinton is easy to portray as representing sort of the Wall Street status quo."
According to campaign-finance data, Clinton's campaign has received at least $35,900 from individuals hired to lobby on behalf of the Peru Free Trade Agreement. Those lobbyists work for major corporations including Wal-Mart, Citigroup, and Coca-Cola -- companies that generally support free trade as a means to open up more markets for their products.
Edwards and Obama do not accept contributions from registered federal lobbyists.
Though her husband fought hard to get NAFTA approved by the Democratic-controlled Congress in 1993, Sen. Clinton has not been as quick to support free-trade deals. She voted against the Central American Free Trade Agreement -- patterned on NAFTA -- in 2005.
And as a candidate this year, she has expressed some disappointment in NAFTA's impact on the US economy, and has said she would reevaluate it as president.
UPDATE: Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., also has come out against the pact. "It's disappointing that Senators Clinton and Obama, in supporting this agreement, would support more of the same, which will only add to our deficit, taking jobs away from hardworking Americans and shipping them elsewhere," he said in a statement.
A senior adviser to the Obama campaign, meanwhile, said the senator is supporting the Peru deal because it has enforcement mechanisms to ensure labor and environmental standards. The adviser also dismissed comparisons to NAFTA, saying that the minuscule impact of Peruvian-American trade makes it "silly" to equate the pacts.
"This is an almost totally symbolic issue," the adviser said. "There's no way you can claim this has anything like the impact of NAFTA."
November 9, 2007 in Tancredo, Tom | Permalink | User Comments (6)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Ok, so Edwards is going to work to build international alliances and forge positive relations abroad while stifling free trade and hence jobs in otehr countries. Certainly makes as much sense as working for a hedge fund to learn about poverty. Keep third world and poor countries third world and poor, maybe he'll just sue them! Menawhile, France, Germany, and Canada have pro American pro capitalist governments...Edwards is going backwards full speed ahead......His position is bought and paid for by Unions...nothing more. They even save 15% by paying him directly and cutting out the middle man (lobbyists)!
Posted by: NC Guy | Nov 9, 2007 2:02:38 PM
I AM NO SUPPORTER OF JOHN EDWARDS, BUT I AGREE WITH HIM ON THIS. JUST LOOK WHAT NAFTA HAS DONE TO THIS COUNTRY, YEAH BILL CLINTON SIGNED US UP ON THIS UNBALANCE DEAL AND ALSO HAVING US UNDER THE WTO (WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION) HAS SENT ALL THE JOBS OVERSEAS. PRESIDENT BUSH IS JUST EXPANDING IT TO ALL OF SOUTH AMERICA, OR ANOTHER AMERICAN GLOBALIZATION FOR CORPORATE AMERICA TO SEND OUT ALL THE JOBS OVERSEAS...LEAVING US AMERICANS WITH NO JOBS BUT TO CLEAN WINDOW AND WORK AT MACDONALD'S ...OH YEAH THE ILLEGALS ARE DOING THAT ALREADY UNDER THE NAFTA AGREEMENT...I STILL SUPPORT EDWARDS...DR.RON PAU FOR U.S. PRESIDENT....
Posted by: JOHN | Nov 9, 2007 2:57:08 PM
Is this the concerned John Edwards, the same Sen. John Edwards who voted for S.2045 which allowed 195,000 foreign IT workers into the US for 2001, 2002 and 2003. The time for concern was then. I didn't get your vote then, you won't get mine now. Information Technology professionals have long memories.
Posted by: popeye1133a | Nov 9, 2007 4:48:30 PM
Jude...what's in a name? A rose by any other name would smell just as sweat. Quit trying to convince people Obama shouldn't be President because his middle name is Hussein, his Last name rhymes with a terrorist, and his first name rhymes with Iraq....it doesn't matter. His name could be Ruba Castro Chavez....or Ron Paul for that matter...it's the politics. Talk about the issues in a controlled matter, and maybe somebody will take you seriously.
Me, personally, I will not vote for anyone who wants to eliminate the Deparment for Education(hint: Ron Paul does), or for someone who wants complete, unequivoical free trade(hint: Ron Paul does). This Peru agreement is frustrating if Obama does in fact vote for it....I'll have to read the full text to see what it's all about. FAIR TRADE NOT FREE TRADE
Posted by: Steven | Nov 9, 2007 5:19:21 PM
John Edwards has admitted that he has made mistakes in the past. Hillary never admits when she makes a mistake. She never answers questions. She is certainly not a true Democrat. She is what I call a Republicrat.Edwards has devoted most of his adult Life fighting for the working man in the court room or in politics. I guess a few of the fat cats don't like him. The fat cats that are pro big buiness and anti union. I am for Edwards a man of courage and honesty.
Posted by: Mark | Nov 9, 2007 11:33:30 PM
Not shure we should listen to him on trade......he traded his soul for a few bucks and a blowdry.
Posted by: whatthe? | Nov 10, 2007 11:56:36 AM
Post a comment
