- Daily Photo: Obama Jokes Around at G-20
- Blackwater gets replaced in Iraq
- Daily Photo: U.S. Marines Look Out for Taliban in Afghanistan
- Hillary Clinton the Tomboy and Her "Ah-Ha" Moment
- Obama Administration Sudan Envoy Headed to Region
- Daily Photo: Potential Flashpoint in Iraq
- Clinton Says New Afghanistan-Pakistan Plan Depends on Diplomacy
- Exclusive: Three Israeli Airstrikes Against Sudan
- Additional 4,000 Troops to Be Ordered to Afghanistan
- Daily Photo: Navy Submarine Trains in the Arctic
- Alarm Over North Korea Missile Prep
- Anti-Terror Stimulus? US Offers Rewards for Top Terrorists
- Daily Photo: Pakistani Women in Refugee Camp
- Condoleezza Rice Appears on "The Tonight Show"
- Diplomat and Aid Group Sound the Alarm on Darfur Camp Situation
- auto industry rescue
- Ballotwatch
- Biden, Joe
- Bush, George W.
- Clinton, Bill
- Clinton, Hillary
- Dodd, Chris
- Edwards, John
- Giuliani, Rudy
- Gravel, Mike
- Huckabee, Mike
- Hunter, Duncan
- Inauguration
- Iraq
- Kucinich, Dennis
- McCain, John
- Obama, Barack
- Palin, Sarah
- Paul, Ron
- Romney, Mitt
- Tancredo, Tom
- Thompson, Fred
- Veepstakes
- Vote 2008: Democrats
- Vote 2008: Republicans
- Washington
- White House
« Previous | Main | Next »
McCain Visits Iraq Over Thanksgiving
November 23, 2007 11:51 AM
ABC News' Ron Claiborne Reports: Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., spent two days in Iraq this week, meeting with Gen. David Petraeus and sharing Thanksgiving lunch and dinner with U.S. troops.
On Friday morning he held talks with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and Vice President Adel Abdulmahdi. His office said he also met with Iraqi police and security forces.
The Arizona Republican senator told ABC's Aaron Katersky in Baghdad that he had seen further evidence of progress in Iraq.
"Winning is what we're doing," McCain said. "Having the Iraq military take over more of our responsibilities, have violence down." But he added: "We have a long way to go."
McCain has expressed frustration with al-Maliki for failing to advance political reconciliation to go along with the security gains.
On the stump in recent days, McCain has been reminding voters of his early support for sending more troops to Iraq. But he also points to his criticism of the administration's handling of the war before the surge.
This was McCain's seventh visit to Iraq and third this year. During a trip to Iraq last April, he was ridiculed for saying the security situation had improved while under heavy protection by U.S. troops. Since then, U.S. military and Iraqi civilian casualties have declined.
McCain was accompanied on this trip by South Carolina Sen. Lindsay Graham, Sen. Joseph Lieberman, Democrat of Connecticut, and Jon Huntsman, the Republican governor of Utah.
November 23, 2007 in Thompson, Fred | Permalink | User Comments (5)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This poor guy needs to retire,I salute him for his service,but his time,and warmongering ideas are unrealistic.
Posted by: AJ | Nov 23, 2007 4:35:08 PM
McCain's "unrealistic" ideas about how to fight the battle in Iraq seem to be working rather well.
As for "amnesty" you will see Comprehensive Immigration Reform before you see 20 million illegals deported as you will NEVER see 20 million illegals deported.
Posted by: Brad Marston | Nov 23, 2007 7:45:00 PM
As a Navy Officer that is being deployed to the middle east, McCain is the only candidate that I trust. He has been there, knows what it takes to win and does what he says without paying lip service to veterans.
Keep up the good work John!
Posted by: Michael H | Nov 23, 2007 9:39:35 PM
All right, the fact is John McCain is not yet nominated and he can’t win the Presidency unless he’s nominated. So let’s concentrate on that issue first. Clinton is in the lead for the Democrats, so it looks very likely she will be their nominee. If that doesn’t happen we’ll have to fall back and re-assess the situation, but for the sake of this argument, let us assume that she is. The front runners for the Republican nomination are listed below. I have not included those fine folks who are polling in single digits. I don’t think they have a snowball’s chance, frankly. If you think they do, just add them to the list and ask yourself the same question.
Clinton versus Giuliani. Who do you think will win?
Clinton versus Huckabee. Who do you think will win?
Clinton versus Romney. Who do you think will win?
Clinton versus Thompson. Who do you think will win?
Clinton versus John McCain. Who do you think will win?
Looking at that list don’t rely on who YOUR favorite candidate is. That’s not the point of the exercise. Of the Republicans listed above, who do you think realistically has a chance to beat Clinton?
Giuliani: You can’t grin your way to the presidency. Yes, he did fine with 9/11 and he did some good stuff with NYC, but he’s still a liberal Republican who will turn off the conservative Republicans and not make as much of a differentiation between himself and the liberal Clinton. In that contest, he’ll lose. He’s too much like a Democrat. Since Hillary is a better Democrat than Rudy, she'll win.
Huckabee: Governor and preacher, way too conservative for the middle Republicans. Family values and anti-abortion are great, but what about Iraq? What about social security? Swing voters will never elect what amounts to a single-issue candidacy. Do Americans want a preacher in the White House? It won’t happen.
Romney: A professional politician as rich as a Kennedy. He’s a politician who has spent a lot of money and (yes, this isn’t ‘fair,’) he’s a Mormon who means it. Can you see the conservative wing voting for him? Can you see the swing voters voting for him? Nope. They won’t. Clinton wins again.
Thompson: I like him. He’s honest, straightforward, and has some experience. It’s just that he gives a sleepy impression and the world is very black & white to him. He doesn’t have a chance for the nomination, really, and he won’t beat Clinton. I think he's polling well because people like him--but they won't vote for him.
The fact is that John McCain is the only Republican candidate who has a chance to beat Clinton. Conservative where it matters, principled, experienced, and will appeal to a broad cross-section of voters, including swing voters and conservatives. He may not be conservative enough for the extreme right, but what are they going to do? Let Clinton win? Plus McCain is about the best Commander-in-Chief you could ever hope to have. He's a leader who's earned it.
So, if you want Clinton as President, choose a Republican candidate other than McCain. That will do the trick, guaranteed. But choose McCain and we just might get a Republican elected. It's the only way it's even possible. If you prefer another Republican nominee, it's time to re-evaluate. Just how, exactly, are you going to get anyone other than McCain into the White House?
Posted by: Michael | Nov 24, 2007 8:56:21 PM
It was uplifting to see John McCain, South Carolina Sen. Lindsay Graham, Sen. Joseph Lieberman, Democrat of Connecticut, and Jon Huntsman in the chow hall on Thanksgiving. It would serve other politicians well to put their feet on the ground in Iraq instead of just talking about it all the time.
Posted by: euroyankee | Nov 29, 2007 12:19:49 AM
Post a comment



