Obama should let the Clintons __who had been living for so long in vice to the extent that they complete forgot what the word morality had ever meant __ continue to show the People of America their true faces. Their attacks will let Americans see by themselves how electing Obama will avoid them the disaster that the election of Siamese Clinton couple would provoke. Their attacks constitute the best arguments for a judgement of the Americans for never vote for such a couple and for Obama supporters to move ahead. There is of course unenviable experience that the Clintons excel in, that Obama needs not to possess nor long for: the contempt and vice. These attacks would let caucus goers who are still hesitating about Hillary Clinton, finally make Obama their genuine candidate for the White House.

TO MUCH. Clinton should be the last person in the world to have anyone working for her to say anything negative about anyone. I was on the fence until this. This is more like what this country has lived through durning the Bush years. Our country needs someone who will not keep the same old things going on for more years. America lets move on. Obama for President.

Obama is no angel. he stirs the pot and watched the fireworks after lighting the fuse. He has defaced and demoralized Hillary Clinton time and again. He has distorted the truth, lied about the issues and has consistantly used the media to do his dirty work. His hands are not clean. At least with Hillary there is no hypocricy. Shes no saint and does'nt pretend to be one. If people would see through the smoke and mirrors and listen to her platform they would see that she truely is the most qualified and gifted politician running for president. Here's hopeing that America is smarter than what the media and Obamas campaign hope they are.

Robert in charlotte............I wonder who you are. Your comments lack rational and simply does not reflect the truth as it relates to this campaign. From your comment I gleam that you are a "Clinton" supporter. Let me be clear I am not, but I am a undecided "Democrat", who is totally disgusted with the "Clinton" campaign and the dirt that they have injected into the process. Senator Obama and former Senator Edwards have conducted a positive campaign based on facts. The "Clintons" have continued the behavior that gave us GWB, the lie and they play the blame game. If the Senator from NY win the nomination this is one "Democrat" who will support the Republicanscome the general election. We deserve better than what the "Clintons" are doing and saying. Enough of the dirty politics, lies, blaming and decit. They (Clintons) are not good for America.

The only dirt on John Edwards is his $400 haircut. I think he would make a great President! If he is the nominee I'm voting for him. I would love to see an Edwards/Biden ticket. If Hillary is the nominee, I'm voting Republican just like you murl41. If Obama is the nominee, I'll voter for him. If he doesn't get it, he would be a great Supreme Court Justice.

When is the press going to raise Bill Clinton's past cocaine abuse? All the coke traffickers he pardoned? Obama only did a little coke here and there, while Bill did mountains of the stuff.

Too bad you media folks are Clinton owned. If you were professionals, these questions would be raised, especially when Hillary's people are raising the coke use against Barack.

"He has defaced and demoralized Hillary Clinton time and again."

LOL. Please learn English.

What's wrong with Obama's past cocaine addiction being brought up again? That is the truth and people have the right to know the truth about this man. This speaks of his character or the lack thereof. It is funny that one blogger mentioned that Obama and Edwards are running positive campaigns, she's got to be kidding me! They are the ones slinging all these mud on Hillary for fear that she's going to get the Democratic nomination. Hillary's fighting back and she's going to win. Obama and Edwards are losers and all they do is plain politicking. They have no plans of making our lives better. They are overly ambitious simpletons and their pretext of serving this great nation is pure hypocrisy and idiotic. The are just so pathetic. Hillary 08!!!

Obama is a sanctimonious and phony presidential wanna -be whose candidacy is nothing but full of political absurdity. He is a peabrained bozo, a halfwit dum-dum with a thickead shmuck character. America deserves better than this Mr. Dopey!

Hillary Clinton's campaign has generated hundreds of thousands of dollars in contributions from some of the poorest neighborhoods in New York City's Chinatown. The Los Angeles Times reports an April fundraiser in an area known for its gritty urban poverty churned out a whopping $380,000 dollars.

The Times says at least one Chinatown donor has denied making a $1,000 contribution recorded in his name. Another who donated $2,500 appears to be ineligible to do so under federal election law. And many donors could not be tracked down using property, telephone or business records.

Clear. Obama= CLASS; INTEGRITY.
Hillary= SLIME TACTICS. PHONINESS.
Have you noticed that where the polls are most strongly moving TOWARD BARACK and AWAY FROM HILLARY just happen to be in the first 2 states to vote (Iowa and NH) -- WHERE THE VOTERS HAVE MOST HAD A CHANCE TO REALLY, GENUINELY KNOW the candidates and see and "sense" UP CLOSE what each one's CORE is really about......... -- Janet (an involved mom and grandmother)

Troy:
u dont see anything wrong with Obama's youthful indiscretions being brought up again?

Good! Do you want the Clintons' indicretions also brought up?

Is that what u want? Want a can of worms opened?

I’m sure Obama’s youthful drug use will be brought up in a general election. As will Bill Clinton’s affairs, (Lewinsky, Gennifer with a “G” Flowers, Paula Jones). Whitewater, campaign fundraising scandals, Hillary’s paranoia and persecution complex, “A vast right wing conspiracy”. Its my guess that her stance that she was instrumental in the running of the Whitehouse under Bill, while disassociating herself from anything negative. Notice how its, “’I’ introduced national healthcare”, but its “’We’ made some mistakes, and special interests made us fail.” How involved was she as Clinton’s advisor?

This blameing Hillary for his affairs has been bugging me for a while. I don't think it is fair. I don't like the drug issue either BUT the guy was right. The republicans will smear it all over and dem's need to be ready for it.

Kathryn: It seems to me that you are willing to accept the lies and deception going on in the Hillery campaign. And it’s finding. Please keep them within the confines of the lies and deception department. I was once like you, until I began to dig for the truth myself. It wasn't hard to do either. With the use of the WWW, I was able to find the info needed to make a constructive decision. My advice to those willing to believe the unfounded truths on the net, dig a little deeper, before you come to these sites with the untruths, as they say! “The truth will set you free”.
OOOBBBAAAMMMAAA 000888!!!

I wouldn't vote for either Obama or Clinton but antone who admits to past Cocaine use shouldn't even be considered to lead this nation.

I love how the Clinton's throw mud and than use "the VRWC" as cover. I am reminded of Hillary saying her husband was a good man and would never sleep around on her and that it was the "VRWC", all over the morning shows and than lo and behold he told us the American public it was true. Hillary needs to find another boogy man the "VRWC" doesn't hold water anymore.

Bottom line.. I don't know if Obama is right for this country.... But I do believe that Hillary is wrong for it... Destructively and criminally wrong for it.

The conventional wisdom today is candidates who can give the best speeches, media savvy answers or are the best talking heads on television is somehow equivalent to leadership in which no historical record of actions and results are required for qualifications. I think our electronic-media generation is confusing great media public relations with leadership. In the end, leadership is the sum of a candidate's record of actions and achievements to date, that include both wins and losses to define the candidates's ability, character, and moral compass to lead and elevation of stature. No wonder Harry Truman despised certain types of politicians.
Senator Clinton and Obama and the rest of the Roman Senate club should pay better attention to the Governors of our nation, because they simply get things done. Congress gets very little done based on performance relative to pay. This is why Congress is called the broken branch of government. And the Democrats want to nominate someone from this institution? I cannot remember when Congress did something for the American people other than the best interest of their political parties. How about reforming Congress?

Hillary would be a great president.. for Venezuela.