John Edwards is clearly the best, most ethical, well trained candidate in the lot of them. Why can't the news media get that? Is it always going to be flash and cash to get you people to sit up and sniff? I wish I could type enough letters, make enough calls, and drive enough of you over the edge to get you to focus on someone with ethics, leadership, and a PLAN.

I'm voting for John Edwards. The closer I get to the actual voting, the more I am absolutely convinced that he has what it takes to be a great President. I've had it with generational or spousal presidents, and while I like Obama, I just don't think he has spent enough time on the planet yet to be able to change the course of the country. EDWARDS in 08!

Aaaaw! That's so cute! Well, he's pretty super to me! (And when he wears his reading glasses, he does look kind of like Clark Kent.)

Edwards/Obama '08, that would be a dream ticket. I saw Edwards speak at the LCV global warming forum a few weeks ago in Los Angeles, and Edwards blew the crowd away. He was the only candidate who received LOUDER applause after he finished than when he was first introduced. Kucinich was too idealistic, Edwards mixed the right amount of idealism and pragmatism on how to set forth his goals.

And I wanted to be a construction worker in the 3rd grade.

Edwards has my vote. (It is strange how the media tends to ignore him. Proof it's not very liberal at all. Many rich people feel threatened by his talk of helping the poor and middle class from sinking further. If only they would study history; the biggest threat to the upper class is when the middle class shrinks to the point the poor no longer can hope to raise themselves up to it. To which point we seem to be heading.)
All of his ideas seem very logical and workable. I hope enough Americans can see our country is in bad shape, economically and financially, that we desperately need someone with concrete workable plans like Edwards, not just another bunch of pretty promises without a map of how to get there from here.