Don't worry my warmongering friends. W will just attack them in order to spread freedom and democracy. Because spreading freedom by occupying sovereign nations always works out in the end...

"In a stunning reversal of Bush administration conventional wisdom"

Talk about the ultimate in sarcasm!!!

No WMD didn't stop us before! Onward to Tehran with an arrogant self-righteous swagger! Oh, and make sure there is no post-invasion plan for Iran either. That'll make the conflict last and defense contractors can make a heck of a lot MORE money! Quick wars are just a bad investment if you manufacture things used by the military.

"A senior U.S. official...” Are you as tired of unnamed sources as I am? The whole story is useless; because MSM continues allow attribution without substantiation!

This could have a big impact on our foreign policy! Unfortunately, as we all know too well, this administration doesn't pay much attention to NIEs...

Oh good. This will give our stateside party-before-country sympathizers another reason to hate GW more than the murdering terrorists who killed 3000 of our friends and neighbors in a single day, just because GW beat two liberal lunatics.

'It's "an intentions judgment, not a capabilities judgment," said a senior U.S. official.' This one idiotic comment speaks volumes about our current foreign (and domestic)anti-terror policy-- it's what they are thinking about doing that we have to punish them for. I haven't read this much doublespeak nonsense since Orwell's '1984'. By the way, recent letterhead legislation by our own doublespeak poster boy does in fact make citizens criminally liable for their 'antagonistic thoughts, opinions, or intentions'. It's "Minority Report", but without the cool special effects or Tom Cruise. Iran may as well resign themselves to the fact that we intend to attack them with or without their provocation, and if they are smart will continue to develop a coalition of their own to discourage the warmongering cabal currently running our country.

Today's NIE report stands in stark contrast to the White House’s propaganda campaign laying the groundwork for military action against Iran, a campaign that dates back almost six years—to Bush’s 2002 State of the Union address in which he designated Iran as a founding member of the “axis of evil.” Since then, this drumbeat has waxed and waned as other concerns—primarily the disastrous invasion and occupation of Iraq—have often commanded center stage. Now, with the Bush administration approaching its final year in office, a renewed push and a shorter fuse have become increasingly evident.

Oh No!!!!
In your face, Georgie!
Now you and your Zionist buddies will have to find someone else to attack. I can only hope that you are held accountable on Judgement Day for every person killed in Iraq for no good reason. Not only should George Bush be impeached but also brought up on criminal charges for defrauding and lying to the American public. For Shame!!

Funny thing is we Americans or I should say most of us paying attention knew Iran had no nukes, why is it that our President and his administration didn't know? We need to bring our troops home now and yes with our tails between our legs, no use in killing anymore of our soldiers for nothing or innocent civilians in the middle east. They want us out, and we have no reason to be there. The longer we stay the worse it will get for us here at home, Wake Up America.

Iran is just using what they can for a smoke screen,what about there secret faculities that may be underground,for uranium making,those areas,Iran is just trying to through us off,we need to attack them before it's to late.

The question is, what kind of coverage will we see on you network news.
I'm betting little if any.

Those dang, liberal U.S. Intelligence Agencies!

"For evil to prevail, it requires good people to do nothing." Keep doing nothing liberals but complaing about how bad the United States is.

So this means that Bu$hCO has been lying for the last 3 years as they have had and have been suppressing this information the whole time and yet still claimed that Iran was working on Nukes. Is that not impeachable?

We all know the war with IRAN is to be sure the oil reserves are not cut off from the United States - that is why we went into IRAQ. This is not a bad reason, but as we all know, it was executed so badly that we now sit in the mess that we are in. Fact #1: The United States NEEDS Oil to survive - day to day. We will eventually build up a alternative energy policy, but not anytime soon - if within our lifetimes. Therefore, the war for oil is just, but dishonest.

IRAN has no nukes. Im sure we'll put 5-10 nukes in the vacinity and quitely warn the middle east to behave. Wow, sounds like we'd need a large base in the center of the Middle East to accomplish this???

Fact 2: US Builds 15 x 15 mile base in IRAQ (curious???) This will be manned by 50,000 American soldiers. The will watch and be guardians to the World Oil Reserve for the next 100 years - or until it runs out.

Fact 3: Due to the Greed of certain Heads of State - the entire plan was botched from the beginning and is just now beginning to be cleaned up. Funny how the timing works for a new administration.

""For evil to prevail, it requires good people to do nothing." Keep doing nothing liberals but complaing about how bad the United States is.

Posted by: dan | Dec 3, 2007 2:18:50 PM"

And you keep apologizing for the war-profiteering war criminals dan.

I think that George W. Bush should be embarressed. Congress should worry about Impeaching than about Iran.

Frankly, I don't believe a word of this report. However, I did get a kick out of reading that the NIE is "moderately confident" that Iran stopped developing nukes in 2003.

Iran is secretly developing nuclear as we speak. Regardless of how you feel about the current administration don't let that blind you from lying dogs like the Iranian government.

"we judge with moderate confidence".........gee that makes me feel good that your moderately confident they wont have the junk for a nuke until '09. Please dont say 'slam-dunk', ok?