Oh wait, maybe as VP? Hmmm - that wouldn't contradict his statement, it's a possibility.

Bloomberg is funny. WIll he or won't he. Does he or doesn't he?

He is an unlikable looking man, which would not help any run nationally. Shallow but true.

Our first Jewish president is going to come from a third party? Unlikely. What people don't realize is that there really aren't that many independent voters out there. People really do vote with one party almost all the time. Think about your own voting history and tell me it's not true, regardless of whether you happen to call yourself an "independent." When people realize there won't be an independent president, they'll vote for a member of the two parties. See also Duverger's law.

Clay: The first Jewish President would be Hillary Clinton.
Didn't she claim to be part Jewish several years ago?
It's not such a stretch for the Clintons! Don't they and their supporters claim that Bill Clinton was the first Black President?
The Clintons are Anything you want them
to be! They might even be Part Clingon!
LOL.

This is like Huckabee saying that he will not attack Mitt Romney personally, but if I would, this is the ad that I would run and these are the nasty personal comments that I would make.

Slimeball, just like the Huckster.

There is no democracy in this country..you can not say no (none of the above ) when you vote...you say yes to the system when you do not vote..there is strong documentation /sworn testimony that the last two elections were a fraud.They have us playing their game lets play ours and get together and show them who is the boss..lets build a better world together for the ones we love ..get my drift .. thanks

I am sick and tired of people saying the last two elections were stolen. Far from it. The last two elections were not frauds. They actually showed the health of our system - both elections were close, people were involved and the every vote counted. 8 major newspaper groups did independent studies in 2001 and 2002 (Knight-Ridder, Gannet, Hearst,ect) and only one scenario found Gore to have possibly won (Gannet). Also, there were thousands of overseas military votes that were tried to be stopped by the Gore campaign (and historically more than 80% go Republican)that affected Florida, NM and Wisconsin. Bush could have asked for recounts in Wisconsin, NM and Iowa for they were that close. Gore was just a bad candidate. Remember, Gore lost both his home state of Tenn. by 100,000 votes and Clinton's state of Arkansas by 50,000. If he had won just either of the two, Florida would not have mattered. As for 2004, Kerry was another bad candidate and Bush won Florida by 400,00 0 votes. Ohio was close, but even Kerry agreed with the totals after he saw the results the following Wednesday morning. Even with the supposed problems in Cleveland, he still could not have won. If all of these votes were stolen - why has there not been ONE credible lawsuit placed? Funny, in 2006 the Dems won a number of victories and all of the sudden the system was fair again.....

hey Vince, please show us some more intelligence in your professional opinions. First off if you didn't notice Rudy is a republican and always has been. Mike Bloomberg was elected a republican twice. He joined the independent party because he is considering a run for the presidency as an independent. Neither of the two have ever been liberal or democrats. Please do us a favor and quit flogging the "liberal NE" horse. It's dust!!

As the dollar continues to slide, Ron Paul's popularity will continue to rise.

He'll be that last man standing on the stage if oil goes over $150.

Dr. Paul is the only one reading the tea leaves correctly. 2008 won't be fun, but its going to be interesting.

Nobody is going to vote for one of those RINO's or DINO's either for that matter. If Ron Paul didn't make Ross Perot appear reasonable, maybe he'd have a shot. There's no one out there with Perot's charisma or message out there. I can't see a grassroots following for a big government liberal like Bloomberg, no matter how much money he can spend.

Bloomberg? Preswident?

No thanks. I already have a mommy.

Bloomberg can best be described as faux...

Faux New Yorker

Faux Environmentalist

Faux Independent

Faux Non-sexist & the Un-bigot

Faux Everyman

Faux self-confidence of ever getting elected as a person living in sin with a religion other protestant who is against Gun Ownership....

These Quasi-aspirations displays a real faux sense of the reality on the ground...

If he decides to run now, he's a liar and no one will trust him.

I'll be voting for Ron Paul.

Bloomberg is far more qualified and much more of a unifier than any other now in the hunt. But can he win? I don't think so.