« Previous | Main | Next »

Clinton Team Calls on Obama to Condemn Negative Spanish Ads

Share

January 18, 2008 5:23 PM

ABC News' Kate Snow, Raelyn Johnson, Eloise Harper, Sunlen Miller Report: On the eve of the Nevada caucuses, Senator Hillary Clinton's campaign manager is demanding that Senator Barack Obama's campaign condemn ads his supporters are running on Spanish language television and radio in the state.

For the second day in a row, Clinton's campaign held a telephone conference call with reporters to express outrage over the ads, clearly sensing that the ads may be resonating with a critical group of voters.

Hispanic voters represent about fifteen percent of Democratic voters in Nevada and could be a pivotal group in a tight race.

"I just want to say how personally offended I am by these ads and outraged,” said Clinton campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle.

UNITE HERE -- a labor group that supports Barack Obama -- continues to run a radio ad in heavy rotation, which accuses Clinton of being "shameless" and not respecting the Hispanic community.

According to the Clinton campaign, the group has also spent fourteen thousand dollars to run television ads on Spanish television, including Univision, in Nevada. 

The television ads do not mention Clinton by name, but praise Obama.

"Together we built our Culinary Union and together we are winning the Las Vegas Dream.  The companies can't divide us by race or by casino or by the job we do," the television ads says in Spanish. 

"Senator Barack Obama believes that the way to change America is by bringing all people together," it says.

Both the Clinton and the campaign of Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C. have called on Obama to disavow the ads.

In Las Vegas Friday, Senator Edwards suggested the ads were bringing racial politics back to the fore.

"Just a few days ago, on a stage where all three of us were participating in the debate, there was a discussion of putting behind us and stopping the race politics that had been going on for a few days before that between Senator Clinton and Senator Obama.  And everyone pledged that this kind of divisive politics that divides the Democratic party and could divide America would come to an end.  Senator Obama made that pledge.  I was sitting five feet from him when I heard him say it.  And now it turns out that in the last twenty-four hours, there's a radio ad that's being run—a malicious radio ad attacking Senator Clinton.  That is exactly that kind of divisive politics.  It's being run right here in Las Vegas.  I denounce it,” Edwards said.

"And from what I've seen, Senator Obama has not said a single word about this,” he continued.

Obama has not taken questions from reporters in a formal setting since Monday.

"It's particularly telling that the Obama campaign is silent about these ads after they expended so much energy condemning labor unions who were advocating on behalf of the Clinton and Edwards campaigns in Iowa," said Clinton spokesman Phil Singer.

On the conference call, Clinton supporter and Hispanic labor leader Dolores Huerta also went after Obama's credentials in the Hispanic community.

"I have yet to find one single worker that is for Obama. They are totally confused by the union's endorsement," she said.

On an Obama campaign conference call with reporters Friday, spokesman Bill Burton stuck to his talking points and said that Obama is against outside group spending. He stopped short, however, of condeming the radio ad's claim that Clinton does not want Las Vegas strip workers to have the right to vote.

January 18, 2008 in Bush, George W., Kucinich, Dennis, Tancredo, Tom | Permalink | User Comments (286)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Well, the leaders of this 527 -- beyond endorsing him -- have no connection to the Obama campaign. That stands in stark contrast to the situation in Iowa, where the 527 in question was headed up by a former Edwards campaign adviser. Clinton & Edwards want the advantages of 527 groups working for them, but they don't want Obama to have the same thing.

Make no mistake, UNITE HERE is hitting the Clinton campaign hard, but it's important to note that this is hot on the heels of the Clinton partisans' lawsuit against the Nevada State Democratic Party to prevent UNITE HERE's workers from caucusing -- and this only after they learned that the union representing those workers is supporting Obama, rather than Clinton.

Posted by: emperor of ice cream | Jan 18, 2008 5:52:27 PM

Ah ha! Again the Clintons come out and demand that Obama defend them.

Posted by: TexBork | Jan 18, 2008 5:53:36 PM

Wasn't that the same kind of dirty tricks Obama was complaining here in Iowa? He cried out loud about dirty tricks but it seems he is allowing his campaign to do it everywhere else. I voted for him in Iowa but I am seeing the other face of Obama and I don't like it. He's starting to look way to cocky and to calculated...like the rest of the politicians.

Posted by: Nancy_Iowa | Jan 18, 2008 5:57:31 PM

Who cares if it's "hot on the heels of the Clinton partisans' lawsuit"? The ads are blatantly racist. It's OK for Obama's people to engage in racism, because they don't like a lawsuit that was filed by the Teachers Union? What rank hypocricy.

Posted by: Chris | Jan 18, 2008 6:04:09 PM

It's ironic that few are mentioning the reason behind the union's outrage -- they were personally offended with the lawsuit that Clinton-backers filed to prevent them from caucusing...and they have a right to be. Since New Hampshire, I've found that the Clintons are indeed playing dirty and encouraging negativity in ways that I am amazed to see, as I once vehemently supported them. I've found their antics -- which are noticeably omitted or lightly glazed over by the media -- to be a huge disappointment.

Posted by: T.P. | Jan 18, 2008 6:09:25 PM

You mean, (gasp) the Clintons are playing diry??

You guys are just now realizing this? We conservatives have known they were both dirty since they took office in '93. Wake up and smell the crooks, er, I mean coffee.

Posted by: Brian York | Jan 18, 2008 6:16:05 PM

Why should Obama apologize?? -- It's okay when it's for Hillary but not when it's against -- as I said in a previous posting Hillary wears her victimhood as a medal.
If there are groups going out against something that the Clinton's tried to pull it's not up to Obama to make it all better.

Posted by: Paulet | Jan 18, 2008 6:20:47 PM

It is SOOOO much fun watching them battle. Hey...maybe Barack should run as a third party candidate if he loses the nomination.

Posted by: Dave Crandall | Jan 18, 2008 6:23:03 PM

Shame on the Clinton's. They say that you can tell a persons real character when the chips are down. Well the Clinton's are really showing their true colors and it stinks. I am a female "Nu Yawker" and I am so ashamed of my Senator. I am going to support Obama all the way........he is a breath of fresh air with new ideas and such an optimistic outlook. He is also reaching out to all parties and that is what I like about him. I am a Latina and I also believe....

Posted by: Sandra | Jan 18, 2008 6:24:22 PM

Just recently Clinton tried to drive a wedge between Hispanics and Blacks by stating Hispanics were disinclined to vote for a black candidate. What a hypocrite.

Posted by: April Campbell | Jan 18, 2008 6:24:29 PM

I will say it again, Obama is an empty Suit with rhetoric and no substance. He wants to make history to serve his ego over the National interest of the American People no matter what color they may be. Remember that he said he came from the South Side of Chicago and quote: "We know how to get down and dirty." Well I examined his expression while doing autographs and talking with the audience after the last debate when he made "nice," and there was this look of realization that he had frankly been outclassed. Gee, Duh! So maybe Obama is just two faced, saying one thing and doing something else and turning a blind eye to this terrible drivel to achieve his goal what ever the cost. This is really what we don't need after eight years of George Bush Jr.'s carousel of pain and lies.

Posted by: Sandra Lea | Jan 18, 2008 6:26:00 PM

I voted for Obama in Iowa impressed with his message on staying positive. This is discouraging, sad to see.

Posted by: Gene | Jan 18, 2008 6:28:49 PM

So, what did Obama say that offended people? Sounds like much to do about nothing.

Posted by: Dave | Jan 18, 2008 6:28:52 PM

Fight. Scrap. Accuse each other of everything in the book. Go for it.

The Clinton campaign is only about running for president as a woman; the Obama campaign is only about running as a black. It's disgusting. It's petty and it's stupid.

I want somebody who can run the COUNTRY, no matter what color or gender they are, and I"m not finding it in the democratic party!

Posted by: midwestlady | Jan 18, 2008 6:30:03 PM

CHANGE WHAT? SPECIFICALLY WHAT? AND HOW WOULD HE DO IT?

Somebody answer me that, because Obama's not answering.

Posted by: midwestlady | Jan 18, 2008 6:31:43 PM

If he does take the primary he won't be getting enough democrat votes in the general. I am so sick of him, he reminds me of Bush. Obama needs run as a republican.....

Posted by: boohall | Jan 18, 2008 6:34:01 PM

I wonder if America is really ready for a politician that doesn't respond the way folks think he should. He's not engaging in dirty politics, rather, he's choosing not to engage. This is an outside group that can choose to post what they want. Why does Sen. Clinton get upset whenever something she doesn't like occurs? Sounds like she's another George W. to me.

Posted by: Duane | Jan 18, 2008 6:36:06 PM

He couldn't run as a republican, Boo. He's much farther to the left than Clinton.

Posted by: midwestlady | Jan 18, 2008 6:36:07 PM

Sorry midwestlady - Obama has never played the "race card" as a platform on which to run. He is so far beyond that and that's what people don't understand. Change is coming whether certain folks are ready for it or not. There will be a Democrat in the White House come January 09. You can thank George Bush for that.

Posted by: Duane | Jan 18, 2008 6:38:59 PM

Oh really, Duane. Sounds like he's playing dirty politics to me. He's no different than any other party hack, don't kid yourself. Just because he's a minority doesn't mean he's not in it for his own agenda.

Posted by: midwestlady | Jan 18, 2008 6:39:04 PM

Post a comment