« Previous | Main | Next »

Clinton Says Campaign Needed More Help

Share

February 11, 2008 9:47 AM

ABC News' Eloise Harper Reports: Senator Clinton denied allegations Monday morning that her campaign manager, Patti Solis Doyle, was scapegoated saying, "that is not the case at all.  She is a dear friend, a trusted adviser and there's just too much to be done."

During an event in Washington, D.C., Clinton said the campaign is in need of more help.

Watch the VIDEO HERE.

"We had to add some more people and she’s remaining as my senior adviser working with me on politics and a lot of very difficult issues that we are confronting. There really is no significant change it’s merely that we’ve got to get more help we just don’t have enough help and we are putting in more people."

Clinton was asked if the move will hurt her among Latino voters.  "No not at all we have a very strong base and she is deeply involved in the campaign going forward as she always has been for 16 years"

When asked how Clinton feels going into tomorrow after a rough weekend, Clinton looked beyond tomorrow to March 4th saying  “Well we always knew this was going to be rough. I had no illusions about that. I feel very good about Ohio and Texas and we're going forward.”

February 11, 2008 in Bush, George W. | Permalink | User Comments (62)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Seems like an odd time in a campaign to be changing personnel, but I suppose she feels she has to. I was surprised to see her choice for replacement. As I was reminded this morning, this is the woman who a secret service agent testified was removing boxes of files from Vince Foster's office after the suicide. Tapping her for campaign manager only seems likely to open up conversations about this and other Clinton White House events/accusations, etc.

Maybe the Clintons see some advantage in this? That's an interesting thought. Let the Republican outlets get all fired up over the new campaign manager, and the Clintons can fall back into impeachment defense mode, with a hope that most Democrats will rally around them.

Posted by: Paul | Feb 11, 2008 10:10:28 AM

So, Sen. Obama again says he doesn't care about the voters of Florida and lumps in Ohio (Becasue he thinks he will lose there too.)

While I appreciate that he has done well in small states, particularly with caucuses - states like Florida, Ohio, Penn, NJ and Michagan will decide the winner in November.

If one candidate wins both Ohio and Texas - that person will be our nominee. If not, this will continue until Pennsylvania!

Posted by: Florida Democrat | Feb 11, 2008 10:15:22 AM

Maggie Williams is an old Whitewater crony of the Clintons, so I guess this will be just like old times then - what fun! :-)

Posted by: Dave | Feb 11, 2008 10:24:32 AM

Are you backpeddling AGAIN, Hillary? So, if, as you're quoted as saying, this is not a 'significant change' and you just 'needed more help', why didn't you just hire some new help and not demote this 'dear friend and trusted advisor'? Spin! Spin! Spin!

Posted by: give me a break | Feb 11, 2008 10:34:27 AM

Maybe, now that she's sure she has the Latino vote in her back pocket, she did what she's been wanting to do since before California, but couldn't since it might anger them. She probably figures by the time of the Texas primary, the Latinos and Hispanic voters will have forgotten that she dumped her campaign manager. Her supporters are so expendable that she didn't even publicy acknowledge the ones who DID vote for her over the week-end even though she lost. I really didn't expect her to congratulate Obama, but I didn't think she'd just ignore the primaries and cauceses. She'll probably back-peddle on that, too, and put out a statement once she sees critisims about her lack of gratitude for her supporters.

Posted by: dream on | Feb 11, 2008 10:42:45 AM

Well, Senator Clinton, if your campaign manager wasn't a scapegoat, why don't you get rid of the two people who ARE the real problem with your campaign? Oh, right...divorcing BILL would be so awkward at this stage, and if YOU resigned there wouldn't be a campaign at all. Silly me.

Posted by: Publius | Feb 11, 2008 10:42:54 AM

Obama forces tried to pack a city party meeting in Ann Arbor so they could make it look like there was a groundswell for ignoring the Michigan primary. That's very very old politics.

Posted by: Jane | Feb 11, 2008 10:50:20 AM

Hillary Clinton can do what she damn well pleases. people always have to think the worst of her. If all you people out there think your so perfact try walking on water!! as for as I'm concerend there Is not anyone running for president, Repub.or Dem. that can turn this country around. It's like a circus out there and their all clowen's. and the news media just cheer's It on. I will be so glad when this election Is over with, and may the best clown win!!

Posted by: Jeanette | Feb 11, 2008 10:54:02 AM

That's a good point, dream on. Why would someone not wanting to see anything about the political races spend time reading a blog like this one? I can see people in places like Iowa and New Hampshire having a complaint about campaigns being forced down their throats, but now that the race is expanded to mulitiple states over a rapid pace, its pretty to easy to hide from them if you want to.

Posted by: Paul | Feb 11, 2008 11:13:25 AM

Hey Take Back the Country...who are we taking it back from? And didn't the NY Times endorse Hillary? Wouldn't be so good for them is Bama won would it...and considering the fact that she's still senator of the state,...well...

Posted by: so what | Feb 11, 2008 11:42:00 AM

RELEASE your TAX return Hillary.

your refusal to release it while Obama did makes it look lik you are hiding something from people.

Posted by: moeen | Feb 11, 2008 11:50:22 AM

Obama: please release your campaign fundraising details, so we can be sure that you have given back EVERY RED CENT of that $100,000 donation from your "friend" Rezko of 17 years, who now sits in jail on corruption and money laundering charges in Illinois

Posted by: Take Back the Country | Feb 11, 2008 11:57:27 AM

Clinton: please release details about your campaign contributions including those from Peter Paul which you failed to disclosed and for which there is evidence of you violating federal election laws and obstruction of justice both felonies.

Posted by: Take It Back from Hillary | Feb 11, 2008 12:08:54 PM

A Campaign Manager dont just step down in the middle of a Big Campaign!There more here then meets the eye.Yo amgios, Clinton No, Obama Si!

Posted by: Listen Up | Feb 11, 2008 12:20:16 PM

I understand that campaigns have to look where their bread and butter is however I would find it insulting that the Clinton campaign is not giving any of her voters credit for their work this weekend, not even giving this week and second thought and focusing all her efforts for the next month.

What does that tell you as a voter and supporter.... do what you can but i dont really need or want you.

If i were her I would be thanking all my hard working supporters for what they have done and continue to do instead of pretending like they dont matter.

Posted by: Illinois for Obama | Feb 11, 2008 12:22:40 PM

Clinton expected to have the nomination tied up by now. She has changed her approach several times - from experience - to agent of change - to maternal - etc. She has used Bill as her pitbull and when that didn't work - she changed campaign managers. Obama has remained consistant throughout and that is why he is succeeding.

Posted by: Dawn | Feb 11, 2008 12:22:44 PM

Getting dumped by Clinton is the best thing possible. This way she will get to a lifeboat before the Titanic goes down and not have the stench of LOSING the nomination that Maggie will now where.

Posted by: ChgoSaint | Feb 11, 2008 12:55:56 PM

I don't see why everyone is making such a big deal about this. Senator McCain has changed his staff many times, and look where he is now? It's just another unimportant detail that the media is trying to criticize Clinton for.

Posted by: Isabella | Feb 11, 2008 1:00:14 PM

I believe whatever Hillary says about this. We all know she is always truthful in all of her campaign news releases.

Posted by: LongT | Feb 11, 2008 1:05:27 PM

Would it hurt her among Latino voters? Was this some sort of slick set-up, to get out the fact she has Latino's working in her campaign? Seriously, we didn't even know the woman was a Latino and may of us don't even care anyway.

I'm a Latino myself. You think I care if she has Latino's or not? Think I care if she downgraded or replaced one of them? This smells like a rat with the press playing right along. I hope others can see this for what it is - if it is what I suspect it is.

Shame on the press for playing shameless games. Her name is Clinton. She has the Clinton machine. She doesn't need anymore help than that.

Message to the press: you're suppose to report the news. Your job isn't to manufacture news or manipulate a headline in favor of or to disadvantage someone.

Shameless.

Posted by: Manuel G.; Austin, Tx. | Feb 11, 2008 1:13:35 PM

Post a comment