HILLARY CLINTON SAYS SHE IS FOR SOLUTIONS.
FOR SURE, THE BEST SOLUTION IS COLD-SHOULDERING OLD POLITICAL TACTICS.

This aught to be easy for Clinton. After all, she has a lot of plans; she should just use one of those plans to come up with a winning strategy for her failed campaign. I mean, the "empty suit" and "empty words" seem to be kicking butt. Or maybe she should steal someone else's campaign. Her negative strategy is not working.

Can't she find a solution for her failed campaign? It aought to be easy, all she has to do is grab one of the solutions she has and apply it to her campaign. If she's able to do that, I'll vote for her. In the meantime, GO OBAMA!

Kevin: It is my point. It means that those are not real works. It doesn’t count much. The real work is what you have to spend a lot of your own times to on work on it. I don’t care of how may bills that they authored or co-authored. What I care is that Hillary or Obama coming up with their own plan such as healthcare plan, plan of how to pull out of Iraq, plan of how to create jobs in US, etc…

Hillary did not play negative campaign. Hillary brings up the facts about Obama and I encourage Obama to do the same. I want to see each other weaknesses. Otherwise, there is no campaign. The candidate can say whatever he/she wants to say and no one allowing questioning them or bringing up the facts. The debates will show how fast the candidate reacts to the questions, how smart their answers are. His/Her real character may show, etc... Speeches won’t prove a thing, just bunch of people, supporters chanting, screaming following whatever the speaker say. Then going home, dreaming and hoping about the sketchy wonderful future. To make that future to happen, we must solve the present issues, plan for that future. Obama promised of uniting people, changing Washington, but he hasn’t showed people how he would do that. Maybe he did not have much idea of them. Hillary has a much clearer plan and strategy and she showed it over the debates.

If the last 8 years of SOLUTIONS is any indication of progress, we need 8 years of SPEECHES, and hope nothing gets done...

I love the way Obama keeps taking credit for being against the war. Hillary didn’t wage war on Iraq, Bush did. Hillary authorized the President to take the necessary action to protect America based on the intelligence that was provided. Remember how they trotted out Colin Powell, someone we trusted to tell us the truth? Hillary was a Senator from New York; you remember that place that was attacked on 9/11? Obama has even admitted that he doesn’t know what he would have done had he been in the position of actually voting. I am guessing he would have voted “present”. Yes, he gave a speech against the war, but did he take any action? Did he stage protests or call on people to rise up against this war? If he felt that strongly, why not? It’s easy to give speeches, but harder to take action. Words are only words if there is no action to back them up.

A deeply divided Democratic party. Can we stop bickering? Neither Obama, who excited me in the beginning, or Hillary, who is so LACK of experience and integrity, impress me. I am sure there is better candidate than these two. I am very sorry to say. Those better politicians should have had a chance. We didn't look at them. We dismissed them. Now these two are further dividing us, especially Hillary and her Bill.

Robert, she did so much more than just her JOB as a Senator. Since you are into looking things up. Find out about her young adulthood working with abused children. Find out about her being one of the attorneys in Water Gate. There is so much more to her than just her First Lady in Governorship and Presidential times,as well as Senator experiences.

Great speech! Right to the point!
Jen, explain exactly how it is that Hillary is dividing us. Because Hillary supporters were the only ones continuously attacked on the news. We were lunch bucket democrats, uneducated, women who felt sorry when she cried. I mean the list goes on. While BO supporters were said to be highly educated, young, wealthy, optomistic etc. The media did this. Meanwhile they were the ones also stating BO's negative attacks as "Questioning Clinton" etc. They attack her and her supporters, build him up, make his attacks sound legit and hers are "negative". They are also the ones who played one comment; Fairytale, over and over. I am half black. I saw Clinton's speech and what the media translated that into was no where near what I thought. I thought Cinderella, the media turned it into a race issue. The Clintons don't have the media power to divide, they are campaigning against a media for BO. I wonder why? Especially since media were the ones who knocked Al Gore down and pushed Bush just as they are doing with BO. That is the scary part.

This primary will to analyzed for years to come. How could a "chosen one" screw up so badly and totally blow an election.
1. The people they thought were behind them, were not;
2. The candidate was so arrogant that there was no Plan B;
3. Desperate people will follow anyone away from a trainwreck.