- Daily Photo: Obama Jokes Around at G-20
- Blackwater gets replaced in Iraq
- Daily Photo: U.S. Marines Look Out for Taliban in Afghanistan
- Hillary Clinton the Tomboy and Her "Ah-Ha" Moment
- Obama Administration Sudan Envoy Headed to Region
- Daily Photo: Potential Flashpoint in Iraq
- Clinton Says New Afghanistan-Pakistan Plan Depends on Diplomacy
- Exclusive: Three Israeli Airstrikes Against Sudan
- Additional 4,000 Troops to Be Ordered to Afghanistan
- Daily Photo: Navy Submarine Trains in the Arctic
- Alarm Over North Korea Missile Prep
- Anti-Terror Stimulus? US Offers Rewards for Top Terrorists
- Daily Photo: Pakistani Women in Refugee Camp
- Condoleezza Rice Appears on "The Tonight Show"
- Diplomat and Aid Group Sound the Alarm on Darfur Camp Situation
- auto industry rescue
- Ballotwatch
- Biden, Joe
- Bush, George W.
- Clinton, Bill
- Clinton, Hillary
- Dodd, Chris
- Edwards, John
- Giuliani, Rudy
- Gravel, Mike
- Huckabee, Mike
- Hunter, Duncan
- Inauguration
- Iraq
- Kucinich, Dennis
- McCain, John
- Obama, Barack
- Palin, Sarah
- Paul, Ron
- Romney, Mitt
- Tancredo, Tom
- Thompson, Fred
- Veepstakes
- Vote 2008: Democrats
- Vote 2008: Republicans
- Washington
- White House
« Previous | Main | Next »
Joint Chiefs Chair Warns Obama & Clinton on Iraq
February 28, 2008 5:47 PM
ABC News' Jonathan Karl Reports: The Joint Chiefs chairman has a word of warning to Sens. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton: A rapid of withdrawal from Iraq would lead to a "chaotic situation" and would "turnaround the gains we have achieved, and struggled to achieve, and turn them around overnight.
Admiral Mullen's comments came in a response to a question about what the Joint Chiefs are doing to prepare for a new president, given that two of the candidates have called for a timetable for withdrawal from Iraq.
"We need to be prepared across the board for what a new president will bring," Mullen said. "I do worry about a rapid withdrawal. . . [that would] turn around the gains we have achieved and struggled to achieve and turn them around overnight."
Asked to define a "rapid withdrawal," Mullen said, "a withdrawal that would be so fast that it would leave us in a chaotic situation and the gains we have achieved would be lost."
That said, Mullen added: "When a new president comes in, I will get my orders and I will carry them out."
Mullen, of course, will still be the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff when the next president is sworn in. His term goes until September 2009 and could be renewed for another two years after that.
Mullen, however, also made it clear that the large commitment of U.S. forces in Iraq is coming at a steep price.
He said that another 3,000 to 4,000 trainers are needed in Afghanistan. But those trainers cannot be sent, he said, until there are further drawdowns in Iraq. There simply aren't enough available troops.
"We'd like to get those trainers out there as fast as we can," he said. "Clearly in Afghanistan the training mission is at the top . . . we need more trainers than we need anything else. . . Clearly it will take forces drawing down in Iraq to provide the headroom to meet that mission."
February 28, 2008 in Bush, George W., Hunter, Duncan, Kucinich, Dennis, Tancredo, Tom, Thompson, Fred | Permalink | User Comments (208)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Who cares? It's costing way to much to keep it "stable."
Get out before we are completely .....ed
Posted by: Tor | Feb 28, 2008 6:03:14 PM
And I believe they said they would meet with the joint chief chair
Posted by: Bishop | Feb 28, 2008 6:04:36 PM
First order of business on 1/21/09 - replace Mullen
Posted by: Tor | Feb 28, 2008 6:04:41 PM
I think we should pull the troops out and move the Obama campaign headquarters there.
Posted by: jim | Feb 28, 2008 6:04:50 PM
Hey can anyone tell me how can MCCain poll so high in the GE if the republicans are voting with us
Posted by: Bishop | Feb 28, 2008 6:06:12 PM
Couldn't Obama give one of his "change" speeches to the people of Iraq and make them delusional? It worked in the U.S.
Posted by: Jeff | Feb 28, 2008 6:08:00 PM
lol
Jim' you are funny"
I am employing the gov to listen to my g.o.d.'s plan if they did they could pay for ten"
Of those Iraq war's rebuild them all and still leave us smelling like Saints as a nation under god;'
Posted by: richard sievert | Feb 28, 2008 6:10:10 PM
here yee, here yee, This "front runners" use the Iraq war just to advance themselves to the pulpit.These arm chair generals know that are just bluffing and un informed americans believe their story. I'll bet my house and salary that if they make it to the Presidency their words will be nothing but that words. Bluffers !!!
Posted by: Frank Soto | Feb 28, 2008 6:10:50 PM
"Bishop"
It's a Clinton conspiracy. Just ask any Obama supporter. It's all her fault.
Posted by: J | Feb 28, 2008 6:12:27 PM
Drawing down in Iraq to address the situation in Afghanistan is the only thing that makes sense. Our mission has been accomplished in Iraq. Time for the Iraqi people to take care of themselves. We'll still have a presence there and and will be close by. There will be some chaos whether we redeploy now, a year from now or 50 years from now. You have to take the training wheels off some time
Posted by: Louis | Feb 28, 2008 6:17:00 PM
Whatever the generals believe I trust Hillary to do the right thing. Obama has no idea what he is doing in what has to do with Foreign Policy. He thinks the President of the United States, the leader of the Free World is at the same level as Dictators...Pathetic
Posted by: Gabriel | Feb 28, 2008 6:17:49 PM
Are Bush&Cheney Now Politicizing Military? Neither Bush nor McCain know Difference between Defensive War and War of Aggression, of Choice?
When he said the U.S. might stay in Iraq for 100 years, Senator John McCain(R-Ariz.) explained he was referring to the kind of military presence the U.S. has had in Japan, Germany, and South Korea since the mid-20th century.
Does this mean McCain fails to grasp the very different circumstances that caused the U.S. to occupy those countries as opposed to Unprovoked War on Iraq, and present Occupation?
The Axis nations had made aggressive war on America and the U.S. had every right to occupy them after it conquered them. It also had a U.N. mandate to defend South Korea from the aggression of the Communist North. It was America's responsibility to "Maintain the Peace" to be in those countries.
America was defending itself or, as in the case of South Korea, a nation that had been the victim of aggression.
But the U.S. is the aggressor against Iraq. Former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan called the war "illegal." The preponderant majority of Iraqis, surveys report, want the U.S. to get out now.
Posted by: Prevere | Feb 28, 2008 6:21:07 PM
Gains? Please explain. Exactly what have we gained, or hope to gain, in Iraq that would even come close to justifying the one million innocent lives lost (men, women, and children) including our brave warriors? There is no honor to be gained from a dishonorable invasion and all the patriotic smoke grenades in the world will not hide this truth.
Posted by: Citizen1960 | Feb 28, 2008 6:29:31 PM
who doesnt know that democrats have a vested interest in giving Iraq up day 1 they have to just litsen to harry "the war is lost" reid, they have no guts for the fight and they want america to lose they have been saying that for years. when have you ever heard them or their minions say anything else but our tropps are killing innocent civilians, heck look the code ponk hags sent over 250,000 doallrs to the insurgents to help them fight against america, code pink and other liberal orgs, treat our troops like crap all the time back here at home, not letting then deplane at airports, not letting then do urban training, allwoing them to harass recruiters, and the termination of ALL jrotc programs at ALL california schools. liberals hate america plane and simple.
Posted by: Mr American | Feb 28, 2008 6:32:51 PM
Well, what is the alternative?? Stay until we go bankrupt?? There has been a virtual news blackout towards any information from Iraq. We don't have a clue to when the Iraqi military can do the job. If we leave right away, yes things might go crazy but how much longer can we keep the military deployed??
Posted by: Brent | Feb 28, 2008 6:34:21 PM
I am wondering if this administration has ever taken a look at itself in the foreign policy mirror and the picture is not pretty. What the hell are they doing in someone's else country bulling them and meddling in their affairs. This is complete violation of the sovereignty of another nation under international law. Nothing justifies it. The blood that continues to be shed is being shed for capitalist gains.
Posted by: Uretha | Feb 28, 2008 6:37:17 PM
I love it. I wonder how the media will 'damage controll' all this in the general election. Not only will the GOP do anything to continue winning in Iraq to help Mc Cain, certainly all the military commanders will as well.
Cmon Obama backed media -SPIN IT. Obama should goto Iraq and tell all the people about 'hope and dreams' ......then pull out all the troops .......LOL
Posted by: tomdavie | Feb 28, 2008 6:37:51 PM
"tomdavie"
That is a good idea but most other countries wouldn't be duped by Super Obama...lol
Posted by: J | Feb 28, 2008 6:40:30 PM
blank - i think we can quote the great BILLY MADISON in saying "what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought."
You say 9/11 could happen again if Barack was voted in? Well you know what, If Bush actually paid ANY attention to the NUMEROUS reports about Osama and the threat of planes being used to attack our country, it would have NEVER happend in the first place.
Bush has used 9/11 as an EXCUSE to go into war in Iraq, even though NOT ONE of the attackers was from Iraq. Barack will go after the REAL TARGET - OSAMA. Something that should have been priority number 1, seven years ago.
Posted by: J | Feb 28, 2008 6:42:53 PM
GW Bush used scare tactics and cheating to win a second term. McCain will use the same scare tactics and cheating.
Posted by: kimberlygwade | Feb 28, 2008 6:45:37 PM
Post a comment



