- Daily Photo: Obama Jokes Around at G-20
- Blackwater gets replaced in Iraq
- Daily Photo: U.S. Marines Look Out for Taliban in Afghanistan
- Hillary Clinton the Tomboy and Her "Ah-Ha" Moment
- Obama Administration Sudan Envoy Headed to Region
- Daily Photo: Potential Flashpoint in Iraq
- Clinton Says New Afghanistan-Pakistan Plan Depends on Diplomacy
- Exclusive: Three Israeli Airstrikes Against Sudan
- Additional 4,000 Troops to Be Ordered to Afghanistan
- Daily Photo: Navy Submarine Trains in the Arctic
- Alarm Over North Korea Missile Prep
- Anti-Terror Stimulus? US Offers Rewards for Top Terrorists
- Daily Photo: Pakistani Women in Refugee Camp
- Condoleezza Rice Appears on "The Tonight Show"
- Diplomat and Aid Group Sound the Alarm on Darfur Camp Situation
- auto industry rescue
- Ballotwatch
- Biden, Joe
- Bush, George W.
- Clinton, Bill
- Clinton, Hillary
- Dodd, Chris
- Edwards, John
- Giuliani, Rudy
- Gravel, Mike
- Huckabee, Mike
- Hunter, Duncan
- Inauguration
- Iraq
- Kucinich, Dennis
- McCain, John
- Obama, Barack
- Palin, Sarah
- Paul, Ron
- Romney, Mitt
- Tancredo, Tom
- Thompson, Fred
- Veepstakes
- Vote 2008: Democrats
- Vote 2008: Republicans
- Washington
- White House
« Previous | Main | Next »
McCain Adviser Won't Fight Obama
February 13, 2008 6:48 PM
ABC News' Teddy Davis Reports: On Wednesday, a top adviser to John McCain said more definitively than he has in the past that he will step down from the Arizona senator's presidential campaign if the presumed GOP nominee faces Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., in the general election.
"I would simply be uncomfortable being in a campaign that would be inevitably attacking Barack Obama," said McCain adviser Mark McKinnon in an interview with NPR's "All Things Considered." "I think it would be uncomfortable for me, and I think it would be bad for the McCain campaign."
McKinnon, who was a Democrat before serving as President Bush's ad maker in 2000 and 2004, said that he plans to be behind McCain "100 percent" no matter who the Democratic nominee is. He explained, however, that if the Democrats nominate Obama, he will be supporting McCain "from the sidelines."
While saying that he does not agree with Obama on every issue, McKinnon gushed about the Illinois Democrat.
"I met Barack Obama, I read his book, I like him a great deal," said McKinnon. "I disagree with him on very fundamental issues. But I think, as I said, I think it would a great race for the country."
Audio of McKinnon's NPR interview is available here.
February 13, 2008 in Hunter, Duncan, Kucinich, Dennis | Permalink | User Comments (268)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
If McKinnon feels that way, he should do the honorable thing and step down now; if McCain were to fire him, it would be blown out of proportion and used to emphasize McCains temper.
Posted by: jack | Feb 13, 2008 7:29:34 PM
By the way, what if a soldier said he/she will fight al Qaida, but sit out the fight if we go to war with those charming Iranian Rev Guards? That is analagous to what Mark McDemocrat did, and to the message Mark sent to America. McCain needs to exercise leadership now. Fire the dude.
Posted by: Where's the unslanted NEWS??? | Feb 13, 2008 7:32:48 PM
Kay, he was born in America. His father is from Kenya and his mother from Kansas...but he was born in America. Last time I checked the US Constitution...you need to be born an American citizen.
Posted by: Erik | Feb 13, 2008 7:33:42 PM
Gushed? You're an adviser in politics? Oh Brother!
Posted by: irma | Feb 13, 2008 7:37:04 PM
Here is a perfect example of why the current political chaos in the GOP exists. We have a so-called expert in politics who has been advising Bush and then McCain but who swoons over "The Unbearable Lightness of Being Barack" Hussein Obama! What ever happened to the manly ability to discern weak minded fools posing as expert advisors? For the GOP to have relied on this kind of mind illustrates just how morally and intellectually impaired they are.
Posted by: BBJR | Feb 13, 2008 7:38:39 PM
I don't understand what McKinnon is saying. Why would he step down from McCain's campaign if Obama is the nominee? Why is Obama different from Hillary? Is he afraid that the campaigns will inevitably play the race card?
Posted by: confused | Feb 13, 2008 7:45:59 PM
I agreee, McCain should drp-kick McKinnon NOW! I believe in the "white guilt" complex. It's sad, to say the least. What, you can't attack a non-white man running for POTUS for fear of being called a racist!? Thank you, Jesse Jackson. The Dem race IS race-based. Look at the recent polls! I know that there are plenty of mostly young white liberals are voting for Obama, because he's young, good looking a so-called "change-agent" with a preacher's fervor. But, look at the black vote. I think it's primarily raced-based voting. Trouble is Obama has no qualifications or accomplishments to speak of. Obama's just a likable guy with "change" as his main speech buzz word. All hat and no cattle. BTW, he IS the most liberal senator in congress based on voting record & no votes. The lefties love him, the blacks, and the young platform. All with little substance from Obama. I can't believe that it's come to a popularity race contest for POTUS for a lot of Dems and other folks. As polarizing as Bill-ary is, she's far more qualified on day one. We conservatives ought to start thinking about congressional seats, supporting McCain and the presidency in 2012. I'd rather fight McCain on issues while in the White than the alternative: a liberal Dem POTUS AND Congress. Makes me ill at the thought.
Posted by: Davie | Feb 13, 2008 7:49:09 PM
Oh, one other thing, if Hill-ary wins the nomination at the DMC only because of the Super-delegate vote, I guarantee there will be riots in the streets.
Posted by: Davie | Feb 13, 2008 7:55:09 PM
"Are American's getting dumb?"
Anyone else see the irony in this?
Posted by: not functionally retarded | Feb 13, 2008 7:56:39 PM
Hey, McCain...that's what you get for getting in bed with liberals all the time. You even wound up with one as your campaign advisor, you dope! LOL.
As a Conservative, I can't vote for you. You won't be any better for the nation as Obama or Clinton. I will write in Romney. I wish he had stayed in the race. Now we are stuck with a RINO like McAmnesty. Bleccchhhh!
Posted by: joyce | Feb 13, 2008 7:57:16 PM
Davie,
Please listen to what I have to say.
You've bought the media's and Hillary's "experience" mantra hook, line and sinker. You've bought the media's line that Obama is all fluff. Did you watch the Democratic debate between Hillary and Obama? I am willing to be my net worth that you did not. That debate was 110% substance, with specifics and details.
Posted by: HumanBeing | Feb 13, 2008 7:57:52 PM
Patronizing racism at its finest, bested only by Obama manipulation of race. Why shouldn't McCain attack Obama? Are African-American so frail that they cannot take on fierce attacks? Of course they're not, but even the slightest suggestion that anyone would question Obama's Purple Unicorn Dream Factory will get out the Sharptons yelling racism. For a minute I thought I could back Obama, but then I realized that he and campaign manipulate race to mute criticism. Even worse for me is the messianic tone of the Obama campaign. Even Huckabee wouldn't dare use religious language the way that Obama does.
Posted by: Juan Venadito | Feb 13, 2008 8:00:33 PM
I'm guessing Republicans will see this as weakness. But independents will see it as character on both McCain's and McKinnon's part.
You guys in the GOP seem to have no idea what a great tactical move you've made by presumably nominating McCain. The very reasons you don't like him are the reasons independents do - and so long as you don't commit political suicide, as in the base taking a collective vacation in Fiji this November, independents will decide the election.
From the Democrats perspective, it is sheer luck they also have a candidate who may be as if not more popular with independents.
Posted by: Paul | Feb 13, 2008 8:03:27 PM
Stop it, Mr. Confused! You make too much sense! Voters can't deal with that...makes them have to think and they don't like that.
Posted by: rachel | Feb 13, 2008 8:03:28 PM
The media crowd has a hard time to have a critical look on Obama's record. Every tiny amt of questions will always go back to - oh, he is black, that's why he is being attacked crap. Make no mistake about it, coming this fall, no media would ever do any negative stories about Hussein Obama...too many people are afraid to label as the one being instructmental to defeat the most promising black man to win the White House in this generation.
Posted by: Mike | Feb 13, 2008 8:05:56 PM
Juan----I am supposed to be happy that our nation will become a Socialist nightmare with the phony Republican McCain, and I should thank the Independents for that??? No thanks. You all can commit national suicide without MY gratitude. He won't be any less dangerous to the nation as Obama or Hillary.
Posted by: Joyce- Los Angeles, CA | Feb 13, 2008 8:10:53 PM
The reason why Obama is winning right now is because he listens to the legitimate criticisms leveled against him and he makes necessary changes. FOR EXAMPLE, WHEN PEOPLE CONSISTENTLY SAY HE IS AN "EMPTY SUIT" OR SIMPLY RUNNING ON IDEALISTIC RHETORIC, HE MADE CHANGES TO HIS STUMP SPEECHES, ADDED MORE "MEAT," SUBSTANCE, ADDED TOWN HALLS, ECONOMIC MEETINGS, ETC. Imagine a President who actually listens to the American people to get things done? Speaking of empty (pant) suits, why does Hillary avoid answering the question of healthcare mandates and tax increases for the majority of working Americans?
Posted by: Tiffany | Feb 13, 2008 8:15:17 PM
A former democrat wants to tie McCains hands against Obamas attacks hmmmm hmmmmmm
Posted by: tyrone | Feb 13, 2008 8:19:39 PM
Ah yes. The "stubby-armed" old coot McCamesty vs Obama with his give-away drivers license program to illegal mexican aliens. What a pair to draw to. The voters don't have much of a choice. Very sad. Very sad, indeed. The US will merge its' borders with mexico and canada, and we'll all live happily ever after.
Posted by: JOG | Feb 13, 2008 8:35:41 PM
Maybe the GOP needs to lose it all, as they did in 1992, so we can flush out the McKinnons, the McCains, the Spectors, the Olympia Snowes, the Susan Collinses, and the corrupt deadweight like Larry Craig (Arlen's buddy). A rest did the conservatives wonder in 1993.
Posted by: Where's the unslanted NEWS??? | Feb 13, 2008 8:37:00 PM
Post a comment



