Nice job - just dismiss the attacks that can be easily dismissed. Never want to get caught in a long explanation, even when you're right, because the very need to explain is something of a loss.

Yes Mr. Obama, and you have give triple what Hillary has taken to buy your way into the White House with the Super Delegate vote. Why didn't you mention or try to explain that.
Mr. Obama is a crooked Chicago Politician, and he can BS with the best of them. People are now becoming aware of how much he is a player.

Talking about lobbyists, Mr. Obama, the house which you are staying in was purchased after collaborating with Mr. Rezko and the deal which now you are trying to wash off by calling it a "bone headed mistake". That's some judgement on day one.

Arrogance will backfire. Thanks for describing him as dismissive. That always works for a candidate!

ps: change does not include buying superdelegates. they are both the same.

I think some internal polls might be showing Obama's support slipping in Wisconsin. Even Rasmussen that always under polls Clinton on Obama's best polling day ever, the 13th only showed him 4% ahead, within the margin of error. Mr. Obama's refusal to debate Clinton is resonating. 75% of Wisconsin's say he should debate her there. That's a lot!

Yes I agree Tony, Almighty King OBama slapping little Hillary's bottom with a nice spanking and telling her to go sit in a corner for being bad.

What utter arrogance. This guy's days are numbered . He talks a good game, but his words and his heart are speaking different languages.

Clinton won't release her tax returns. Clinton got more than 4 times as many (over $400 million worth) earmarks for NY. Clinton takes money from PACs and lobbyists. She wants delegates from states that were told they wouldn't count. How do you spell "unethical"? H-I-L-L-A-R-Y!

And of course Janet, Mr. Obama is squeaky clean. He is a saint among politicians.

Mrs. Clinton has to go 'negative' at this time. . .what else can she do.
She has been out-spent; and out-classed by someone she ignored for too long !!
He'll continue to talk about issues and answer questions. .same as her !!!
What matters are the voters. .and the final chapter will be written in Texas and Ohio. . .stay tuned.

To be fair BJ Mr. OBama has been slamming Mrs. Clinton in every speech for weeks. No ones says anything is wrong with that. He can do no wrong.
He has been given a complete pass and has been the media darling since the beginning. It is about time Hillary took off the gloves and came out fighting. She is going to throttle him at the next debate.

Dennis: I don't hate Mr. Obama at all. I just think right now, voting for him to become President would be a huge, terrible and costly mistake. Don't I have a right to support the candidate of my choice and speak out for him/her anymore? Is this still the USA and a free country right?
I see a terrible amount of hate and sexism for Hillary coming from Obama supporters constantly, but I suppose you think that is acceptable.

$400,000,000 for NY? I thought you all said she has done nothing for NY?

Just bend the news to suit your tastes, and ignore anything that darkens the door step of your candidate.

Bravery in the upcoming New World. Can't wait.

If obama thinks this is an attack, he need to buckle up for McCain, should he continue to get the free pass from the media. The gloves will come off with the Republicans and a smirk and put down won't get him very far with the right wing pit bulls. He can't debate because he can't win on the facts. It always looks bad for him when "a girl" beats him up on national tv. Wis. isn't going to like the "assumption" that he will win their vote.

Jordan..no one is saying that Obama is a saint. It's interesting though that all the Clinton campaign can throw at Obama is that he won't debate in WI and his speeches aren't specific enough for them. If they actually had dirt on him they would be using it. So Obama may not be "squeaky clean" but he sure has less to hide than Hillary.

Mark, Mr. OBama's plan is not any better. At least 15 million or more Americans will suffer without any health insurance under his plan. I have been examining Hillary's plan, and the poorest people will still have health insurance and even thought it will be mandated, the poorest sector of the country will receive subsidies and tax credits and other help so they will be able to afford excellent coverage, the same as congress receives. That is Hillary's plan, and I support it.

The Clinton's had their shot in the White House. Remember you got "two for the price of one" under Bill's eight years. Now is the time for a new voice, new perspective, and new fresh ideas. Hillary's tit-for-tat negative attacks when she's perceived as not being the current front runner or lost the momementum are doing no favors for ANY democrats chance in November. Demos: remember the big picture. Losing the Whitehouse for another four years to more failed Bush policies- foreign and domestic would sink this country into further abyss. Obama has to repond to them. He can't let the spin doctors of the Clinton political machine taint the facts.

Sen. Clinton has said she has 35 years of experience. Last time I checked she was first lady for eight years. What experience are we talking about "Planning State Dinners". She has been a Senator for less than 6 years. I did take math and that adds up to about 14 years. I ask where is the 35 years??? DO we really want another LYING CLINTON IN THE WHITE HOUSE???

When the tough gets going Sen. Clinton starts to lie and distort. That's a great quality for our leaders to have.

Here's a running list of Obama's lobbyists and PAC people

As if he is pure, WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!

Donald Alexander (Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld)
John Buscher (Holland & Knight)
Kevin Chavous (Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal)
Tom Daschle (Alston & Bird)
Stan Fendley (Corning)
Elizabeth Fox (Jolly/Rissler)
Francis Grab (Washington Council Ernst & Young)
Tim Hannegan (Wexler & Walker Public Policy Associates)
Tom Jensen (Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal)
Broderick Johnson (Bryan Cave Strategies)
Mark Keam (Verizon)
Bob Maloney (Maloney Government Relations)
Marcus Mason (The Madison Group)
Andy Rosenberg (Ogilvy Government Relations)
Bobby Sepucha (Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal)
Jarvis Stewart (Stewart Partners)
Tom Walls (McGuireWoods)
Michael Williams (Credit Suisse)

Interesting comments - but I think it's time to talk issues that affect Americans and to be fair to both Obama and Hillary, they both have been talking substance recently. I am an independent, but I might be shifting towards Obama now that he is talking more of substance... Good speech is vital and inspirational, but a good combination will be good speech and substance. I will be watching...

and before everyone cries foul,

Check the data against the truth and see, for a change, that all is not as the media has put it. Before you attack and say it is lame, check to see if it is true first. Then attack if you can prove it wrong.

PAC and lobbyists work heavily for both candidates, not just one. Sorry to disappoint with facts. They are like that sometimes. Aggrevating and inescapable.