Regarding Rev. Wright's comments:

How can somebody rather take the "guilt by association" stance on this, and claim Sen. Obama must be a racist and a country hater, while completely disregarding that:
* he was raised by one parent - his white mother. are you suggesting he is a racist that grew up with his white mother?
* he has been in public service for this country since he graduated from Harvard Law. every year.

If you want to know his feelings on racism, patriotism, and actually want to make an informed decision, rather than let FOX tell you what to think, please consider reading his books. they are also available on audiotape, in fact he got a Grammy for his last one.

Such Hillary haters. And they usually don't even have a logical reason to feel that way. By the way, she is far more on the ball about the economy that either of her opponents. With John McCain, we will get more of the same insanity that we have now and with Obama we get... well, that would be kinda vague, who knows with that one.

Laydown Hillary what you are going to do about foreclosures & mortgage crisis. Instead you are just talking about convening Congress to find out the solution!

You will do nothing Hillary on economy. The way you conducted your campaign(loaning it 5 million plus interest) tells all.

How can we know that Hillary has a clue about the economy? She handled the finanaces of her campaign badly and she won't disclose any financial information related to her family. I don't trust her for a second.

memoryaid : actually more than of his money comes from those who donated more than $1000.

memoryaid: Wright has the right of free speech, Obama has the right of choosing the church he feels like home, and the voters have the right of having doubts about him.

df: excuse me? what are you saying?

Total Funds: $55 million
Primary Funds: More than $54 million

Contributors: 727,972
First Time Contributors: 385,101
Total Contributors – Campaign to Date: 1,069,333

Online Fundraising:
More than $45 million raised online in February
More than 90% of online donations were $100 or less
More than 50% of online donations were $25 or less More than 75% of online donors in February were first-time online donors

Peace-Why does Hillary want congress involved? Well, Peace to get an aid package for the mortgage crisis it is congress who must pass the package and it is the President who must sign it into law in order for the money to make it out to the homeowners and in turn to the financial institutions. Yes, the nation is in a world of hurt right now. Gas $110 a barrel. That alone will hit every single pocket book in the nation in every single food and household item, and business operating in America today. It is time for action by this congress, now!

memoryaid: Hmm, I am sure McCain can hire a bunch of people to have even more comprehensive plan, but the question is: does he understand the plan?

df: you have the right to have doubts about him, but you also have the obligation, as a voter, to make a well informed decision, and as a member of the society, to try to understand something instead of just hating on everything that rubs you the wrong way.

read the WSJ piece in today's paper about the church and the pastor.

Finally the rose colored glasses are coming off, and the real Obama is now being seen.

The info about the amount of money from each group was on the website, google it.

People who are fond of bashing up Clinton should remember that it was President Clinton who presided over the golden age for the American economy. Neither McCain or Obama have produced any economic plan to rescue the country from the current mess. It was the Bush tax cuts, the war in Iraq and Afghanistan that has contributed to this mess. Hillary Clinton was the first candidate to produce a blueprint for restoring the country's economy.

df: you might want to understand that, when Sen. Obama started his campaign, he was talking about just issues. All the time, all town meetings, and everybody was falling asleep. It was boring.

As his support grew, he started giving more inspirational speeches to rally his base. Most people at the rallies know his stance of issues, despite your assumption to the contrary. But then everybody started saying "this is just talk, we want concrete plans now".

Guess what, he's been, and will be, in town hall meetings for the next two months, talking about issues again. People are falling asleep again, and even the media is not interested.

If you only want to see one thing, and believe one thing, there's nothing that can help you understand.

memoryaid: Yes, everyone should do a comprehensive research about each candidate, even if the media is trying to protect someone. I did my research, and have fours words for Obama: Too little, Too much.

Too Little:
1. Too little experience.
2. Too little is known about him.
3. Too little about his practical plan.

Too much:
1. Too much love from the media, too little scrutinizing.
2. Too much words, too little actions.
3. Too many caucuses, too little primaries.
4. Too much hatred from his friends and supporters (check all the posts on the internet), too little comprise essential for democracy.
5. Too much hype, too little reality.
....

memoryaid: I take your words as his leading in delegates largely based on his inspirational speeches. Should I?

Prado:
yes, during Pres. Clinton's presidency, the country experienced an economic boom. most economists don't attribute that to him though, but rather to the dotcom boom. in fact, a great president in that position would have taken measures to anticipate and prevent the crash that happened thereafter.

but it's Sen. Clinton that's running for president now, not the former president. And we still don't know how he will be involved in her presidency. And neither him nor her, not any of the other candidates have presided over an economy in trouble. So it will come down to whoever can surround himself with the best talent.

It would be awesome if we could chop of the piece of Pres. Clinton that was a good omen to the economy, and put it in the white house, but many don't like the baggage of connections, dishonesty and partisanship that comes necessarily attached.

That's why we embrace a new choice, tested enough (more time in public office than Sen. Clinton).

df: i'm sure his motivational speeches started to bring more people out, people that had lost hope. and you might be able to argue that, had he not been such a good speaker, he might not be as popular right now.

but guess what: every president that runs for office has to be able to inspire, and motivate people to support him. that's what a campaign is about.

very few times will a first time president have the public recognition Sen. Clinton currently enjoys. It's the exception by far. Her mistake was to assume that would be enough to carry her to nomination. She wasn't counting on there being a contest. Take that as you will.

There are more to be told about Obama. Again Rezko -- can anyone map out the locations of Rezko's projects in Chicago? Every single Rezko project went bad, either construction failure or financial failure. 11 of those projects happened to be in Obama's district. He claimed he knew nothing about those bad projects where low-income people went without heat; yet Rezko threw him lavish fund raising party at his mansion…
How convenient Obama always said “I don’t know…” when he was confronted with those questions.

So, Obama is the cause of the economic problems. The costs of the war in Iraq has nothing to do with it. Well said, Hillary. That's precisely, why you will lose to Obama.