« Previous | Main | Next »

He's In, He's Out...He's IN!

Share

March 11, 2008 2:35 PM

ABC News' Z. Byron Wolf Reports: For Ron Paul supporters disheartened at a March 6 web video the candidate posted on his website announcing that he was moving on to the "next phase" of his grand revolution to recast the Republican party as a small-government, non-interventionist and committed to civil liberties, Paul has clarified what the "next phase" is.

Even as he enjoined supporters to continue to cast votes for him, Paul said then that he was moving on and referred to his candidacy in the past tense, as something he would look back on.

He clarified his cryptic admission that he won't be President a bit on CNN's American Morning on Monday, telling anchor John Roberts' he's still in the race technically, but realizes he can't win nominally.
"The true revolution, the change in party and the change in the country is ongoing and we feel very good about it, which means I'm still in the race, but certainly in a manner that is less energetic than it was six months ago."

Roberts pushed a bit further, asking for a clarification of the clarification.

"So when people say Ron Paul is out of the Presidential race, that's true, not true, partly true, how would you describe it?" Roberts asked.

"I would think in the nominal sense, what are the odds of us overcoming delegates of John McCain or his delegates deserting, in that way it's over. But the campaign to get the maximum number of votes the max amount of delegates to participate in writing platforms and talking about the future, I think we're very much involved and very much alive," Paul said, arguing that so many people had worked on his campaign and "I don't feel good about walking away from them."

It does not appear Paul will ever make a Shermanesque statement about ending his candidacy because it would spell the end of the first leg of his revolution. And don't hold your breath waiting for Paul's endorsement of Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz, the Republican nominee.

Paul pointed out that McCain is anathema to pretty much everything Paul has been fighting for the past 30 years and he probably won't throw his support behind McCain, even at the Republican National Convention in September.

"Unity might be secondary to principle," he said.

Nor does it mean that Paul is going to endorse a Democrat. He pointed out that Sen. Obama, one of the Democrats still in contention for the nomination, says he wants to pull out of Iraq, but continues to vote to fund the war and wants to send more troops into Afghanistan, where the Taliban has seen a resurgence.

"His rhetoric is playing to the people that come my way, but he is every bit as much of an interventionist. He wants to send more troops into Afghanistan. He wants to broaden the military. I think it’s a fraud when he talks about how he wants to really get out of Iraq, but I think that's politics," Paul said.

March 11, 2008 in McCain, John | Permalink | User Comments (24)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Novelty candidates are interesting... they have a small kernel of truth, but it's usually wrapped in an odd package. I only know that simple soltions are not necessarily the best ones. Just like Huckabee... and Obama, interesting speakers but substance is suspect.

Posted by: smartprimate | Mar 11, 2008 2:53:18 PM

He's a novelty only on the surface. His core beliefs are decidedly right wing and dangerous for this country!

Good riddance, Ron Paul!

Posted by: Jackt51 | Mar 11, 2008 3:04:39 PM

Ron Paul is a libertarian not necessarily a conservative. Libertarians traditionally align with the Republican party because that party claims to be al about states rights, small federal government, and lower taxes. The GOP today really isnt what the libertarians believe and sometimes you will see libertarians align with fiscal democrats. Being from TX, I am familiar with the real Ron Paul and do not support his candidacy. But he has a right to run as does any candidate!

Posted by: DCVoter | Mar 11, 2008 3:22:04 PM

Jackt51 - I don't think someone that was correct on voting against the Iraq war, who understands the root causes of terrorism, who continually votes against waste and corruption and unbalanced budgets, who is the only sound fiscal conservative running, who understands the workings of our economic engine should be considered dangerous for our country. If you say such things, then I would say you are the dangerous one.

Posted by: Ben Straub | Mar 11, 2008 3:22:53 PM

DCVoter - We meet again. I also am from Texas, Ron Paul's district south of Houston. What I do know about him is that he has the public interest at heart. He is certainly not mired in scandal like the three front-runners Clinton, Obama, and McCain. We all complain about correct politicians, why not vote for someone who hasn't sold their sole to special interests?

Posted by: Ben Straub | Mar 11, 2008 3:28:31 PM

I wonder what he is gonna do with all that worthless paper money that he's raised.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | Mar 11, 2008 3:40:04 PM

Does anyone else (besides me) think Ron Paul might make a good V.P. candidate for John McCain?

Posted by: Rhys | Mar 11, 2008 3:43:48 PM

Rhys-It would never happen. Ron Paul opposes so many of the things John McCain advocates. In addition McCain does not think much of Paul's philosophy. Paul would be useful in a VP slot by trying his best to oppose McCain's warmongering insanity. Gridlock in the executive branch may be good thing. One guy trying to make it more secretive, and the other guy trying to let the American public know what is really going on.

Posted by: Ben Straub | Mar 11, 2008 4:10:25 PM

how could anyone here say that fighting for lowering or doing away all together of income taxes? Bringing the soldiers from all around the world home? Downsizing the government to constitutional levels ( remember that old historical document that limits the power of gov? ) and giving the power back to the states? Paying off the national debt? Getting value to the dollar? Are dangerous for our country? What planet do you people live on? I'm an economist and everyone of his policies regarding monetary and fiscal objectives are right on. How ironic that a constitutionalist who favors small government, limited spending, civil liberties is considered a novelty? A liberal? Doesn't that tell you how screwed up the republican party has become?

Posted by: don | Mar 11, 2008 4:17:13 PM

...dangerous for this country"? That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard! How is standing up for our Constitution and damanding a sound monetary policy dangerous for this country? If the rest of you continue to bury your heads in the sand we won't have a country. Keep ignoring the problem? That's not a solution that I can vote for, Sorry. Ron Paul was our best hope and you folks let him slip away by continuing to vote for ignorance.

Posted by: Don Donofrio | Mar 11, 2008 4:24:05 PM

War-mongering? McCain is war-mongering? Just because he's been endorsed by Bush, who said McCain "will carry on the fight in Iraq"? Yep. War-mongering. At 12 BILLION dollars per month! Ron Paul is the only candidate who recognizes that Bush's War is bankrupting America.

Posted by: Rhys | Mar 11, 2008 4:35:21 PM

As long as the American people continue to vote half-witted we will never get the kind of leadership in this country that we truly need. Ron Paul was one of those rare opportunities to put a principled leader who understands social and economic issues at their core into the White House and the American people blew it. Americans continue to vote out of blind fear when they don't understand something. The overwhelming majority of Americans have IQ's around the 105 range - which makes them very easy to manipulate. Government controls education, controls people, and we wonder why things never change.

Posted by: Max | Mar 11, 2008 4:42:53 PM

He won't pull out. First it gives this political nobody a (very very small) soapbox. Second, if he quits he won't be able to continue to bilk his gullible and fawning supporters out of loads of loot. I think he'll continue this charade until November and his supporters will continue to shower him with cash while they continue to shower us with their repeated laughable predicitions of how victory is just around the corner.

Posted by: LAGuy | Mar 11, 2008 4:48:35 PM

Oh no not LAGuy again!!! Actually Paul will probably use the funds to help finance and promote like-minded folks that want to enter the political frame. That's what I would do. I wouldn't call his supporters gullible. I think many of them love this country and want to see it change for the better. Many of his supporters see the nation moving away from any sense of fiscal responsibility, protection of the monetary unit to promote savings and stave off inflation, moral fortitude, protection of civil liberties, respect for other nations sovereignty , as well as our own sovereignty for that matter. I think the financial support that has come his way during the campaign was done in order for many of us to have a voice on some of these issues during this campaign. Who is LAGuy supporting for president? Just curious...

Posted by: Ben Straub | Mar 11, 2008 5:00:40 PM

Can someone give me a legit reason why Ron Paul is dangerous? Just listening to Paul should be enough to convince anyone of his ability to lead this nation. However, day in and day out I have to listen to Obama's speeches. Please someone help me to understand why you would not vote for Paul, because all logic points me in his direction.

Posted by: Kirk Ridenour | Mar 11, 2008 9:55:07 PM

Ben - Ron Paul is not a viable candidate at this stage in the game so I think a vote for him has the same effect as not voting at all. So it is really a moot point.

I personally do not like him and lived in the area for the first 37 years of my life. With an active political family, I am very familiar with who he is and his background (not what he says today or what is on his website). He can climb to the top of the water tower all he wants with a can of paint... The true color will eventually shine through again.

I dont diss you for supporting him and I know he does have some supporters. But I think the most important thing right now is to work to elect the best presidential candidate in the dem party that is viable. IMHO that is Senator Clinton based on her record, her qualifications, and her proposals combined with democratic party support as well as bipartisan support in Congress.

Posted by: DCVoter | Mar 11, 2008 10:51:06 PM

Kirk-- "on Paul is not a viable candidate at this stage in the game so I think a vote for him has the same effect as not voting at all. So it is really a moot point." That's exactly the mindset that will help good candidates lose. Did anyone notice that in the initial primaries when Guiliani was still in the race, everyone was mentioned but Paul? The media has never covered him as much as their favorite candidates, yet here he stands. If enough people vote for him, he will win.
If he drops out, I'm just not voting because I don't like anyone else.

Posted by: Rosie | Mar 12, 2008 2:51:26 AM

I will tell you what has so personally set me against Ron Paul, and his supporters so very, very much. Their utter and complete arrogance, stupidity, and unwillingness to follow the rules.

NO, after all their shenanigans of this past year...I will fight them every step of the way. These people are idiots, and they under-estimate the deep anger they will be subject to if they stay in the party. They'll have better luck trying to start one of their own.
Can you tell I don't like them? LOL!

Posted by: Thunder Pig | Mar 12, 2008 10:52:55 AM

Thunder Pig; Where do you get Ron Paul being arrogant? He certainly is not stupid and what rules has he not followed? No one says you have to like him but if you are not going to at least don't have a stupid reason for not liking him. In case you have not noticed the Republicans stand very little chance of keeping the White House and their base of followers is disappearing. You might be speaking for yourself about the deep anger he insights but I like seeing someone shake up that worthless party of Neo-cons!

Posted by: jonstew | Mar 12, 2008 12:05:10 PM

I'm glad to see an unbiased account of Ron Paul's actions through the mainstream media. I guess that since he's already lost the nomination, it's not worth painting him as a nut anymore. Even Fox is showing him respect now.

Anyway, I agree with all the people who've stated that America blew their chance at getting a decent president this time around.

Posted by: Shaede | Mar 12, 2008 9:54:00 PM

Post a comment