- Daily Photo: Obama Jokes Around at G-20
- Blackwater gets replaced in Iraq
- Daily Photo: U.S. Marines Look Out for Taliban in Afghanistan
- Hillary Clinton the Tomboy and Her "Ah-Ha" Moment
- Obama Administration Sudan Envoy Headed to Region
- Daily Photo: Potential Flashpoint in Iraq
- Clinton Says New Afghanistan-Pakistan Plan Depends on Diplomacy
- Exclusive: Three Israeli Airstrikes Against Sudan
- Additional 4,000 Troops to Be Ordered to Afghanistan
- Daily Photo: Navy Submarine Trains in the Arctic
- Alarm Over North Korea Missile Prep
- Anti-Terror Stimulus? US Offers Rewards for Top Terrorists
- Daily Photo: Pakistani Women in Refugee Camp
- Condoleezza Rice Appears on "The Tonight Show"
- Diplomat and Aid Group Sound the Alarm on Darfur Camp Situation
- auto industry rescue
- Ballotwatch
- Biden, Joe
- Bush, George W.
- Clinton, Bill
- Clinton, Hillary
- Dodd, Chris
- Edwards, John
- Giuliani, Rudy
- Gravel, Mike
- Huckabee, Mike
- Hunter, Duncan
- Inauguration
- Iraq
- Kucinich, Dennis
- McCain, John
- Obama, Barack
- Palin, Sarah
- Paul, Ron
- Romney, Mitt
- Tancredo, Tom
- Thompson, Fred
- Veepstakes
- Vote 2008: Democrats
- Vote 2008: Republicans
- Washington
- White House
« Previous | Main | Next »
Michigan Re-vote at Risk as Obama Withholds Support
March 18, 2008 10:45 PM
ABC News' Teddy Davis and Eloise Harper report: The Democratic National Committee (DNC) says a proposal to hold a privately-financed June 3 re-vote in Michigan appropriately complies with the Democratic Party's delegate selection rules for nominating events.
But the plan's fate is in serious jeopardy, in part, because of a wait-and-see tactic adopted by Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., the Democratic front-runner who has the most to lose from allowing a re-vote to go forward.
Michigan state legislative leaders have indicated that Obama needs to agree to a repeat election before it will pass legislation.
But the Obama campaign has suggested that it is waiting on the Michigan legislature before signing off on a re-vote.
Chief among the Obama campaign's concerns are:
(1) whether people who voted in Michigan's Republican primary would be eligible to participate in the re-vote (the Obama campaign thinks that some of its supporters participated in the Michigan's GOP primary in January because Obama's name was not on the Democratic ballot).
(2) the reliance on private funding (which Michigan's Democratic governor and legislators of both parties insist on).
(3) whether local election officials will have time to discharge their responsibilities (state election officials have indicated that they need 60-70 days to prepare for an election).
Obama spokesman Tommy Vietor alluded to these three concerns in a statement issued Tuesday evening, adding that "we're waiting to see if these issues can be resolved by the legislature."
Current DNC rules prohibit a voter from participating in a Democratic nominating contest if he or she has voted earlier in the year in a Republican nominating contest. The Michigan re-vote proposal currently under consideration complies with the DNC's rule in this area.
But given the unusual circumstances facing Michigan, a DNC official said a special appeal could be made to the rules committee to waive this rule.
A re-vote proposal is under serious time pressure: the Michigan legislature is currently scheduled to go on a two-week Easter recess at the end of business on Thursday. Holding another primary also faces considerable political pressure: the Michigan state Senate is controlled by Republicans who want to make sure that the private financing is money-in-the-bank and not simply an IOU.
In addition, re-vote legislation faces a procedural hurdle: a two-thirds vote would be needed in order for a June 3 primary to happen.
If legislation is passed by the Michigan legislature, the Michigan Democratic Party would then have to draft a plan which would have to be available for public comment for 30 days before it is taken up by the DNC's rules and by-laws committee.
Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., is headed to Detroit, Mich., on Wednesday in order to step up pressure on Obama.
"The people of Michigan should not be disenfranchised, and snubbing Michigan will hurt Democrats in the general election," said Clinton spokesman Mo Elleithee. "We have an opportunity to prevent that from happening and Sen. Obama is standing in the way of that opportunity. Clinton wants to go to Michigan to press that case herself."
Clinton's Wednesday push for a re-vote in Michigan comes two days after the Florida Democratic Party declared dead their plans to hold a do-over primary election in the Sunshine State.
Michigan and Florida Democrats have found themselves weighing re-vote proposals because both states were stripped of their delegates to the Democratic National Convention when they violated DNC rules by holding their contests before Feb. 5.
March 18, 2008 | Permalink | User Comments (103)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Well Well - the Obamites accuse Clinton of spin and here are the facts to dispute it. Politically, I am not surprised Obama is blocking the revote. But he should be an American first and a candidate second. All votes matter in a democratic election and if this is what this state wants to do, no one should be blocking it.
Posted by: DCVoter | Mar 18, 2008 10:52:02 PM
I don't understand how Obama thinks he can unite the democrats by denying the votes of Michigan and Florida. What is he afraid of really? By all accounts even if he let Clinton have the delegates she won - she still would not catch him in pledged delegates. So what gives? He can't have it both ways. Is he a uniter or a denier of votes?
Posted by: bjorn | Mar 18, 2008 11:02:29 PM
DCVoter,
Please drop all this "America first" crap. Hillary didn't start talking about "disenfranchised" voters until she failed to wrap up the nomination on February 5. Now that she's behind, she wants to change the rules; Obama wants to abide by the agreement they BOTH SIGNED.
Very clever how Hillary and her supporters have maneuvered the media into putting the pressure on Obama to go along with the DNC caving on its rules so HRC can have an unfair advantage.
If the situation were reversed . . . . Well, you can complete that sentence.
Posted by: jac13 | Mar 18, 2008 11:05:51 PM
The signed agreement was to not campaign. Candidates do not determine which votes count or dont count. The party does but if the party violates the voting rights of the states voters, the court can order the votes counted. This is what happens in FL. Try not attacking me personally for things you are not aware of. I am happy to help you learn and I am never going to abide by anyone telling me not to be an American first or to ask anyone else to be an American first.. same as you.
Posted by: DCVoter | Mar 18, 2008 11:08:39 PM
Yes jac13, if the situation was reversed Obama would be screaming his head off about how he's be penalized. He only believes in doing the right thing when it serves HIMSELF.
Posted by: JR | Mar 18, 2008 11:12:48 PM
And... Clinton stated (before the voting began after the states were disenfranchised) that they expected the whomever nominee is would likely ask their delegates at the convention to ask that FL and MI delegates be seated. I think Obama agreed in similar form. Why would you as an American expect any less from your candidate but to be an American and do every thing he could to get the votes counted even if that meant another voting round? His own camp, in an interview the other day said he expects Obama to do well in MI since he probably accounts for the 40% uncommitted and he did not campaign or even have his name on the ballot. (I dont buy that spin but the point is even his camp does not agree with you.)
Posted by: DCVoter | Mar 18, 2008 11:20:18 PM
After a somewhat nice but hollow speech about bringing people together and trying to make all people count... is he saying "but not the people of Michigan"? Actions speak volumes... words are only powerful when supported by conviction and accomplishments.
Posted by: smartprimate | Mar 18, 2008 11:21:52 PM
How the heck is a revote an unfair advantage for either candidate?
Posted by: DCVoter | Mar 18, 2008 11:22:27 PM
Not counting MI would likely result in it joining the ranks of swing states and be likely to go Red. No real democrat would ever want the votes to not be counted in some way.
Posted by: DCVoter | Mar 18, 2008 11:28:56 PM
Don't know why Obama is stalling the re-vote, even if he get the nomination he is not winning this election so he may as well have the re-vote.
Obama needs to wake up the AA vote alone cant win him this race to the WH, and he has already turned so many other off with his lies and flip flopping now he is angering the FL and MI votes, and expect them to support him in a GE
Seems to me he is acting like if he cant make it he is going to ensure that no one else does.
Posted by: SJ | Mar 18, 2008 11:41:23 PM
OBAMA against a Michigan vote-- doesn't surprise me. This guy is willing to disenfranchise two major states. That is not the DEMOCRATIC PARTY way. Michigan should ignore OBAMA and re-vote. These elections are run by the state party, not by the candidates. If OBAMA doesn't participate that's his choice. The outcome of a compliant election will count because a federal judge can easily make it so.
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | Mar 18, 2008 11:42:19 PM
A re-vote is considered unfair by the Obama camp since the people of Michigan have now been tainted by the Wright issue.
Posted by: smartprimate | Mar 18, 2008 11:42:36 PM
If the MI voters are tainted by the Wright issue what does he expect in a GE, if he feels that way then he should drop out and give Hillary a chance.
Posted by: SJ | Mar 18, 2008 11:45:45 PM
Talk about disenfranchising the voters! How does Obama think this is going to play out in the general election IF he were to get the nomination? Talk about trying to do anything to get elected! If Obama doesn't work towards a new election in Michigan (and also Florida, although that seems unlikely now) he will be putting his political aspirations in front of the voting public. How can democrats discount two of the most important states in the general election! It is ridiculous! He should agree to a re-vote in both states and them campaign so they can deem the election fair. If the situation was reversed you better believe he would be asking for a re-vote. Wake up democrats of both Clinton and Obama supporters! If this was your state wouldn't you want your vote counted?! This should be appalling to all democrats no matter who your vote is going for.
Posted by: Andrea | Mar 18, 2008 11:55:22 PM
If Obama is the great uniter than he should encourage the vote in Florida and Michigan. Isn't he always taking credit for bringing people into the voting booths? Why does he then want to stop people from voting? I guess it's better to turn millions of people away than to take the chance that he might lose those states. Obama says one thing and does another. I guess he doesn't really care about the people- just his own ambitions.
There is no excuse for this- the people in Florida and Michigan deserve the right to voice their opinion in the voting booth.
Posted by: t | Mar 18, 2008 11:58:20 PM
DCVoter: Your're absolutely right. How can 2.7 million people in FL and MI be disenfranchised? Is Obama not supposed to be a uniter?
I guess he only unites the black racists.
Posted by: Roberto-Sc | Mar 19, 2008 12:00:02 AM
I'm not convinced. There is no difference betwen Obama and his pastor. His speech did nothing for me.
Hate speech only divides America and Obama is not fit to be President.
Shame on you Obama!
Posted by: Mitch | Mar 19, 2008 12:02:51 AM
The speech on race given by Obama appears to have had little effect on changing public perception. During a prepared speech which was highly orchestrated and by invitation to mostly supporters, Obama went to great length repeating reasons for his continued association and friendship with his spiritual advisor Rev. Wright and his membership at Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago. Obama said the pastor introduced him to the Christian faith and continues to perform God’s work.
The bottom line is that Obama is no different than the lunetic racist pastor. Get the facts here
Posted by: Neema | Mar 19, 2008 12:05:32 AM
Obama won't drop out and give Hillary a chance despite the overwhelming negative response to the Wright issue he is receiving. He wants to anger his AA supporters and the young college kids who are backing him, so they can blame Hillary for cheating, and her so-called scorched earth tactics that his supporters are constantly saying all over the blogosphere. This way, either McCain will win, or if Hillary wins, people will hate her. He is not a uniter, but after this, one AA blogger wrote that he will never, ever be credible for any office, even the Presidency. ...and it is not, I repeat, not about his race. It is about trust, experience and qualifications for this highest office of the land.
Posted by: dani | Mar 19, 2008 12:07:29 AM
Isn't it wonderful to have a great uniter like Obama? Except if you live in FL and MI. A fellow who asks us to understand Uncle Wright but not the voters of FL and MI. Yep. That's Obama.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | Mar 19, 2008 12:17:03 AM
Post a comment



