« Previous | Main | Next »

Pelosi's Delegate Stance Boosts Obama

Share

March 14, 2008 6:08 PM

ABC News' Teddy Davis Reports: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told ABC News' George Stephanopoulos on Friday that it would be "harmful" to Democrats if superdelegates were to give the party's presidential nomination to a candidate who is trailing in the delegates awarded in primaries and caucuses.

"If the votes of the superdelegates overturn what's happened in the elections," said Pelosi, "it would be harmful to the Democratic Party."

Although Pelosi offered her assessment without directly referencing Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., her comments lend considerable support to the Illinois Democrat.

Obama leads Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., in pledged delegates: 1,396 to 1,241. Because of the proportional system used by the Democratic Party to allocate delegates, Obama is widely expected to remain in front of Clinton in pledged delegates at the conclusion of the primary season.

Political prognosticators give Clinton more of a chance of catching, or even surpassing, Obama in the national popular vote but Pelosi argued that superdelegates should follow the pledged-delegate, not the popular-vote, leader.

"But what if one candidate has won the popular vote and the other candidate has won the delegates?" asked Stephanopoulos.

"But it's a delegate race," Pelosi replied. "The way the system works is that the delegates choose the nominee." 

Pelosi's comments to Stephanopoulos, which were made in Washington, D.C., air Friday evening on ABC News' "World News with Charles Gibson."

The full interview with Pelosi airs Sunday morning on "This Week with George Stephanopoulos."

March 14, 2008 in Kucinich, Dennis, Tancredo, Tom | Permalink | User Comments (245)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Then she disagrees with her parties rules.

Posted by: Katie | Mar 14, 2008 6:46:45 PM

If you read Pelosi's words carefully, she just like to spin again: "But it's a delegate race," Pelosi replied. "The way the system works is that the delegates choose the nominee."

She is correct: it is delegates to decide who the nominee is, she does not mention only "pledged delegates".. she said "delegates", which includes......

She is "politically correct"... let convention decide...

Posted by: Truth | Mar 14, 2008 6:46:46 PM

Hillary, Barrack and the DNC will get this whole delegate debacle settled(including all the lawsuits that are getting ready to be filed)about 2 months after John McCain is sworn in..

Posted by: smearjay | Mar 14, 2008 6:47:50 PM

Methinks Pelosi, like Oprah, would be intimidated by a stronger woman like Hillary, thusly, seek to squeeze her out of the picture. Kudos to Hillary for rising above betrayal after betrayal. Something to think about.

Posted by: ALL | Mar 14, 2008 6:47:58 PM

It's strange how we can change our minds. In the last election we were all for the popular vote not the delegates. Shouldn't the people's vote count.

Posted by: kt | Mar 14, 2008 6:48:44 PM

Why have any rules or guidelines at all? They are quickly and conveniently disposed of whenever they don't suit the plans.

Posted by: genius | Mar 14, 2008 6:49:03 PM

Rush is right...the queen beee *bzzzzbzzzzbzzz* syndrome...there can be only one queen bee in a domain!

Posted by: nakks | Mar 14, 2008 6:50:09 PM

In a rare moment on honesty, Pelosi just sank Hil's battleship. Too bad. I was looking forward to watching McCain demolish her. But now I can watch him demolish the empty suit that is Mr. Obama.

Posted by: DEW | Mar 14, 2008 6:50:17 PM

There is a lot of Democrats on both sides that are going to be hurt. Nancy has not done a good job in the House. 29% rating is not very good. Her p[opularity is not a good rating either. (Polling report.com)
Superdelagates are part of the proicess. A process everyone agreed to when this election took place. Obama's words himself. Obama camp and supporter Nancy Pelosi Popular vote is as important as delagets. Sorry your wrong. If Obama wins the nomination I and alot of other true Democrats are voting for McCain. Either way we loose. Thanks to people like Pelosi

Posted by: Jimmy J Sanborn | Mar 14, 2008 6:53:26 PM

S.B. Yup, I can imagine Hillary saying something like that to Nancers. At which point Nancers should come back with a witty reply like "...I hear Vince was almost as hard as Bill was with Monica when they found him...

Posted by: John, Las Vegas, NV | Mar 14, 2008 6:54:03 PM

Well, Kenrda Woods, seems like a contadition in terms -- electable in November and Hillabeans Clinton in the same sentence!

Posted by: Jackt51 | Mar 14, 2008 6:54:40 PM

Again, Pelosi said: "delegates", Not "pledged delegates"...

She is a fox...can go either way...

Posted by: Truth | Mar 14, 2008 6:54:45 PM

Just a comment to all democrats.

Your primary system weakens you in the general election statistically. Since the General Election is winner take all, and the Democratic Primary is Proportional, it creates a distortional result when compared to the rules they will run under for the big one.

Also, note, that Hilary is winning more of the "swing states" (Florida, Texas, New York, etc.) than Obama. No offense to Obama, but proving you can win California means nothing in the General Election.

All reason Dem's will lose in November.

Posted by: Peter | Mar 14, 2008 6:55:41 PM

If you listen really hard you can hear the ObamaBubble bursting? Can you hear it now?

Posted by: Robert Marley | Mar 14, 2008 6:57:20 PM

Democrats are no longer scared of the Clintons, they see the opening to be rid of them once and for all.

Posted by: Rich | Mar 14, 2008 6:57:54 PM

Obama is the only hope for the country. Hillary is a horribly flawed person who would farther divide a country teetering on the brink of collapse due to the Clinton and Bush years. We cannot survive Hillary and most of the country knows it. Where are the Clinton 06 and 07 tax and library records? What are they hiding and why are they delaying except to hide what we all suspect is a list of corrupt donors.

Posted by: rockychance | Mar 14, 2008 6:57:59 PM

Nan's right...it is a delegate race.
The Clinton's want it to be popular vote so they can cry for Fl/MI...BUT what about all the states with CAUCUSES...they chose delegates, and did not add to the popular total...who wants to tell those folks their votes don't count ??

Posted by: Carolyn Sells | Mar 14, 2008 6:59:28 PM

It's true those superdelegates can vote any way they want. Heck, I'm sure that 20,000,000 devoted Obama supporters wouldn't mind in the least bit if it was 800 superdelegates who ultimately gave the nomination to Hillary. I'm sure there would be no hard feelings at all if Obama went into the convention with more pledged delegates and the party leadership (which as I understand it includes at least one 21 year old guy in Wisconsin) made the difference. I've heard he's for Obama, but in any case that means one superdelegate has the same weight as about 50,000 voters who spent time listening to speeches, commercials, and waiting in line to vote. Yup, no hard feelings at all.

Posted by: John, Las Vegas, NV | Mar 14, 2008 7:00:06 PM

If they want to be fair to the people, then what counts is the popular vote. The supers should follow whoever wins the popular vote. Either that or the supers vote for whoever they want to, as the rules allow them to. Pelosi's statement makes no sense, because she's choosing one set of rules (most delegates) over another (supers are independent), while disregarding what really matters, the popular vote.

Posted by: john | Mar 14, 2008 7:01:54 PM

Hey Barack, if your pastor's words ain't legit, you must stop peddlin' your b.s...

Posted by: Robert Marley | Mar 14, 2008 7:02:18 PM

Post a comment